Re: [CentOS] Here we go again: SpamAssassin doesn't like the new Perl update...
On Oct 1, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Steve Huff wrote: > On Oct 1, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > >> Starting spamd: Subroutine NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted::AF_INET6 redefined >> at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65. >> at >> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/NetAddr/IP/Util.pm >> line 180 > > this does not look like CentOS's fault. > > $ rpm -qf > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/NetAddr/IP/Util.pm > perl-NetAddr-IP-4.032-1.el5.rf > > first off, the package in question comes from RPMforge. Hi, same issue here, SA was behaving nicely until I updated it. I saw that it was suddenly coming from rpmforge, but I trusted that and pressed Y. Since then, every sa-update complains about the above routine redefinition. Regards Michael -- Michael Kress, kr...@hal.saar.de http://www.michael-kress.de / http://kress.net P E N G U I N S A R E C O O L ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:27 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello listmates, > > I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to > anything but NIS thus far. See here: > > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/ > > http://readlist.com/lists/suse.com/suse-linux-e/38/193419.html > > Hence the question: is NIS (YP) still in use much anywhere for authentication? I have setup NIS where a winbind box builds NIS maps of Windows users without passwords of course and then the NIS clients use those maps coupled with Kerberos for authentication which worked well. If the winbind service crashed or locked up there were still the maps to use until it was fixed, so better uptime then winbind alone. Even without AD one could setup a Kerberos server and NIS database a lot easier then LDAP. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] error when logging into system
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 17:37 -0600, Ski Dawg wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a CentOS 5 system. On this system, I used the usermod -n and
> groupmod -g to change the user id and the group id for a standard,
> regular user from 500 to 1000.
>
> I then ran the following commands (as root), to make sure all the
> files were changed to match:
> find / -uid 500 -exec chown 1000 {} \;
> -- and --
> find / -gid 500 -exec chgrp 1000 {} \;
>
> Now, whenever I try to login as that regular user, I get the following error:
> id: can't find name for groupd ID 500
>
> I have checked /etc/passwd and /etc/group and both files are correctly
> showing 1000 as the user and group ids. I didn't see the id isn't
> listed in either of the shadow files. All of the files in the user's
> home directory have the ownership and group set to id 1000.
>
> I have rebooted the system to make sure nothing was being stored in
> memory, with the same results.
>
> Any other thoughts to look into to correct this error?
Is the user a local user?
What is the output of 'grep passwd /etc/nsswitch' ?
Craig
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Patching openssl rpms
Here's the full output in a text file. === Al - Original Message From: Al Sparks To: Centos List Sent: Thu, September 30, 2010 5:14:51 PM Subject: [CentOS] Patching openssl rpms Running CentOS release 5.5. I'm trying to update or patch an SRPMS file, specifically openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5_4.6.src.rpm. Basically, I'm trying to change one line in the source, in ssl/ssl.h. I create a "diff –u" file called openssl-ssl-h.patch. I then edit the openssl.spec file, and add 2 lines to that in the appropriate place: Patch88: openssl-ssl-h.patch And %patch88 -p1 I then do rpmbuild -ba openssl.spec and the last lines of output are: Patch #87 (openssl-fips-0.9.8e-cve-2009-3245.patch): + patch -p1 -b --suffix .wexpand -s + echo 'Patch #88 (openssl-ssl-h.patch):' Patch #88 (openssl-ssl-h.patch): + patch -p1 -s 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ssl/ssl.h.rej error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52066 (%prep) The ssl.h.rej file has: *** *** 497,503 /* SSL_OP_ALL: various bug workarounds that should be rather harmless. * This used to be 0x000FL before 0.9.7. */ - #define SSL_OP_ALL0x0FFFL /* DTLS options */ #define SSL_OP_NO_QUERY_MTU 0x1000L --- 497,503 /* SSL_OP_ALL: various bug workarounds that should be rather harmless. * This used to be 0x000FL before 0.9.7. */ + #define SSL_OP_ALL (0x0FFFL^SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG) /* DTLS options */ #define SSL_OP_NO_QUERY_MTU 0x1000L How do I go about troubleshooting this? === Al ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos patch-output Description: Binary data ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] error when logging into system
Hello everyone,
I have a CentOS 5 system. On this system, I used the usermod -n and
groupmod -g to change the user id and the group id for a standard,
regular user from 500 to 1000.
I then ran the following commands (as root), to make sure all the
files were changed to match:
find / -uid 500 -exec chown 1000 {} \;
-- and --
find / -gid 500 -exec chgrp 1000 {} \;
Now, whenever I try to login as that regular user, I get the following error:
id: can't find name for groupd ID 500
I have checked /etc/passwd and /etc/group and both files are correctly
showing 1000 as the user and group ids. I didn't see the id isn't
listed in either of the shadow files. All of the files in the user's
home directory have the ownership and group set to id 1000.
I have rebooted the system to make sure nothing was being stored in
memory, with the same results.
Any other thoughts to look into to correct this error?
--
Doug
Registered Linux User #285548 (http://counter.li.org)
Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window.
-- Steve Wozniak
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:47:09PM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Craig White wrote: >>> As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a matter of perspective because I've been using it for at least 7 years now and it works for me without any problems whatsoever. >>> >>> Agreed. I have found that LDAP, in the guise of OpenLDAP, is not very >>> difficult at all once you have done your first setup, providing, as >>> Craig >>> says, you take the time to understand why you're doing what you're >>> doing >>> and you properly plan ahead. OpenLDAP also has excellent performance >>> and >>> is as solid as a rock. >>> >>> Steve >> >> Whats bizarre is the NIS/LDAP gateway that padl.com sells starting at >> $1500. >> >> I said screw it and just migrated over to OpenLDAP. >> >> Didn't think it was a PITA but then again, all IT is a PITA so non of >> it is if you catch my drift. >> >> I mean if its all a PITA, then its not a PITA cuz PITA is PITA if >> there is no PITA to compare to. >> > > What bites is if you already have a large AD environment in place along > with legacy NIS. > > It's obviously not efficient to maintain two separate environments with > many of the same usernames... > > AD does have "Unix Extensions" to expand their schema to make it more > friendly for use as LDAP.. but it's pretty limited really. That and, > what if you have many legacy Unix clients that can only talk NIS > easily? > > There are packages like LikeWise out there that can make this work > fairly well -- they even have a free version. > > Lately I've been thinking of using something like Fedora Directory > Server to just sync up daily from AD and provide LDAP and NIS services > via some sort of shim to older Unix clients who can't handle LDAP. > > Note that Samba 3.3.x integrates pretty well with AD via winbind. If > you can get good external uid mapping going you can even preserve UID's > from your NIS environments. > > It's definitely not as fast as NIS though as far as responsiveness... > > Ray Anybody use OpenDS instead of OpenLDAP? I just ask, because OpenDS is shipped as part of a large enterprise app we use (PTC WIndchill) and it doesn't seem as bad as OpenLDAP as far as the management tools go. -- Don ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:47:09PM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Craig White wrote: >>> As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a matter of perspective because I've been using it for at least 7 years now and it works for me without any problems whatsoever. >>> >>> Agreed. I have found that LDAP, in the guise of OpenLDAP, is not >>> very >>> difficult at all once you have done your first setup, providing, as >>> Craig >>> says, you take the time to understand why you're doing what you're >>> doing >>> and you properly plan ahead. OpenLDAP also has excellent performance >>> and >>> is as solid as a rock. >>> >>> Steve >> >> Whats bizarre is the NIS/LDAP gateway that padl.com sells starting at >> $1500. >> >> I said screw it and just migrated over to OpenLDAP. >> >> Didn't think it was a PITA but then again, all IT is a PITA so non of >> it is if you catch my drift. >> >> I mean if its all a PITA, then its not a PITA cuz PITA is PITA if >> there is no PITA to compare to. >> > > Note that Samba 3.3.x integrates pretty well with AD via winbind. If > you can get good external uid mapping going you can even preserve > UID's > from your NIS environments. Not for every one, but I scrapped using Samba as it quadruples your LDIFs and use pGina for Windows client auth to LDAP. Now I realize that LDAP is really fast but I just hated how my LDIFs looked after Samba got a hold of em. Samba is an awesome project so I'm not dissin them at all. Again, I realize not a fit for every env, but I was lucky in not having any large AD/Windows population to deal with, perhaps only a few hundred is all. -aurf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:47:09PM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: > > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Craig White wrote: > > > >> As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a matter of > >> perspective because I've been using it for at least 7 years now and > >> it > >> works for me without any problems whatsoever. > > > > Agreed. I have found that LDAP, in the guise of OpenLDAP, is not very > > difficult at all once you have done your first setup, providing, as > > Craig > > says, you take the time to understand why you're doing what you're > > doing > > and you properly plan ahead. OpenLDAP also has excellent performance > > and > > is as solid as a rock. > > > > Steve > > Whats bizarre is the NIS/LDAP gateway that padl.com sells starting at > $1500. > > I said screw it and just migrated over to OpenLDAP. > > Didn't think it was a PITA but then again, all IT is a PITA so non of > it is if you catch my drift. > > I mean if its all a PITA, then its not a PITA cuz PITA is PITA if > there is no PITA to compare to. > What bites is if you already have a large AD environment in place along with legacy NIS. It's obviously not efficient to maintain two separate environments with many of the same usernames... AD does have "Unix Extensions" to expand their schema to make it more friendly for use as LDAP.. but it's pretty limited really. That and, what if you have many legacy Unix clients that can only talk NIS easily? There are packages like LikeWise out there that can make this work fairly well -- they even have a free version. Lately I've been thinking of using something like Fedora Directory Server to just sync up daily from AD and provide LDAP and NIS services via some sort of shim to older Unix clients who can't handle LDAP. Note that Samba 3.3.x integrates pretty well with AD via winbind. If you can get good external uid mapping going you can even preserve UID's from your NIS environments. It's definitely not as fast as NIS though as far as responsiveness... Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 05:16:49PM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: > Agreed. I have found that LDAP, in the guise of OpenLDAP, is not very > difficult at all once you have done your first setup, providing, as Craig > says, you take the time to understand why you're doing what you're doing > and you properly plan ahead. OpenLDAP also has excellent performance and > is as solid as a rock. The server is great... the client side not so much. Definitely ensure you have nscd running, 'cos without it you'll be making lots of TCP connections to the server and these are relatively slow (definitely compared to NIS which uses UDP). -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Zoneminder
>ehh -- The version in RawHide will build and run under C5, >with some tedious gathering and packaging of buildchain work > >[herr...@centos-5 zoneminder]$ rpm -q zoneminder >zoneminder-1.24.2-5orc >[herr...@centos-5 zoneminder]$ ls *src.rpm | grep orc | wc > 28 281021 >[herr...@centos-5 zoneminder]$ Russ, Although Motion looks neat, the project looks a bit quite for my taste. KB's repo doesn't have a recent zm srpm would you care to update your ftp site or share in the process you used to get the F14 rpm in CentOS? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Craig White wrote: > >> As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a matter of >> perspective because I've been using it for at least 7 years now and >> it >> works for me without any problems whatsoever. > > Agreed. I have found that LDAP, in the guise of OpenLDAP, is not very > difficult at all once you have done your first setup, providing, as > Craig > says, you take the time to understand why you're doing what you're > doing > and you properly plan ahead. OpenLDAP also has excellent performance > and > is as solid as a rock. > > Steve > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Whats bizarre is the NIS/LDAP gateway that padl.com sells starting at $1500. I said screw it and just migrated over to OpenLDAP. Didn't think it was a PITA but then again, all IT is a PITA so non of it is if you catch my drift. I mean if its all a PITA, then its not a PITA cuz PITA is PITA if there is no PITA to compare to. - aurf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Craig White wrote: > As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a matter of > perspective because I've been using it for at least 7 years now and it > works for me without any problems whatsoever. Agreed. I have found that LDAP, in the guise of OpenLDAP, is not very difficult at all once you have done your first setup, providing, as Craig says, you take the time to understand why you're doing what you're doing and you properly plan ahead. OpenLDAP also has excellent performance and is as solid as a rock. Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
Craig White wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:46 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> *shrug* I've never used it. Trust me, openLDAP is a royal PITA, but with >> AD as an alternative > > well AD *is* LDAP but it has many other services/requirements beyond > LDAP. > > As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a matter of > perspective because I've been using it for at least 7 years now and it > works for me without any problems whatsoever. The only griping I hear is > from people who expect to use it without actually taking the time to > learn how it works. In later '06, I set it up, with nobody I worked with knowing anything about how to do it. The "tools" suck dead roaches, the error messages are lousy, and its error handling leases much to be desired, like, um, error handling. The documentation was mostly out of date, and written worse than old mainframe documentation (which I have, indeed, used). Once its working, it's ok, but doing *anything* to it is a royal pain. I'm glad you have no trouble; I, and most folks I've spoken with about it, think the way I do. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:46 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > *shrug* I've never used it. Trust me, openLDAP is a royal PITA, but with > AD as an alternative well AD *is* LDAP but it has many other services/requirements beyond LDAP. As for OpenLDAP being a royal PITA, I suppose that's a matter of perspective because I've been using it for at least 7 years now and it works for me without any problems whatsoever. The only griping I hear is from people who expect to use it without actually taking the time to learn how it works. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
Boris Epstein wrote: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:46 PM, wrote: > >> Stephen Harris wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:22:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> When >> > I did Solaris 9 training it took 2 sentences. Yes, NIS+ may be more >> > secure than NIS, but it's a FPOS to use properly and not a recommended >> > solution. >> >> *shrug* I've never used it. Trust me, openLDAP is a royal PITA, but with >> AD as an alternative > > Thanks... what is AD? I never even heard of that. Windows. Active Directory, or whatever. > > I think we are going to LDAP at some point - due to its universality if > for no other reason. Seems reasonable to me. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:46 PM, wrote: > Stephen Harris wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:22:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > >> And I'd at *least* go to NIS+. openLDAP is an unbelievable pain, but > > > > Nobody in their right mind uses NIS+. Even Sun have stopped it. > > > > When I did Solaris 2.4 training NIS+ took 2 chapters of the manual. When > > I did Solaris 9 training it took 2 sentences. Yes, NIS+ may be more > > secure than NIS, but it's a FPOS to use properly and not a recommended > > solution. > > *shrug* I've never used it. Trust me, openLDAP is a royal PITA, but with > AD as an alternative > > mark > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Thanks... what is AD? I never even heard of that. I think we are going to LDAP at some point - due to its universality if for no other reason. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
Stephen Harris wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:22:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> And I'd at *least* go to NIS+. openLDAP is an unbelievable pain, but > > Nobody in their right mind uses NIS+. Even Sun have stopped it. > > When I did Solaris 2.4 training NIS+ took 2 chapters of the manual. When > I did Solaris 9 training it took 2 sentences. Yes, NIS+ may be more > secure than NIS, but it's a FPOS to use properly and not a recommended > solution. *shrug* I've never used it. Trust me, openLDAP is a royal PITA, but with AD as an alternative mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:22:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > And I'd at *least* go to NIS+. openLDAP is an unbelievable pain, but Nobody in their right mind uses NIS+. Even Sun have stopped it. When I did Solaris 2.4 training NIS+ took 2 chapters of the manual. When I did Solaris 9 training it took 2 sentences. Yes, NIS+ may be more secure than NIS, but it's a FPOS to use properly and not a recommended solution. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
James Pearson wrote: > Boris Epstein wrote: >> Hello listmates, >> >> I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to >> anything but NIS thus far. See here: >> >> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/ >> >> http://readlist.com/lists/suse.com/suse-linux-e/38/193419.html >> >> Hence the question: is NIS (YP) still in use much anywhere for >> authentication? > > I have no problems as a NIS user using sftp to a CentOS 5 box running > OpenSSH 5.x > > This isn't really a CentOS issue - as CentOS ships with OpenSSH v4.x > > I suggest you download the vanilla OpenSSH 5.x source and build and > install it on a host that has NIS accounts and test it. And I'd at *least* go to NIS+. openLDAP is an unbelievable pain, but that's the way I'd go, well, actually, when I was working at AT&T 4 years ago, I did go that way for our group, and where I'm at now, with the fed gov't, we've got AD through kerborous. NIS is very insecure. scp works fine, as does rsync with ssh. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Format details for a raid partition....
Tom Bishop wrote: > So I have been playing with a RAID 10 f2 ( 2 disks far layout) > setup...thanks for all of the advice..Now I am playing with the format > and want to make sure I have it setup the best that I can, my raid was > built using the raid 10 option with 2 disks with the layout=far, chunk > size 512now I read all of the docs I could find about format and > stride and stripe size and this is what i came up with... > > mkfs -t ext4 -E stride=128,stripe-width=32 /dev/md0 > > > Someone let meknow if this looks right, but since i only have two > disks to get my stride 512/4k=128 and then to get my stripe 2/2*128/4=32 I have this in my notes for ext2/ext3 filesystem under raid 5. You will have to see how your layout differs from raid5 in terms of distribution of data across the disks. # the optimal stride is given by: # #chunk size # stride = -- * ( num disks ) #block size # # Here is a framework of a script to test performance of various chunk sizes (came off of some webpage a while ago). Optimal chunk size will of course depend on your application and the size of your writes and files.. # # EXT2BLOCKSIZE=4096 # or 1024 or ??? # for CHUNKSIZE in 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 do stride=$(( $CHUNKSIZE * 1024 / $EXT2BLOCKSIZE )) .. .. create new /etc/raidtab and run the test .. mke2fs -b $EXT2BLOCKSIZE -m 1 -Rstride=$stride /dev/mdxx .. mount /dev/mdxx ..configurations # whatever test .. tiobench bonnie dd .. done # # ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
Hi there -- We use NIS on our site which is a mixture of HP-UX and Linux systems. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ben McGinnes Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:50 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS? On 2/10/10 4:27 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello listmates, > > I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to > anything but NIS thus far. See here: > > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-n is-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/ > > http://readlist.com/lists/suse.com/suse-linux-e/38/193419.html > > Hence the question: is NIS (YP) still in use much anywhere for > authentication? Solaris still favours it, but mainly because Sun invented it. Most of the rest of us don't bother. I certainly haven't seen it anywhere except exclusively SunOS/Solaris based networks for ages. Regards, Ben The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] HP ML110 G6: how to update kernel with HP hpahcisr raid driver installed
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 10:24:43AM -0700, Scott Silva wrote: > on 9-30-2010 8:35 AM Dario Lesca spake the following: > > Il giorno gio, 30/09/2010 alle 07.54 -0400, mark ha scritto: > >> Dario Lesca wrote: > >> ... > > Now I have reinstall and solved this issue > > adding a "exclude=kernel*" into /etc/yum.conf > > > > Thank to all. > > > That doesn't really "solve" the issue, it only stops you from getting > important kernel updates. and you really should upgrade your kernel if you have local users on your server... http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01732801 seems fun too if you are lucky you could just copy the hpahcisr.ko file and into /lib/modules/`uname -r`/extra and let kernel upgrade do the weak update magic. OTOH, if the order of kernel module is important as suggested above, you need to do it manually see mkinird man pages. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgppxOOrkxlBP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On 10/1/10 2:27 PM, "Boris Epstein" wrote: > Hello listmates, > > I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to > anything but NIS thus far. See here: > > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for > -nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/ > > http://readlist.com/lists/suse.com/suse-linux-e/38/193419.html > > Hence the question: is NIS (YP) still in use much anywhere for > authentication? We use it for our mixed environment of Solaris and Linux (including CentOS) workstations. 100-150 machines, 600-700 users. --- Mike VanHorn Senior Computer Systems Administrator College of Engineering and Computer Science Wright State University 265 Russ Engineering Center 937-775-5157 michael.vanh...@wright.edu RSS: http://www.engineering.wright.edu/~mvanhorn/MikeVanHorn'sNewsFeed.xml http://www.engineering.wright.edu/~mvanhorn/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello listmates, > > I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to > anything but NIS thus far. See here: > > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/ > > http://readlist.com/lists/suse.com/suse-linux-e/38/193419.html > > Hence the question: is NIS (YP) still in use much anywhere for > authentication? I have no problems as a NIS user using sftp to a CentOS 5 box running OpenSSH 5.x This isn't really a CentOS issue - as CentOS ships with OpenSSH v4.x I suggest you download the vanilla OpenSSH 5.x source and build and install it on a host that has NIS accounts and test it. James Pearson ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Don Krause > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 15:40 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS? > > > On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote: > > > On 2/10/10 4:27 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > >> Hello listmates, > >> > >> Hence the question: is NIS (YP) still in use much anywhere for > >> authentication? > > > > Solaris still favours it, but mainly because Sun invented > it. Most of > > the rest of us don't bother. I certainly haven't seen it anywhere > > except exclusively SunOS/Solaris based networks for ages. > > > > > > Regards, > > Ben > > > > > > We still use it quite extensively, across 100 or so Linux, > Solaris, and SunOS boxes. > > Since we still have to maintain and support some very > expensive industrial equipment that use SunOS, I'd hate to > see it go away. > We use it in our linux/windows SSO, about 75 machines. Eventually we will switch to LDAP, but until then... -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote: > On 2/10/10 4:27 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: >> Hello listmates, >> >> I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to >> anything but NIS thus far. See here: >> >> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/ >> >> http://readlist.com/lists/suse.com/suse-linux-e/38/193419.html >> >> Hence the question: is NIS (YP) still in use much anywhere for >> authentication? > > Solaris still favours it, but mainly because Sun invented it. Most of > the rest of us don't bother. I certainly haven't seen it anywhere > except exclusively SunOS/Solaris based networks for ages. > > > Regards, > Ben > > We still use it quite extensively, across 100 or so Linux, Solaris, and SunOS boxes. Since we still have to maintain and support some very expensive industrial equipment that use SunOS, I'd hate to see it go away. Take Care, Don ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
On 2/10/10 4:27 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello listmates, > > I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to > anything but NIS thus far. See here: > > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/ > > http://readlist.com/lists/suse.com/suse-linux-e/38/193419.html > > Hence the question: is NIS (YP) still in use much anywhere for > authentication? Solaris still favours it, but mainly because Sun invented it. Most of the rest of us don't bother. I certainly haven't seen it anywhere except exclusively SunOS/Solaris based networks for ages. Regards, Ben signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Format details for a raid partition....
So I have been playing with a RAID 10 f2 ( 2 disks far layout) setup...thanks for all of the advice..Now I am playing with the format and want to make sure I have it setup the best that I can, my raid was built using the raid 10 option with 2 disks with the layout=far, chunk size 512now I read all of the docs I could find about format and stride and stripe size and this is what i came up with... mkfs -t ext4 -E stride=128,stripe-width=32 /dev/md0 Someone let meknow if this looks right, but since i only have two disks to get my stride 512/4k=128 and then to get my stripe 2/2*128/4=32 Does that look right and if not let me know but more important how to obtain the right number so I can do it correctly in the future...Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] how many people still use NIS?
Hello listmates, I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to anything but NIS thus far. See here: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/ http://readlist.com/lists/suse.com/suse-linux-e/38/193419.html Hence the question: is NIS (YP) still in use much anywhere for authentication? Thanks. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] HP ML110 G6: how to update kernel with HP hpahcisr raid driver installed
>That doesn't really "solve" the issue, it only stops you from getting >important kernel updates. An unfortunate way of life if you insist on using HP's modules. They do their own QA testing and it takes a moons age. I have never had a need to use the latest cciss for example versus the shipped module's but I guess if you want software raid on that little server you have to. AFAIK, turning off raid and using ahci then using mdraid (as I do on my ML110 G6's) makes much more sense is way easier longterm. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] HP ML110 G6: how to update kernel with HP hpahcisr raid driver installed
on 9-30-2010 8:35 AM Dario Lesca spake the following: > Il giorno gio, 30/09/2010 alle 07.54 -0400, mark ha scritto: >> Dario Lesca wrote: >> >>> ... start with "linux dd" and, at the end of setup, install the >> >> What? What are you saying you did with the dd command? > At dvd boot prompt, I have add 'dd' option an I have load hp driver. > >> Where'd you get the original? > On the hp site > >> Does installation of it build the driver, the way, for example, I have >> to rebuild a years-old driver for my Nvidia card at work, every time I >> update the kernel? > HP not release the source of driver. > > Now I have reinstall and solved this issue > adding a "exclude=kernel*" into /etc/yum.conf > > Thank to all. > That doesn't really "solve" the issue, it only stops you from getting important kernel updates. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Here we go again: SpamAssassin doesn't like the new Perl update...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, David Hrbá? wrote: Hi, sa-update and spamd restart works for me. What's the rpm -q spamassasin perl perl-NetAddr-IP and uname -a? Hi David, Here you go: Linux machine.something 2.6.18-225.el5 #1 SMP Mon Sep 27 10:34:23 EDT 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux spamassassin-3.3.1-3.el5.rf perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2 perl-NetAddr-IP-4.032-1.el5.rf *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University E-mail: seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu *** web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu ** ***___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 68, Issue 1
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2010:0723 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update
(Karanbir Singh)
2. CESA-2010:0723 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update
(Karanbir Singh)
3. CESA-2010:0734 Low CentOS 3 1-Month End Of Life (Tru Huynh)
--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:36:09 +
From: Karanbir Singh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0723 Important CentOS 5 x86_64
kernel Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20100930153609.ga24...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0723 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0723.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
de64ed82f6bbd5d31fcfa715f7062e46 kernel-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
d2eba9bf61ec467c6912a402cdaf8743 kernel-debug-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
1c1315f5a3e51e830c9d1177c71d5403
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
e28baaea0021fc9aa0f69c5b607e682d kernel-devel-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
f7c56919ef50788accd52906b7b49032 kernel-doc-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.noarch.rpm
6c086bb6208b54f965d82fb0b29ccc86 kernel-headers-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
bc2794ac0116ee711ab8849667eb87bf kernel-xen-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
b6771a5f3820002fcf678d1858aea08b
kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
7c84d0e56d5ee83f40e2a0ae04fc9dae kernel-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:36:09 +
From: Karanbir Singh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0723 Important CentOS 5 i386
kernel Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20100930153609.ga24...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0723 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0723.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
3ef29d18ecd25913bbe376dab181f307 kernel-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.i686.rpm
cd0a5ef58324cefbf317e5a6ce7edf4f kernel-debug-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.i686.rpm
a200b62c7e53f8add6d58a96525ea9b1
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.i686.rpm
cb95e670cd014e1009dee9a2e5dfeb4d kernel-devel-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.i686.rpm
b139834804cf996fd1a79388e37acd41 kernel-doc-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.noarch.rpm
ed22e4b36463ad82aba1e9ca0689d9ec kernel-headers-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.i386.rpm
cfce07e82ea5c10b78d946a2e6e693c6 kernel-PAE-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.i686.rpm
1d5d1ec282a4b1efa43b6df05af5dd58 kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.i686.rpm
00316ec2bda6d6fd6c11211ae9458c63 kernel-xen-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.i686.rpm
769f9a500de8200266a3d24f4c61997f kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.i686.rpm
Source:
7c84d0e56d5ee83f40e2a0ae04fc9dae kernel-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:56:47 +0200
From: Tru Huynh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0734 Low CentOS 3 1-Month End Of
Life
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20101001095647.ga23...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
As per the upstream vendors errata support policy, updates for CentOS 3 will
also end on October 31th 2010.
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0734.html
It is recommended that any system still running CentOS 3 should be
upgraded to a more recent version of CentOS before this date to ensure
continued security and bug fix support.
see also http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/EOLC3
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20101001/1684c88a/attachment-0001.bin
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
c
Re: [CentOS] Here we go again: SpamAssassin doesn't like the new Perl update...
Dne 1.10.2010 16:34, Gilbert Sebenste napsal(a): > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > >> Check this out: >> >> % sa-update >> >> Subroutine NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted::AF_INET6 redefined at >> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65. >> at >> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/NetAddr/IP/Util.pm >> line 180 > Hi, sa-update and spamd restart works for me. What's the rpm -q spamassasin perl perl-NetAddr-IP and uname -a? DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Here we go again: SpamAssassin doesn't like the new Perl update...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Steve Huff wrote: > looks like it should be fixed in revision 4.033, which is already in RPMforge > SVN but not yet pushed to the repo. > > how much troubleshooting did you do before you assumed it was CentOS's fault? > :) Hi Steve, I wish I knew how to troubleshoot it. But, I didn't say it was CentOS fault, I just said the Perl update (collectively, somewhere) was the issue. I was throwing this out there to also see if anyone else was seeing this, and not being a CentOS genius (to say the least), I was looking for someone like you, smarter than me on this, who could figure it out. And you did so very well, thanks. :-) Have a good one! Gilbert *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Here we go again: SpamAssassin doesn't like the new Perl update...
On Oct 1, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > I'll raise that and a restart: > > % /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin restart > Stopping spamd:[ OK ] > Starting spamd: Subroutine NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted::AF_INET6 redefined > at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65. > at > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/NetAddr/IP/Util.pm > line 180 this does not look like CentOS's fault. $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/NetAddr/IP/Util.pm perl-NetAddr-IP-4.032-1.el5.rf first off, the package in question comes from RPMforge. this looks like a bug in the upstream Perl module: http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/MIKER/NetAddr-IP-4.033/Changes Revision history for Perl extension NetAddr::IP 4.033 Wed Sep 29 10:32:50 PDT 2010 Conditionalize import of AF_INET6 in Util.pm NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted 4.032 Wed Sep 22 13:39:08 PDT 2010 Added overload => 'ne' and '!=' to Lite.pm v1.18 looks like it should be fixed in revision 4.033, which is already in RPMforge SVN but not yet pushed to the repo. how much troubleshooting did you do before you assumed it was CentOS's fault? :) -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] MegaRAID Storage Manager on CentOS 5.5?
giggzounet wrote: > Le 28/09/2010 12:33, James Pearson a écrit : >> Does anyone have the 'MegaRAID Storage Manager' GUI working on CentOS >> 5.5? >> >> I can run it, but it won't let me log in. >> >> The docs state that it requires the local root username and password - >> but it always rejects this with "Message = Login failed: Invalid >> username or password!" > > I had a login problem with 'MegaRAID Storage Manager' GUI on CentOS 5.5 > too. That was very strange: > the system was installed with US keyboard and the configuration was US > too. Then I'm in germany so we are working with german Keyboard so I > have modified US to DE. But I'm french so I'm using a french keyboard on > my workstation...all works out of the box (I get the letter wich I > wan... :) ) except with 'MegaRAID Storage Manager' GUI. I found that I > have to enter my root password on the keyboard as if I enter it on a US > keyboard...even If the config is DE or FR. very very strange... It could very well be that it takes the characters entered in ASCII. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] logwatch question
on 9-29-2010 2:43 PM lostson spake the following: > Quoting M�rio Barbosa : > >> LostSon wrote: >>> Yes I did run newaliases and still no joy >>> >>> Mark Van Bogart wrote: >>> Did you run 'newaliases' after editing /etc/aliases? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:27 AM, lostson wrote: > Hello > A few weeks ago I started having problems with my system email or > specifically my logwatch reports showing up in my inbox. I got most of > those issues figued out except one now when i get an email from my > system it has a title of this > > Cron run-parts /etc/cron.daily > > > with this message > > /etc/cron.daily/0logwatch: > > Recipient names must be specified >> >> >> http://linuxhelp.blogspot.com/2005/06/sendmail-versatile-mail-server.html >> >> Look for "Check if sendmail is identifying your station's hostname >> correctly:" >> > > Well a few weeks ago after updating, my logwatch reports just > stopped, i had some > permission problems and other such things. So last night what i did was > > yum remove sendmail logwatch > > then i reinstalled them and was gettting the error > logwatch cannot execute sendmail -t > > turns out that in the /usr/share/--- logwatch.conf its says mailer > = " sendmail -t" > > but that kicks in the error so in etc/logwatch/logwatch.conf if you add > mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t" > then the error goes away and logwatch reports start flowing back to > my inbox like normal > so that fixed my error and all is well now. Talking with people last > night they said it > was weird probably that a symlink was pointing to where it should be. > Weird thing was i > did a fresh install on my laptop while working on my main machine last > night and was > getting the exact same issue on a fresh install. but again applying > this fix made it work > fine. So the question is now is, is it a logwatch issue or a sendmail > issue and if so > where and how to fix > it. I'm gonna write up a full bug report hopefully tonight and look > upstream as well to > see if there are any bugs filed with RH about this as well. > > LostSon > > http://lostsonsvault.org It seems to be a path issue... The environment that logwatch is running under doesn't have /usr/sbin in its path, so it needs the full reference. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Here we go again: SpamAssassin doesn't like the new Perl update...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > Check this out: > > % sa-update > > Subroutine NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted::AF_INET6 redefined at > /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65. > at > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/NetAddr/IP/Util.pm > line 180 I'll raise that and a restart: % /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin restart Stopping spamd:[ OK ] Starting spamd: Subroutine NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted::AF_INET6 redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65. at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/NetAddr/IP/Util.pm line 180 [ OK ] *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] MegaRAID Storage Manager on CentOS 5.5?
Le 28/09/2010 12:33, James Pearson a écrit : > Does anyone have the 'MegaRAID Storage Manager' GUI working on CentOS 5.5? > > I can run it, but it won't let me log in. > > The docs state that it requires the local root username and password - > but it always rejects this with "Message = Login failed: Invalid > username or password!" > > Thanks > > James Pearson Hi, I had a login problem with 'MegaRAID Storage Manager' GUI on CentOS 5.5 too. That was very strange: the system was installed with US keyboard and the configuration was US too. Then I'm in germany so we are working with german Keyboard so I have modified US to DE. But I'm french so I'm using a french keyboard on my workstation...all works out of the box (I get the letter wich I wan... :) ) except with 'MegaRAID Storage Manager' GUI. I found that I have to enter my root password on the keyboard as if I enter it on a US keyboard...even If the config is DE or FR. very very strange... Regards, Guillaume ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Here we go again: SpamAssassin doesn't like the new Perl update...
Check this out: % sa-update Subroutine NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted::AF_INET6 redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65. at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/NetAddr/IP/Util.pm line 180 *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question on mkfs.hfsplus
-Original Message- From: "John Doe" Date: Fri Oct 01 12:45:21 GMT 2010 To: "CentOS mailing list" CC: Subject: Re: [CentOS] question on mkfs.hfsplus From: Jerry Geis > I am wanting to use the mkfs.hfsplus as mentioned here > http://www.oli.id.au/createosxdmgdiskimagesinlinux > but I dont have the command. > yum provides "*/mkfs.hfsplus" returns no packages found. > Where do I find this command? Thanks. If you don't find one for CentOS, maybe your could try fedora's one http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=hfsplus-tools JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question on mkfs.hfsplus
-Original Message- From: "John Doe" Date: Fri Oct 01 12:45:21 GMT 2010 To: "CentOS mailing list" CC: Subject: Re: [CentOS] question on mkfs.hfsplus From: Jerry Geis > I am wanting to use the mkfs.hfsplus as mentioned here > http://www.oli.id.au/createosxdmgdiskimagesinlinux > but I dont have the command. > yum provides "*/mkfs.hfsplus" returns no packages found. > Where do I find this command? Thanks. If you don't find one for CentOS, maybe your could try fedora's one http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=hfsplus-tools JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question on mkfs.hfsplus
From: Jerry Geis > I am wanting to use the mkfs.hfsplus as mentioned here > http://www.oli.id.au/createosxdmgdiskimagesinlinux > but I dont have the command. > yum provides "*/mkfs.hfsplus" returns no packages found. > Where do I find this command? Thanks. If you don't find one for CentOS, maybe your could try fedora's one http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=hfsplus-tools JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] question on mkfs.hfsplus
I am wanting to use the mkfs.hfsplus as mentioned here http://www.oli.id.au/createosxdmgdiskimagesinlinux but I dont have the command. yum provides "*/mkfs.hfsplus" returns no packages found. Where do I find this command? Thanks. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Mailman - searchable archive
On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > Mailman works well for our mailing lists, but the archive is > unacceptable - the worst thing is lack of search function. > > I got one tip for this: > > 1) emails converted to html format with mhonarc > 2) search can be done with htdig > > Opinions? Maybe there are better software solutions for this - I hope. > > - Jussi You might give Namazu a try: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2004-June/037584.html Regards, James ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Routing of outgoing packets
On 09/30/2010 05:02 PM, John Doe wrote: > From: Mitja Mihelič >> I am trying to use hping to chek the latency of our network. >> Somehow things are not going to plan and I thought someone might be able >> to shed some light on the subject. >> Here is the setup: >> (the IP addresses gvien here are fake, but they do represent the correct >> state of the networking setup) >> vlan interface IP mask >> V2eth0 192.168.20.2032 >> V4eth1 172.16.4.4032 >> V6eth2 172.16.6.6032 >> >> The default route is set to eth1. >> The idea is to use eth2 for pinging only, the other two interfaces are >> used by another service and management access. > Could you show the ifconfig and route outputs...? > > JD The Centos version is 5.5. This is the kernel we are using (http://rpms.mcnc.org/web100/el5/distro-compat/i386/): 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5.web100PAE #1 SMP Mon May 17 17:01:51 EDT 2010 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux The IP addresses are presented as private addresses, netmasks are real. Here is the ifconfig output: [r...@server ~]# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:35:82:45:A0 inet addr:192.168.254.236 Bcast:192.168.254.239 Mask:255.255.255.240 inet6 addr: fe80::216:35ff:fe82:45a0/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:139602 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:58914 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:211203420 (201.4 MiB) TX bytes:4285647 (4.0 MiB) Interrupt:186 Memory:dc00-dc012800 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:35:82:45:A2 inet addr:192.168.254.244 Bcast:192.168.254.247 Mask:255.255.255.248 inet6 addr: fe80::216:35ff:fe82:45a2/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:15 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:14 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:1130 (1.1 KiB) TX bytes:1116 (1.0 KiB) Interrupt:194 Memory:da00-da012800 eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:C5:84:4D inet addr:192.168.254.18 Bcast:192.168.254.23 Mask:255.255.255.248 inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fec5:844d/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:29 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:18 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:2280 (2.2 KiB) TX bytes:1236 (1.2 KiB) Memory:dfde-dfe0 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:21 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:21 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:4240 (4.1 KiB) TX bytes:4240 (4.1 KiB) And the route command output: [r...@server ~]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.18.122 192.168.254.225 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.254.16 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth2 192.168.254.240 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.18.160 192.168.254.225 255.255.255.240 UG0 0 0 eth0 192.168.254.224 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.1.64 192.168.254.225 255.255.255.192 UG0 0 0 eth0 192.168.1.128192.168.254.225 255.255.255.128 UG0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth2 0.0.0.0 192.168.254.241 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 eth1 -- Mitja ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
