On 2005-05-29T18:46:43+0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/29/1547234
> Posted by: CmdrTaco, on 2005-05-29 16:07:00
>
>from the finally-i-have-to-ask-why dept.
>[1]Anil Kandangath writes "A Japanese firm has shown off new
>technology that enables GPS units to be embedded [2]in clothing that
>will enable the wearer to be tracked continuously. The device is thin
>enough to be tacked on unobtrusively and is powered by a thin watch
>battery.
As opposed to a thick watch battery?
>It is also capable of taking biometric measurements and
>[3]transmitting them PCs and handheld devices.
Is that english? I don't think the device transmits PCs and handheld
devices to biometric measurements.
>Though marketed as a device to enable people to keep track of
>spouses, how long before such technology becomes intrusive in our
>lives?" Like tracking your spouse is ok?. What a world!
I know that isn't english, and it's only marginally coherent.
I would much rather read a summary written by someone literate.
> References
>
>1. http://www.ecogito.net/anil
I don't see it.
>2. http://forgetmenotpanties.contagiousmedia.org/
>3. http://forgetmenotpanties.contagiousmedia.org/sensatech.html
Uh huh. This looks like a joke or a scam. Even if it's not, I have a
hard time believing that a girlfriend/wife/daughter is not going to
notice that in her panties, and I doubt sufficiently miniaturized GPS
receivers could be made for so little money.
Perhaps that's why Anil seems to have removed the entry in his blog?
Do you now understand why I hate redistribution of slashdot stories?
--
Unable to correct the source of the indignity to the Negro, [the Phoenix,
AZ public accommodations law prohibiting racial discrimination] redresses
the situation by placing a separate indignity on the proprietor. ... The
unwanted customer and the disliked proprietor are left glowering at one
another across the lunch counter. -William "Strom" Rehnquist, 1964-06-15
