Re: [CentOS] Gmail problem

[Shrikrishna Aryal]

Go to link

http://richard.jones.name/google-hacks/gmail-filesystem/gmail-filesystem.html
and
follow the instructions.

Which works for me.





On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Majian  wrote:

> Hi,all :
>
>
> There is gmail drive for windows 
> platformwhere the person can access his 
> gmail storage space as a drive.
>
> Do we have something similar on Linux?
>  Means is there any software that will allow the person to 'mount' the
> gmail storage and say 'copy/paste' from his system to the gmail account?
>
>
> Thanks ~
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>


-- 
Yours  truly,
SHREE

Stephen 
Leacock
- "I detest life-insurance agents: they always argue that I shall some
day
die, which is not so."
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 32 bit Full Virtualized DomU on 64 Dom0

[Michael Holmes]

2010/1/23 Sergio Belkin :
> Hi,
>
> I need to virtualize a physical machine (Debian Etch 32 bit) to run on
> Centos 5.4 64 bit. Can I do that? I mean can a full virtualized DomU
> 32 bit run on a 64 bit Dom0.
>
> Thanks in advance!!

My host uses Xen to virtualise 32-bit and 64-bit kernels on the same
Dom0. So it's certainly possible.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Robert Nichols]

Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:43:40 + CentOS mailing list  
> wrote:
> 
>> Just curious. What is the difference between the command above and "find 
>>  -exec rm -f {} \;" ?
> 
> The command "find  -exec rm -f {} \;" collects ALL of the names
> "find " as a single command line, which in your case is too
> large for the shell to deal with.

Gosh, then I guess the manpage for 'find' must be totally wrong where it
says:

-exec command ;
   ...
   The specified command is run once for each matched file.

-- 
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
 Do NOT delete it.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 32 bit Full Virtualized DomU on 64 Dom0

[Rudi Ahlers]

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Sergio Belkin  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I need to virtualize a physical machine (Debian Etch 32 bit) to run on
> Centos 5.4 64 bit. Can I do that? I mean can a full virtualized DomU
> 32 bit run on a 64 bit Dom0.
>
> Thanks in advance!!
>
> --
> --
> Open Kairos http://www.sergiobelkin.com
> Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
> Sergio Belkin -
> ___
>
>
Sure it can, why not?

-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] 32 bit Full Virtualized DomU on 64 Dom0

[Sergio Belkin]

Hi,

I need to virtualize a physical machine (Debian Etch 32 bit) to run on
Centos 5.4 64 bit. Can I do that? I mean can a full virtualized DomU
32 bit run on a 64 bit Dom0.

Thanks in advance!!

-- 
--
Open Kairos http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
Sergio Belkin -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Just installed DomU won't boot

[Sergio Belkin]

2010/1/22 Lucian @ lastdot.org :
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Sergio Belkin  wrote:
>> Hi, I am using Centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5xen.
>> I've installed a Centos 5.4 (64 bit too) DomU (paravirtualized),
>> process was apparently with no problems, but DomU refuses to start,
>> this the error:
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>  File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/engine.py", line 498, in 
>> run_domain
>>    vm.startup()
>>  File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/domain.py", line 573, in startup
>>    self.vm.create()
>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 287, in create
>>    if ret == -1: raise libvirtError ('virDomainCreate() failed', dom=self)
>> libvirtError: La operación POST falló: xend_post: error del demonio de
>> xen: (xend.err "Error creating domain: Boot loader didn't return any
>> data!")
>>
>> End of Error Message.
>>
>> Config file is as follows:
>>
>> name = "fido"
>> uuid = "af13748d-6084-2357-73b7-0c7ff9ed9553"
>> maxmem = 1500
>> memory = 1500
>> vcpus = 16
>> bootloader = "/usr/bin/pygrub"
>> on_poweroff = "destroy"
>> on_reboot = "restart"
>> on_crash = "restart"
>> vfb = [ "type=vnc,vncunused=1,keymap=es" ]
>> disk = [ "phy:/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol02,xvda,w" ]
>> vif = [ "mac=00:16:36:19:a7:66,bridge=xenbr0,script=vif-bridge" ]
>>
>>
>> Please could you tell me what'w wrong with it?
>>
>> Thanks in advance!!
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Open Kairos http://www.sergiobelkin.com
>> Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
>> Sergio Belkin -
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>
> What happens if you run:
>
> pygrub /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol02
>
> I suspect you don't have the required stuff (kernel, initrd and
> menu.lst/grub.conf) in your domU's /boot dir.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


Thanks now  I have not the server at hand, I'll try to keep in touch.
-- 
--
Open Kairos http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
Sergio Belkin -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Gmail problem

[Nikita Izyumtsev]

> Hi,all :
>
>
> There is gmail drive for windows
> platformwhere the person can
> access his gmail storage space as a drive.
>
> Do we have something similar on Linux?
>  Means is there any software that will allow the person to 'mount' the gmail
> storage and say 'copy/paste' from his system to the gmail account?
>
>
> Thanks ~

I used to work with fuse-gmailfs, but currently I have switched to dropbox.
There is two disadwantages with it: first, it's quite untrivial task
to get it working under Centos, and second, it doesn't work anymore :)

>From official fuse-gmailfs site (richard.jones.name):
Gmail Filesystem no longer works with the latest Gmail interface, and
will not be maintained in the future.

BTW, according to google EULA, it's illegal to use gmail it that way.
Gmail team could even disable you account.

I would suggest you to take a look at dropbox, which provides 2-5Gb
online storage with full desktop integration on lin/win/mac. At the
moment it's quite tricky to install in under CentOS, because it uses
python 2.5 (CentOS has python 2.4), but it's achievable:
http://wiki.dropbox.com/TipsAndTricks/CnetOS-KDE-Install . Fancy GUI
isn't working at the moment.

I'm currently backporting it to CentOS, and I would like to include it
in rpmforge (it's distributable). I estimate it in about one week.

I hope it'll be useful ...

Nikita
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] authentication failure

[Athmane Madjoudj]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:30 PM, fabien faye  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a fail2ban user and i am very interested to have an autosent mail to the 
> ip provider of the brute force ip address.
> Do you know if it is possible with fail2ban or if we have to rewrite action 
> in fail2ban ?.
>
> Fabien FAYE
> RHCE
> www.generationip.com
> Free network tools & HOWTO for centos and Redhat
>
>

Unfortunately i use APF/BFD, and i forward all root mails to other
mailbox, since the bfd alert template contain all necessary
information about the attacker (see alert.bfd) .



-- 
Athmane Madjoudj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] authentication failure

[fabien faye]

Hi,

I am a fail2ban user and i am very interested to have an autosent mail to the 
ip provider of the brute force ip address.
Do you know if it is possible with fail2ban or if we have to rewrite action in 
fail2ban ?.

Fabien FAYE
RHCE
www.generationip.com
Free network tools & HOWTO for centos and Redhat


- Mail Original -
De: "Athmane Madjoudj" 
À: "CentOS mailing list" 
Envoyé: Samedi 23 Janvier 2010 18:20:01
Objet: Re: [CentOS] authentication failure

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:14 PM, madunix  wrote:
> I noticed that my server has a lot ca. 1000x auth failure from
> different alocated in China / Romania and Netherlands per day since 3
> days
> It looks to me like somebody was trying to get into server by guessing
> my password by brute force.
> what would be the best to stop this attack and how? the server running
> apache mysql and ftp
> PORT     STATE SERVICE
> 21/tcp   open  ftp
> 80/tcp   open  http
> 443/tcp  open  https
> 3306/tcp open  mysql
> ...
> Jan 22 16:07:14 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[17462]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=195.95.228.150
> Jan 22 16:07:16 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[16737]: check pass; user unknown
> Jan 22 16:07:16 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[16737]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=195.95.228.150
> Jan 22 16:07:17 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[17462]: check pass; user unknown
> Jan 23 17:23:52 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=221.7.40.47
> Jan 23 17:23:55 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: check pass; user unknown
> Jan 23 17:23:55 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=221.7.40.47
> Jan 23 17:23:59 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: check pass; user unknown
> Jan 23 17:24:58 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=221.7.40.47
> Jan 23 00:37:47 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[1791]: check pass; user unknown
> Jan 23 00:37:47 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[1791]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=217.23.14.168
> Jan 23 00:38:06 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[1791]: check pass; user unknown
> Jan 23 00:38:06 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[1791]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=217.23.14.168
> ...
>
> Thanks
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

Maybe a brute force attack, try to install a HIDS like:

APF/BFD: http://www.rfxn.com/projects/advanced-policy-firewall/
http://www.rfxn.com/projects/brute-force-detection/

Fail2ban: http://www.fail2ban.org/

Fail2ban is available in EPEL repos.

HTH
-- 
Athmane Madjoudj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] any significant differences between centos and OEL?

[David G . Miller]

Larry Vaden  writes:

> 
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Robert P. J. Day  crashcourse.ca>
wrote:
> >
> >  someone just pointed out to me that there is a distro called "oracle
> > enterprise linux" which is effectively a re-branded RHEL, so i'm
> > curious -- has anyone here used both centos and OEL and would there be
> > any differences that would be worth caring about?
> 
> Unless Oracle has changed their policy in the last two years or so,
> the release cycle for critical patches (e.g., security fixes) is
> _very_ different.
> 
> Quarterly for Oracle, days for CentOS.  Again, observations are from a
> couple of years ago, but should be verifiable.  See a recent email
> below the sig.
> 
> kind regards/ldv
> 
> October 20th, 2009
> Oracle Critical Patch Update October 2009
> 
> Dear Oracle customer,
> 
> The Critical Patch Update for October 2009 was released on October 20,
> 2009. Oracle strongly recommends applying the patches as soon as
> possible.
> 
>  ... 
> 
> The next four Critical Patch Update release dates are:
> 
>   January 12, 2010
>   April 13, 2010
>   July  13, 2010
>   October 12, 2010
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS  centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 

The rationale given at an Oracle presentation was that it reduces their support
costs while at the same time giving their customers a more stable platform. 
Consider the possibility that RH releases an update that breaks an Oracle
installation.  Someone running Oracle on RH ends up with a broken system and
finger pointing between RH and Oracle as to who caused the problem.  Someone
running OEL never sees the problem.

Given that most folks running OEL as their Oracle DB platform will have that
system well protected, locked down and not exposed to either internal or
external users.  Thus, security flaws that only relate to exposed systems become
less of an issue.  On the other hand, it means that OEL is only appropriate for
running an Oracle database server; not a web server, e-mail server, etc.

Cheers,
Dave


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] authentication failure

[Athmane Madjoudj]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:14 PM, madunix  wrote:
> I noticed that my server has a lot ca. 1000x auth failure from
> different alocated in China / Romania and Netherlands per day since 3
> days
> It looks to me like somebody was trying to get into server by guessing
> my password by brute force.
> what would be the best to stop this attack and how? the server running
> apache mysql and ftp
> PORT     STATE SERVICE
> 21/tcp   open  ftp
> 80/tcp   open  http
> 443/tcp  open  https
> 3306/tcp open  mysql
> ...
> Jan 22 16:07:14 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[17462]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=195.95.228.150
> Jan 22 16:07:16 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[16737]: check pass; user unknown
> Jan 22 16:07:16 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[16737]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=195.95.228.150
> Jan 22 16:07:17 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[17462]: check pass; user unknown
> Jan 23 17:23:52 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=221.7.40.47
> Jan 23 17:23:55 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: check pass; user unknown
> Jan 23 17:23:55 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=221.7.40.47
> Jan 23 17:23:59 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: check pass; user unknown
> Jan 23 17:24:58 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=221.7.40.47
> Jan 23 00:37:47 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[1791]: check pass; user unknown
> Jan 23 00:37:47 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[1791]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=217.23.14.168
> Jan 23 00:38:06 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[1791]: check pass; user unknown
> Jan 23 00:38:06 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[1791]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=217.23.14.168
> ...
>
> Thanks
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

Maybe a brute force attack, try to install a HIDS like:

APF/BFD: http://www.rfxn.com/projects/advanced-policy-firewall/
http://www.rfxn.com/projects/brute-force-detection/

Fail2ban: http://www.fail2ban.org/

Fail2ban is available in EPEL repos.

HTH
-- 
Athmane Madjoudj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] authentication failure

[madunix]

I noticed that my server has a lot ca. 1000x auth failure from
different alocated in China / Romania and Netherlands per day since 3
days
It looks to me like somebody was trying to get into server by guessing
my password by brute force.
what would be the best to stop this attack and how? the server running
apache mysql and ftp
PORT STATE SERVICE
21/tcp   open  ftp
80/tcp   open  http
443/tcp  open  https
3306/tcp open  mysql
...
Jan 22 16:07:14 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[17462]: authentication failure;
logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=195.95.228.150
Jan 22 16:07:16 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[16737]: check pass; user unknown
Jan 22 16:07:16 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[16737]: authentication failure;
logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=195.95.228.150
Jan 22 16:07:17 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[17462]: check pass; user unknown
Jan 23 17:23:52 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: authentication failure;
logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=221.7.40.47
Jan 23 17:23:55 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: check pass; user unknown
Jan 23 17:23:55 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: authentication failure;
logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=221.7.40.47
Jan 23 17:23:59 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: check pass; user unknown
Jan 23 17:24:58 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[20524]: authentication failure;
logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=221.7.40.47
Jan 23 00:37:47 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[1791]: check pass; user unknown
Jan 23 00:37:47 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[1791]: authentication failure;
logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=217.23.14.168
Jan 23 00:38:06 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[1791]: check pass; user unknown
Jan 23 00:38:06 user vsftpd(pam_unix)[1791]: authentication failure;
logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost=217.23.14.168
...

Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Question about running a CentOS4.8 (32-bit) guest under CentOS5.4xen (64-bit)

[Robert Heller]

At Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:33:00 +0100 CentOS mailing list  
wrote:

> 
> Robert Heller wrote on Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:37:30 -0500:
> 
> > I followed the instructions in Appendix A
> > of the xen user manual (/usr/share/doc/xen-3.0.3/pdf/user.pdf)
> 
> Why consult the wiki?
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/MoveNative2DomU
> 
> You need a xenified kernel. I see you use the plus kernel. There might be 
> no xenified plus kernel.
> Anyway, what you have to do, if I remember right, is to mount the c4 
> partition in your c5, chroot to it and then install that xenified kernel 
> and a new initrd to it. Read the instructions about "4.5-only" on the 
> wiki, that should get you going.

Yes, this got me going.  There were some other (minor) issues, but I
figured them out as well.  Thanks!

> 
> Kai
> 

-- 
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System
http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows
hel...@deepsoft.com   -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Robert Heller]

At Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:43:40 + CentOS mailing list  
wrote:

> 
> Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:23:58 +0300 CentOS mailing list  
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> Content-Language: en-us
> >>
> >>
> >> The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge . every time get this
> >> error msg 
> >>
> >>  
> >>
> >> -bash: /usr/bin/find: Argument list too long
> > 
> > 'man xargs'
> > 
> > find  -print | xargs rm 
> > 
> Hi
> 
> Just curious. What is the difference between the command above and "find 
>  -exec rm -f {} \;" ?

The command "find  -exec rm -f {} \;" collects ALL of the names
"find " as a single command line, which in your case is too
large for the shell to deal with.  The command "find  -print |
xargs rm" uses a pipeline.  "find  -print", *prints* the names
it finds to stdout.  xargs reads stdin, line by line, and collects those
lines as words up to some reasonable string length (within the shell's
command line length limits) and passes this argument list to xargs's
arguments.  If necessary, xargs will call the command repeatedly with
suitable subsets of the complete list, keeping each subset below the
shell's command line string length limit.

The '-exec ...' option to find is fine for small sets of results.  The 
"find ... -print | xargs ..." will handle arbitrarily large result
sets.  xargs can also be used anyplace you happen to have a list of
names (one per line) that you need to pass as words to a command:

tar tzf foo.tar.gz| xargs -r ls -d

Will list those files that are in the tar file that are also on disk.
The '-r' option to xargs will prevent xargs from calling ls with no
arguments, if xargs happens not to get any input.


> 
> Thanks
> 
> mg.
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
>   

-- 
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System
http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows
hel...@deepsoft.com   -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Question about running a CentOS4.8 (32-bit) guest under CentOS5.4xen (64-bit)

[Pasi Kärkkäinen]

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 04:37:30PM -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
> I am trying to run my old CentOS4.8 (32-bit) system as a guest system
> under CentOS5.4xen (64-bit).  I followed the instructions in Appendix A
> of the xen user manual (/usr/share/doc/xen-3.0.3/pdf/user.pdf) and
> created a 'disk image' (actually a 10gig LVM logical volume:
> 

Check this instead: 
http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/html/Virtualization_Guide/index.html

You can install CentOS4 guest using virt-install or virt-manager.

The problem you have with your custom-made guest is that you're not using 
a Xen PV kernel.

iirc it's called kernel-xenU in EL 4.8.

-- Pasi

> sauron.deepsoft.com% sudo fdisk -l /dev/mapper/sauron-c4guest
> 
> Disk /dev/mapper/sauron-c4guest: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes
> 16 heads, 32 sectors/track, 40960 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 512 * 512 = 262144 bytes
> 
>  Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id
>  System
> /dev/mapper/sauron-c4guest1   *   1   4096010485744   83
>  Linux
> sauron.deepsoft.com% sudo lomount -t ext3 -diskimage
> /dev/mapper/sauron-c4guest -partition 1 /mnt/guest
> sauron.deepsoft.com% ls -ltr /mnt/guest/boot
> total 17432
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   51614 Jan 21 20:35 config-2.6.9-89.0.11.EL
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1425764 Jan 21 20:35 initrd-2.6.9-89.0.16.EL.img
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  832064 Jan 21 20:35 initrd-2.6.9-89.0.15.EL.img
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  832055 Jan 21 20:35 initrd-2.6.9-89.0.11.EL.img
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  766328 Jan 21 20:35 initrd-2.6.9-78.0.22.EL.img-orig
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   51613 Jan 21 20:35 config-2.6.9-89.0.9.EL
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   55212 Jan 21 20:35 config-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.plus.c4
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   51614 Jan 21 20:35 config-2.6.9-89.0.16.EL
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   51614 Jan 21 20:35 config-2.6.9-89.0.15.EL
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  768504 Jan 21 20:35 System.map-2.6.9-89.0.9.EL
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  787043 Jan 21 20:35 
> System.map-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.plus.c4
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  768660 Jan 21 20:35 System.map-2.6.9-89.0.16.EL
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  768660 Jan 21 20:35 System.map-2.6.9-89.0.15.EL
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  768606 Jan 21 20:35 System.map-2.6.9-89.0.11.EL
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   67596 Jan 21 20:35 symvers-2.6.9-89.0.9.EL.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   78176 Jan 21 20:35 
> symvers-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.plus.c4.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   67596 Jan 21 20:35 symvers-2.6.9-89.0.16.EL.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   67596 Jan 21 20:35 symvers-2.6.9-89.0.15.EL.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   67596 Jan 21 20:35 symvers-2.6.9-89.0.11.EL.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  832001 Jan 21 20:35 initrd-2.6.9-89.0.9.EL.img
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1533159 Jan 21 20:35 vmlinuz-2.6.9-89.0.9.EL
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1579298 Jan 21 20:35 vmlinuz-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.plus.c4
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1536244 Jan 21 20:35 vmlinuz-2.6.9-89.0.16.EL
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1536207 Jan 21 20:35 vmlinuz-2.6.9-89.0.15.EL
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1533468 Jan 21 20:35 vmlinuz-2.6.9-89.0.11.EL
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root4096 Jan 21 20:36 grub
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  796960 Jan 22 15:35 
> initrd-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.plus.c4.img
> sauron.deepsoft.com% cat /mnt/guest/boot/grub/grub.conf
> # grub.conf generated by anaconda
> #
> # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
> # NOTICE:  You have a /boot partition.  This means that
> #  all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
> #  root (hd0,0)
> #  kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/sauron/c5root
> #  initrd /initrd-version.img
> #boot=/dev/sda
> default=1
> timeout=5
> #splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
> hiddenmenu
> title CentOS4 (2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.plus.c4)
>   root (hd0,0)
>   kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.plus.c4 ro root=/dev/hda1 single
>   initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.9-89.0.18.EL.plus.c4.img
> 
> pygrub seems to be happy:
> 
> sudo /usr/bin/pygrub /dev/mapper/sauron-c4guest
> 
> [Reasonable imitation of a Grub boot screen]
> 
> linux (kernel /var/lib/xen/boot_kernel.8bcf-G)(ramdisk 
> /var/lib/xen/boot_ramdisk
> 
> But when I try to start the guest, I get:
> 
> error: POST operation failed: xend_post: error from xen daemon:
> (xend.err "Error creating domain: (2, 'Invalid kernel',
> 'xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found\\n')")
> 
> I googled this error message and the only hits I got were about FC11 or
> FC12 and some issue relating to how the kernel image was compressed,
> which probably does not relate to an *older* CentOS 4 kernel.
> 
> The config file for this guest is: 
> 
> sauron.deepsoft.com% sudo cat /etc/xen/c4guest
> name = "c4guest"
> uuid = "06bfb4e1-c427-c93c-2365-b80b832bb6d4"
> maxmem = 512
> memory = 512
> vcpus = 1
> bootloader = "/usr/bin/pygrub"
> on_poweroff = "destroy"
> on_reboot = "restart"
> on_crash = "restart"
> vfb = [ "type=vnc,vncunused=1,keymap=en-us" ]
> disk = [ "phy:/dev/mapper/sa

Re: [CentOS] any significant differences between centos and OEL?

[Larry Vaden]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Robert P. J. Day  wrote:
>
>  someone just pointed out to me that there is a distro called "oracle
> enterprise linux" which is effectively a re-branded RHEL, so i'm
> curious -- has anyone here used both centos and OEL and would there be
> any differences that would be worth caring about?

Unless Oracle has changed their policy in the last two years or so,
the release cycle for critical patches (e.g., security fixes) is
_very_ different.

Quarterly for Oracle, days for CentOS.  Again, observations are from a
couple of years ago, but should be verifiable.  See a recent email
below the sig.

kind regards/ldv

October 20th, 2009
Oracle Critical Patch Update October 2009

Dear Oracle customer,

The Critical Patch Update for October 2009 was released on October 20,
2009. Oracle strongly recommends applying the patches as soon as
possible.

 ... 

The next four Critical Patch Update release dates are:

  January 12, 2010
  April 13, 2010
  July  13, 2010
  October 12, 2010
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Git: help sought

[Timothy Murphy]

I have a project using Git on machine A.
I'm running a Centos server on machine B.
I'd like to "publish" the project on machine B
(mainly for my own use, so I can access it from various sites).

I've asked about this on a Git mailing list,
but haven't understood the replies.
In particular, a couple of people suggested gitolite,
but when I examined this I couldn't make out what it did.

As will be obvious I am a Git newbie,
having been reared on SVN.
But I thought some CentOS users might have met this problem
and come to a simple solution.

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] any significant differences between centos and OEL?

[Jim Perrin]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Robert P. J. Day  wrote:
>
>  someone just pointed out to me that there is a distro called "oracle
> enterprise linux" which is effectively a re-branded RHEL, so i'm
> curious -- has anyone here used both centos and OEL and would there be
> any differences that would be worth caring about?
>
>  the only thing i can think of that might be worthwhile is that OEL
> might change some of the default kernel parms thru /etc/sysctl.conf
> that make that distro more appropriate for running large oracle
> databases.  beyond that, i have no idea.
>
>  thoughts?
>

CentOS is essentially a doggedly faithful rebuild of RHEL. OEL adds
some tweaks, php-oracle, and various other mods they feel are
appropriate. Last I looked, it was available for free, but the updates
and support came with a price tag attached. This may have changed, and
I make no claims as to its stance.

There's also a moral implication. RH's staff has vocally supported
CentOS, and we contribute back to the RH community though bug
reporting, bug fixes, suggestions, patches, etc. We don't charge for
CentOS support, so we don't impact RH's business. Oracle on the other
hand DOES offer paid support, which impacts RH's business, and I don't
see any substantive attempts by oracle to give anything back to the
community at large.

Note, I have nothing against oracle nor do I work for RH, so this is
my own opinion, entirely speculative, and in rare cases incorrect.



-- 
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] any significant differences between centos and OEL?

[Karanbir Singh]

On 01/23/2010 01:07 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> Price ?
>
>OEL 5.4 is freely downloadable so i'm guessing that's not it.

either you or I are missing something here.

downloadable != maintainable.

besides Oracle's offering does not get the vendor endorsement that 
CentOS does mostly due to the fact that they use a different toolchain 
than rhel and they have a different patchset. Vendor and platform 
endorsement on oracle's offering was not even into double digits a few 
months back, whereas rhel ( and therefore centos's ) was into 4 digits.

- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] voice chat on centos with gtalk users.

[Arvind P R]

hi all,

i have a centos 5.4 64 bit system running on the base hardware of my system
and have windows machines running in virtual in vmware workstation.

i need something to *voice chat* with *GTALK* users.
In the windows VMs i can install gtalk for windows which does support voice
chat, but the problem there is the microphone doesnt get detected inside the
VMs.
incase of centos installed on the base i can get the microphone but i can
find a utility to voice chat. i have heard of empathy, but i cant find a yum
repository for it.

anyway i can get the mic detected inside the VM? or any utility for voice
chat with Gtalk users in centos ??
can anyone plz help me with it?

thanks,
Arvind
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Kevin Krieser]

> 
> find on CentOS 5.4 supports
> 
> find  -exec {} +;
> 
> which avoids the negative effect of spawning new subprocesses when using
> "-exec {} \;"
> 
> find on CentOS 4.8 does not support that.

I'll have to give that a try sometime.  A person gets used to a subset of a 
command, and doesn't necessarily look for new options being added.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am 23.01.2010 14:12, schrieb Kevin Krieser:
> 
> On Jan 23, 2010, at 6:45 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
>>
>>> Robert Heller wrote:
>
> -bash: /usr/bin/find: Argument list too long

 'man xargs'

 find  -print | xargs rm

>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Just curious. What is the difference between the command above and "find
>>>  -exec rm -f {} \;" ?
>>
>>  the find ... -exec variation will invoke a new "rm" command for
>> every single file it finds, which will simply take more time to run.
>> beyond that, the effect should be the same.
> 
> 
> Unless there are files or directories with spaces in them, in which case the 
> xargs variant can fail.

find on CentOS 5.4 supports

find  -exec {} +;

which avoids the negative effect of spawning new subprocesses when using
"-exec {} \;"

find on CentOS 4.8 does not support that.

> It is likely the original poster either did
> find * ...
> or find . -name *
> and the bash shell still expanded the arguments.  He was on the right track 
> using the find command, but it wasn't used right.

Alexander

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Kevin Krieser]

On Jan 23, 2010, at 7:07 AM, Anas Alnaffar wrote:

> I tried to run this command
> 
> find -name "*.access*" -mtime +2 -exec rm {} \;
> 
> 
> and I have same error message
> 
> 
> 
> Anas 
> 


There must have been more to it, since the command above is invalid.  you need 
to specify where to start the find.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Kevin Krieser]

On Jan 23, 2010, at 6:45 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
> 
>> Robert Heller wrote:
 
 -bash: /usr/bin/find: Argument list too long
>>> 
>>> 'man xargs'
>>> 
>>> find  -print | xargs rm
>>> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> Just curious. What is the difference between the command above and "find
>>  -exec rm -f {} \;" ?
> 
>  the find ... -exec variation will invoke a new "rm" command for
> every single file it finds, which will simply take more time to run.
> beyond that, the effect should be the same.


Unless there are files or directories with spaces in them, in which case the 
xargs variant can fail.

It is likely the original poster either did
find * ...
or find . -name *
and the bash shell still expanded the arguments.  He was on the right track 
using the find command, but it wasn't used right.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] any significant differences between centos and OEL?

[Athmane Madjoudj]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Robert P. J. Day  wrote:
>
>  someone just pointed out to me that there is a distro called "oracle
> enterprise linux" which is effectively a re-branded RHEL, so i'm
> curious -- has anyone here used both centos and OEL and would there be
> any differences that would be worth caring about?
>
>  the only thing i can think of that might be worthwhile is that OEL
> might change some of the default kernel parms thru /etc/sysctl.conf
> that make that distro more appropriate for running large oracle
> databases.  beyond that, i have no idea.
>
>  thoughts?
>
> rday
> --
>
> 
> Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
>
>            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
>
> Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
> Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


CentOS is 100% RHEL clone  + Extra repos

While OEL include Yast (from SuSE).


-- 
Athmane Madjoudj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] any significant differences between centos and OEL?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Fabian Arrotin wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >   someone just pointed out to me that there is a distro called "oracle
> > enterprise linux" which is effectively a re-branded RHEL, so i'm
> > curious -- has anyone here used both centos and OEL and would there be
> > any differences that would be worth caring about?
> >
> >   the only thing i can think of that might be worthwhile is that OEL
> > might change some of the default kernel parms thru /etc/sysctl.conf
> > that make that distro more appropriate for running large oracle
> > databases.  beyond that, i have no idea.
> >
> >   thoughts?
> >
>
> Price ?

  OEL 5.4 is freely downloadable so i'm guessing that's not it.

rday
--


Robert P. J. Day   Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:  http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Anas Alnaffar]

I tried to run this command

find -name "*.access*" -mtime +2 -exec rm {} \;


and I have same error message



Anas 


-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Marcelo M. Garcia
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 3:34 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

Anas Alnaffar wrote:
> The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge . every time get this 
> error msg
> 
>  
> 
> -bash: /usr/bin/find: Argument list too long
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Please advise
> 
>  
> 
> *Anas *
Hi

Could you put the complete command? Please provide more details.

Regards

mg.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] any significant differences between centos and OEL?

[Fabian Arrotin]

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   someone just pointed out to me that there is a distro called "oracle
> enterprise linux" which is effectively a re-branded RHEL, so i'm
> curious -- has anyone here used both centos and OEL and would there be
> any differences that would be worth caring about?
> 
>   the only thing i can think of that might be worthwhile is that OEL
> might change some of the default kernel parms thru /etc/sysctl.conf
> that make that distro more appropriate for running large oracle
> databases.  beyond that, i have no idea.
> 
>   thoughts?
> 

Price ?


-- 
--
Fabian Arrotin
test -e /dev/human/brain || ( echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq ; echo c > 
/proc/sysrq-trigger )



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Kai Schaetzl]

http://www.google.com/search?as_epq=Argument+list+too+long

Kai

-- 
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] any significant differences between centos and OEL?

[Robert P. J. Day]

  someone just pointed out to me that there is a distro called "oracle
enterprise linux" which is effectively a re-branded RHEL, so i'm
curious -- has anyone here used both centos and OEL and would there be
any differences that would be worth caring about?

  the only thing i can think of that might be worthwhile is that OEL
might change some of the default kernel parms thru /etc/sysctl.conf
that make that distro more appropriate for running large oracle
databases.  beyond that, i have no idea.

  thoughts?

rday
--


Robert P. J. Day   Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:  http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:

> Robert Heller wrote:
> >>
> >> -bash: /usr/bin/find: Argument list too long
> >
> > 'man xargs'
> >
> > find  -print | xargs rm
> >
> Hi
>
> Just curious. What is the difference between the command above and "find
>  -exec rm -f {} \;" ?

  the find ... -exec variation will invoke a new "rm" command for
every single file it finds, which will simply take more time to run.
beyond that, the effect should be the same.

rday
--


Robert P. J. Day   Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:  http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Marcelo M. Garcia]

Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:23:58 +0300 CentOS mailing list  
> wrote:
> 
>> Content-Language: en-us
>>
>>
>> The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge . every time get this
>> error msg 
>>
>>  
>>
>> -bash: /usr/bin/find: Argument list too long
> 
> 'man xargs'
> 
> find  -print | xargs rm 
> 
Hi

Just curious. What is the difference between the command above and "find 
 -exec rm -f {} \;" ?

Thanks

mg.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Robert Heller]

At Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:23:58 +0300 CentOS mailing list  
wrote:

> 
> Content-Language: en-us
> 
> 
> The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge . every time get this
> error msg 
> 
>  
> 
> -bash: /usr/bin/find: Argument list too long

'man xargs'

find  -print | xargs rm 

> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Please advise 
> 
>  
> 
> Anas 
> 
> 
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
>   
> 

-- 
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System
http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows
hel...@deepsoft.com   -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/

  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Marcelo M. Garcia]

Anas Alnaffar wrote:
> The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge … every time get this 
> error msg
> 
>  
> 
> -bash: /usr/bin/find: Argument list too long
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Please advise
> 
>  
> 
> *Anas *
Hi

Could you put the complete command? Please provide more details.

Regards

mg.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge

[Anas Alnaffar]

The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge . every time get this
error msg 

 

-bash: /usr/bin/find: Argument list too long

 

 

Please advise 

 

Anas 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Gmail problem

[Majian]

Yeah~ That looks nice ~  Thanks all ~


On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan <
raju.rajs...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Majian  wrote:
>
>> Hi,all :
>>
>>
>> Do we have something similar on Linux?
>>  Means is there any software that will allow the person to 'mount' the
>> gmail storage and say 'copy/paste' from his system to the gmail account?
>>
>
> There is a firefox extension (gspace I think)
>
> HTH
>
> Regards
>
> Rajagopal
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Gmail problem

[Rajagopal Swaminathan]

Greetings,

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Majian  wrote:

> Hi,all :
>
>
> Do we have something similar on Linux?
>  Means is there any software that will allow the person to 'mount' the
> gmail storage and say 'copy/paste' from his system to the gmail account?
>

There is a firefox extension (gspace I think)

HTH

Regards

Rajagopal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Gmail problem

[Patrick Stueck]

I don't see how this relates to a "Gmail Problem", as it seems as you're
simply asking if a similar application exists. 

 

Maybe you should use the prime application that came out of Google, and it
just happens to be called "Google".

 

---

Patrick Stueck

Excalibur Systems, Inc.

Director of Operations

 

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: 

This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying,
disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return
e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies.

 

From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Majian
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 5:38 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Gmail problem

 

Hi,all :


There is gmail drive for windows  
platform where the person can access his gmail storage space as a drive.

Do we have something similar on Linux?
 Means is there any software that will allow the person to 'mount' the gmail
storage and say 'copy/paste' from his system to the gmail account?


Thanks ~

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.730 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2640 - Release Date: 01/23/10
01:33:00

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Gmail problem

[nux]

On 23/Jan/2010 13:38 Majian  wrote ..
> Hi,all :
> 
> 
> There is gmail drive for windows
> platformwhere the person can
> access his gmail storage space as a drive.
> 
> Do we have something similar on Linux?
>  Means is there any software that will allow the person to 'mount' the
gmail
> storage and say 'copy/paste' from his system to the gmail account?
> 
> 
> Thanks ~

Google is your friend (wikipedia too :> )
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GmailFS

--
Nux!
www.nux.ro

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Gmail problem

[James Bensley]

I don't know if there is one, but I think the Gmail Drive app for
windows simply connects to your mail account and files you store on
there are actually attachments to drafts emails (its been a while so I
might be wrong). I'm sure from Linux you could script this without to
much difficulty?

-- 
Regards,
James ;)

Joan Crawford  - "I, Joan Crawford, I believe in the dollar.
Everything I earn, I spend." -
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/joan_crawford.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Gmail problem

[Majian]

Hi,all :


There is gmail drive for windows
platformwhere the person can
access his gmail storage space as a drive.

Do we have something similar on Linux?
 Means is there any software that will allow the person to 'mount' the gmail
storage and say 'copy/paste' from his system to the gmail account?


Thanks ~
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] wifi doesnt work on centos 5.4

[Arvind P R]

hi there
thanks for that reply
i didnt know NetworkManager existed as a different service in centos!! all
this while i used the network service to start n stop the network services!!
i thought network and NetworkManager are one n the same.

thanks for the insight. i m writing this mail while connected to my wireless
router thru the wifi :)

thanks a lot
Arvind


On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Agile Aspect wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Arvind P R  wrote:
> > hi all,
> > this is my first hit on the mailing list. hope i m posting in the right
> > place.
> > well, i have a dell vostro 1510 laptop with broadcom wifi adapter. n it
> > doesnt work! :(
> > i installed the wifi drivers with ndiswrapper.
> >
> > iwconfig shows the following.
> >
> > [r...@laptop ~]# iwconfig
> > lono wireless extensions.
> >
> > eth0  no wireless extensions.
> >
> > sit0  no wireless extensions.
> >
> > wlan0 IEEE 802.11g  ESSID:off/any  Nickname:"laptop"
> >   Mode:Managed  Frequency:2.417 GHz  Access Point: Not-Associated
> >   Bit Rate=54 Mb/s   Tx-Power:32 dBm
> >   RTS thr=2347 B   Fragment thr=2346 B
> >   Encryption key:off
> >   Power Management:off
> >   Link Quality:0  Signal level:0  Noise level:0
> >   Rx invalid nwid:0  Rx invalid crypt:0  Rx invalid frag:0
> >   Tx excessive retries:0  Invalid misc:0   Missed beacon:0
> >
> > strangely i cannot find the wlan0 config file in the
> > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/!!
> >
> > [r...@laptop ~]# iwlist wlan0 scanning
> >
> > wlan0 Scan completed :
> >   Cell 01 - Address: 00:xx:xx:91:xx:xx
> > ESSID:"thephenomenon"
> > Protocol:IEEE 802.11g
> > Mode:Managed
> > Frequency:2.412 GHz (Channel 1)
> > Quality:78/100  Signal level:-46 dBm  Noise level:-96
> > dBm
> > Encryption key:on
> > Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s
> >   18 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s
> >   24 Mb/s; 48 Mb/s
> > Extra:bcn_int=100
> > Extra:atim=0
> > IE: WPA Version 1
> > Group Cipher : TKIP
> > Pairwise Ciphers (2) : TKIP CCMP
> > Authentication Suites (1) : PSK
> > IE: IEEE 802.11i/WPA2 Version 1
> > Group Cipher : TKIP
> > Pairwise Ciphers (2) : TKIP CCMP
> > Authentication Suites (1) : PSK
> >
> > i generated a wpa_passphrase and wpa_supplicant.conf is as follows
> >
> > [r...@laptop ~]# cat /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf
> > ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant
> > ctrl_interface_group=wheel
> >
> > network={
> > ssid="thephenomenon"
> > key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
> >
> psk=88a745bb68f4ff4fae41x5b1a66341ced3cxx2167b218d8c
> > }
> >
> > now when i do a
> > [r...@laptop ~]# wpa_supplicant -Dwext -iwlan0
> -c/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf
> > Failed to read or parse configuration '/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf'.
> > [r...@laptop ~]#
> >
> > i get the above error. i have a WPA encryption in my router.
> >
> > infact earlier i used to get a connected status when i tried to connect
> it
> > with wpa_gui once. but later i think i have screwed the config a bit
> >
> > sorry for the long post... can someone plz guide me from here?
> >
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> >
>
> Try
>
>   yum install wpa_supplicant
>   yum install NetworkManager\*
>   service NetworkManager start
>
> --
>  Enjoy global warming while it lasts.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Question about running a CentOS4.8 (32-bit) guest under CentOS5.4xen (64-bit)

[Kai Schaetzl]

Robert Heller wrote on Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:37:30 -0500:

> I followed the instructions in Appendix A
> of the xen user manual (/usr/share/doc/xen-3.0.3/pdf/user.pdf)

Why consult the wiki?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/MoveNative2DomU

You need a xenified kernel. I see you use the plus kernel. There might be 
no xenified plus kernel.
Anyway, what you have to do, if I remember right, is to mount the c4 
partition in your c5, chroot to it and then install that xenified kernel 
and a new initrd to it. Read the instructions about "4.5-only" on the 
wiki, that should get you going.

Kai

-- 
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos