Bug#1073234: bookworm-pu: package gdk-pixbuf/2.42.10+dfsg-1+deb12u1

2024-06-14 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 5:18 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso  wrote:
>
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: bookworm
> X-Debbugs-Cc: gdk-pix...@packages.debian.org, Simon McVittie 
> , car...@debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:gdk-pixbuf
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Hi stable release managers, CC'ing Simon,
>
> [ Reason ]
> gdk-pixbuf is affected by CVE-2022-48622, a memory corruption via
> crafted .ani files, cf. #1071265.
>
> [ Impact ]
> At least denial of service but potentially as well arbitrary code
> execution. But we have classified in no-dsa and it does not warrant a
> DSA on its own.
>
> [ Tests ]
> Manual test against the poc in the upstream issue
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdk-pixbuf/-/issues/202 .
>
> [ Risks ]
> Isolated changes, and the fix has been exposed in sid and trixie.
>
> [ Checklist ]
>   [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
>   [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
>   [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
>   [x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable
>
> [ Changes ]
> Three commits cherry-picked from upstream:
>
>   * ANI: Reject files with multiple anih chunks (CVE-2022-48622)
> (Closes: #1071265)
>   * ANI: Reject files with multiple INAM or IART chunks
>   * ANI: Validate anih chunk size
>
> The two other commits are not for CVE-2022-48622 but additional
> hardening and fixing changes related to the ANI code.
>
> Simon, ideally we should do as well the fixup in bullseye, but I have
> not looked at that version yet.

Salvatore, I pushed commits a few days ago to the debian/bookworm and
debian/bullseye branches of
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gdk-pixbuf based directly on
similar work that had been done by Ubuntu Security but I hadn't made
time to do further testing and reach out to Debian Security. Do you
want to use those versions or the version you have prepared now?

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1073005: transmission: consider switching back to vendored libb64

2024-06-14 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 9:29 AM Alexandre Rossi  wrote:
> Regarding those valid points, because there is not reason to have the same
> source in multiple packages, there are only 2 paths compliant with the Debian
> policy:
>
> 1) Fix those points in src:libb64 for transmission and all rdepends
> 2) Remove src:libb64 from Debian and then vendor in transmission source
>
> I'll try to move towards 1) and see how it goes. So for now, this is a
> wontfix because against DFSG.

I agree that it would be helpful if many of these issues were fixed
for all users of libb64.

On the other hand, this does not fix the fact that libb64 has been
unmaintained since 2013 and therefore it still wouldn't be a good
candidate to complete Ubuntu's Main Inclusion process even if the
other issues were fixed. Therefore, Ubuntu will need to keep vendoring
libb64 in transmission. I am unaware of any maintained version of
libb64.

I disagree that this violates the Debian Free Software Guidelines
although it does violate what is normally considered "best practice"
in Debian development. However, there are many exceptions to this best
practice in Debian and there is a lot of vendored code. (Even after
your recent work, transmission still has vendored code and that is not
a DFSG violation). Notably, Debian ftpmasters routinely accept new
packages that have vendored code as long as the code is correctly
documented in debian/copyright (which had been done for transmission).
See https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCopies

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1073156: freerdp2: Add autopkgtest

2024-06-13 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: freerdp2
Version: 2.11.5+dfsg1-1
Tags: patch

Please apply this merge request to add autopkgtests for freerdp2. This
has previously been done for freerdp3.

https://salsa.debian.org/debian-remote-team/freerdp2/-/merge_requests/16

https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/freerdp3/

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1073151: rust-yoke: unsatisfiable dependency librust-yoke-derive-0.7-dev

2024-06-13 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-yoke
Version: 0.7.3-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: sylves...@debian.org
Control: block -1 by 1073146

librust-yoke-dev is uninstallable because it has Depends:
librust-yoke-derive-0.7-dev

It also has unsatisfiable Depends: librust-zerofrom-0.1+derive-dev
(see the blocking bug)

These issues are preventing rust-yoke from reaching Testing.

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-yoke
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/rust.html
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/state-dependency-does-not-exist.html#librust-yoke-dev

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1073145: rust-bcrypt: unsatisfiable dependency librust-getrandom-0.2+js-dev

2024-06-13 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-bcrypt
Version: 0.15.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:rust-getrandom
X-Debbugs-CC: b...@debian.org

librust-bcrypt-dev is uninstallable because it has Depends:
librust-getrandom-0.2+js-dev

While rust-getrandom 0.2 is packaged in Debian,
librust-getrandom-0.2+js-dev is not.

This issue is preventing rust-bcrypt from reaching Testing.

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-bcrypt
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/rust.html
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/state-dependency-does-not-exist.html#librust-bcrypt-dev

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1073146: rust-zerofrom: unsatisfiable dependency librust-zerofrom-derive-0.1-dev

2024-06-13 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-zerofrom
Version: 0.1.3-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: sylves...@debian.org

librust-zerofrom-dev is uninstallable because it has Depends:
librust-zerofrom-derive-0.1-dev

This issue is preventing rust-zerofrom from reaching Testing.

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-zerofrom
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/rust.html
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/state-dependency-does-not-exist.html#librust-zerofrom-dev

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1073077: krita: Fails to build with jpeg-xl 0.9

2024-06-12 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: krita
Version: 1:5.2.2+dfsg-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: jpeg...@packages.debian.org

krita fails to build with jpeg-xl 0.9 available in Debian Experimental.

I tried cherry-picking 2 patches which I thought might fix the issue
but the build still fails for me.

https://invent.kde.org/graphics/krita/-/commit/6ddb599
https://invent.kde.org/graphics/krita/-/commit/546765d

Build logs

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krita/1:5.2.2+dfsg-3build3
https://launchpad.net/~jbicha/+archive/ubuntu/arch2/+sourcepub/16216044/+listing-archive-extra

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1073069: magic-wormhole: Fails to build with Python 3.12

2024-06-12 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: magic-wormhole
Version: 0.13.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs

magic-wormhole 0.13.0-1 fails to build when the default Python 3 is
switched to 3.12 (as was done with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS and will happen in
Debian "soon").

This issue is fixed in magic-wormhole 0.14.0 so I recommend upgrading
to that version.

You can also close LP: #2068774 with your upload.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/2068774

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072821: wireshark: binNMUs revert t64 transition

2024-06-12 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 9:21 AM Bálint Réczey  wrote:
> I've just added sid and oracular. I can't recall any upload targeting
> devel in Ubuntu, but it may work, thus I can add that as well.
> I expect the next upstream SO version bump to take place this
> summer/autumn, thus the code is expected to be short-lived.
> Is there any better example of generating a t64 transitioned control
> file for one set of releases and a not transitioned one for backports?

I have seen 'devel' used for the upload series a few times in Ubuntu,
but it's unusual.

The simplest way to handle backporting is to ensure your package is
not built on affected 32-bit architectures (armel & armhf for Debian
release architectures).

I'm not aware of anyone attempting debian/rules tweaks like you did
for Debian Backports, but I've never worked with Debian Backports
either.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1073050: rdma-core: Fails to build on several architectures: dh_install missing files

2024-06-12 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rdma-core
Version: 52.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

rdma-core is failing to build on multiple architectures including the
release architectures armel and armhf.

Build logs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rdma-core

Build log excerpt
--
dh_install: warning: ibverbs-providers missing files: usr/lib/*/libhns.so.*
dh_install: warning: libibverbs-dev missing files:
usr/include/infiniband/hnsdv.h
dh_install: warning: libibverbs-dev missing files: usr/lib/*/libhns.a
dh_install: warning: libibverbs-dev missing files: usr/lib/*/libhns.so
dh_install: warning: libibverbs-dev missing files: usr/lib/*/pkgconfig/libhns.pc
dh_install: warning: libibverbs-dev missing files: usr/share/man/man3/hnsdv_*.3
dh_install: warning: libibverbs-dev missing files: usr/share/man/man7/hnsdv.7

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1073005: transmission: consider switching back to vendored libb64

2024-06-11 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: transmission
Version: 4.0.6+dfsg-1

transmission-gtk is included in Ubuntu Desktop's default install
(specifically the expanded install option). This means that
transmission-gtk is in Ubuntu main and all its dependencies must be in
Ubuntu main instead of in Ubuntu universe.

libb64 is in Ubuntu universe. After an initial review, I determined
that libb64 does not seem like a good candidate for Ubuntu's Main
Inclusion process [1]. Therefore, I will need to re-vendor libb64
inside the transmission package. If Debian does the same, then it
would be possible for Debian and Ubuntu to share the same packaging,
allowing package improvements to more quickly reach Ubuntu during the
part of Ubuntu's development cycle when automatic sync is enabled.

Specifically:
- libb64 has been unmaintained since 2013
https://sourceforge.net/p/libb64/git/commit_browser
- libb64 has several open bugs, some of which have security implications
https://sourceforge.net/p/libb64/bugs/
- libb64 is missing a pkgconfig file which is a relatively simple
standard way for other software to use libb64
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1534293
- The Debian packaging is not using simple dh rules. The packaging
seems to otherwise be fairly modern but it's more complicated than
typical Debian packages.
https://salsa.debian.org/alteholz/libb64/-/blob/master/debian/rules

Reference
--
[1] https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1073004: transmission-qt: Switch to qt6

2024-06-11 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: transmission-qt
Version: 4.0.6+dfsg-1

Please consider switching transmission-qt to build with Qt6 instead of
Qt5. I think the Debian Qt/KDE team is going to try to switch to KDE 6
in time for the next major release of Debian (Debian 13 "Trixie").
Therefore, as long as the transmission qt6 build works reasonably
well, I think it would be a better fit than the qt5 build.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072993: please add OnlyShowIn=GNOME;Unity; in com.mattjakeman.ExtensionManager.desktop

2024-06-11 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 8:54 AM xiao sheng wen  wrote:
>   The gnome-shell-extension-manager is only use in GNOME, so add field:
>
> OnlyShowIn=GNOME;Unity;

While this could be done as a Debian specific patch, this could be
useful to people using other distros too. Could you report this
request to the upstream project at
https://github.com/mjakeman/extension-manager/issues ?

Also, you could try to submit your own git merge request there for
this if you want.

Note that Unity does not use GNOME Shell at all so you don't want
Unity in the OnlyShowIn field.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070815: libdrm-intel1 should be compiled for arm64

2024-06-11 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: reopen -1
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 +ftbfs -patch

After this change, libdrm is failing to build on arm64.

Build log excerpt

dh_install: warning: Cannot find (any matches for)
"usr/lib/*/libdrm_intel.so.1*" (tried in ., debian/tmp)

dh_install: warning: libdrm-intel1 missing files: usr/lib/*/libdrm_intel.so.1*

Full build log
-
Click Build-Attempted at https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libdrm

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1052660: gst-plugins-bad1.0: Fails to build: netsim build test failing

2024-06-11 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 7:02 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort  wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 15:52:57 -0400 Jeremy Bicha  
> wrote:
> > Forwarded: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/issues/3000
> >
> > gst-plugins-bad1.0's elements_netsim build test began failing sometime
> > after July 6 but before August 15 because of a change in its build
> > depends.
> >
> > Also reported as https://launchpad.net/bugs/2037323
>
> I don't see this happening on the Debian buildds from looking at a few old 
> logs.
> Not sure if it's fixed or if it was specific to some buildd configuration, but
> for now let's downgrade the bug.

We simply ignore the test failure. Thank you for downgrading!

https://salsa.debian.org/gstreamer-team/gst-plugins-bad1.0/-/blob/master/debian/patches/Skip-failing-tests.patch

Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072914: xdg-terminal-exec: [Debdiff] Run upstream tests and provide manual page.

2024-06-10 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Thank you very much for adding the build test override and
autopkgtests. I have applied those improvements with minor tweaks.

Could you please forward the manpage upstream? I consider a missing
manpage to usually be a fairly minor Debian bug but I'd be happy to
cherry-pick that after it is accepted upstream.

Anyway, the manpage is a separate fix from the tests so in the future
I encourage you to split it into a separate commit or merge request
(or Debian bug).

Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1060474: Bug#1072960: pulseaudio: diff for NMU version 16.1+dfsg1-5.1

2024-06-10 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 6:24 PM Chris Hofstaedtler  wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for pulseaudio (versioned as 16.1+dfsg1-5.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.

Feel free to upload now without delay.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072963: jpeg-xl: Failing autopkgtests on non-amd64

2024-06-10 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: jpeg-xl
Version: 0.9.2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

jpeg-xl in experimental has autopkgtests that are failing on all
architectures except for amd64.

Specifically, the problem is that debian/libjxl-gdk-pixbuf.postinst
and debian/libjxl-gdk-pixbuf.postrm have hardcoded the amd64
architecture which means that libjxl-gdk-pixbuf is uninstallable on
architectures other than amd64.

https://ci.debian.net/packages/j/jpeg-xl/unstable/arm64/

https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/libjxl/-/blob/debian/experimental/debian/libjxl-gdk-pixbuf.postinst

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072943: jpeg-xl: Simplify symbols file

2024-06-10 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: jpeg-xl
Version: 0.9.2-6
Tags: patch

I'm submitting a merge request with multiple improvements to the
symbols file (most from Gianfranco Costamagna)

https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/libjxl/-/merge_requests/4

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072938: jupyterhub: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends python3-pydantic (>= 2)

2024-06-10 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: jupyterhub
Version: 5.0.0+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: block -1 by 1052028
Control: unblock 107192 by 1052028
X-Debbugs-CC: lola...@debian.org

jupyterhub is unable to build from source because it has
Build-Depends: python3-pydantic >=2 but the latest version of
python3-pydantic in Debian is 1.10.14.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072879: fonts-conf.5: some remarks and editorial fixes for this man page

2024-06-09 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: tags -1 upstream

On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 1:15 PM Bjarni Ingi Gislason  wrote:
> Package: fontconfig-config
> Version: 2.15.0-1.1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>* What led up to the situation?
>
>  Checking for defects with
>
> [test-]groff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -ww -b -z 

The manpage is generated by the upstream build, not by Debian-specific
code. Please work with upstream to fix manpage issues in fontconfig
rather than in Debian directly.

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/fontconfig/-/issues

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072821: wireshark: binNMUs revert t64 transition

2024-06-09 Thread Jeremy Bícha
That debian/rules code seems fragile. Beyond sid, it also doesn't
recognize several other valid upload targets: experimental, oracular
(for Ubuntu), devel (for Ubuntu), forky (not valid yet but it will be
the release after trixie).

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072863: RM: libpoppler-qt6-3t64 libpoppler-qt6-dev [i386] -- RoM; ANAIS for specific packages

2024-06-09 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: popp...@packages.debian.org, sramac...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:poppler

poppler's qt6 bindings are no longer built on i386. Previously, we
have already removed i386 binary packages for the 3 reverse
dependencies: photoqt, qpdfview, texworks after coordination with
their maintainers.

poppler's other binary packages are still built on i386 so please only
remove these 2 packages.

dak rm -R -b libpoppler-qt6-3t64 libpoppler-qt6-dev -a i386

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070972: epiphany-browser fails to render webpages - blank pages

2024-06-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 2:42 PM Dennis Camera
 wrote:
> I am seeing the same bug with Epiphany 43.1 on Debian bookworm (12.5)
> since upgrading libwebkit2gtk-4.1-0 from version 2.42.5 to 2.44.2.
>
> I attached the output of webkit://gpu at the end of this e-mail.

Thank you for the details. Please file a new bug for your issue even
though it might appear to be similar to an existing bug.

In your case, you are providing graphics details which can help if
this bug is specific to your graphics drivers. The original reporter
did not provide that information so it would be difficult to know
whether they are affected by a graphics driver bug.

More importantly, your issue is with Debian 12, but the original
report is about Debian Testing which has many differences compared to
Debian 12.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072835: jpeg-xl: Failing autopkgtests

2024-06-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: jpeg-xl
Version: 0.9.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

jpeg-xl in experimental has failing autopkgtests.

https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#jpeg-xl

https://ci.debian.net/packages/j/jpeg-xl/unstable/amd64/

autopkgtest log excerpt
==
md5sum: traffic_light-0-ec0.ppm: No such file or directory
traffic_light-0-ec0.ppm: FAILED open or read
traffic_light-0-ec1.pgm: FAILED open or read
md5sum: traffic_light-0-ec1.pgm: No such file or directory
md5sum: traffic_light-1-ec0.ppm: No such file or directory
traffic_light-1-ec0.ppm: FAILED open or read
md5sum: traffic_light-1-ec1.pgm: No such file or directory
traffic_light-1-ec1.pgm: FAILED open or read
md5sum: traffic_light-2-ec0.ppm: No such file or directory
traffic_light-2-ec0.ppm: FAILED open or read
md5sum: traffic_light-2-ec1.pgm: No such file or directory
traffic_light-2-ec1.pgm: FAILED open or read
md5sum: traffic_light-3-ec0.ppm: No such file or directory
traffic_light-3-ec0.ppm: FAILED open or read
md5sum: traffic_light-3-ec1.pgm: No such file or directory
traffic_light-3-ec1.pgm: FAILED open or read
md5sum: animation_patches-0-ec0.ppm: No such file or directory
animation_patches-0-ec0.ppm: FAILED open or read
md5sum: animation_patches-0-ec1.pgm: No such file or directory
animation_patches-0-ec1.pgm: FAILED open or read
md5sum: animation_patches-1-ec0.ppm: No such file or directory
animation_patches-1-ec0.ppm: FAILED open or read
md5sum: animation_patches-1-ec1.pgm: No such file or directory
animation_patches-1-ec1.pgm: FAILED open or read
pq_gradient.pgm: OK
md5sum: WARNING: 12 listed files could not be read

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1051615: rust-minijinja: Uninstallable dependencies

2024-06-07 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: reopen -1

librust-mininija-dev is still uninstallable because it has Depends:
librust-v-htmlescape-0.15+default-dev and
librust-indexmap-1+default-dev but neither of those exist in Debian.

This was detected by Britney and piuparts lists the specific missing
dependencies.

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-minijinja

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072773: rust-launchpadlib: Missing dependency: librust-keyring-dev

2024-06-07 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-launchpadlib
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org

librust-launchpadlib-dev is uninstallable because it has Depends:
librust-keyring-2+default-dev

but that package does not exist in Debian.

britney has detected this and is preventing migration to Testing.
piuparts also shows the specific missing dependency.

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-launchpadlib

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072712: ITP: tinysparql -- rename of tracker

2024-06-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:tracker
Owner: jeremy.bi...@canonical.com

Package Name: tinysparql
Version: 3.8 (not yet released yet)
Upstream Author: Sam Thursfield, Carlos Garnacho and others
License: GPL-2+. Library: LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: C

Description: metadata database, indexer and search tool
 TinySPARQL is an advanced framework for first class objects with associated
 metadata and tags. It provides a one stop solution for all metadata, tags,
 shared object databases, search tools and indexing.
 .
 TinySPARQL was previously known as Tracker.

Other Info
--
TinySPARL is a rename of the Tracker file indexer included by default
in GNOME. The primary driver for this rename is that privacy-conscious
curious users are disturbed by the persistent background process named
tracker-miner-fs-3. It sounds like something is tracking users perhaps
for malicious reasons. Miner brings to mind cryptocurrency miners that
could have been installed without authorization. Concerned users can
complain or may try to disable or remove these services and break core
functionality of their desktop environment.

The Debian GNOME team intends to package tinysparql (and the
tracker-miners replacement named localsearch) in Experimental probably
in July. The intent is for the new binary packages to replace the
existing tracker packages. We expect to do the transition in Unstable
later in the year.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/tracker/-/issues/437

Thanks,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072711: ITP: localsearch -- rename of tracker-miners

2024-06-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:tracker-miners
Owner: jeremy.bi...@canonical.com

Package Name: localsearch
Version: 3.8 (not yet released yet)
Upstream Author: Sam Thursfield, Carlos Garnacho and others
License: GPL-2+ (some parts are LGPL-2.1+)
Programming Lang: C

Description: metadata database, indexer and search tool - filesystem indexer
 This package contains the indexer for indexing your files and folders.
 .
 localsearch is an advanced framework for first class objects with associated
 metadata and tags. It provides a one stop solution for all metadata, tags,
 shared object databases, search tools and indexing.
 .
 localsearch was previously known as Tracker Miners.

Other Info
--
localsearch is a rename of the tracker-miners file indexer included by
default in GNOME. The primary driver for this rename is that
privacy-conscious curious users are disturbed by the persistent
background process named tracker-miner-fs-3. It sounds like something
is tracking users perhaps for malicious reasons. Miner brings to mind
cryptocurrency miners that could have been installed without
authorization. Concerned users can complain or may try to disable or
remove these services and break core functionality of their desktop
environment.

The Debian GNOME team intends to package localsearch (and the tracker
replacement named tinysparql) in Experimental probably in July. The
intent is for the new binary packages to replace the existing
tracker-miners packages. We expect to do the transition in Unstable
later in the year.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/tracker-miners/-/issues/346

Thanks,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072700: lintian-brush: Don't correct debhelper-but-no-misc-depends for compat 14+

2024-06-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I worked around this in my package by using a Lintian override to
suppress debhelper-but-no-misc-depends

https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-boxes/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/source/lintian-overrides

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072700: lintian-brush: Don't correct debhelper-but-no-misc-depends for compat 14+

2024-06-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: lintian-brush
Version: 0.152
Control: block -1 by 1067653

Please don't run debhelper-but-no-misc-depends.py when the dh compat
level is set to 14 or higher. Perhaps this issue ought to be fixed by
having lintian not emit this warning for dh compat 14+ packages. See
the blocked bug. I filed this bug because maybe lintian-brush may want
to handle this independently until lintian is fixed.

https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/debhelper-compat-upgrade-checklist#v14

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072698: debhelper: Mark 14 as stable?

2024-06-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: debhelper
Version: 13.15.3

Do you intend to mark debhelper 14 as stable in time for the next
major Debian stable release (Debian 13 "Trixie")?

There are interesting features and improvements in compat 14 that I
would like to use in my packages but I hesitate because as long as 14
is open for development, there is a risk that changes could cause
packages to fail to build.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072491: Acknowledgement (libglib2.0-0t64: Dead keys stopped working, again!)

2024-06-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 11:12 AM Michael Rasmussen  wrote:
> Reason: Either the package gnome-session-bin was uninstalled or
> gnome-session-bin is now a requirement for working dead keys?

What desktop are you using? gnome-session-bin is a required dependency
for many desktops.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072679: ITP: papers -- PDF document viewer for GNOME

2024-06-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:papers
Owner: jeremy.bi...@canonical.com

Package Name: papers
Version: 46.1
Upstream Author: Pablo Correa Gómez, Markus Göllnitz, Evince authors
License: GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C and Rust

Description: PDF document viewer for GNOME
 Papers is a simple multi-page document viewer. It can display and print
 DjVu, Portable Document Format (PDF) and XML Paper Specification (XPS) files.
 When supported by the document, it also allows searching for text,
 copying text to the clipboard, hypertext navigation, and
 table-of-contents bookmarks.

Other Info
--
Papers is a fork of Evince. Papers uses GTK4 and libadwaita (evince
uses GTK3). The app now uses Rust for some features. Papers has been
proposed to replace Evince as the default PDF viewer for GNOME 47.

Evince is not just an app but also libraries for other apps to support
PDF (etc.) viewing. Papers also provides those libraries but they have
been renamed and use GTK4 now. Those other apps may not be ready for
GTK4 yet so we will keep the Evince libraries available for Debian 13.

It hasn't yet been finalized what formats the app will support beyond
PDF. DVI support has been dropped upstream. Debian, like most distros,
has continued to enable viewing PostScript files in Evince although
the Evince developers have disabled that by default for years.

This package will be maintained by the Debian GNOME team. Packaging will be at
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/papers

The upstream source is at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/Incubator/papers

Thanks,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072657: rust-subtile: Fails to build

2024-06-05 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-subtile
Version: 0.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

rust-subtile is failing to build.

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rust-subtile

Build log excerpt
---
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of undeclared crate or module `profiling`
  --> src/image/mod.rs:71:3
   |
71 | #[profiling::function]
   |   ^ use of undeclared crate or module `profiling`


Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072541: gedit: Update to 47

2024-06-03 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: gedit
Version: 46.2-3
Severity: wishlist
Control: affects -1 src:gedit-plugins
Control: block -1 by 1072540

There is a new version of gedit available. However, it requires a new
version of tepl which has been renamed to libgedit-tepl (no other
reverse dependencies except gedit-plugins which has also been
updated). More importantly, it intentionally breaks translations. See
the blocking bug.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072540: gedit: 47 drops all translations

2024-06-03 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: gedit
Severity: important
Tags: l10n
X-Debbugs-CC: budgie-desktop-environm...@packages.debian.org

gedit 47 has disabled all translations because key UI libraries are
not hosted on https://gitlab.gnome.org/ . This is particularly
frustrating because it is the gedit maintainer's decision to move the
libraries to https://github.com/gedit-technology

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072512: debci: mutter fails tests

2024-06-03 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 upstream

On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 4:16 AM Drew Parsons  wrote:
> Source: mutter
> Version: 44.8-3.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: debci
> Control: affects -1 libxcursor-dev
>
> mutter is failing tests in debci.
> This is blocking migration of libxcursor to testing.

The tests passed on retry and libxcursor is no longer blocked from
migrating. Sorry that the autopkgtests are flaky. :(

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072130: geary: FTBFS: MESA: error: ZINK: vkCreateInstance failed (VK_ERROR_INCOMPATIBLE_DRIVER)

2024-06-01 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 6:39 PM Santiago Vila  wrote:
> --- stderr ---
> MESA: error: ZINK: vkCreateInstance failed (VK_ERROR_INCOMPATIBLE_DRIVER)
> glx: failed to create drisw screen
>
> (test-client:335985): GLib-Net-WARNING **: 16:07:18.084: Failed to load TLS 
> database: System trust contains zero trusted certificates; please investigate 
> your GnuTLS configuration

The actual error is "Failed to load TLS database" which makes the
build failure a duplicate of https://bugs.debian.org/1064744 (which
was already marked as affecting geary).

For instance, the ZINK error is also seen with Test 8 but Test 8 passes.

However, I'll go ahead and do an upload to get rid of the ZINK stderr
in the build tests to make this more obvious.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1064372: evolution: segfault during startup

2024-05-30 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Are you still experiencing this crash with evolution 3.52.1 in Debian
Testing (or 3.52.2 which will reach Testing in a few days)?

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072124: gnome-shell: CVE-2024-36472

2024-05-29 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 5:37 PM Moritz Muehlenhoff  wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 05:33:32PM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> > Control: forwarded -1 
> > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/7688
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 5:24 PM Moritz Mühlenhoff  wrote:
> > > CVE-2024-36472[0]:
> > > | In GNOME Shell through 45.7, a portal helper can be launched
> > > | automatically (without user confirmation) based on network responses
> > > | provided by an adversary (e.g., an adversary who controls the local
> > > | Wi-Fi network), and subsequently loads untrusted JavaScript code,
> > > | which may lead to resource consumption or other impacts depending on
> > > | the JavaScript code's behavior.
> >
> > The initial GNOME issue was closed already (the CVE was requested by
> > someone who is not a GNOME developer). But GNOME Shell may change the
> > workflow for the captive portal helper so we can leave this bug open,
> > pointing to the new issue that was opened upstream.
>
> Yeah, the never filed a bug for the botched CVE assignment, this is the
> bug reference explocitly for the followup actionable filed by Michael 
> Catanzaro

Oh, the bug reporter actually requested 2 CVEs. CVE-2024-36472 which
you already filed the Debian bug for, is
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/7688 and is
recognized as valid by GNOME.

The other CVE, CVE-2023-50977, was closed already in NIST.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1072124: gnome-shell: CVE-2024-36472

2024-05-28 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/7688

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 5:24 PM Moritz Mühlenhoff  wrote:
> CVE-2024-36472[0]:
> | In GNOME Shell through 45.7, a portal helper can be launched
> | automatically (without user confirmation) based on network responses
> | provided by an adversary (e.g., an adversary who controls the local
> | Wi-Fi network), and subsequently loads untrusted JavaScript code,
> | which may lead to resource consumption or other impacts depending on
> | the JavaScript code's behavior.

The initial GNOME issue was closed already (the CVE was requested by
someone who is not a GNOME developer). But GNOME Shell may change the
workflow for the captive portal helper so we can leave this bug open,
pointing to the new issue that was opened upstream.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1065553: marked as done (fonts-jetbrains-mono: Jetbrains-Mono 2.304 broken in Gnome Terminal)

2024-05-21 Thread Jeremy Bícha
> Tried again, and the problem goes away if I close all open gnome-terminals, 
> so this bug can be closed.
> I guess it's a problem in gnome-terminal that doesn't detect the font file 
> changed, and tries accessing glyphs in wrong locations in the font file 
> (based on the older file).

There is a longstanding bug where apps need to be restarted to make
use of updated fonts. A particularly serious report of this is
https://bugs.debian.org/788791 which is mitigated because the
Cantarell font (the default UI font for Debian's GNOME Shell) is only
updated rarely.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1071546: rust-curve25519-dalek: failing autopkgtests

2024-05-20 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-curve25519-dalek
Version: 4+20240207+dfsg-3
Severity: serious

rust-curve25519-dalek's autopkgtests are failing in 3 places. The
failing autopkgtests are preventing migration to Testing.

https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rust-curve25519-dalek

error: none of the selected packages contains these features: fiat_backend

error: none of the selected packages contains these features: bench

error[E0412]: cannot find type `StaticSecret` in this scope

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1071528: ITP: hardinfo2 -- Hardinfo2 offers System Information and Benchmark for Linux Systems

2024-05-20 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 11:09 AM Lucas Castro  wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Lucas Castro 
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: hardinfo2
>   Version : 2.1.2
>   Upstream Contact: Name 
> * URL : https://hardinfo2.org/
> * License : GPL-2
>   Programming Lang: C
>   Description : Hardinfo2 offers System Information and Benchmark for 
> Linux Systems
>
> Hardinfo2 is based on hardinfo, which have not been released >10 years. 
> Hardinfo2 is the reboot that was needed.
>
> Hardinfo2 offers System Information and Benchmark for Linux Systems. It is 
> able to
> obtain information from both hardware and basic software. It can benchmark 
> your system and compare
> to other machines online.
>
> Features include:
> - Report generation (in either HTML or plain text)
> - Online Benchmarking - compare your machine against other machines
>
> Status
> --
> - Capabilities: Hardinfo2 currently detects most software and hardware 
> detected by the OS.
> - Features: Online database for exchanging benchmark results.
> - Development: Currently done by contributors, hwspeedy maintains
>
> Hardinfo2 is based on hardinfo, which have not been released >10 years. 
> Hardinfo2 is the reboot that was needed.

Please see https://bugs.debian.org/1071373 (ITS: hardinfo) and
coordinate with Boyuan Yang on updating hardinfo.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1071537: rust-snow: autopkgtest failures

2024-05-20 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-snow
Version: 0.9.6-4
Severity: serious

rust-snow's autopkgtest is still failing which prevents migration to Testing.

https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rust-snow

Excerpt
--
error[E0599]: no function or associated item named `new` found for
struct `snow::Builder` in the current scope
 --> tests/vectors.rs:151:37
   |
151 | let mut init_builder = Builder::new(params.clone());
   |   ^^^ function or
associated item not found in `Builder<'_>`


Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1071517: hardinfo: Unnecessary Build-Depends libsoup2.4

2024-05-20 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: hardinfo
Version: 0.5.1+git20180227-2.1
Severity: important
Tags: trixie sid
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: libsoup2
X-Debbugs-CC: by...@debian.org

hardinfo has Build-Depends: libsoup2.4-dev but doesn't use libsoup
at all. I checked with

rgrep -i soup

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1071514: RM: qpdfview [i386] -- RoM; NBS; no reverse dependencies

2024-05-20 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: qpdfv...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:qpdfview

poppler's qt6 bindings are no longer built on i386. This means that
qpdfview is no longer buildable on i386; therefore, please remove
qpdfview from i386.

qpdfview has no reverse dependencies, but both lqxt and xfe have
Recommends: qpdfview. Please let me know if we need to update those
packages to drop the Recommends  on i386.

I got approval from Debian's qpdfview maintainer Louis-Philippe
Véronneau before filing this bug.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1071513: RM: photoqt [i386] -- RoQA; NBS; no reverse dependencies

2024-05-20 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: phot...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:photoqt

poppler's qt6 bindings are no longer built on i386. This means that
photoqt is no longer buildable on i386; therefore, please remove
photoqt from i386. photoqt has no reverse dependencies.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1071253: rust-snow: autopkgtest failures

2024-05-18 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: retitle -1 rust-snow: autopkgtest failures

rust-snow builds now but its autopkgtests fail which blocks migration
to Testing.

I saw this in a brief look at the autopkgtest log but there may be other errors:

error: no matching package named `aes-gcm` found

https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rust-snow

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1071259: foxtrotgps: Unnecessary Build-Depends libsoup2.4

2024-05-17 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Patch attached

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
From: Jeremy Bicha 
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 12:15:28 +0200
Subject: Drop obsolete Build-Depends: libsoup2.4-dev

Closes: #1071259
---
 debian/control | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 6281f17..6759913 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ Build-Depends:
  libglade2-dev,
  libgps-dev,
  libgtk2.0-dev,
- libsoup2.4-dev,
  libsqlite3-dev,
  libxml2-dev,
  texinfo,



Bug#1071259: foxtrotgps: Unnecessary Build-Depends libsoup2.4

2024-05-17 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: foxtrotgps
Version: 1.2.2+bzr332-1
Severity: important
Tags: trixie sid patch
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: libsoup2

foxtrotgps has Build-Depends: libsoup2.4-dev but doesn't use libsoup
at all. I checked with

rgrep -i soup

foxtrotgps uses Beautiful Soup (python3-bs4) which is different than libsoup.

In my follow-up email, I am attaching a patch to fix this issue

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1071252: rust-libp2p-identity: fails to build

2024-05-17 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-libp2p-identity
Version: 0.2.8+ds-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

rust-libsp2p-identity fails to build from source in Unstable because
of a build test error:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rust-libp2p-identity


Running 
`/<>/target/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/keypair_api-0ab69a7110130a15`

running 1 test
test calling_keypair_api ... FAILED

failures:
 calling_keypair_api stdout 
thread 'calling_keypair_api' panicked at 'internal error: entered
unreachable code', identity/src/keypair.rs:329:9
stack backtrace:
   0: rust_begin_unwind
 at /usr/src/rustc-1.70.0/library/std/src/panicking.rs:578:5
   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
 at /usr/src/rustc-1.70.0/library/core/src/panicking.rs:67:14
   2: core::panicking::panic
 at /usr/src/rustc-1.70.0/library/core/src/panicking.rs:117:5
   3: libp2p_identity::keypair::Keypair::from_protobuf_encoding
 at ./src/keypair.rs:329:9
   4: keypair_api::calling_keypair_api
 at ./tests/keypair_api.rs:5:13
   5: keypair_api::calling_keypair_api::{{closure}}
 at ./tests/keypair_api.rs:4:26
   6: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
 at /usr/src/rustc-1.70.0/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:250:5
   7: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
 at /usr/src/rustc-1.70.0/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:250:5
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a
verbose backtrace.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1071253: rust-snow: Fails to build, missing crate x25519_dalek

2024-05-17 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-snow
Version: 0.9.6-2
Tags: ftbfs

rust-snow fails to build in Unstable. This is an excerpt from the build log:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rust-snow

error[E0432]: unresolved import `x25519_dalek`
  --> tests/general.rs:13:5
   |
13 | use x25519_dalek as x25519;
   | ^^ no external crate `x25519_dalek`

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1071250: rust-imap-codec: Fails to build: error: no matching package named `libfuzzer-sys` found

2024-05-17 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-imap-codec
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

rust-imap-codec fails to build from source in Unstable. This line
shows in its build log:

error: no matching package named `libfuzzer-sys` found

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rust-imap-codec

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1061179: Bug#1060019: transition: poppler 24.02

2024-05-16 Thread Jeremy Bícha
libpoppler134 has migrated to Testing and I don't see libpoppler126
there any more so I'm closing the poppler transition bug.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1071141: gnome-remote-desktop: `/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/gnome-remote-desktop-tmpfiles.conf:2: Failed to resolve user 'gnome-remote-desktop': No such process`

2024-05-15 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 7:51 AM Paul Menzel  wrote:
>  gnome-remote-desktop (46.1-3) wird eingerichtet ...
>  /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/gnome-remote-desktop-tmpfiles.conf:2: Failed to
> resolve user 'gnome-remote-desktop': No such process
>  /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/gnome-remote-desktop-tmpfiles.conf:3: Failed to
> resolve user 'gnome-remote-desktop': No such process
>  Creating group 'gnome-remote-desktop' with GID 987.
>
> The failure lines were printed in red.

Yes, I am tracking this in https://bugs.debian.org/1070119 and
https://bugs.debian.org/1070473

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070119: gnome-remote-desktop: missing gnome-remote-desktop user setup in salsa upcoming 46 version

2024-05-15 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: reopen -1
Control: retitle -1 gnome-remote-desktop: long delay when first
installing version 46
Control: block 1050237 by -1

I'm not happy with the performance of what I've implemented because it
still has the 90 second delay even though gnome-remote-desktop is
otherwise working now.

See also https://bugs.debian.org/1070473

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070862: poppler: possibly unintended revert of t64 renames for non-main library in 24.x

2024-05-10 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 serious

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 1:48 PM Simon McVittie  wrote:
> Please bump this up to RC if analysis shows that it is a genuine problem,
> or close it if analysis shows that I'm being overly cautious.

I think it is appropriate to bump this to RC. I will try to get this
upload done by tomorrow; I'm in the midst of a busy travel week.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070836: rust-apple-nvram: Switch from rust-nix 0.26 to 0.27

2024-05-10 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-apple-nvram
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs upstream sid
X-Debbugs-CC: andr...@fatal.se

rust-apple-nvram Depends and Build-Depends: rust-nix 0.26 but Unstable
has rust-nix 0.27 instead. I tried doing a simple version bump from
0.26 to 0.27 in the package but dh_auto_test failed.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070405: darktable: Please drop unused Build-Depends: libsoup2.4-dev

2024-05-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:46 PM David Bremner  wrote:
>
> Jeremy Bícha  writes:
>
> > Source: darktable
> > Version: 4.6.1-2
> >
> > Please drop Build-Depends: libsoup2.4-dev . It isn't used at all and
> > we would eventually like to remove libsoup2.4 from Debian.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Jeremy Bícha
>
> How can I verify that it is not used?

rgrep -i soup

Also: https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/commit/228fcf0041773

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070644: gnome-remote-desktop: System .service file enabled but not the user one?

2024-05-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: forwarded -1
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop/-/merge_requests/260

It looks like upstream is proposing to split gnome-remote-desktop's
new systemd systemd service into two system services to fix this
issue. It's unclear whether they will land this in 46.x

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070644: gnome-remote-desktop: System .service file enabled but not the user one?

2024-05-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 serious

On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 11:03 AM Laurent Bigonville  wrote:
>
> Package: gnome-remote-desktop
> Version: 46.1-3
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> It seems that the system systemd .service is enabled at boot, while the
> user one is not.
>
> Any reason why the former is enabled and the later is not?
>
> Not sure I see the rational here

That could be a critical bug so I'm bumping the severity. I think the
service ought not run unless it is enabled and it shouldn't be enabled
by default. (There is GUI in gnome-control-center to enable it but
that GUI is patched out for Unstable.)

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070473: debhelper: Run dh_installsysusers after dh_installtmpfiles

2024-05-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 7:33 AM Luca Boccassi  wrote:
> Am I reading this correctly, that the package is using tmpfiles to
> create a home directory? I'm not sure that was foreseen as a use case
> to be honest, I'd bring it upstream

Yes. Should I bring the issue upstream to systemd or upstream to
gnome-remote-desktop?

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070473: debhelper: Run dh_installsysusers after dh_installtmpfiles

2024-05-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:06 AM Niels Thykier  wrote:
>
> Jeremy Bícha:
> > Source: debhelper
> > Version: 13.15.3
> > Control: affects -1 src:gnome-remote-desktop
> > X-Debbugs: syst...@packages.debian.org
> >
> > gnome-remote-desktop 46 upstream has decided to implement both
> > tmpfiles.d and sysusers.d to create a system user and its home
> > directory. systemd-tmpfiles needs to run before systemd-sysusers. If
> > not, on a new install, this command hangs for about 90 seconds:
> >
> > Creating user 'gnome-remote-desktop' (GNOME Remote Desktop) with UID
> > *** and GID ***.
> >
> > Then this error:
> > Could not execute systemctl:  at /usr/bin/deb-systemd-invoke line 148.
> >
> > Then the installation completes successfully.
> >
> > Therefore, I recommend that debhelper automatically runs
> > dh_installtmpfiles before running dh_installsysusers in case any other
> > projects want to do what gnome-remote-desktop does.
> >
> > I was able to workaround this issue:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-remote-desktop/-/commit/8490919
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Jeremy Bícha
> >
>
> Hi Michael and Luca
>
> What is the correct order for tmpfiles vs. sysusers?
>
> I thought the order was sysusers (to create the user) and then tmpfiles
> (to create files/directories and set ownership accordingly). In this bug
> report, the request is to have the directories first before the user is
> created.
>
> Could you please assert what the correct order is for the default case?

There is a circular dependency here.

$ cat /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/gnome-remote-desktop-tmpfiles.conf
# tmpfiles.d file to ensure the existence of the home directory for
gnome-remote-desktop user
d /var/lib/gnome-remote-desktop 0700 gnome-remote-desktop gnome-remote-desktop
d /etc/gnome-remote-desktop 0755 gnome-remote-desktop gnome-remote-desktop

$ cat /usr/lib/sysusers.d/gnome-remote-desktop-sysusers.conf
# sysusers.d file to ensure the existence of the gnome-remote-desktop user
u gnome-remote-desktop - "GNOME Remote Desktop" /var/lib/gnome-remote-desktop

The 90 second hang if systemd-sysusers is run before
/var/lib/gnome-remote-desktop exists is annoying, but systemd-tmpfiles
errors if the gnome-remote-desktop user doesn't exist yet.

Running tmpfiles, then sysusers, then tmpfiles again works except for
that 90 second hang.

I had to remove the gnome-remote-desktop package, then remove the
gnome-remote-desktop user and the directories and then reboot to test
changes properly.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070463: gnome-remote-desktop: 46 has failing build tests

2024-05-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 important
Control: unblock 1050237 by -1

On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 1:15 PM Jeremy Bícha  wrote:
> The build tests were passing with version 45. It is not clear to me
> why the tests are failing in Debian Experimental but passing in Ubuntu
> 24.04 LTS.

I have ignored gnome-remote-desktop's test failures for now in Debian
since it is a higher priority to land GNOME Shell 46 in Testing.

Maybe there is a missing dependency and getting more things in
Unstable would help.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070473: debhelper: Run dh_installsysusers after dh_installtmpfiles

2024-05-05 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: debhelper
Version: 13.15.3
Control: affects -1 src:gnome-remote-desktop
X-Debbugs: syst...@packages.debian.org

gnome-remote-desktop 46 upstream has decided to implement both
tmpfiles.d and sysusers.d to create a system user and its home
directory. systemd-tmpfiles needs to run before systemd-sysusers. If
not, on a new install, this command hangs for about 90 seconds:

Creating user 'gnome-remote-desktop' (GNOME Remote Desktop) with UID
*** and GID ***.

Then this error:
Could not execute systemctl:  at /usr/bin/deb-systemd-invoke line 148.

Then the installation completes successfully.

Therefore, I recommend that debhelper automatically runs
dh_installtmpfiles before running dh_installsysusers in case any other
projects want to do what gnome-remote-desktop does.

I was able to workaround this issue:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-remote-desktop/-/commit/8490919

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1053866: transition: jpeg-xl

2024-05-05 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: block -1 by 1061627

I was able to build all the reverse dependencies in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
against jpeg-xl from experimental. But jpeg-xl won't be able to
migrate to Testing until its autopkgtests are fixed.

https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#jpeg-xl

See the blocking bug.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1060019: transition: poppler 24.02

2024-05-05 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: retitle -1 transition: poppler 24.02
Control: affects -1 src:poppler

Since originally requesting this transition, I have updated the
version to 24.02. I believe all reverse dependencies can be binNMU'd
for this.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070119: gnome-remote-desktop: missing gnome-remote-desktop user setup in salsa upcoming 46 version

2024-05-05 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 2:51 PM Jeremy Bícha  wrote:
> Where did you get gnome-remote-desktop 46.1-1_amd64.deb from? It has
> not been successfully built on Debian's buildds yet.

Oh, I guess it was mentioned in your bug title: you built it from Salsa.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070119: gnome-remote-desktop: missing gnome-remote-desktop user setup in salsa upcoming 46 version

2024-05-05 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Where did you get gnome-remote-desktop 46.1-1_amd64.deb from? It has
not been successfully built on Debian's buildds yet.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070463: gnome-remote-desktop: 46 has failing build tests

2024-05-05 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: gnome-remote-desktop
Version: 46.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs experimental
Control: block 1050237 by -1
X-Debbugs-CC: ma...@ubuntu.com

gnome-remote-desktop's build tests are failing. This is blocking the
GNOME Shell 46 transition since GNOME Shell & GNOME Remote Desktop
should have the same major version, at least while the projects are
under heavy development.

The build tests were passing with version 45. It is not clear to me
why the tests are failing in Debian Experimental but passing in Ubuntu
24.04 LTS.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070462: transition: evolution-data-server 3.52

2024-05-05 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: evolution-data-ser...@packages.debain.org

One of the evolution-data-server libraries had a soname bump. I
believe everything should be binNMUable without issue.

This tracker is good:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-evolution-data-server.html

On behalf of the Debian GNOME team,
Jeremy Bicha



Bug#1070348: pipewire: pipewire-pulse: warningin syslog every second for snap_get_audio_permissions

2024-05-05 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 4:00 AM Dylan Aïssi  wrote:
>
> Hello Sergio and Jeremy,
>
> Le sam. 4 mai 2024 à 05:48, Michael Welsh Duggan  a écrit :
> >
> > After updating my linux kernel to 6.7.12-1, I keep getting the following
> > message in my syslog, once a second:
> >
> > pipewire-pulse[]: default: snap_get_audio_permissions: kernel lacks
> > 'fine grained unix mediation'; snap audio permissions won't be honored.
> >
>
> It seems that snap support in pipewire requires a kernel feature
> (fine grained unix mediation) that is not yet enabled in Debian.
>
> I'm thinking of disabling for now the snap support in Debian since
> there is no point in keeping it enabled if it's unusable. But, I will
> keep it enabled for Ubuntu. What do you think?

That makes sense to me.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1063026: helvum: Upcoming gtk update

2024-05-05 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 + ftbfs

Jonas, the Rust GTK crates were uploaded to Unstable today. Could you
upload your helvum package from Experimental to Unstable?

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070405: darktable: Please drop unused Build-Depends: libsoup2.4-dev

2024-05-04 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: darktable
Version: 4.6.1-2

Please drop Build-Depends: libsoup2.4-dev . It isn't used at all and
we would eventually like to remove libsoup2.4 from Debian.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070404: srain: Please update to 1.7.0

2024-05-04 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: srain
Version: 1.7.0
Severity: wishlist

Please update srain to 1.7.0. One detail I am interested in is that it
switches from libsoup2.4 to libsoup3.

https://github.com/SrainApp/srain/releases

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070399: RM: pmix [armel armhf i386] -- RoQA; NBS; no arch-specific reverse dependencies

2024-05-04 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:pmix

Please remove pmix on 32-bit architectures. It is no longer built
there and its only reverse dependency, openmpi has already been
updated to only use pmix on 64-bit architectures.

This will allow several packages to migrate from Unstable to Testing
(it is one of the blockers for gst-plugins-bad1.0).

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1034878: #1034878 meld gives python traceback if run as root

2024-05-04 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/meld/-/issues/846
Control: severity -1 minor

On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:42 AM  wrote:
> Bug #1034878 - meld gives python traceback if run as root is caused by the 
> call to Gtk.Settings.get_default() in settings.py at about line 56.

In general, GNOME developers and the Debian GNOME team don't want you
running apps as root/sudo. We do expect some things to be broken if
you try it anyway. However, you can try raising this issue directly
with the upstream meld developers who may be willing to apply a fix
for the issue. I notice that someone already reported a similar issue
today but maybe you can add a comment with your additional research.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/meld/-/issues/846

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1067169: gnome-control-center: Disable location services?

2024-05-03 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:33 AM Arnaud Ferraris  wrote:
> TBH I would prefer it if those services were kept enabled in Debian, as
> those are useful to mobile users. Moreover, it seems an alternative to
> MLS is being worked on, although I don't know what its current status
> is, nor whether it'll be live before MLS goes down. But if it's ready
> soon enough (that's a big "if", granted), then g-c-c will likely need a
> small patch to switch to it, without user-visible disruption.

Thank you for your reply. After further consideration, both Ubuntu
24.04 LTS and Fedora 40 have re-enabled location service settings in
gnome-control-center for now. Therefore, I have kept location services
enabled in Debian Unstable too.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues/3032

Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070323: RM: gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect -- RoM; unmaintained, obsolete with gnome-shell 45

2024-05-03 Thread Jeremy Bícha
The  new upstream project is
https://github.com/Extensions-Valhalla/gnome-bluetooth-quick-connect

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1052090: gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect: needs update for GNOME Shell 45

2024-05-03 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 9:33 AM Simon McVittie  wrote:
> I don't intend to put time into this change myself, because I no longer
> use this extension (see #1043008), so I'm marking this as serious already
> (justification: "in the package maintainer's opinion, makes the package
> unsuitable for release"). If anyone else in the GNOME team wants to see
> this extension stay available in Debian, now is your chance to take over
> the package, at which point the severity of this bug becomes your choice.
>
> If nobody steps up to maintain it, I will ask for this extension to be
> removed when we are ready for the GNOME Shell 45 transition.

Simon, I filed the removal bug. I haven't really seen complaints
during the 6 months that the extension was removed from Testing.

The upstream project was archived. However I noted in the removal bug,
that there is a fork:
https://github.com/Extensions-Valhalla/gnome-bluetooth-quick-connect
But the fork switched to TypeScript which might make it difficult to
package for Debian main.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070323: RM: gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect -- RoM; unmaintained, obsolete with gnome-shell 45

2024-05-03 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc:gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-conn...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect

Please remove gnome-shell-extension-bluetooth-quick-connect from
Debian. It is no longer maintained upstream:
https://github.com/bjarosze/gnome-bluetooth-quick-connect

Its functionality has basically been incorporated into GNOME Shell 45
which we intend to land in Unstable soon after the t64 transition
completes.

There does happen to be a forked version but it uses TypeScript. I've
not looked closely at that version but in my experience, GNOME
Typescript packages are difficult to package for Debian main.

On behalf of the Debian GNOME Maintainers,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1068123: Breaks phosh << 0.37.0-2

2024-05-03 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 important

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 6:03 AM Guido Günther  wrote:
> gnome-session 46 dropped `--builtin` and `--systemd`. This breaks phosh <
> 0.37.0-2. Would be great to have a proper `Breaks: ` relationship
> to ease upgrades.

I'm lowering the severity since phosh 0.38 landed in Testing today and
it would be good for gnome-session to migrate also. But I can do
another gnome-session upload soon. What exact gnome-session
binary-package do you think we need to add the Breaks: to? I know that
Budgie was also affected by the change; that's why budgie-session
exists now.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070269: bluez: Please update to 5.75

2024-05-02 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: bluez
Version: 5.73-1
Severity: wishlist

bluez 5.75 is available. Please update to it. Perhaps it helps
https://bugs.debian.org/1069012 ?

Also I submitted several merge requests for the Debian package at
https://salsa.debian.org/bluetooth-team/bluez/-/merge_requests

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070250: telepathy-glib: Fails to build with glib 2.80

2024-05-02 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: telepathy-glib
Severity: serious
Version: 0.24.2-0.3
Tags: ftbfs upstream
X-Debbugs-CC: bi...@debian.org

Please cherry-pick the glib commit from
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/telepathy/telepathy-glib/-/commits/master
to fix the build with glib 2.80 (currently in experimental but will be
uploaded to Unstable as soon as the t64 transitions clear out).

There is also a commit there to port examples from Python 2 to 3.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070247: telepathy-glib: Fails to build with glib 2.80

2024-05-02 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: telepathy-glib
Severity: serious
Version: 0.24.2-0.3
Tags: ftbfs upstream
X-Debbugs-CC: bi...@debian.org

Please cherry-pick the glib commit from
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/telepathy/telepathy-glib/-/commits/master
to fix the build with glib 2.80 (currently in experimental but will be
uploaded to Unstable as soon as the t64 transitions clear out). There
is also a commit there to port examples from Python 2 to 3.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1019042: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1019042: rust-qwertone: FTBFS - dep issue

2024-05-01 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 serious

This issue is now RC since it's not possible to build qwertone on Unstable now.

But I expect qwertone will get an upload to fix this issue within a
few days. See https://salsa.debian.org/debian/qwertone/-/merge_requests/1

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1058652: RM: python-boto -- ROM; orphaned upstream, replaced by python-boto3

2024-05-01 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo

The reverse dependencies have been taken care of now.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070186: python3-datalad: Don't recommend python3-boto

2024-05-01 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: python3-datalad
Version: 0.19.6-2
Severity: serious

Debian Policy § 2.2 says that packages in main (like python3-datalad)
are not allowed to have Recommends on packages that are not in main
(unless it is only a non-default alternative for a package in main).

python3-datalad Recommends: python3-boto but python3-boto has been
removed from Testing and will likely be removed from Unstable soon.
See https://bugs.debian.org/1058652

The replacement is python3-boto3 but the package will likely need
changes to upstream code to work with the new version.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070119: gnome-remote-desktop: missing gnome-remote-desktop user setup in salsa upcoming 46 version

2024-04-30 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:29 AM Alban Browaeys  wrote:
> So I did not mean mixinf gnome-shell/gnome-remote-desktop version. My
> interest was into connection via RDP to a not unlocked or already
> opened remote Gnome Shell.
>
> As of now I us the "Allow Locked Remote Desktop" extension and gdm3
> autologin on the remote gnome shell user session.
> I would like to get rid of these hacks (especially since I have to set
> an empty password on my gnome keyring for such a setup).

Well you'll also need gnome-control-center built without the "revert
the remote desktop changes" patch.

Our priority is to get the t64 transitions migrated to Testing, then
upload GNOME Shell 46 to Unstable (with Release Team permission). The
Debian GNOME team may not have time or interest in maintaining two
versions of gnome-control-center for people trying to use Remote Login
right now.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070119: gnome-remote-desktop: missing gnome-remote-desktop user setup in salsa upcoming 46 version

2024-04-30 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 important

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 9:57 AM Alban Browaeys  wrote:
> The issue seems to be that the user gnome-remote-desktop is not existing
> thus the system wide systemd gnome-remote-desktop.service fails to
> start:

The gnome-remote-desktop user is new for gnome-remote-desktop 46. The
user ought to be created by the package and it seems to work for
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS (which uses the same packaging).

> I found no issue tracker on the salsa project for gnome-remote-desktop
> so opened the issue here.

I wouldn't open an upstream bug for this issue yet since we should
assume this is a Debian packaging issue until confirmed otherwise.

> I believe the bug is import as it prevents opening a new desktop session
> (but it still works when connection to an existing session).

Yes, I've bumped the severity but what do you mean about connecting to
an existing session? It's not intended to run, for instance,
gnome-remote-desktop 45 with gnome-shell 46 or with gnome-shell 44 but
I guess the package dependencies aren't set quite that strict.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070094: RM: rust-gtk3-macros -- RoM; unmaintained library

2024-04-29 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-gtk3-mac...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:rust-gtk3-macros

Please remove rust-gtk3-macros from Debian. It is part of the Rust
GTK3 stack that is no longer maintained and is incompatible with the
Rust GNOME 46 packages.

https://bugs.debian.org/1064375

On behalf of the Debian Rust Maintainers,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070093: RM: rust-gdk-sys -- RoM; unmaintained library

2024-04-29 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-gdk-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:rust-gdk-sys

Please remove rust-gdk-sy from Debian. It is part of the Rust GTK3
stack that is no longer maintained and is incompatible with the Rust
GNOME 46 packages.

https://bugs.debian.org/1064375

On behalf of the Debian Rust Maintainers,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070091: RM: rust-gdk -- RoM; unmaintained library

2024-04-29 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:rust-gdk

Please remove rust-gdk from Debian. It is part of the Rust GTK3 stack
that is no longer maintained and is incompatible with the Rust GNOME
46 packages.

https://bugs.debian.org/1064375

On behalf of the Debian Rust Maintainers,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070092: RM: rust-gtk -- RoM; unmaintained library

2024-04-29 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:rust-gtk

Please remove rust-gtk from Debian. Rust GTK3 is no longer maintained
and is incompatible with the Rust GNOME 46 packages.

https://bugs.debian.org/1064375

On behalf of the Debian Rust Maintainers,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070090: RM: rust-gdkx11- RoM; unmaintained library

2024-04-29 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-gdk...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:rust-gdkx11

Please remove rust-gdkx11 from Debian. It is part of the Rust GTK3
stack that is no longer maintained and is incompatible with the Rust
GNOME 46 packages.

https://bugs.debian.org/1064375

On behalf of the Debian Rust Maintainers,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070086: RM: rust-gtk-sys -- RoM; unmaintained library

2024-04-29 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
Tags: moreinfo
X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-gtk-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:rust-gtk-sys
Control: block -1 by 1064373

Please remove rust-gtk-sys from Debian. It is part of the Rust GTK3
stack that is no longer maintained and is incompatible with the Rust
GNOME 46 packages.

https://bugs.debian.org/1064375

On behalf of the Debian Rust Maintainers,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070089: RM: rust-gdkx11-sys-- RoM; unmaintained library

2024-04-29 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-gdkx11-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:rust-gdkx11-sys

Please remove rust-gdkx11-sys from Debian. It is part of the Rust GTK3
stack that is no longer maintained and is incompatible with the Rust
GNOME 46 packages.

https://bugs.debian.org/1064375

On behalf of the Debian Rust Maintainers,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1070088: RM: rust-atk-sys -- RoM; unmaintained library

2024-04-29 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-atk-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:rust-atk-sys

Please remove rust-atk-sys from Debian. It is part of the Rust GTK3
stack that is no longer maintained and is incompatible with the Rust
GNOME 46 packages.

https://bugs.debian.org/1064375

On behalf of the Debian Rust Maintainers,
Jeremy Bícha



  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >