Bug#256713: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#256713: Apache security update made my website disappear)

2004-07-14 Thread Ian Jackson
Debian Bug Tracking System writes ("Bug#256713 acknowledged by developer    
  (Re: Bug#256713: Apache security update made my website disappear)"):
> I am closing this bug since there has been no reaction from the submitter
> after my comments.

Um, it's only been a week.  I will get back to you very shortly.

Ian.




Processed: Re: Bug#256713 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#256713: Apache security update made my website disappear)

2004-07-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 256713
Bug#256713: Apache security update made my website disappear
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)




Re: Bug#256713: Apache security update made my website disappear

2004-07-06 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> In any case there is nothing left as a bug in here.

I am closing this bug since there has been no reaction from the submitter
after my comments.

-- 
 fajita: step one
 Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
 fajita: step two
 When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.




Re: Bug#256713: Apache security update made my website disappear

2004-06-28 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Ian Jackson wrote:

> Package: apache
> Version: 1.3.26-0woody5
>
> The security update to apache changed my httpd.conf and srm.conf in a
> way that meant my system's website disappeared.
>
> I did get offered `Save these changes to the configuration files? [Y/n]'
> and said yes, but:

You accepted a new configuration without checking it. It is exactly the
same as many other tools to handle configurations.

>  * Security updates should be safe.  In particular, security updates
>should be doable with less care, checking, presence of mind,
>etc. etc. than an elective upgrade.

Negative. Security updated fix a bit of the code. The rest of the package
stays the same. Please check:

http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-bug-security

for more information.

>  * The default should not be to override a user-changed configuration.

You asked for it once you told the script "Yes". You have been prompeted
and warned.

>  * The default should not be to disable an existing website by
>changing the DocumentRoot to the Debian default.

Same as above.

>  * The question was preceded by a large amount of largely irrelevant
>messages.

This is not true in sarge/sid anymore.

In any case there is nothing left as a bug in here.

Fabio

-- 
 fajita: step one
 Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
 fajita: step two
 When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.