Re: [c-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???
Only an idiot will make an important announcement on a Saturday. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matlock, Kenneth L Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 1:15 PM To: Drew Weaver; Derick Winkworth; Cisco NSP; juniper- n...@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Network Liberation Movement??? Gibberish, and marketing speak. My guess is a linux-based 'router' they're trying to sell to unsuspecting mom-and-pop businesses. Ken Matlock Network Analyst Exempla Healthcare (303) 467-4671 matlo...@exempla.org -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Drew Weaver Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 9:38 AM To: 'Derick Winkworth'; Cisco NSP; juniper-...@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Network Liberation Movement??? Just looks like a bunch of gibberish to me. -Drew -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Derick Winkworth Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 10:23 AM To: Cisco NSP; juniper-...@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Network Liberation Movement??? http://networkliberationmovement.net/ 15 hours some big announcement? Anyone know what this is? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] VRF and STATIC ROUTE to GLOBAL
I've been playing around with this command and the short answer with an example is: |CPE VRF|(11.0.0.2) Se1|PE ROUTER|POS2(10.0.0.2) [Internet] 1.1.1.1 PE ROUTER - ! whatever you need for VRF, mBGP, etc. ! to propagate your networks ! you may need to add the following: router bgp $ASN address-family ipv4 vrf ESNET redistribute static default-information originate ! ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Serial1 ip route vrf ESNET 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 POS2 10.0.0.2 global Disclaimer: Blame me, not my company, if I misread your question. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Fitzwater Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 1:56 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] VRF and STATIC ROUTE to GLOBAL This question was posted earlier, before I opened ticket with CISCO. Router is 6500 with 720-CXL running SXI code. 1. I have router A which is used to connect to our three ISPs ( two I1s and one I2 connection with full BGP), and also receives all our internal campus traffic via RIP default path.Router A announces default to campus. 2. I now need to add a new special ESNET.GOV ISP which cannot be used by the majority of our campus except for two subnets. These two subnets will still have access to the other three ISPs for normal path selection but have the option of choosing an ESNET route if needed. 3. So the original thinking was to create the VRF for ESNET which would have its own ESNET route table and tell the two special subnets (using route-map match subs, set vrf ) to check the ESNET table first and if route is not in table then fall thru to global. 4. I can't just have one route table that includes the ESNET routes, because ESNET announces some more specific routes and there may be hosts that normally use the I1 path to these DSTs, but now see a more specific path and try to use it and fail because it is not allowed by ESNET outbound ACL. I have BGP peering working in VRF ( can see prefixes from ESNET in VRF table), but cannot announce our two subnet prefixes because they do not show up in VRF route table. So getting static back to global would fix this and other issue with DEFAULT to global. When I try to add static routes they never show up because the next hop is not present in VRF table or the command fails stating that... Invalid next-hop address (it's this router). I was hoping that just adding a static DEFAULT in VRF pointing to global would do everything I needed, but cannot get it to work even after trying all permutations of the command. ip route vrf vrf-esnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 global Also tried ip route vrf vrf-esnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 loopback3 10.10.10.10 global Loopback3 was created with RFC-1918 IP and had vrf forwarding added on this loopback. This also failed. Creating an internal path between the VRF router and the global router is stopping all this from working. I have a ticket open with CISCO but they are saying I have to add an external link with two physical ports on vrf. This will not work for us. Does anybody know how to get statics working between VRF and global table, if its even possible. Really stuck! Jeff Fitzwater OIT Network Systems Princeton University ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] load balance between to EBGP peers
You don't need the default route from your providers, just the full table. Inside your VRF, originate the default route locally from you ASBR and redistribute it to the rest of your routers (I'm assuming you are not sending the full table to the rest of the routers due to several limitations you may have there). To balance between your providers use any BGP attribute that may suit the purpose. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of moshe mizrachi Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 11:27 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] load balance between to EBGP peers Hi all , i have MPLS/VPN network based on 7600's . all the Internet is going via VRF-INTERNET , my ASBR gets full route from 2 peers via OC12 POS interfaces on VRF INTERNET , also he gets 0.0.0.0 route from both peers but of course only 1 gets to FIB . my target is to get load balance between the 2 peers(on the ASBR) in the outgoing traffic and to redistribute only 0.0.0.0 to VRF INTERNET to all the IBGP peers. what i see now is that the 0.0.0.0 gets label in the FIB of the ASBR pointing on one of the POS interface, so the other POS stay empty , with the show ip route vrf INTERNET 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 command i see the LB0 of the ASBR which is OK but the MPLS label table on the VRF INTERNET is pointing on the POS interface . i just want that the ASBR will route the traffic according to his full route table . so actually now i redistribute to all PE's /20 subnets for getting load balance , does someone have a good ides for this one ? regards moshe ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] How to match local IP address?
If you are not going to send connected routes out of you AS then do not distribute them. I'm assuming you are using an IGP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grzegorz Janoszka Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 12:26 PM To: David Prall Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] How to match local IP address? David Prall wrote: What exactly are you trying to do? Redistribute connected and redistribute static only match those, no need for a route-map. Or are you attempting to advertise these to a particular BGP peer? Announce connected network with no-export community - it may be lot of smaller prefixes. The big aggregate prefixes will be announced statically in other places. -- Grzegorz Janoszka ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Sub-interface question...
Frame relay, ATM ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Cartier Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:36 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Sub-interface question... I'm in an awkward situation where I've been given the task to investigate how to design MPLS vrf connections without using vlans define locally, and with using sub-interfaces. I'm unsure of how this is possible...any suggestions on where to look? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Platforms supporting FRF.16
Cisco NSPs, I was searching for the router models that support FRF16 and what I got at this point is 2500 (?), 2600, 3600, 7200, 7500 and 12000. Do you know any other model supporting this feature or shall I assume that after 12.4 all the routers support it? Regards, Tomas ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
