[chromium-dev] Re: About hunspell

[Brett Wilson]

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Dmitry.Skiba wrote:
>
> Recently I was playing with hunspell and got very displeased with its
> code (which claims to be cpp, but in fact 'classified' c). I even
> started to think about rewriting it in, you know, "correct" cpp. Then
> I realized that Chrome also uses hunspell and went to the repository.
> I saw a very useful patch to HashMgr, which in fact alters its
> behaviour pretty much. And at the same time all old code were left as
> is.

Glad you like it!

> So I have a question: why? Why didn't you just remove all that old and
> unused code? It's unlikely that your patches will be merged into
> hunspell.

We do this so we can tell what we changed so it's easier to merge to
future versions of Hunspell. Of course it should be possible to do
with SVN logs only, but it makes it a little easier. I believe there
are some new capabilities we would like to take advantage of in the
newer ones.

Brett

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: Full pass of acid3.

[Darin Fisher]

http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9633

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Peter Kasting  wrote:

> Woot!
>
> What's --enable-remote-fonts, and will it be on by default "soon"?
>
> Thanks dglazkov!
>
> PK
>
> On Jul 3, 2009 12:13 PM, "Dimitri Glazkov"  wrote:
>
>
> As of r19910 (and with --enable-remote-fonts flag), we now fully pass
> the acid3 test. Thanks to brettw for his patience and to pkasting for
> guilting me into fixing this "the right way".
>
> :DG<
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: Where is the implmentation of GraphincsContext::drawLine

[Amanda Walker]

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:23 PM, n179911 wrote:
> In GraphicsContext.h, it has this method declaration:
> void drawLine(const IntPoint&, const IntPoint&);
>
> But can you please tell me where i can find the implementation of the method?
> I can't find that in GraphicsContext.cpp.
>
> I am looking for the implementation on MacOS X.

GraphicsContextCG.cpp, line 139.

Many of the questions you have been asking can be answered using the
"Find in Project..." feature of Xcode, which you can access by pulling
down the Edit menu, going down to the the "Find" submenu, and
selecting "Find in Project...".  It will give you a dialog that will
let you search through either the current project or all open projects
for a particular string.

If you are new to Xcode, I would recommend reading through its online
help, or joining the xcode-us...@apple.com mailing list.

--Amanda

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Where is the implmentation of GraphincsContext::drawLine

[n179911]

Hi,

In GraphicsContext.h, it has this method declaration:
void drawLine(const IntPoint&, const IntPoint&);

But can you please tell me where i can find the implementation of the method?
I can't find that in GraphicsContext.cpp.

I am looking for the implementation on MacOS X.

Thank you.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Sample Extension failing to install.

[Hundasupa]

When attempting to install the Google Reader extension, Chromium gives
this error. This is on a Chromium build 3.0.192.0 (19907) on a Windows
7 OS 7100 build. Install breaks also after "Save Link As" downloading
it.
Any ideas?


---Extension error---
Could not install extension from 'C:\Users\Doddi\Documents\Downloads
\subscribe_page_action.crx'. Required value 'page_actions[0].icons' is
missing or invalid.
---OK--

The Following link show's the error on a "Save Link As"
downloaded .crx
http://imgur.com/kuJLyl.png

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Issue 4576: Home/End and PageUp/PageDn buttons do not do anything in drop down lists

[Vamsi Kalyan]

Hi,

To fix issue #4576 how to get the page size? Fixing where would be
considered as the best?

Below I elaborate the issue.

In WebCore, HTML Select element is rendered using either RenderMenuList or
RenderListBox. RenderMenuList further uses PopupListBox as a popup. When
popup is visible, PageUp/PageDn are working fine. Issue comes only when
popup is closed. When popup is not visible, SelectElement.cpp present in dom
folder of WebCore handles keyboard events and notifies its corresponding
renderer.

So the place where PageUp/PageDn events are handled knows only renderer.
Only renderer can tell the number of visible lines considering current zoom
level etc. Is it a good idea to ask renderer from SelectElement.cpp to
return number of visible items?

In case of RenderMenuList, it has to ask PopupListBox under platform
chromium, and in the else part of this platform check we need to write code
that will get called by rest of Webkit users. But is it fine if we decide
what is correct for other users of Webkit?

In case of RenderListBox, the method, numVisibleItems() that can return
number of visible items is a private method. Changing it to public lets
SelectElement.cpp to know the page size, but is it a good thing to do?

Please suggest.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: cygwin dependence missing?

[Dirk Pranke]

Oh, I should add that if I run the same binaries under Vista,
everything works fine (no error from wdiff).

-- Dirk

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> Hi Marc-Antoine,
>
> I am getting the same "wdiff: /tmp/t101c.0: No such file or directory"
> errors ... I'm running an XP VM on a Vista 64 host, but I've tried
> both local files (running the tests on a virtual drive) as well as a
> network share to the host VM. I've tried the /etc/fstab, the
> CYGWIN=nontsec, and the changing of directory ACLs, all to no avail.
> Any other ideas?
>
> -- Dirk
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
>> 2009/7/1 Bradley Nelson 
>>>
>>> gyp should be setting CYGWIN=nontsec for actions and rules (unless you use
>>> the msvs_use_cygwin_shell:0).
>>
>> FYI, cygwin 1.7 doesn't honour CYGWIN=NONTSEC anymore. You need to modify
>> /etc/fstab, e.g. c:\cygwin\etc\fstab to add something line:
>> none /cygdrive cygdrive binary,posix=0,user,noacl 0 0
>> to have the same effect.
>> M-A
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: cygwin dependence missing?

[Dirk Pranke]

Hi Marc-Antoine,

I am getting the same "wdiff: /tmp/t101c.0: No such file or directory"
errors ... I'm running an XP VM on a Vista 64 host, but I've tried
both local files (running the tests on a virtual drive) as well as a
network share to the host VM. I've tried the /etc/fstab, the
CYGWIN=nontsec, and the changing of directory ACLs, all to no avail.
Any other ideas?

-- Dirk

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
> 2009/7/1 Bradley Nelson 
>>
>> gyp should be setting CYGWIN=nontsec for actions and rules (unless you use
>> the msvs_use_cygwin_shell:0).
>
> FYI, cygwin 1.7 doesn't honour CYGWIN=NONTSEC anymore. You need to modify
> /etc/fstab, e.g. c:\cygwin\etc\fstab to add something line:
> none /cygdrive cygdrive binary,posix=0,user,noacl 0 0
> to have the same effect.
> M-A
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Issue 4576: Home/End and PageUp/PageDn buttons do not do anything in drop down lists

[tvk]

Hi,

To fix issue #4576 how to get the page size? Fixing where would be
considered as the best?

Below I elaborate the issue.

In WebCore, HTML Select element is rendered using either
RenderMenuList or RenderListBox. RenderMenuList further uses
PopupListBox as a popup. When popup is visible, PageUp/PageDn are
working fine. Issue comes only when popup is closed. When popup is not
visible, SelectElement.cpp present in dom folder of WebCore handles
keyboard events and notifies its corresponding renderer.

So the place where PageUp/PageDn events are handled knows only
renderer. Only renderer can tell the number of visible lines
considering current zoom level etc. Is it a good idea to ask renderer
from SelectElement.cpp to return number of visible items?

In case of RenderMenuList, it has to ask PopupListBox under platform
chromium, and in the else part of this platform check we need to write
code that will get called by rest of Webkit users. But is it fine if
we decide what is correct for other users of Webkit?

In case of RenderListBox, the method, numVisibleItems() that can
return number of visible items is a private method. Changing it to
public lets SelectElement.cpp to know the page size, but is it a good
thing to do?

Please suggest.

Thanks,
---

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: cygwin dependence missing?

[Dirk Pranke]

Debugging this a bit more ... it seems to be some sort of XP vs. Vista
thing. If I run "wdiff exp.txt act.txt" in a bash shell or a command
prompt on Vista, it works. On XP, it works in a bash shell, but in a
command prompt, I get the "/tmp" error. It looks like XP is expecting
to find the cygwin environment, but isn't, and it is finding it on
Vista. I don't see anything obvious in my environment that is
different.

I am running Cygwin 1.5.25, though. At this point, my knowledge of
cygwin falters, so I'm out of ideas. Anyone else?

-- Dirk

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> Oh, I should add that if I run the same binaries under Vista,
> everything works fine (no error from wdiff).
>
> -- Dirk
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
>> Hi Marc-Antoine,
>>
>> I am getting the same "wdiff: /tmp/t101c.0: No such file or directory"
>> errors ... I'm running an XP VM on a Vista 64 host, but I've tried
>> both local files (running the tests on a virtual drive) as well as a
>> network share to the host VM. I've tried the /etc/fstab, the
>> CYGWIN=nontsec, and the changing of directory ACLs, all to no avail.
>> Any other ideas?
>>
>> -- Dirk
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
>>> 2009/7/1 Bradley Nelson 

 gyp should be setting CYGWIN=nontsec for actions and rules (unless you use
 the msvs_use_cygwin_shell:0).
>>>
>>> FYI, cygwin 1.7 doesn't honour CYGWIN=NONTSEC anymore. You need to modify
>>> /etc/fstab, e.g. c:\cygwin\etc\fstab to add something line:
>>> none /cygdrive cygdrive binary,posix=0,user,noacl 0 0
>>> to have the same effect.
>>> M-A
>>> >>>
>>>
>>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] About hunspell

[Dmitry.Skiba]

Recently I was playing with hunspell and got very displeased with its
code (which claims to be cpp, but in fact 'classified' c). I even
started to think about rewriting it in, you know, "correct" cpp. Then
I realized that Chrome also uses hunspell and went to the repository.
I saw a very useful patch to HashMgr, which in fact alters its
behaviour pretty much. And at the same time all old code were left as
is.

So I have a question: why? Why didn't you just remove all that old and
unused code? It's unlikely that your patches will be merged into
hunspell.

I'm asking because, as I said, I'm thinking of rewriting (well,
'correcting') hunspell and want to know in advance that someone else
is interested.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Joy of generated files

[Marc-Antoine Ruel]

* PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT *

As long as the generated project files will be in src/ and not in the
$(outdir) , PLEASE
fix the svn:ignore everytime generated project files are added or removed.

For examples, see 19914 and 19915.

Thanks,

M-A

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[Marc-Antoine Ruel]

It could be added automatically when generating VS2008 projects but it
can't on VS2005.

It's probably relatively easy in GYP syntax but I don't know :/

M-A

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Mohamed Mansour wrote:
> Would be nice if we can make multiprocess build (/MP) integrated with gyp.
> Don't know how that could be done.
> -- Mohamed Mansour
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Jeremy Orlow  wrote:
>>
>> Actually, there are a couple spots to edit:
>> http://codereview.chromium.org/155057  -- maybe more
>>
>> Is it time to make this default yet?  It speeds up the build considerably
>> and almost everyone uses it now.  It does make things a bit less
>> deterministic, but you can always clobber build if something gets into a bad
>> state.  And it's _much_ faster.
>>
>> J
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Tommi  wrote:
>>>
>>> Don't know if this is what most do but I ended up adding it to
>>> build\common.gpyi (line 471 in my case)
>>> ...
>>>           'VCCLCompilerTool': {
>>>             'AdditionalOptions': '/MP',
>>>             'MinimalRebuild': 'false',
>>>             'ExceptionHandling': '0',
>>>             'BufferSecurityCheck': 'true',
>>>             'EnableFunctionLevelLinking': 'true',
>>>             'RuntimeTypeInfo': 'false',
>>>             'WarningLevel': '3',
>>>             'WarnAsError': 'true',
>>>             'DebugInformationFormat': '3',
>>>           },
>>> ...
>>> If that's not what everyone else is doing, please let me know.
>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:11 PM, PhistucK  wrote:

 Where exactly do I add "/MP" (using Visual Basic Professional 2005)?
 (I know extremely little about the whole environment..)

 Thank you.
 ☆PhistucK


 On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 20:08, Peter Kasting 
 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Mohamed Mansour 
> wrote:
>>
>> It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
>> incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as 
>> well.
>
> Note: /MP is "multiprocess build", not "incremental build".
> PK


>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: Full pass of acid3.

[Peter Kasting]

Woot!

What's --enable-remote-fonts, and will it be on by default "soon"?

Thanks dglazkov!

PK

On Jul 3, 2009 12:13 PM, "Dimitri Glazkov"  wrote:


As of r19910 (and with --enable-remote-fonts flag), we now fully pass
the acid3 test. Thanks to brettw for his patience and to pkasting for
guilting me into fixing this "the right way".

:DG<


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[Mohamed Mansour]

Would be nice if we can make multiprocess build (/MP) integrated with gyp.
Don't know how that could be done.
-- Mohamed Mansour


On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Jeremy Orlow  wrote:

> Actually, there are a couple spots to edit:
> http://codereview.chromium.org/155057  -- maybe more
>
> Is it time to make this default yet?  It speeds up the build considerably
> and almost everyone uses it now.  It does make things a bit less
> deterministic, but you can always clobber build if something gets into a bad
> state.  And it's _much_ faster.
>
> J
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Tommi  wrote:
>
>> Don't know if this is what most do but I ended up adding it to
>> build\common.gpyi (line 471 in my case)
>> ...
>>   'VCCLCompilerTool': {
>> *'AdditionalOptions': '/MP',*
>> 'MinimalRebuild': 'false',
>> 'ExceptionHandling': '0',
>> 'BufferSecurityCheck': 'true',
>> 'EnableFunctionLevelLinking': 'true',
>> 'RuntimeTypeInfo': 'false',
>> 'WarningLevel': '3',
>> 'WarnAsError': 'true',
>> 'DebugInformationFormat': '3',
>>   },
>> ...
>>
>> If that's not what everyone else is doing, please let me know.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:11 PM, PhistucK  wrote:
>>
>>> Where exactly do I add "/MP" (using Visual Basic Professional 2005)? (I
>>> know extremely little about the whole environment..)
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> ☆PhistucK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 20:08, Peter Kasting wrote:
>>>
 On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Mohamed Mansour wrote:

> It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
> incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.
>

 Note: /MP is "multiprocess build", not "incremental build".

 PK

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Fwd: [webkit-dev] [V8] It's time for V8Proxy to come to Jesus

[Jeremy Orlow]

FYI because some people might not be on webkit-dev.

BUT if this seems even remotely interesting to you, get on that list!  (They
recently split it into webkit-dev and webkit-help, so signal to noise should
get better than it was before...in case that was a concern of yours.)

J

-- Forwarded message --
From: Adam Barth 
Date: Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:23 PM
Subject: [webkit-dev] [V8] It's time for V8Proxy to come to Jesus
To: webkit-...@lists.webkit.org
Cc: Mike Belshe 


If you're uninterested in the V8 bindings, you can skip this email.

Clocking in at 3255 lines (plus a 682-line header file), V8Proxy is
out of control.  Historically a bridge from the V8 bindings to the V8
engine, V8Proxy is responsible for a number of tasks including:

1) Creating new contexts
2) Implementing security checks
3) Supervising garbage collection
4) Caching event listeners
5) Executing scripts
6) Converting between frames, contexts, and global objects
7) Manging DOM wrappers
8) etc, etc, etc

I propose we separate these concerns into a number of distinct classes
that have clear, understandable purposes before things get worse.

Please let me know if you have any in-progress patches to V8Proxy.
I'd like to lock that file sometime next week while I rip it apart and
put it back together.

Thanks,
Adam

P.S., FrameLoader: you've escaped for now, but don't think I'm not watching
you.
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-...@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Full pass of acid3.

[Dimitri Glazkov]

As of r19910 (and with --enable-remote-fonts flag), we now fully pass
the acid3 test. Thanks to brettw for his patience and to pkasting for
guilting me into fixing this "the right way".

:DG<

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[Tommi]

thanks jeremy - applied that cl and got my cpus pegged even more ;)

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Jeremy Orlow  wrote:

> Actually, there are a couple spots to edit:
> http://codereview.chromium.org/155057  -- maybe more
>
> Is it time to make this default yet?  It speeds up the build considerably
> and almost everyone uses it now.  It does make things a bit less
> deterministic, but you can always clobber build if something gets into a bad
> state.  And it's _much_ faster.
>
> J
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Tommi  wrote:
>
>> Don't know if this is what most do but I ended up adding it to
>> build\common.gpyi (line 471 in my case)
>> ...
>>   'VCCLCompilerTool': {
>> *'AdditionalOptions': '/MP',*
>> 'MinimalRebuild': 'false',
>> 'ExceptionHandling': '0',
>> 'BufferSecurityCheck': 'true',
>> 'EnableFunctionLevelLinking': 'true',
>> 'RuntimeTypeInfo': 'false',
>> 'WarningLevel': '3',
>> 'WarnAsError': 'true',
>> 'DebugInformationFormat': '3',
>>   },
>> ...
>>
>> If that's not what everyone else is doing, please let me know.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:11 PM, PhistucK  wrote:
>>
>>> Where exactly do I add "/MP" (using Visual Basic Professional 2005)? (I
>>> know extremely little about the whole environment..)
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> ☆PhistucK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 20:08, Peter Kasting wrote:
>>>
 On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Mohamed Mansour wrote:

> It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
> incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.
>

 Note: /MP is "multiprocess build", not "incremental build".

 PK

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: [Windows CRichEditCtrl] question on parenthesis handling in right-to-Left CRichEditCtrl

[Peter Kasting]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Xiaomei Ji  wrote:

> 2. If CRichEditCtrl does not support this out of the box, we can do the
> dirty and hard work to make it work. It wont be easy since we need to handle
> all kinds of opening/closing punctuations, and we need back-trace to change
> the punctuation depending on the surrounding characters (for example, after
> "abc", U+0028 will be displayed as ")", but if we type in "d", ")" need to
> be changed to "(".), and we might need some states-saving as well. I think
> the performance in textfield and omnibox will be degraded a lot by those. Is
> there any better way?
>

The better way is "use a WebKit textfield instead of a native control to
provide the UI here".

This was something I had hoped to prototype in Q2 but didn't get to.  Help
welcomed.  Talk with Darin (Fisher) if you're interested.

PK

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[Jeremy Orlow]

Actually, there are a couple spots to edit:
http://codereview.chromium.org/155057  -- maybe more

Is it time to make this default yet?  It speeds up the build considerably
and almost everyone uses it now.  It does make things a bit less
deterministic, but you can always clobber build if something gets into a bad
state.  And it's _much_ faster.

J

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Tommi  wrote:

> Don't know if this is what most do but I ended up adding it to
> build\common.gpyi (line 471 in my case)
> ...
>   'VCCLCompilerTool': {
> *'AdditionalOptions': '/MP',*
> 'MinimalRebuild': 'false',
> 'ExceptionHandling': '0',
> 'BufferSecurityCheck': 'true',
> 'EnableFunctionLevelLinking': 'true',
> 'RuntimeTypeInfo': 'false',
> 'WarningLevel': '3',
> 'WarnAsError': 'true',
> 'DebugInformationFormat': '3',
>   },
> ...
>
> If that's not what everyone else is doing, please let me know.
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:11 PM, PhistucK  wrote:
>
>> Where exactly do I add "/MP" (using Visual Basic Professional 2005)?(I
>> know extremely little about the whole environment..)
>>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> ☆PhistucK
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 20:08, Peter Kasting wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Mohamed Mansour wrote:
>>>
 It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
 incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.

>>>
>>> Note: /MP is "multiprocess build", not "incremental build".
>>>
>>> PK
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[Finnur Thorarinsson]

Glad to hear its fixed.-F

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:40, Thiago Farina  wrote:

>
> I was having exactly this problem. With this configuration, now when
> I
> click F5 (with chrome as my startup project) VS build only the
> project and dependencies, no more the projects tests.
>
> Thanks for your hint, it was exactly what I was looking for to avoid
> the compilation of project tests(that are not necessary for me to
> debug chromium).
>
> On Jul 3, 2:04 pm, Finnur Thorarinsson  wrote:
> > I had a similar problem on VS 2005, maybe it is the same as yours. Turned
> > out VS was set to build everything as opposed to just building what the
> > project depended on.
> > Not sure how to do it in VS2008, but in VS 2005, under Tools \ Options,
> go
> > to: Projects and Solutions \ Build and Run
> > Make sure "Only build startup projects and dependencies on Run" is
> checked.
> >
> > Then (if you make sure chrome is set as the startup project) it should
> not
> > be building all those tests.
> >
> > Hope that helps.
> >
> > Finnur
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 09:32, Mohamed Mansour  wrote:
> > > It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
> > > incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as
> well.
> > > -- Mohamed Mansour
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, PhistucK  wrote:
> >
> > >> At least in Visual Studio 2005, you can right click on the solution
> and in
> > >> "Configuration Options" (or something like that), you can select what
> to
> > >> build and what not to build.It does speed up the compiling process by
> at
> > >> least half (for me). It still, generally, takes a lot of time.
> >
> > >> ☆PhistucK
> >
> > >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:21, Thiago Farina  >wrote:
> >
> > >>> Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in
> > >>> Visual Studio 2008?
> >
> > >>> Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long
> > >>> time to compile and build project test with him.
> >
> > >>> How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests,
> > >>> interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe)
> > >>> project?
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: Is there an option to block file downloads in Chromium?

[Marc-Antoine Ruel]

Since you're building your own fork, you could simply disable the code by
adding the #ifdef at the right places. You could use git to more easily
manage the merge tracking.
You could also setup a continuous build but note that our buildbot code
doesn't support git at the moment.
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/testing/chromium-build-infrastructure

M-A

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Cowx  wrote:

>
> Yeah, it would be an administrative feature for a version of Chromium
> that is being developed for Library use. The library admins don't want
> users to be able to download files.
>
> On Jul 3, 10:26 am, Peter Kasting  wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Daniel Cowx 
> wrote:
> > > If not, where would be the most logical place to add this
> > > functionality?
> >
> > No, and I Don't Know, but presumably "as an extension", assuming we have
> an
> > API or proposed API that allows an extension to respond to queries like
> > "what should the disposition of the link be".
> >
> > PK
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[Thiago Farina]

I was having exactly this problem. With this configuration, now when
I
click F5 (with chrome as my startup project) VS build only the
project and dependencies, no more the projects tests.

Thanks for your hint, it was exactly what I was looking for to avoid
the compilation of project tests(that are not necessary for me to
debug chromium).

On Jul 3, 2:04 pm, Finnur Thorarinsson  wrote:
> I had a similar problem on VS 2005, maybe it is the same as yours. Turned
> out VS was set to build everything as opposed to just building what the
> project depended on.
> Not sure how to do it in VS2008, but in VS 2005, under Tools \ Options, go
> to: Projects and Solutions \ Build and Run
> Make sure "Only build startup projects and dependencies on Run" is checked.
>
> Then (if you make sure chrome is set as the startup project) it should not
> be building all those tests.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Finnur
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 09:32, Mohamed Mansour  wrote:
> > It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
> > incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.
> > -- Mohamed Mansour
>
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, PhistucK  wrote:
>
> >> At least in Visual Studio 2005, you can right click on the solution and in
> >> "Configuration Options" (or something like that), you can select what to
> >> build and what not to build.It does speed up the compiling process by at
> >> least half (for me). It still, generally, takes a lot of time.
>
> >> ☆PhistucK
>
> >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:21, Thiago Farina wrote:
>
> >>> Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in
> >>> Visual Studio 2008?
>
> >>> Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long
> >>> time to compile and build project test with him.
>
> >>> How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests,
> >>> interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe)
> >>> project?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[Thiago Farina]

I was having exactly this problem. It this configuration now when I
click F5 (with chrome as my startup project) they build only the
project and dependencies, no more the projects tests.

Thanks for your hint, it was exactly what I was looking for to avoid
the compilation of project tests(that are not necessary for me to
debug chromium).

On Jul 3, 2:04 pm, Finnur Thorarinsson  wrote:
> I had a similar problem on VS 2005, maybe it is the same as yours. Turned
> out VS was set to build everything as opposed to just building what the
> project depended on.
> Not sure how to do it in VS2008, but in VS 2005, under Tools \ Options, go
> to: Projects and Solutions \ Build and Run
> Make sure "Only build startup projects and dependencies on Run" is checked.
>
> Then (if you make sure chrome is set as the startup project) it should not
> be building all those tests.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Finnur
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 09:32, Mohamed Mansour  wrote:
> > It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
> > incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.
> > -- Mohamed Mansour
>
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, PhistucK  wrote:
>
> >> At least in Visual Studio 2005, you can right click on the solution and in
> >> "Configuration Options" (or something like that), you can select what to
> >> build and what not to build.It does speed up the compiling process by at
> >> least half (for me). It still, generally, takes a lot of time.
>
> >> ☆PhistucK
>
> >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:21, Thiago Farina wrote:
>
> >>> Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in
> >>> Visual Studio 2008?
>
> >>> Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long
> >>> time to compile and build project test with him.
>
> >>> How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests,
> >>> interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe)
> >>> project?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: Is there an option to block file downloads in Chromium?

[Daniel Cowx]

Yeah, it would be an administrative feature for a version of Chromium
that is being developed for Library use. The library admins don't want
users to be able to download files.

On Jul 3, 10:26 am, Peter Kasting  wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Daniel Cowx  wrote:
> > If not, where would be the most logical place to add this
> > functionality?
>
> No, and I Don't Know, but presumably "as an extension", assuming we have an
> API or proposed API that allows an extension to respond to queries like
> "what should the disposition of the link be".
>
> PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: Is there an option to block file downloads in Chromium?

[Peter Kasting]

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Daniel Cowx  wrote:

> If not, where would be the most logical place to add this
> functionality?


No, and I Don't Know, but presumably "as an extension", assuming we have an
API or proposed API that allows an extension to respond to queries like
"what should the disposition of the link be".

PK

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: Is there an option to block file downloads in Chromium?

[PhistucK]

Are you referring to some kind of an administrative feature that will not
allow the user to download, even if one wants to?
☆PhistucK


On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 20:22, Daniel Cowx  wrote:

>
> If not, where would be the most logical place to add this
> functionality?
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Is there an option to block file downloads in Chromium?

[Daniel Cowx]

If not, where would be the most logical place to add this
functionality?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[Tommi]

Don't know if this is what most do but I ended up adding it to
build\common.gpyi (line 471 in my case)
...
  'VCCLCompilerTool': {
*'AdditionalOptions': '/MP',*
'MinimalRebuild': 'false',
'ExceptionHandling': '0',
'BufferSecurityCheck': 'true',
'EnableFunctionLevelLinking': 'true',
'RuntimeTypeInfo': 'false',
'WarningLevel': '3',
'WarnAsError': 'true',
'DebugInformationFormat': '3',
  },
...

If that's not what everyone else is doing, please let me know.

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:11 PM, PhistucK  wrote:

> Where exactly do I add "/MP" (using Visual Basic Professional 2005)?(I
> know extremely little about the whole environment..)
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> ☆PhistucK
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 20:08, Peter Kasting  wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Mohamed Mansour  wrote:
>>
>>> It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
>>> incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.
>>>
>>
>> Note: /MP is "multiprocess build", not "incremental build".
>>
>> PK
>>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[PhistucK]

Where exactly do I add "/MP" (using Visual Basic Professional 2005)?(I know
extremely little about the whole environment..)


Thank you.

☆PhistucK


On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 20:08, Peter Kasting  wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Mohamed Mansour  wrote:
>
>> It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
>> incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.
>>
>
> Note: /MP is "multiprocess build", not "incremental build".
>
> PK
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[Peter Kasting]

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Mohamed Mansour  wrote:

> It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
> incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.
>

Note: /MP is "multiprocess build", not "incremental build".

PK

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[Finnur Thorarinsson]

I had a similar problem on VS 2005, maybe it is the same as yours. Turned
out VS was set to build everything as opposed to just building what the
project depended on.
Not sure how to do it in VS2008, but in VS 2005, under Tools \ Options, go
to: Projects and Solutions \ Build and Run
Make sure "Only build startup projects and dependencies on Run" is checked.

Then (if you make sure chrome is set as the startup project) it should not
be building all those tests.

Hope that helps.

Finnur

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 09:32, Mohamed Mansour  wrote:

> It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
> incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.
> -- Mohamed Mansour
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, PhistucK  wrote:
>
>> At least in Visual Studio 2005, you can right click on the solution and in
>> "Configuration Options" (or something like that), you can select what to
>> build and what not to build.It does speed up the compiling process by at
>> least half (for me). It still, generally, takes a lot of time.
>>
>> ☆PhistucK
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:21, Thiago Farina wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in
>>> Visual Studio 2008?
>>>
>>> Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long
>>> time to compile and build project test with him.
>>>
>>> How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests,
>>> interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe)
>>> project?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[Mohamed Mansour]

It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.
-- Mohamed Mansour


On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, PhistucK  wrote:

> At least in Visual Studio 2005, you can right click on the solution and in
> "Configuration Options" (or something like that), you can select what to
> build and what not to build.It does speed up the compiling process by at
> least half (for me). It still, generally, takes a lot of time.
>
> ☆PhistucK
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:21, Thiago Farina wrote:
>
>>
>> Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in
>> Visual Studio 2008?
>>
>> Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long
>> time to compile and build project test with him.
>>
>> How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests,
>> interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe)
>> project?
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process

[PhistucK]

At least in Visual Studio 2005, you can right click on the solution and in
"Configuration Options" (or something like that), you can select what to
build and what not to build.It does speed up the compiling process by at
least half (for me). It still, generally, takes a lot of time.

☆PhistucK


On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:21, Thiago Farina  wrote:

>
> Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in
> Visual Studio 2008?
>
> Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long
> time to compile and build project test with him.
>
> How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests,
> interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe)
> project?
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] F5 Debug process

[Thiago Farina]

Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in
Visual Studio 2008?

Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long
time to compile and build project test with him.

How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests,
interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe)
project?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[chromium-dev] Re: changing chrome_exe to chrome, converting chrome.exe to gyp

[Dean McNamee]

Hey Bradley,

Thanks, I can build again from the command line.  My CPU utilization
is still annoying low.  I made sure and NUM_CPUS is 4.  Compare this
to the Linux make build, which keeps my 4 cores at 100% cpu all the
way through.

Thanks
-- dean

On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Bradley Nelson wrote:
> Hi Dean,
> So I've dropped in a change that switches directories to have name like:
> (base)
> (test_shell)
> This will allow you to run things at the command line again.
> I don't find this choice particularly ascetic myself. But the options where
> limited, because the following characters cannot appear in solution folder
> names:
> / ? : & \ * " < > | # %
> Let me know if you run into any more problems with this.
> Also definitely let me know if someone thinks of something less ugly.
> -BradN
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Dean McNamee  wrote:
>>
>> This also broke building from the command line.
>>
>> I usually never open Visual Studio as an IDE.  I build on the command
>> line with something like:
>>
>> devenv chrome\\chrome.sln /Build release /Project test_shell
>>
>> It looks like project names like test_shell now have complicated names
>> like "test_shell (webkit\tools\test_shell\test_shell)", and I haven't
>> been able to manage supplying those on the command line.
>>
>> Is there a way we can get back our nice project names "test_shell",
>> "chrome", etc?
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Andrew Scherkus
>> wrote:
>> > Here's a quick example:
>> >  1) Delete whole Debug directory
>> >  2) gclient runhooks --force
>> >  3) Set test_shell as startup project
>> >  4) Hit F5
>> > Sample output of things that shouldn't be dependencies (mostly because
>> > they're other executables)
>> >     sandbox (sandbox\sandbox) - Debug Win32
>> >     chrome_dll - Debug Win32
>> >     net_perftests - Debug Win32
>> >     base_unittests - Debug Win32
>> >     net_unittests - Debug Win32
>> >     v8_shell - Debug Win32
>> >     mini_installer - Debug Win32
>> >     test_support_unit - Debug Win32
>> >     test_support_ui - Debug Win32
>> >     codesighs (third_party\codesighs\codesighs) - Debug Win32
>> >     automated_ui_tests - Debug Win32
>> >     memory_test - Debug Win32
>> >     activex_test_control - Debug Win32
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Bradley Nelson 
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Andrew, can you give an example of something that built that shouldn't
>> >> have for test_shell?  Maybe we have some overspecified dependencies as
>> >> well.
>> >>
>> >> -BradN
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Andrew Scherkus
>> >> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I'll see if I can repro this again before filing a bug, but similar to
>> >>> what Daniel and John reported, when I right click on test_shell and
>> >>> say
>> >>> Build it builds the minimal set required to fully build+link
>> >>> test_shell.exe
>> >>> However when I set test_shell as the start-up project and launch the
>> >>> debugger, Visual Studio warns that every other project in chrome.sln
>> >>> must be
>> >>>
>> >>> built before running (not true!).  Is there a difference in build vs. runtime dependencies?
>> >>> Andrew
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Steven Knight 
>> >>> wrote:
>> 
>>  All--
>>  When you notice missing dependencies, pleased add them to the
>>  necessary
>>  .gyp file(s)!  One of the main reasons we've been trying to land all
>>  this
>>  stuff is so that tracking down all these pieces isn't single-threaded
>>  through one person (or two).  If you're not comfortable making the
>>  change
>>  yourself, then please file a bug so the dependency problems get
>>  tracked and
>>  fixed in an organized fashion.
>>  Re:  unnecessary rebuilds:  please file bugs so they don't get lost.
>>   Please include the target you were building, and the the
>>  libs/targets that
>>  were rebuilt unnecessarily.  You don't have to be exhaustive about
>>  the list,
>>  it's more important here that at least some information gets
>>  collected and
>>  doesn't languish on the ML or get dropped on the floor.
>>  I'm working on a buildbot script that will test for missing
>>  dependencies
>>  by building every target from scratch individually, and will then
>>  test for
>>  unnecessary rebuilds by rebuilding each target after no updates.
>>   That's
>>  been taking a back seat to just getting the conversion completed, but
>>  I've
>>  accelerated my work on it as we wind down to the last few targets.
>>          --SK
>> 
>>  On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:11 PM, John Abd-El-Malek 
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:10 PM, John Abd-El-Malek
>> > 
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yeah it happened to me before as well, I just figured I'd complain
>> >> now..  Note another missing dependency is on crash_service.exe
>> >> , npapi_layout_test_plugin, and npapi_tes