[Bug ld/13880] -Bsymbolic fails to handle protected function pointer

2012-08-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13880

H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|unspecified |2.23 (HEAD)
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-08-08 16:30:50 
UTC ---
Fixed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/13880] -Bsymbolic fails to handle protected function pointer

2012-03-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13880

--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot 
gnu.org 2012-03-20 18:16:50 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by:h...@sourceware.org2012-03-20 18:16:39

Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog elf32-i386.c elf64-x86-64.c 
ld/testsuite   : ChangeLog 
ld/testsuite/ld-i386: i386.exp 
ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64: x86-64.exp 
Added files:
ld/testsuite/ld-i386: protected4.d protected4.s protected5.d 
  protected5.s 
ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64: protected4.d protected4.s protected5.d 
protected5.s 

Log message:
Handle relocation against protected function for -Bsymbolic

bfd/

2012-03-20  H.J. Lu  hongjiu...@intel.com

PR ld/13880
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_relocate_section): Don't issue an error
for R_386_GOTOFF relocation against protected function if
SYMBOLIC_BIND is true.

* elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_relocate_section): Don't issue an
error for R_X86_64_GOTOFF64 relocation against protected function
when building executable or SYMBOLIC_BIND is true.

ld/testsuite/

2012-03-20  H.J. Lu  hongjiu...@intel.com

PR ld/13880
* ld-i386/i386.exp: Run protected4 and protected5.
* ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Likewise.

* ld-i386/protected4.d: New.
* ld-i386/protected4.s: Likewise.
* ld-i386/protected5.d: Likewise.
* ld-i386/protected5.s: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/protected4.d: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/protected4.s: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/protected5.d: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/protected5.s: Likewise.

Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.5632r2=1.5633
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf32-i386.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.268r2=1.269
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.253r2=1.254
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.1505r2=1.1506
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/protected4.d.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=NONEr2=1.1
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/protected4.s.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=NONEr2=1.1
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/protected5.d.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=NONEr2=1.1
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/protected5.s.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=NONEr2=1.1
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.41r2=1.42
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected4.d.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=NONEr2=1.1
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected4.s.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=NONEr2=1.1
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected5.d.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=NONEr2=1.1
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected5.s.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=NONEr2=1.1
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.39r2=1.40

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils