Re: [Ankur-core] GNOME Translation: bn_BD and bn_IN
On 5/29/06, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have been (somewhat passively) watching the discussions/debates going on > about the various technical decisions, and I'm feeling that the time has > come when we should start having two sets of translations going into the > GNOME CVS. This should make a lot of things easier to resolve - for > example, bn_IN can have en shortcuts, while bn_BD can easily have bn > shortcuts, or the reverse, whichever is preferred. IIRC that short cut issue was ended at, http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=15539631 Later RunaB mailed but none responded - I guess I didn't miss any. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=15549670 The thread is, http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=10247955&forum_id=12023 > Of course, it would mean extra work - but if we keep the base translations > same (and we already do have a solid base for GNOME), and do the required > modifications for each locale before committing into CVS, I don't think it > would be very difficult. There would be one developer for each locale who > would be responsible for committing the respective files into the > repository - on our side we already have Runa-di, and for bn_BD, Runa-di > and myself can definitely help the designated volunteer get a CVS account > in GNOME. Yes, we *need* more CVS account. I think RunaB can give us some idea on that. She is the last person who got it in our team. Best, `Jamil ___ Bengalinux-core mailing list Bengalinux-core@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bengalinux-core
Re: [Ankur-core] GNOME Translation: bn_BD and bn_IN
Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: >Hello everyone, > >I have been (somewhat passively) watching the discussions/debates going on >about the various technical decisions, and I'm feeling that the time has >come when we should start having two sets of translations going into the >GNOME CVS. This should make a lot of things easier to resolve - for >example, bn_IN can have en shortcuts, while bn_BD can easily have bn >shortcuts, or the reverse, whichever is preferred. >Of course, it would mean extra work - but if we keep the base translations >same (and we already do have a solid base for GNOME), and do the required >modifications for each locale before committing into CVS, I don't think it >would be very difficult. There would be one developer for each locale who >would be responsible for committing the respective files into the >repository - on our side we already have Runa-di, and for bn_BD, Runa-di >and myself can definitely help the designated volunteer get a CVS account >in GNOME. > > If done promptly then CVS account can be obtained really fast. >A point raised by Jamil was that of possible volunteer shortage. This is a >valid point. However, from the bn_BD angle, most of our active translators >are from BD, and for bn_IN, I would like to hear the opinion of Runa-di. > > As mentioned above by sayam we already have a solid base and with regular updations and commits the work generally doesnt pile up. Can be easily maintained for bn_IN. >Our GNOME translation project has matured significantly, and I don't think >a "split" at this point of time would be beneficial, as it would allow for >greater freedom and flexibility. > > I *do* think a "split" at this point of time would be beneficial :) >Regards, >Sayamindu > > regards Runa > >___ >Bengalinux-core mailing list >Bengalinux-core@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bengalinux-core > > > ___ Bengalinux-core mailing list Bengalinux-core@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bengalinux-core
Re: [Ankur-core] GNOME Translation: bn_BD and bn_IN
<...snipped...> > Our GNOME translation project has matured significantly, and I don't think > a "split" at this point of time would be beneficial, as it would allow for > greater freedom and flexibility. Oops sorry. The above line should read: "Our GNOME translation project has matured significantly, and I _think_ a "split" at this point of time would be beneficial, as it would allow for greater freedom and flexibility." Note to myself: Do not mail anyone in the morning before having your dose of caffeine. :-D -sdg- ___ Bengalinux-core mailing list Bengalinux-core@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bengalinux-core