Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
Hi, On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 14:34 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Hi againn. > > * Gerfried Fuchs [2011-06-20 12:55:26 CEST]: > > I took the liberty to cherry-pick the first patch, and for the second, > > I did simply duplicate the entry and gave it the proper name. This is > > the debdiff: > > Given that I was told that it's actually my own fault that this hasn't > got fixed yet I took the liberty to upload the package. Thanks; the diff looks fine. Unfortunately, as mentioned on IRC, the window for acceptance in to 6.0.2 closed yesterday. Given the size and nature of the update, we may well look at pushing it via squeeze-updates once the point release is over. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
Hi againn. * Gerfried Fuchs [2011-06-20 12:55:26 CEST]: > I took the liberty to cherry-pick the first patch, and for the second, > I did simply duplicate the entry and gave it the proper name. This is > the debdiff: Given that I was told that it's actually my own fault that this hasn't got fixed yet I took the liberty to upload the package. Enjoy, Rhonda -- Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los| Wir sind Helden Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
Hi! * Adam D. Barratt [2011-06-09 13:50:41 CEST]: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:58:02 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: >>> Ping? :) >> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dput.git;a=commitdiff;h=7453fa87858049595d4413abab458a76204942e0 >> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dput.git;a=commitdiff;h=a3a3cf04da6f4412ea47323d0becc71cb49fa552 > > Thanks. We'd need to see a finalised (and tested) debdiff against the > current stable package before approving the upload, however. > > The second patch also introduces a behavioural change, in that it will > cause the previous target name to stop working, which is generally not > okay for a stable update. Does dput.cf support the concept of target > aliases, or "includes", or something similar that would allow us to > avoid having two targets which differ only in name? I took the liberty to cherry-pick the first patch, and for the second, I did simply duplicate the entry and gave it the proper name. This is the debdiff: #v+ diff -Nru dput-0.9.6.1/debian/changelog dput-0.9.6.1+squeeze1/debian/changelog --- dput-0.9.6.1/debian/changelog 2010-07-08 10:46:03.0 +0200 +++ dput-0.9.6.1+squeeze1/debian/changelog 2011-06-20 12:46:33.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +dput (0.9.6.1+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low + + [ Y Giridhar Appaji Nag ] + * Change the default backports configuration (Closes: #595726) + + [ Gerfried Fuchs ] + * Duplicate the backports.org upload host as backports. backports.org is +left as legacy hostname for now, it shouldn't be used anymore. + + -- Gerfried Fuchs Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:44:42 +0200 + dput (0.9.6.1) unstable; urgency=low * Use hashlib instead of md5/sha modules for Python 2.6 (Closes: #517831) diff -Nru dput-0.9.6.1/dput.cf dput-0.9.6.1+squeeze1/dput.cf --- dput-0.9.6.1/dput.cf2010-05-21 07:58:22.0 +0200 +++ dput-0.9.6.1+squeeze1/dput.cf 2011-06-20 12:44:10.0 +0200 @@ -83,9 +83,16 @@ hash = md5 [backports.org] -fqdn = www.backports.org +fqdn = backports-master.debian.org method = ftp -incoming = / +incoming = /pub/UploadQueue/ +login = anonymous +allow_dcut = 1 + +[backports] +fqdn = backports-master.debian.org +method = ftp +incoming = /pub/UploadQueue/ login = anonymous allow_dcut = 1 #v- This is in essence the two topmost commits on http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dput.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/squeeze (75e338 and c3fb53) It would really be swift if we could finally get this ready and done for the pending 6.0.2 update ... Thanks, Rhonda -- Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los| Wir sind Helden Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:58:02 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: On 11/06/08 20:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt said ... On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 19:13 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:12:21 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > > Dear Release Team. dput in squeeze still has the old upload data for > > backports in it from its unofficial time. Given that we released squeeze > > with backports being official I would like to request permission to > > upload dput with an adapted /etc/dput.cf file to fix that so that we > > don't have to adjust it on systems we upload from. > > > As I said on irc, ack in principle (send a patch here before uploading > though please, although I assume it's just the config file being > updated; haven't looked at the bug). Ping? :) http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dput.git;a=commitdiff;h=7453fa87858049595d4413abab458a76204942e0 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dput.git;a=commitdiff;h=a3a3cf04da6f4412ea47323d0becc71cb49fa552 Thanks. We'd need to see a finalised (and tested) debdiff against the current stable package before approving the upload, however. The second patch also introduces a behavioural change, in that it will cause the previous target name to stop working, which is generally not okay for a stable update. Does dput.cf support the concept of target aliases, or "includes", or something similar that would allow us to avoid having two targets which differ only in name? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
On 11/06/08 20:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt said ... > On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 19:13 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:12:21 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > > > > Dear Release Team. dput in squeeze still has the old upload data for > > > backports in it from its unofficial time. Given that we released squeeze > > > with backports being official I would like to request permission to > > > upload dput with an adapted /etc/dput.cf file to fix that so that we > > > don't have to adjust it on systems we upload from. > > > > > As I said on irc, ack in principle (send a patch here before uploading > > though please, although I assume it's just the config file being > > updated; haven't looked at the bug). > > Ping? :) http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dput.git;a=commitdiff;h=7453fa87858049595d4413abab458a76204942e0 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dput.git;a=commitdiff;h=a3a3cf04da6f4412ea47323d0becc71cb49fa552 Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://people.debian.org/~appaji/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 19:13 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:12:21 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > > Dear Release Team. dput in squeeze still has the old upload data for > > backports in it from its unofficial time. Given that we released squeeze > > with backports being official I would like to request permission to > > upload dput with an adapted /etc/dput.cf file to fix that so that we > > don't have to adjust it on systems we upload from. > > > As I said on irc, ack in principle (send a patch here before uploading > though please, although I assume it's just the config file being > updated; haven't looked at the bug). Ping? :) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:12:21 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Dear Release Team. dput in squeeze still has the old upload data for > backports in it from its unofficial time. Given that we released squeeze > with backports being official I would like to request permission to > upload dput with an adapted /etc/dput.cf file to fix that so that we > don't have to adjust it on systems we upload from. > As I said on irc, ack in principle (send a patch here before uploading though please, although I assume it's just the config file being updated; haven't looked at the bug). Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
Hi! * Y Giridhar Appaji Nag [2011-03-07 09:16:04 CET]: > I will get in touch with the release team to have this integrated for r1 but I > am not sure they would accept a 'non critical' change. I haven't seen anything on the mailing list of the release team, so I'm forwarding the request myself. Dear Release Team. dput in squeeze still has the old upload data for backports in it from its unofficial time. Given that we released squeeze with backports being official I would like to request permission to upload dput with an adapted /etc/dput.cf file to fix that so that we don't have to adjust it on systems we upload from. Thanks in advance, more information is available in the bugreport: http://bugs.debian.org/595726 Enjoy, Rhonda -- Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los| Wir sind Helden Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
Hi! On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 01:46:04PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > On 11/03/04 22:14 +0100, Gerfried Fuchs said ... > > * Salvatore Bonaccorso [2011-03-04 20:51:32 CET]: > > > Hi Rhonda and Y Giridhar Appaji Nag > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:14:22PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:24:12PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > > > > > # * Change the default backports configuration (Closes: #595726) > > > > > > > > > > tags 595726 + pending > > > > > > > > This was in September - I am thinking of preparing an NMU for this and > > > > also run it through the release-team to get this into squeeze. Please > > > > speak up if you want to do that yourself, it's quite inconvenient that > > > > backports is official since squeeze but the squeeze version of dput is > > > > unable to push there (without personal tweaking). > > > > > > Any news on this? > > > > I haven't received any response from Y Giridhar Appaji Nag and wanted > > to give them a chance to respond. > > > > If you want to do the upload you have my blessing. I have a fair bit of > > load on my shoulders these days, additionally if I'd done the NMU I > > would check the other bugs too to see wether there are others to do in > > the same upload, so it might take a bit until I get around to doing so. > > Thank you for your patience. I have been traveling since a while and also > moved my residence (I don't expect to have an internet connection at home till > a few days to be able to actively upload packages). I am on the Low threshold > NMU list and would be happy in case you do uploads on my behalf. There aren't > many other pressing 'bugs' that would need attention, but I will integrate a > couple of feature patches and do an upload in a few days. > > I will get in touch with the release team to have this integrated for r1 but I > am not sure they would accept a 'non critical' change. Ok, thank you for letting us know! As a small change, but usefull as said from Rhonda, IMHO it make sense to have this in squeeze, as backports.d.o now official for stable. Bests Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
Hi, On 11/03/04 22:14 +0100, Gerfried Fuchs said ... > * Salvatore Bonaccorso [2011-03-04 20:51:32 CET]: > > Hi Rhonda and Y Giridhar Appaji Nag > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:14:22PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:24:12PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > > > > # * Change the default backports configuration (Closes: #595726) > > > > > > > > tags 595726 + pending > > > > > > This was in September - I am thinking of preparing an NMU for this and > > > also run it through the release-team to get this into squeeze. Please > > > speak up if you want to do that yourself, it's quite inconvenient that > > > backports is official since squeeze but the squeeze version of dput is > > > unable to push there (without personal tweaking). > > > > Any news on this? > > I haven't received any response from Y Giridhar Appaji Nag and wanted > to give them a chance to respond. > > If you want to do the upload you have my blessing. I have a fair bit of > load on my shoulders these days, additionally if I'd done the NMU I > would check the other bugs too to see wether there are others to do in > the same upload, so it might take a bit until I get around to doing so. Thank you for your patience. I have been traveling since a while and also moved my residence (I don't expect to have an internet connection at home till a few days to be able to actively upload packages). I am on the Low threshold NMU list and would be happy in case you do uploads on my behalf. There aren't many other pressing 'bugs' that would need attention, but I will integrate a couple of feature patches and do an upload in a few days. I will get in touch with the release team to have this integrated for r1 but I am not sure they would accept a 'non critical' change. Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://people.debian.org/~appaji/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
Hi! * Salvatore Bonaccorso [2011-03-04 20:51:32 CET]: > Hi Rhonda and Y Giridhar Appaji Nag > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:14:22PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:24:12PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > > > #dput (0.9.6.2) unstable; urgency=low > > > # > > > # * Change the default backports configuration (Closes: #595726) > > > # > > > > > > limit source dput > > > tags 595726 + pending > > > thanks > > > > This was in September - I am thinking of preparing an NMU for this and > > also run it through the release-team to get this into squeeze. Please > > speak up if you want to do that yourself, it's quite inconvenient that > > backports is official since squeeze but the squeeze version of dput is > > unable to push there (without personal tweaking). > > Any news on this? I haven't received any response from Y Giridhar Appaji Nag and wanted to give them a chance to respond. If you want to do the upload you have my blessing. I have a fair bit of load on my shoulders these days, additionally if I'd done the NMU I would check the other bugs too to see wether there are others to do in the same upload, so it might take a bit until I get around to doing so. Thanks for your interest, Rhonda -- "What are the differences between Mark Zuckerberg and me? I give private information on corporations to you for free, and I'm a villain. Zuckerberg gives your private information to corporations for money and he's Man of the Year." -- Julian Assange -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
Hi Rhonda and Y Giridhar Appaji Nag On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:14:22PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:24:12PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > > #dput (0.9.6.2) unstable; urgency=low > > # > > # * Change the default backports configuration (Closes: #595726) > > # > > > > limit source dput > > tags 595726 + pending > > thanks > > This was in September - I am thinking of preparing an NMU for this and > also run it through the release-team to get this into squeeze. Please > speak up if you want to do that yourself, it's quite inconvenient that > backports is official since squeeze but the squeeze version of dput is > unable to push there (without personal tweaking). Any news on this? Bests Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#595726: limit source to dput, tagging 595726
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:24:12PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > #dput (0.9.6.2) unstable; urgency=low > # > # * Change the default backports configuration (Closes: #595726) > # > > limit source dput > tags 595726 + pending > thanks This was in September - I am thinking of preparing an NMU for this and also run it through the release-team to get this into squeeze. Please speak up if you want to do that yourself, it's quite inconvenient that backports is official since squeeze but the squeeze version of dput is unable to push there (without personal tweaking). Thanks, Rhonda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
