Processed: Re: Bug#643297: [INTL:fa] Persian(farsi) D-I w32-loader translation
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 643297 win32-loader Bug #643297 [w32-loader] [INTL:fa] Persian(farsi) D-I w32-loader translation Warning: Unknown package 'w32-loader' Bug reassigned from package 'w32-loader' to 'win32-loader'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 643297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643297 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131710674830415.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#643295: [INTL:fa] Persian(farsi) D-I w32-loader translation
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 643295 win32-loader Bug #643295 [w32-loader] [INTL:fa] Persian(farsi) D-I w32-loader translation Warning: Unknown package 'w32-loader' Bug reassigned from package 'w32-loader' to 'win32-loader'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 643295: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643295 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131710677330452.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Installing on btrfs
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:04:46PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Matthijs Wensveen wrote: It seems that btrfs is supported since grub2 version 1.99~20110104-1: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/g/grub2/grub2_1.99-12/changelog#version1.99_20110104-1. The required module seems to be there: http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/amd64/grub-pc-bin/filelist. So, this might be a bug (omission or oversight) in debian-installer? Should I file a bug? Thanks for pointing that out. I've started making changes to remove the check for btrfs on /boot. I sort of wish that it were easier to make this code conditional on *both* the partition table setup *and* the boot loader in use (consider architectures that GRUB hasn't been ported to yet). This has long been problematic. The main problem is that when partman check.d scripts run we don't yet know what boot loader is going to be used; that decision is made later. I wonder if it would be worth integrating boot loader selection (not installation!) into partman? This wouldn't have to imply UI, except maybe in expert mode, but if we knew the answer to that question earlier we could make better decisions. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110927090419.gh19...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk
Re: [SRM] proposed stable update grub-installer
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 22:05 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 09:10:02PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 10:27 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: [allowing use GRUB legacy to be pre-seeded] The following patch restores this. I've just uploaded a matching patch to unstable, and would like to upload this to stable-proposed-updates. As discussed on IRC, please go ahead; thanks. OK, uploaded. Thanks. For the record, the upload was accepted last night and has already built everywhere. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1317116283.7282.40.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Bug#637111: pu: package freebsd-libs/8.1-6
-boot: ping? On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 13:04 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 14:51 +, Robert Millan wrote: * Move libsbuf.so.0 to /lib (needed by /sbin/zfs and /sbin/zpool). (Closes: #637100) * Move libipx.so.2 to /lib (needed by ifconfig). Have the portions of this change which affect the udebs been run past the d-i team? They're in testing and being used for new builds already. In any case, D-I team please if you have any objection to libsbuf.so.0 and libipx.so.2 being in /lib, please let us know. These libraries are needed in /lib because zfs and zpool are linked with them, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636668#55 for the bug report. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1317116801.7282.45.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Installing on btrfs
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:04:46PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Matthijs Wensveen wrote: It seems that btrfs is supported since grub2 version 1.99~20110104-1: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/g/grub2/grub2_1.99-12/changelog#version1.99_20110104-1. The required module seems to be there: http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/amd64/grub-pc-bin/filelist. So, this might be a bug (omission or oversight) in debian-installer? Should I file a bug? Thanks for pointing that out. I've started making changes to remove the check for btrfs on /boot. I sort of wish that it were easier to make this code conditional on *both* the partition table setup *and* the boot loader in use (consider architectures that GRUB hasn't been ported to yet). This has long been problematic. The main problem is that when partman check.d scripts run we don't yet know what boot loader is going to be used; that decision is made later. I wonder if it would be worth integrating boot loader selection (not installation!) into partman? This wouldn't have to imply UI, except maybe in expert mode, but if we knew the answer to that question earlier we could make better decisions. I was sort of thinking along the same lines, except with less technical knowledge. Might it be possible to do the boot loader selection *before* partman, and set some state (environment variable or something) that is checked in a check.d script? Then after that, a step Install the selected boot loader would actually install it (or not when the user selected so). But this is beside the fact that grub seems to support btrfs currently (on i386 and amd64 at least). Matthijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CABkA_9vT2mBDUhTpJnA5duftq4pL53W+dg6jWkov7oHa...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Installing on btrfs
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 02:09:29PM +0200, Matthijs Wensveen wrote: I was sort of thinking along the same lines, except with less technical knowledge. Might it be possible to do the boot loader selection *before* partman, It can't be before partman because boot loader selection often depends on partitioning; for example GRUB Legacy has a more restricted range of filesystems it understands than GRUB 2 does, doesn't understand LVM, etc. If we want to have boot loader selection available by the time check.d scripts run, it has to be done during partman. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110927122741.ga27...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk
Bug#642362: marked as done (win32-loader: Please update Spanish translation)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:48:26 + with message-id e1r8y1k-0001pq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#642362: fixed in win32-loader 0.7.4.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #642362, regarding win32-loader: Please update Spanish translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 642362: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642362 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: win32-loader Version: 0.7.4.1 Priority: wishlist Tags: l10n patch Please find attached a diff to update the existing Spanish translation in GIT so that it is 100% translated. Regards Javier diff --git a/l10n/po/es.po b/l10n/po/es.po index 610224d..5d3d2db 100644 --- a/l10n/po/es.po +++ b/l10n/po/es.po @@ -4,8 +4,10 @@ # # Changes: # - Initial translation -# Javier Fernández-Sanguino , 2007 +# Javier Fernández-Sanguino, 2007 # - Reviewers: Fernando Cerezal +# - Updated by: +# Javier Fernández-Sanguino, 2008-2011 # # # Traductores, si no conoce el formato PO, merece la pena leer la @@ -35,7 +37,7 @@ msgstr Project-Id-Version: win32-loader\n Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n POT-Creation-Date: 2011-02-21 17:01+\n -PO-Revision-Date: 2010-08-08 03:00+0200\n +PO-Revision-Date: 2011-09-21 23:51+0200\n Last-Translator: Javier Fernández-Sanguino j...@debian.org\n Language-Team: Debian Spanish debian-l10n-span...@lists.debian.org\n Language: \n @@ -87,9 +89,9 @@ msgstr Spanish #. applies, limit yourself to ascii. $target_distro; will be Debian and $kernel_name; #. will be either GNU/Linux or GNU/kFreeBSD (in ASCII) #: win32-loader.sh:82 -#, fuzzy, sh-format +#, sh-format msgid $target_distro $kernel_name - Continue with install process -msgstr Continuar con el proceso de instalación +msgstr $target_distro $kernel_name - Continuar con el proceso de instalación #. translate: #. IMPORTANT: only the subset of UTF-8 that can be converted to NTLDR charset @@ -97,7 +99,7 @@ msgstr Continuar con el proceso de instalación #. applies, limit yourself to ascii. #: win32-loader.sh:88 msgid PXE - Network boot -msgstr +msgstr PXE - Arranque de red #. translate: #. The nlf file for your language should be found in @@ -112,9 +114,8 @@ msgstr Spanish.nlf #. Ampersands () are _forbidden_ in that string. #. #: win32-loader.c:75 -#, fuzzy msgid Debian-Installer loader -msgstr Cargador del instalador +msgstr Cargador del instalador de Debian #: win32-loader.c:76 msgid Cannot find win32-loader.ini. @@ -251,7 +252,7 @@ msgstr #: win32-loader.c:96 msgid PXE mode: install a PXE loader to allow remote kernel loading. -msgstr +msgstr Modo PXE: instalar un cargador PXE para permitir la carga remota del núcleo. #: win32-loader.c:97 msgid Select action: @@ -396,14 +397,14 @@ msgstr Error: no se ha podido copiar $0 a $1. #. #: win32-loader.c:141 msgid Checking GPG signature on $0. -msgstr +msgstr Comprobando la firma GPG de $0. #. translate: #. $0 will be Release (it is a filename). #. #: win32-loader.c:146 msgid The downloaded $0 file cannot be trusted! Aborting. -msgstr +msgstr ¡No se puede confiar en el archivo descargado $0! Interrumpiendo. #. translate: #. This appears in a MessageBox when the md5 checksum verification failed. $0 is a url; $2 is the filename $1 is the @@ -411,14 +412,14 @@ msgstr #. #: win32-loader.c:152 msgid Checksum mismatch for $0/$2. Got $1 when expecting $4. Aborting. -msgstr +msgstr Fallo en la suma de control de $0/$2. Se obtuvo $1 cuando se esperaba $4. Interrumpiendo. #. translate: #. $2 is a filename #. #: win32-loader.c:157 msgid Computing checksum for $2 -msgstr +msgstr Calculando la suma de control para $2 #: win32-loader.c:158 msgid Generating $0 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: win32-loader Source-Version: 0.7.4.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of win32-loader, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: win32-loader_0.7.4.2.dsc to main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.7.4.2.dsc win32-loader_0.7.4.2.tar.bz2 to main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.7.4.2.tar.bz2 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.deb to main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.deb win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.exe byhand win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.txt byhand A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 642...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the
Bug#643295: marked as done ([INTL:fa] Persian(farsi) D-I w32-loader translation)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:48:26 + with message-id e1r8y1k-0001pw...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#643295: fixed in win32-loader 0.7.4.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #643295, regarding [INTL:fa] Persian(farsi) D-I w32-loader translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 643295: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643295 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: w32-loader Version: N/A Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n patch Please find attached the Persian (Farsi) translation of the w32-loader package. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: win32-loader Source-Version: 0.7.4.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of win32-loader, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: win32-loader_0.7.4.2.dsc to main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.7.4.2.dsc win32-loader_0.7.4.2.tar.bz2 to main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.7.4.2.tar.bz2 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.deb to main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.deb win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.exe byhand win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.txt byhand A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 643...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Didier Raboud o...@debian.org (supplier of updated win32-loader package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:08:48 +0200 Source: win32-loader Binary: win32-loader Architecture: source all Version: 0.7.4.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Didier Raboud o...@debian.org Changed-By: Didier Raboud o...@debian.org Description: win32-loader - Debian-Installer loader for win32 Closes: 642362 643295 643297 Changes: win32-loader (0.7.4.2) unstable; urgency=low . The « شراب » release. . * Updated translations: - Turkish (hadi canım) - Dutch (Jeroen Schot) - Spanish (Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, Closes: #642362) - Persian (New, behrad eslami, Closes: #643297, #643295) * Use the -c iconv option to be more fault-tolerant with weird translation files. * Refresh translations. Checksums-Sha1: 898df0ed5dba38da0bf9ed1808923f1433c90b34 1686 win32-loader_0.7.4.2.dsc a7e2517af995f454bdb0c37e11805335c5102d56 251230 win32-loader_0.7.4.2.tar.bz2 bc8dac45250a128adbd1d3f84de0a31ab115d892 487200 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.deb e74900e5d31a3d08d0c05eb3626dcf7a1cc6724f 933282 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.exe 1faf4585ff1079375c4e161ddb4c1f29442450aa 4349 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.txt Checksums-Sha256: 82f933e1d1abea980d60825cd2cf62bf0a71d001cfc80ad32093a596d645efac 1686 win32-loader_0.7.4.2.dsc ba1b583b961727e5a05b812cbdb8f0a96d26b745bf5ea6c8cb584804794b8d7f 251230 win32-loader_0.7.4.2.tar.bz2 cbc6a7fe830672be04491a8c2e98041a80dbbcaba437583905809d3c6a48b4b8 487200 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.deb ab3d7628bc5a374642ada771afe4ba220f084d61b479b2b32162655f37c6feac 933282 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.exe c757d1b56dbf77ba3ac67499a46fa397a18663b63998faf4e302fcf8f15d892d 4349 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.txt Files: 135bf687032de9b713a9f5f812e4b5b7 1686 utils extra win32-loader_0.7.4.2.dsc 5cb15ae61cbbdde4999e6bbef211c305 251230 utils extra win32-loader_0.7.4.2.tar.bz2 2cd8c0c8e87ea43a5f6a854049d9d2c4 487200 utils extra win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.deb a38dbc51b5eca15600feb50efef43267 933282 byhand - win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.exe 079e47028dd790d0d3d55170265035e8 4349 byhand - win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.txt -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQGcBAEBCAAGBQJOgdBtAAoJEIvPpx7KFjRVeu0MAIa+fHV+C7FH05AiaylKmWY+ nXJGh2ukbucdpbulwTB7enspghEQeaHtf+xZ/CKwMaZiDhHv5ZHXjpelMQQyx6ko uRQXNXyKS+2ESaun2VumASOWJf2URs/1+QaIabImeex5C+bUK+2+jkwZeXU1uYgT 4zDGMNVp7ZD14S7/M7nMYkNttpLBNfAfGr1vjJ5Pz8ke+i2BY3ydIPEgfyz2m0Ic Tq+qKtQTRx8FrT7hamIOn7qtQcJY2rrdOA76Wn/XXQrrSGktGQq9yE8FRcYpp3Ai BMQL4QRO9qIoeZxnTrUDpIoS45PAtb7LhEUpjzNbhHzGBFXq6alhbHEP1xRTI2GZ DKnDaDW+1TGNZGq4thlrDRKtyV9rgtlINa+7zTuiBItwRO0WFE99lK25yTHp9n2p 27QK0fycHFJK+WllJhj4T4ASxpGM++iMBRsPhZdHXW0seHiKke6Mz3gr9yT3KN6L XHjWb8rDeuHns+PNHK7D+61pRkHcY1jReTczwY1SWg== =1R/c -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#643297: marked as done ([INTL:fa] Persian(farsi) D-I w32-loader translation)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:48:26 + with message-id e1r8y1k-0001q1...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#643297: fixed in win32-loader 0.7.4.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #643297, regarding [INTL:fa] Persian(farsi) D-I w32-loader translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 643297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643297 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: w32-loader Version: N/A Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n patch Please find attached the Persian (Farsi) translation of the w32-loader package. w32-loader.po Description: Binary data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: win32-loader Source-Version: 0.7.4.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of win32-loader, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: win32-loader_0.7.4.2.dsc to main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.7.4.2.dsc win32-loader_0.7.4.2.tar.bz2 to main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.7.4.2.tar.bz2 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.deb to main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.deb win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.exe byhand win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.txt byhand A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 643...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Didier Raboud o...@debian.org (supplier of updated win32-loader package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:08:48 +0200 Source: win32-loader Binary: win32-loader Architecture: source all Version: 0.7.4.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Didier Raboud o...@debian.org Changed-By: Didier Raboud o...@debian.org Description: win32-loader - Debian-Installer loader for win32 Closes: 642362 643295 643297 Changes: win32-loader (0.7.4.2) unstable; urgency=low . The « شراب » release. . * Updated translations: - Turkish (hadi canım) - Dutch (Jeroen Schot) - Spanish (Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, Closes: #642362) - Persian (New, behrad eslami, Closes: #643297, #643295) * Use the -c iconv option to be more fault-tolerant with weird translation files. * Refresh translations. Checksums-Sha1: 898df0ed5dba38da0bf9ed1808923f1433c90b34 1686 win32-loader_0.7.4.2.dsc a7e2517af995f454bdb0c37e11805335c5102d56 251230 win32-loader_0.7.4.2.tar.bz2 bc8dac45250a128adbd1d3f84de0a31ab115d892 487200 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.deb e74900e5d31a3d08d0c05eb3626dcf7a1cc6724f 933282 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.exe 1faf4585ff1079375c4e161ddb4c1f29442450aa 4349 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.txt Checksums-Sha256: 82f933e1d1abea980d60825cd2cf62bf0a71d001cfc80ad32093a596d645efac 1686 win32-loader_0.7.4.2.dsc ba1b583b961727e5a05b812cbdb8f0a96d26b745bf5ea6c8cb584804794b8d7f 251230 win32-loader_0.7.4.2.tar.bz2 cbc6a7fe830672be04491a8c2e98041a80dbbcaba437583905809d3c6a48b4b8 487200 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.deb ab3d7628bc5a374642ada771afe4ba220f084d61b479b2b32162655f37c6feac 933282 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.exe c757d1b56dbf77ba3ac67499a46fa397a18663b63998faf4e302fcf8f15d892d 4349 win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.txt Files: 135bf687032de9b713a9f5f812e4b5b7 1686 utils extra win32-loader_0.7.4.2.dsc 5cb15ae61cbbdde4999e6bbef211c305 251230 utils extra win32-loader_0.7.4.2.tar.bz2 2cd8c0c8e87ea43a5f6a854049d9d2c4 487200 utils extra win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.deb a38dbc51b5eca15600feb50efef43267 933282 byhand - win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.exe 079e47028dd790d0d3d55170265035e8 4349 byhand - win32-loader_0.7.4.2_all.txt -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQGcBAEBCAAGBQJOgdBtAAoJEIvPpx7KFjRVeu0MAIa+fHV+C7FH05AiaylKmWY+ nXJGh2ukbucdpbulwTB7enspghEQeaHtf+xZ/CKwMaZiDhHv5ZHXjpelMQQyx6ko uRQXNXyKS+2ESaun2VumASOWJf2URs/1+QaIabImeex5C+bUK+2+jkwZeXU1uYgT 4zDGMNVp7ZD14S7/M7nMYkNttpLBNfAfGr1vjJ5Pz8ke+i2BY3ydIPEgfyz2m0Ic Tq+qKtQTRx8FrT7hamIOn7qtQcJY2rrdOA76Wn/XXQrrSGktGQq9yE8FRcYpp3Ai BMQL4QRO9qIoeZxnTrUDpIoS45PAtb7LhEUpjzNbhHzGBFXq6alhbHEP1xRTI2GZ DKnDaDW+1TGNZGq4thlrDRKtyV9rgtlINa+7zTuiBItwRO0WFE99lK25yTHp9n2p 27QK0fycHFJK+WllJhj4T4ASxpGM++iMBRsPhZdHXW0seHiKke6Mz3gr9yT3KN6L XHjWb8rDeuHns+PNHK7D+61pRkHcY1jReTczwY1SWg== =1R/c -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
s390 kernel-wedge failure
The first upload of linux-2.6 using kernel-wedge failed to build on s390 because 'kernel-wedge find-dups' failed. To summarise, the duplicated modules were: drivers/md/dm-mod.ko in: - crypto-dm-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di - md-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di - multipath-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di md-modules explicitly contains this and the others explicitly depend on it. drivers/s390/block/dasd_mod.ko in: - dasd-extra-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di - dasd-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di This is not explicitly contained in any package. But that doesn't seem to have been a problem previously. drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh.ko in: - multipath-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di - scsi-core-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di scsi-core-modules explicitly contains this and multipath-modules depends on it. drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.ko in: - multipath-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di - scsi-core-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di - scsi-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di scsi-core-modules explicitly contains this and the others depend on it. fs/mbcache.ko in: - core-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di - ext2-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di - ext3-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di - ext4-modules-3.1.0-rc7-s390x-di core-modules explicitly contains this and the others depend on it. Aside from dasd_mod, I don't understand these failures. (As for other architectures: so far amd64, i386, ia64 and mips have built successfully, while powerpc failed at an earlier stage.) Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#643012: Pentium M doesn't have the PAE flag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have executed x86info on my Notebook (x86info --all): x86info v1.25. Dave Jones 2001-2009 Feedback to da...@redhat.com. Need to be root to use specified options. Found 1 CPU -- EFamily: 0 EModel: 0 Family: 6 Model: 13 Stepping: 6 CPU Model: Pentium M (Dothan) [B-1] Processor name string: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.60GHz Type: 0 (Original OEM)Brand: 6 (Mobile Intel® Pentium® III processor) Number of cores per physical package=1 Number of logical processors per socket=1 Number of logical processors per core=1 APIC ID: 0x0 Package: 0 Core: 0 SMT ID 0 eax in: 0x, eax = 0002 ebx = 756e6547 ecx = 6c65746e edx = 49656e69 eax in: 0x0001, eax = 06d6 ebx = 0816 ecx = 0180 edx = afe9fbbf eax in: 0x0002, eax = 02b3b001 ebx = 00f0 ecx = edx = 2c04307d eax in: 0x8000, eax = 8004 ebx = ecx = edx = eax in: 0x8001, eax = ebx = ecx = edx = eax in: 0x8002, eax = 20202020 ebx = 20202020 ecx = 65746e49 edx = 2952286c eax in: 0x8003, eax = 6e655020 ebx = 6d756974 ecx = 20295228 edx = 7270204d eax in: 0x8004, eax = 7365636f ebx = 20726f73 ecx = 30362e31 edx = 007a4847 Cache info L1 Instruction cache: 32KB, 8-way associative. 64 byte line size. L1 Data cache: 32KB, 8-way associative. 64 byte line size. L2 cache: 2MB, 8-way associative. 64 byte line size. TLB info Instruction TLB: 4K pages, 4-way associative, 128 entries. Instruction TLB: 4MB pages, fully associative, 2 entries Data TLB: 4K pages, 4-way associative, 128 entries. Data TLB: 4MB pages, 4-way associative, 8 entries 64 byte prefetching. Feature flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat clflsh ds acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss tm pbe Extended feature flags: est tm2 Connector type: Micro-FCBGA 1.60GHz processor (estimate). Best regards Bernhard -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6B3TYACgkQLIf9UiHPz1o/KQCfbjG56qBSiXtraXNNr172KNwk Nv0AoLfSJm1dD/sKbwYpYVdH4thcZjfd =vlnW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e81dd37.8050...@yahoo.de
Re: s390 kernel-wedge failure
Ben Hutchings wrote: The first upload of linux-2.6 using kernel-wedge failed to build on s390 because 'kernel-wedge find-dups' failed. To summarise, the duplicated modules were: Aside from dasd_mod, I don't understand these failures. (As for other architectures: so far amd64, i386, ia64 and mips have built successfully, while powerpc failed at an earlier stage.) You missed $configdir in one place, so it was not finding the debian/installer/s390/modules/s390x/ directory, so did not know about udeb interdependencies. I've committed a fix to kernel-wedge. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: reassign 586887 to pkgsel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 586887 pkgsel Bug #586887 [debian-installer] cannot replace sudo by sudo-ldap when no root password has been set Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'pkgsel'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 586887: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586887 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13171434015537.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#586887: marked as done (cannot replace sudo by sudo-ldap when no root password has been set)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:17:14 + with message-id e1r8bho-0008f8...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#586887: fixed in debian-installer-utils 1.85 has caused the Debian Bug report #586887, regarding cannot replace sudo by sudo-ldap when no root password has been set to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 586887: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586887 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sudo Version: 1.7.2p7-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: debian-edu Hi, when installing a ltsp-server in debian-edu, the installation fails because sudo is removed and no root password set. This is caused by sudo.prerm which checks whether the root account is locked. Unfortunately this happens even if at the same time sudo-ldap is scheduled for installation. I'll try to find a workaround for the time being in the debian-edu installer, but perhaps there is a more general solution around. Regards, Andi -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages sudo depends on: ii libc6 2.11.1-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libpam-modules1.1.1-3Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam0g 1.1.1-3Pluggable Authentication Modules l sudo recommends no packages. sudo suggests no packages. -- Configuration Files: /etc/sudoers.d/README [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/sudoers.d/README' -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: debian-installer-utils Source-Version: 1.85 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of debian-installer-utils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: debian-installer-utils_1.85.dsc to main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.85.dsc debian-installer-utils_1.85.tar.gz to main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.85.tar.gz di-utils-exit-installer_1.85_all.udeb to main/d/debian-installer-utils/di-utils-exit-installer_1.85_all.udeb di-utils-mapdevfs_1.85_i386.udeb to main/d/debian-installer-utils/di-utils-mapdevfs_1.85_i386.udeb di-utils-reboot_1.85_all.udeb to main/d/debian-installer-utils/di-utils-reboot_1.85_all.udeb di-utils-shell_1.85_all.udeb to main/d/debian-installer-utils/di-utils-shell_1.85_all.udeb di-utils-terminfo_1.85_i386.udeb to main/d/debian-installer-utils/di-utils-terminfo_1.85_i386.udeb di-utils_1.85_i386.udeb to main/d/debian-installer-utils/di-utils_1.85_i386.udeb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 586...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org (supplier of updated debian-installer-utils package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:12:05 +0100 Source: debian-installer-utils Binary: di-utils-shell di-utils-reboot di-utils-exit-installer di-utils di-utils-mapdevfs di-utils-terminfo Architecture: source all i386 Version: 1.85 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org Description: di-utils - Miscellaneous utilities for the debian installer (udeb) di-utils-exit-installer - Exit installer (udeb) di-utils-mapdevfs - mapdevfs utility for the debian installer (udeb) di-utils-reboot - Reboot (udeb) di-utils-shell - Execute a shell (udeb) di-utils-terminfo - Terminfo entries needed by newt/slang in debian installer (udeb) Closes: 586887 Changes: debian-installer-utils (1.85) unstable; urgency=low . [ Samuel Thibault ] * Add SCSI HDD and CD-ROM detection on hurd-i386. . [ Colin Watson ] * chroot_setup.sh: Export SUDO_FORCE_REMOVE=yes, since removing sudo is never harmful during installation and is occasionally useful, e.g. when installing sudo-ldap (closes: #586887). .
Processing of debian-installer-utils_1.85_i386.changes
debian-installer-utils_1.85_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-utils_1.85.dsc debian-installer-utils_1.85.tar.gz di-utils-shell_1.85_all.udeb di-utils-reboot_1.85_all.udeb di-utils-exit-installer_1.85_all.udeb di-utils_1.85_i386.udeb di-utils-mapdevfs_1.85_i386.udeb di-utils-terminfo_1.85_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1r8bgy-00087j...@franck.debian.org
debian-installer-utils_1.85_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: debian-installer-utils_1.85.dsc to main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.85.dsc debian-installer-utils_1.85.tar.gz to main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.85.tar.gz di-utils-exit-installer_1.85_all.udeb to main/d/debian-installer-utils/di-utils-exit-installer_1.85_all.udeb di-utils-mapdevfs_1.85_i386.udeb to main/d/debian-installer-utils/di-utils-mapdevfs_1.85_i386.udeb di-utils-reboot_1.85_all.udeb to main/d/debian-installer-utils/di-utils-reboot_1.85_all.udeb di-utils-shell_1.85_all.udeb to main/d/debian-installer-utils/di-utils-shell_1.85_all.udeb di-utils-terminfo_1.85_i386.udeb to main/d/debian-installer-utils/di-utils-terminfo_1.85_i386.udeb di-utils_1.85_i386.udeb to main/d/debian-installer-utils/di-utils_1.85_i386.udeb Override entries for your package: debian-installer-utils_1.85.dsc - source debian-installer di-utils-exit-installer_1.85_all.udeb - extra debian-installer di-utils-mapdevfs_1.85_i386.udeb - standard debian-installer di-utils-reboot_1.85_all.udeb - standard debian-installer di-utils-shell_1.85_all.udeb - standard debian-installer di-utils-terminfo_1.85_i386.udeb - standard debian-installer di-utils_1.85_i386.udeb - standard debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 586887 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1r8bho-0008f2...@franck.debian.org
Bug#642574: bug report: partitions filesystems
The filesystems of my partitions are: /dev/sda1 - Ext4 (version 1.0) /dev/sda2 - NTFS /dev/sda4, /dev/sda5 are for swap space and /dev/sda3 is container for logical partitions. best regards -- Osvaldo.
Bug#642574: bug report: partitions filesystems
Hi, A Terça, 27 de Setembro de 2011 21:48:34 Osvaldo Navarro você escreveu: The filesystems of my partitions are: /dev/sda1 - Ext4 (version 1.0) /dev/sda2 - NTFS /dev/sda4, /dev/sda5 are for swap space and /dev/sda3 is container for logical partitions. best regards From your log it seems installer (iso-scan) tries to mount filesystems as ext3, ext2, reiserfs and fat and fails. As you have an ext4 filesystem I suspect it tries to mount it as ext3 but as the filesystem as unsupported ext4 features it fails. I have seen this error and cause reported in several distros in some googling so don't take this as 100% sure. In fact, if someone more experienced could comment on this would be great. iso-scan had a major rewrite after current stable being launched so it would be nice if you can try to install with current development images to check if the problem is solved in daily images. You can find those images on: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/ Sep 26 17:05:24 iso-scan: First pass: Look for ISOs near top-level of each filesystem. Sep 26 17:05:25 kernel: [ 10.684045] EXT2-fs: sda1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (240). Sep 26 17:05:25 kernel: [ 10.684240] EXT3-fs: sda1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (240). Sep 26 17:05:25 kernel: [ 10.684588] FAT: utf8 is not a recommended IO charset for FAT filesystems, filesystem will be case sensitive! Sep 26 17:05:25 iso-scan: Waiting for /dev/sda1 to possibly get ready.. -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best Regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201109272252.12361.el...@debianpt.org
