Re: DIS: back to normal
On 1/3/2019 12:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:> Also, this may vary depending on rate of play, but maybe a "monthly magazine" is a better model than a weekly journal - that gives long enough to summarize e.g. the full proposing and implementation of a proposal, or a full round of some subgame - three weeks is long enough to lose track of daily happenings and get a reminder, while a week might not be. I really like this idea‚ actually. It takes a lot of the pressure of of me to publish it, allows me to be more relaxed, and probably makes it more useful. I think I will actually do this.
Re: DIS: back to normal
Ok, good to know. On 1/2/2019 9:23 PM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote: On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 21:20 -0500, ATMunn wrote: During the holidays, I still checked my email, but didn't really pay much attention to Agora (but there also wasn't much to pay attention to). I'm sure I'm behind on reports and stuff, and obviously haven't been doing Agora Weekly. I will try to resume these soon. One quick question though: Is anyone actually reading Agora Weekly? I know they haven't been much yet, but there hasn't been much activity. I will gladly keep doing it, but if nobody is reading it then there's no reason to. I'm not looking for attention or anything, I just want to know if my time doing that is well spent. I read it, but then I already read the lists anyway so know most of the information already (although sometimes it reminds me of details I've forgotten about). This sort of information is often most useful in retrospect, so that we can look at events years after they happened and think "oh, that's what Agora was like in early 2019". By then, we're likely to have forgotten most of it.
Re: DIS: back to normal
On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 21:20 -0500, ATMunn wrote: > During the holidays, I still checked my email, but didn't really pay > much attention to Agora (but there also wasn't much to pay attention > to). I'm sure I'm behind on reports and stuff, and obviously haven't > been doing Agora Weekly. I will try to resume these soon. > > One quick question though: Is anyone actually reading Agora Weekly? I > know they haven't been much yet, but there hasn't been much activity. > I will gladly keep doing it, but if nobody is reading it then there's > no reason to. I'm not looking for attention or anything, I just want > to know if my time doing that is well spent. I read it, but then I already read the lists anyway so know most of the information already (although sometimes it reminds me of details I've forgotten about). This sort of information is often most useful in retrospect, so that we can look at events years after they happened and think "oh, that's what Agora was like in early 2019". By then, we're likely to have forgotten most of it. -- ais523
