Processed: tgmochikit: contains files without license
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 689285 1.4.2-2.1
Bug #689285 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk} [tgmochikit]
tgmochikit: contains files without license
There is no source info for the package 'tgmochikit' at version '1.4.2-2.1'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.4.2-2.1'
Marked as found in versions 1.4.2-2.1; no longer marked as fixed in versions
tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1 and reopened.
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
689285: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689285
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: pymongo: incomplete debian/copyright
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 689283 2.2-3.1
Bug #689283 {Done: Bas Wijnen wij...@debian.org} [pymongo] pymongo:
incomplete debian/copyright
There is no source info for the package 'pymongo' at version '2.2-3.1' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.2-3.1'
Marked as found in versions 2.2-3.1; no longer marked as fixed in versions
pymongo/2.2-3.1 and reopened.
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
689283: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689283
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#684923: fontconfig-config: Please stop messing with my /etc
On 2012-09-29 Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote: [...] It is just not yet documented. /usr/share/doc/fontconfig/README.Debian seems to be outdated. * /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-debconf-no-bitmaps.conf was the filename used in old versions of fontconfig ( 2.4.x?) * The package one needs to reconfigure is not fontconfig but fontconfig-config. * Link deletion is not supported. ... which would be implemented by attached tiny patch. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' diff -Nru fontconfig-2.9.0/debian/changelog fontconfig-2.9.0/debian/changelog --- fontconfig-2.9.0/debian/changelog 2012-07-25 17:52:32.0 +0200 +++ fontconfig-2.9.0/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 08:48:28.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +fontconfig (2.9.0-7.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Update README.Debian with respect to enabling bitmapped fonts. Just +removing the no-bitmaps.conf symlink is not enough, the corresponding +symlink for yes-bitmaps.conf needs to be added. Closes: #684923 + + -- Andreas Metzler ametz...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 08:21:18 +0200 + fontconfig (2.9.0-7) unstable; urgency=low * Don't clean ancient cache files on new install. Closes: #636173. diff -Nru fontconfig-2.9.0/debian/README.Debian fontconfig-2.9.0/debian/README.Debian --- fontconfig-2.9.0/debian/README.Debian 2012-04-16 20:35:08.0 +0200 +++ fontconfig-2.9.0/debian/README.Debian 2012-10-14 08:45:18.0 +0200 @@ -3,9 +3,12 @@ Recently, fontconfig changed to not include bitmapped fonts in the default font set. There is now a Debconf question about this. -If you wish to enable bitmapped fonts manually, either reconfigure this -package (with dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config), or remove the -symbolic link /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-debconf-no-bitmaps.conf +If you wish to enable bitmapped fonts manually, either reconfigure +fontconfig-config (with dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config), or remove the +symbolic link /etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf and add a symlink named +70-yes-bitmaps.conf pointing to ../conf.avail/70-yes-bitmaps.conf. +(cd /etc/fonts/conf.d/ rm -f 70-no-bitmaps.conf + ln -s ../conf.avail/70-yes-bitmaps.conf 70-yes-bitmaps.conf) *
Bug#680084: os-prober: postinst script gets stuck
I see processes such as: grub-mount /dev/mapper/vg1-SomeLogicalVolume /var/lib/os-prober/mount Can you all see if you have anything in common with these vg partitions? Also, can you analyze the output from manually running the seemingly hanging process? # grub-mount /dev/mapper/vgwhatever mount-point Also, what does /dev/mapper/vgwhatever actually point to? Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Fixed upstream
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 687405 + fixed-upstream Bug #687405 [src:audiofile] audiofile: FTBFS: test failed Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 687405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687405 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: re: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name
Processing control commands: tag -1 patch Bug #665476 [libsasl2-2,libsasl2-modules] libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name Added tag(s) patch. -- 665476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name
control: tag -1 patch Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please let me know if I should delay longer. See attached patch. Best wishes, Mike sasl.patch Description: Binary data
Processed: re: grub-efi-amd64: Stuck at grub recovery prompt when USB media reader attached
Processing control commands: tag -1 patch Bug #687320 [grub-efi-amd64] grub-efi-amd64: Stuck at grub recovery prompt when USB media reader attached Added tag(s) patch. -- 687320: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687320 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#687320: grub-efi-amd64: Stuck at grub recovery prompt when USB media reader attached
control: tag -1 patch Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/10. I pulled the patch unchanged directly from Ubuntu, so it should be ok, but I want to give you sufficient time for review or to do a maintainer upload. See attached. Best wishes, Mike grub2.patch Description: Binary data
Bug#677280: grub-efi: cannot find normal; wrong prefix to grub2 (EFI)?
control: reassign -1 grub-common control: forcemerge 684574 -1 So, there seems to be a problem with video when I load EFI and grub all from the harddisk, but it works when I load grub from the supergrub CD. This seems like the EFI video modules issue. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: re: grub-efi: cannot find normal; wrong prefix to grub2 (EFI)?
Processing control commands: reassign -1 grub-common Bug #677280 [grub-efi] grub-efi: cannot find normal; wrong prefix to grub2 (EFI)? Bug reassigned from package 'grub-efi' to 'grub-common'. No longer marked as found in versions grub2/1.99-22. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #677280 to the same values previously set forcemerge 684574 -1 Bug #684574 [grub-common] grub-efi-amd64 - Does not load EFI console modules Bug #661789 [grub-common] grub-common: load_video required for linux on UEFI Bug #677280 [grub-common] grub-efi: cannot find normal; wrong prefix to grub2 (EFI)? Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' Marked as found in versions grub2/1.99-14. Bug #661789 [grub-common] grub-common: load_video required for linux on UEFI Merged 661789 677280 684574 -- 661789: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661789 677280: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677280 684574: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684574 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#680791: marked as done (clamfs: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libpoco-dev)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 10:21:20 +0100 with message-id 20121014102120.3acc39e4c9e5792ed60fb...@debian.org and subject line Fixed in poco has caused the Debian Bug report #680791, regarding clamfs: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libpoco-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 680791: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680791 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: clamfs Version: 1.0.1-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: ┌──┐ │ Install clamfs build dependencies (apt-based resolver) │ └──┘ Installing build dependencies Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: sbuild-build-depends-clamfs-dummy : Depends: libpoco-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. apt-get failed. The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/07/08/clamfs_1.0.1-1.1_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- tag 680791 - wheezy thanks poco is now available in unstable and clamfs is not in testing currently and does now build in a clean chroot. Closing and removing wheezy indication. -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpgYzKTQWZJZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
Bug#684889: Confirmed, but FTBFS with patch
tags 684889 + patch thanks The test case from the link in the original report does indeed cause a segmentation fault for me. I looked over the patch which was linked, and it looks good. However, when I applied it, the compile failed one of its tests. This may not be related to the patch, though. I do not have the computing power at hand to try more compiles. Below I quoted the final part of the output. Thanks, Bas /tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686/elf/check-localplt /tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686/libc.so /tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686/math/libm.so /tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686/nptl/libpthread.so /tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686/rt/librt.so /tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686/dlfcn/libdl.so /tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686/resolv/libresolv.so /tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686/crypt/libcrypt.so | \ LC_ALL=C sort | \ diff -u ../scripts/data/localplt-i386-linux-gnu.data - /tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686/elf/check-localplt.out make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/eglibc-2.13/elf' scripts/check-c++-types.sh scripts/data/c++-types-i386-linux-gnu.data g++-4.4 -fgnu89-inline -O2 -Wall -Winline -Wwrite-strings -fmerge-all-constants -fstrict-aliasing -g -march=i686 -mtune=generic -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -Iinclude -I/tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686 -Isysdeps/i386/elf -Inptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i686 -Isysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i686 -Inptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386 -Isysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386 -Inptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -Inptl/sysdeps/pthread -Isysdeps/pthread -Isysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -Isysdeps/gnu -Isysdeps/unix/common -Isysdeps/unix/mman -Isysdeps/unix/inet -Isysdeps/unix/sysv/i386 -Inptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv -Isysdeps/unix/sysv -Isysdeps/unix/i386 -Inptl/sysdeps/unix -Isysdeps/unix -Isysdeps/posix -Isysdeps/i386/i686/fpu -Isysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch -Inptl/sysdeps/i386/i686 -Isysdeps/i386/i686 -Isysdeps/i386/i486 -Inptl/sysdeps/i386/i486 -Isysdeps/i386/fpu -Inptl/sysdeps/i386 -Isysdeps/i386 -Isysdeps/wordsize-32 -Isysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-96 -Isysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 -Isysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -Isysdeps/ieee754 -Isysdeps/generic/elf -Isysdeps/generic -Inptl -Ilibio -I. -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.4.7/include -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.4.7/include-fixed -isystem /tmp/eglibc-2.13/debian/include -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include include/libc-symbols.h /tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686/c++-types-check.out scripts/check-local-headers.sh /usr/include /tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686/ /tmp/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/i386-i686/check-local-headers.out /usr/bin/perl scripts/begin-end-check.pl argp/argp.h assert/assert.h catgets/nl_types.h crypt/crypt.h ctype/ctype.h debug/execinfo.h dirent/dirent.h dlfcn/dlfcn.h elf/elf.h elf/link.h gmon/sys/gmon.h gmon/sys/gmon_out.h gmon/sys/profil.h grp/grp.h gshadow/gshadow.h iconv/iconv.h iconv/gconv.h inet/netinet/ether.h inet/netinet/icmp6.h inet/netinet/igmp.h inet/netinet/in.h inet/netinet/ip6.h inet/arpa/ftp.h inet/arpa/inet.h inet/arpa/telnet.h inet/arpa/tftp.h inet/protocols/routed.h inet/protocols/rwhod.h inet/protocols/talkd.h inet/protocols/timed.h inet/aliases.h inet/ifaddrs.h inet/netinet/ip6.h inet/netinet/icmp6.h intl/libintl.h io/sys/stat.h io/sys/statfs.h io/sys/vfs.h io/sys/statvfs.h io/fcntl.h io/sys/fcntl.h io/poll.h io/sys/poll.h io/utime.h io/ftw.h io/fts.h io/sys/sendfile.h libio/stdio.h libio/libio.h locale/locale.h locale/langinfo.h locale/xlocale.h login/utmp.h login/lastlog.h login/pty.h malloc/malloc.h malloc/obstack.h malloc/mcheck.h math/math.h math/complex.h math/fenv.h math/tgmath.h misc/sys/uio.h nis/rpcsvc/nis.h nis/rpcsvc/nis_callback.h nis/rpcsvc/nis_tags.h nis/rpcsvc/nislib.h nis/rpcsvc/yp.h nis/rpcsvc/yp_prot.h nis/rpcsvc/ypclnt.h nis/rpcsvc/ypupd.h nptl_db/thread_db.h nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pthread.h nptl/semaphore.h nss/nss.h posix/sys/utsname.h posix/sys/times.h posix/sys/wait.h posix/sys/types.h posix/unistd.h posix/glob.h posix/regex.h posix/wordexp.h posix/fnmatch.h posix/getopt.h posix/tar.h posix/sys/unistd.h posix/sched.h posix/re_comp.h posix/wait.h posix/cpio.h posix/spawn.h pwd/pwd.h resolv/resolv.h resolv/netdb.h resolv/arpa/nameser.h resolv/arpa/nameser_compat.h resource/sys/resource.h resource/sys/vlimit.h resource/sys/vtimes.h resource/ulimit.h rt/aio.h rt/mqueue.h setjmp/setjmp.h shadow/shadow.h signal/signal.h signal/sys/signal.h socket/sys/socket.h socket/sys/un.h stdio-common/printf.h stdio-common/stdio_ext.h stdlib/stdlib.h stdlib/alloca.h stdlib/monetary.h stdlib/fmtmsg.h stdlib/ucontext.h sysdeps/generic/inttypes.h sysdeps/generic/stdint.h stdlib/errno.h stdlib/sys/errno.h string/string.h string/strings.h string/memory.h string/endian.h string/argz.h string/envz.h string/byteswap.h sunrpc/rpc/auth.h sunrpc/rpc/auth_des.h sunrpc/rpc/auth_unix.h sunrpc/rpc/clnt.h sunrpc/rpc/des_crypt.h sunrpc/rpc/key_prot.h sunrpc/rpc/netdb.h sunrpc/rpc/pmap_clnt.h sunrpc/rpc/pmap_prot.h sunrpc/rpc/pmap_rmt.h
Processed: Confirmed, but FTBFS with patch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 684889 + patch Bug #684889 [eglibc] eglibc: CVE-2012-3480 Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 684889: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684889 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name
Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't really want transition sasl right now. The only thing which broke was openldap due some really deep internal library symbols, which are not used anywhere else, and it's already fixed, so I don't think this deserves transition. Debian release might have different opinion though, but if not I suggest to set this as wheezy-ignore. O. On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: control: tag -1 patch Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please let me know if I should delay longer. See attached patch. Best wishes, Mike ___ Pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel mailing list pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel -- Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Fixed in poco
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 680791 - wheezy
Bug #680791 {Done: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org} [src:clamfs] clamfs:
FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libpoco-dev
Removed tag(s) wheezy.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
680791: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680791
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name
And your patch is wrong, you have bumped soname, but left the package name same, which is even more wrong the this subtle breakage in the first place. On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org wrote: Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't really want transition sasl right now. The only thing which broke was openldap due some really deep internal library symbols, which are not used anywhere else, and it's already fixed, so I don't think this deserves transition. Debian release might have different opinion though, but if not I suggest to set this as wheezy-ignore. O. On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: control: tag -1 patch Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please let me know if I should delay longer. See attached patch. Best wishes, Mike ___ Pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel mailing list pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel -- Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org -- Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#687402: marked as done (beanstalkd: FTBFS: tests failed)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:17:25 + with message-id e1tnkk5-00034w...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#687402: fixed in beanstalkd 1.4.6-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #687402, regarding beanstalkd: FTBFS: tests failed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 687402: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687402 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: beanstalkd Version: 1.4.6-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -I/usr/include -c -o cutgen.o cutgen.c gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib -o cutgen cutgen.o -levent -levent -levent mkdir -p tests ./cutgen -o tests/cutcheck.c ./tests/test_job.c ./tests/test_pq.c - parsing './tests/test_job.c'... done. - parsing './tests/test_pq.c'... done. gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -I/usr/include -c -o tests/cutcheck.o tests/cutcheck.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -I/usr/include -c -o cut.o cut.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -I/usr/include -c -o tests/test_job.o tests/test_job.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -I/usr/include -c -o tests/test_pq.o tests/test_pq.c gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib -o tests/cutcheck tests/cutcheck.o cut.o binlog.o conn.o job.o ms.o net.o port.o pq.o primes.o prot.o tube.o util.o tests/test_job.o tests/test_pq.o -levent -levent -levent tests/cutcheck 0.. 10... 13 tests; 0 failures; 0 errors. SRCDIR=. ./check.sh ./sh-tests/*.commands sh-tests/*.sh loopback interface is configured, getting on with tests ./sh-tests/allow-underscore.commands ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 40874 -z 10 Started beanstalkd (pid: 14488), listening on port 40874 ./sh-tests/delete_ready.commands ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 13945 -z 10 Started beanstalkd (pid: 14496), listening on port 13945 ./sh-tests/multi-tube.commands ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 43557 -z 10 Started beanstalkd (pid: 14504), listening on port 43557 ./sh-tests/no_negative_delays.commands ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 15031 -z 10 Started beanstalkd (pid: 14512), listening on port 15031 ./sh-tests/omit-time-left.commands ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 29365 -z 10 Started beanstalkd (pid: 14520), listening on port 29365 ./sh-tests/pause-tube.commands ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 19063 -z 10 Started beanstalkd (pid: 14528), listening on port 19063 ./sh-tests/small_delay.commands ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 17319 -z 10 Started beanstalkd (pid: 14536), listening on port 17319 ./sh-tests/too-big.commands ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 39171 -z 10 Started beanstalkd (pid: 14544), listening on port 39171 ./sh-tests/ttr-large.commands ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 21893 -z 10 Started beanstalkd (pid: 14552), listening on port 21893 ./sh-tests/zero_delay.commands ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 27048 -z 10 Started beanstalkd (pid: 14560), listening on port 27048 sh-tests/binlog-allocation.sh ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 35190 -b /tmp/bnch14567.d -s 601 Started beanstalkd (pid: 14569), listening on port 35190 sh-tests/binlog-basic.sh ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 31443 -b /tmp/bnch14576.d Started beanstalkd (pid: 14578), listening on port 31443 ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 23412 -b /tmp/bnch14576.d Started beanstalkd (pid: 14586), listening on port 23412 sh-tests/binlog-bury.sh ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 41544 -b /tmp/bnch14593.d Started beanstalkd (pid: 14595), listening on port 41544 sh-tests/binlog-diskfull-delete.sh fiu-run -x ./beanstalkd -l 127.0.0.1 -p 32452 -b /tmp/bnch14602.d -s 1000 Started beanstalkd (pid: 14605), listening on port 32452 4,5c4,5 OUT_OF_MEMORY OUT_OF_MEMORY --- INSERTED 9 INSERTED 10 FAIL: sh-tests/binlog-diskfull-delete.sh make[1]: *** [check-shell] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/09/12/beanstalkd_1.4.6-3_wheezy.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and
Bug#688413: accountsservice: Makes gnome-shell crash
tags 688413 + unreproducible In wheezy i386 I have switched back and forth between two users, without seeing the error reported. I didn't experience it in sid i386 either. -- Gianluca Ciccarelli http://disi.unitn.it/~ciccarelli GPG key ID: 0x39BBDB6C signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#688233: marked as done (/usr/bin/uim-module-manager: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/uim/installed-modules.scm, /etc/uim/loader.scm)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:51:55 + with message-id e1tnkrt-my...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#688233: fixed in uim 1:1.8.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #688233, regarding /usr/bin/uim-module-manager: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/uim/installed-modules.scm, /etc/uim/loader.scm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 688233: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688233 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: uim-utils Version: 1:1.8.1-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Control: affects -1 + uim-yahoo-jp uim-viqr uim-social-ime fail/uim-skk uim-prime uim-pinyin uim-mozc uim-m17nlib uim-look uim-latin uim-latin uim-ipa-x-sampa uim-google-cgiapi-jp uim-chewing uim-canna uim-byeoru uim-baidu-olime-jp uim-anthy uim-ajax-ime Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed that all the uim module packages modify conffiles. This is forbidden by the policy, see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files 10.7.3: [...] The easy way to achieve this behavior is to make the configuration file a conffile. [...] This implies that the default version will be part of the package distribution, and must not be modified by the maintainer scripts during installation (or at any other time). Note that once a package ships a modified version of that conffile, dpkg will prompt the user for an action how to handle the upgrade of this modified conffile (that was not modified by the user). Further in 10.7.3: [...] must not ask unnecessary questions (particularly during upgrades) [...] If a configuration file is customized by a maintainer script after having asked some debconf questions, it may not be marked as a conffile. Instead a template could be installed in /usr/share and used by the postinst script to fill in the custom values and create (or update) the configuration file (preserving any user modifications!). This file must be removed during postrm purge. ucf(1) may help with these tasks. See also http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling In https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/09/msg00412.html and followups it has been agreed that these bugs are to be filed with severity serious. debsums reports modification of the following files, from the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): /etc/uim/installed-modules.scm /etc/uim/loader.scm Having the registration/unregistration of the modules done by uim-module-manager is perfectly fine, only the registration database files must not be conffiles and must be cleaned up during postrm purge. cheers, Andreas uim-yahoo-jp_1:1.8.1-2.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: uim Source-Version: 1:1.8.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of uim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 688...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) d...@debian.org (supplier of updated uim package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:07:35 +0900 Source: uim Binary: uim-common uim libuim8 libuim-scm0 libuim-custom2 libuim-data libuim-dev uim-dbg uim-gtk2.0 uim-gtk3 uim-qt uim-qt3 uim-xim uim-applet-gnome plasma-widget-uim uim-applet-kde uim-dict-gtk uim-dict-gtk3 uim-fep uim-utils uim-anthy uim-canna uim-skk uim-prime uim-m17nlib uim-el uim-byeoru uim-hangul uim-latin uim-pinyin uim-tcode uim-viqr uim-ipa-x-sampa uim-look uim-yahoo-jp uim-social-ime uim-ajax-ime uim-google-cgiapi-jp uim-baidu-olime-jp Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1:1.8.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) d...@debian.org Changed-By: HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) d...@debian.org Description: libuim-custom2 - Universal Input Method - uim-custom API library libuim-data - Universal Input Method - data files libuim-dev - Universal Input Method - development files libuim-scm0 - Universal Input Method - uim-scm API library libuim8- Universal Input Method - uim library
Bug#681361: NMU diff
Just uploaded an NMU to implement the TC requirements. Here's the debdiff
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky,
Tongue-tied twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...
diff -u node-0.3.2/Makefile node-0.3.2/Makefile
--- node-0.3.2/Makefile
+++ node-0.3.2/Makefile
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
installbin: all
install -m 755 -o root -g root -d$(prefix)$(SBIN_DIR)
- install -m 4755 -s -o root -g root node $(prefix)$(SBIN_DIR)
+ install -m 4755 -s -o root -g root node
$(prefix)$(SBIN_DIR)/ax25-node
install -m 755 -s -o root -g root nodeusers $(prefix)$(SBIN_DIR)
installhelp:
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
install -m 644-o bin -g bin man/node.conf.5
$(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man5
install -m 644-o bin -g bin man/node.perms.5
$(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man5
install -m 755-o root -g root -d
$(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man8
- install -m 644-o bin -g bin man/node.8
$(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man8
+ install -m 644-o bin -g bin man/node.8
$(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man8/ax25-node.8
clean:
rm -f *.o *~ *.bak *.orig
diff -u node-0.3.2/debian/rules node-0.3.2/debian/rules
--- node-0.3.2/debian/rules
+++ node-0.3.2/debian/rules
@@ -42,8 +42,13 @@
dh_installdirs
# Add here commands to install the package into debian/node.
- $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/node/
+ $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/ax25-node/
+ # Set up symlinks in the transitional package
+ mkdir -p debian/node/usr/sbin
+ ln -s ax25-node debian/node/usr/sbin/node
+ mkdir -p debian/node/usr/share/man/man8
+ ln -s ax25-node.8 debian/node/usr/share/man/man8/node.8
# Build architecture-independent files here.
binary-indep: build install
@@ -61,7 +66,7 @@
# dh_installpam
# dh_installinit
# dh_installcron
- dh_installmanpages
+ dh_installmanpages -p ax25-node
# dh_installinfo
# dh_undocumented
dh_installchangelogs
diff -u node-0.3.2/debian/control node-0.3.2/debian/control
--- node-0.3.2/debian/control
+++ node-0.3.2/debian/control
@@ -9,8 +9,17 @@
-Package: node
+Package: ax25-node
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, update-inetd, openbsd-inetd|inet-superserver
Description: Amateur Packet Radio Node program
- The node program accepts TCP/IP and packet radio network connections and
+ The ax25-node program accepts TCP/IP and packet radio network connections and
presents users with an interface that allows them to make gateway connections
to remote hosts using a variety of amateur radio protocols.
+Package: node
+Priority: extra
+Architecture: all
+Depends: ax25-node
+Conflicts: nodejs-legacy
+Section: oldlibs
+Description: Amateur Packet Radio Node program (transitional package)
+ The existing node package has been renamed to ax25-node. This transitional
+ package exists to ease the upgrade path for existing users.
diff -u node-0.3.2/debian/changelog node-0.3.2/debian/changelog
--- node-0.3.2/debian/changelog
+++ node-0.3.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+node (0.3.2-7.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU
+ * Implement the tech committee decision to fix the node/nodejs name
+clash (Closes: #681361):
++ Rename the existing node binary package to ax25-node
++ Rename the /usr/sbin/node binary in that package to
+ /usr/sbin/ax25-node
++ Add a new node transitional package which depends on ax25-node
+ and conflicts with nodejs-legacy.
+
+ -- Steve McIntyre 93...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 00:37:37 +0100
+
node (0.3.2-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Retiring - remove myself from the uploaders list.
reverted:
--- node-0.3.2/debian/postinst
+++ node-0.3.2.orig/debian/postinst
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-#! /bin/sh
-# postinst script for node
-#
-# see: dh_installdeb(1)
-
-set -e
-
-# summary of how this script can be called:
-#* postinst `configure' most-recently-configured-version
-#* old-postinst `abort-upgrade' new version
-#* conflictor's-postinst `abort-remove' `in-favour' package
-# new-version
-#* deconfigured's-postinst `abort-deconfigure' `in-favour'
-# failed-install-package version `removing'
-# conflicting-package version
-# for details, see /usr/share/doc/packaging-manual/
-#
-# quoting from the policy:
-# Any necessary prompting should almost always be confined to the
-# post-installation script, and should be protected with a conditional
-# so that unnecessary prompting doesn't happen if a package's
-# installation fails and the `postinst' is called with `abort-upgrade',
-# `abort-remove' or `abort-deconfigure'.
-
-case $1 in
-install|upgrade|configure)
-update-inetd --add \
-bbs\tstream\ttcp\twait\troot\t/usr/sbin/node\tnode
-update-inetd --disable bbs
-;;
-
-
Bug#680843: uninstallable build-dependencies are causing this build failure
On up to date sid: $ sudo apt-get install libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl libcatalyst-perl libmoose-perl libnamespace-autoclean-perl Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libcatalyst-perl : Conflicts: libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. Source: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl Section: perl Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Perl Group pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Uploaders: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8) Build-Depends-Indep: perl, libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl, libcatalyst-perl, libmoose-perl, libnamespace-autoclean-perl In a clean sid chroot: # apt-get install libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl : Depends: libcatalyst-perl (= 5.80025) but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. Will investigate some more -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpgayQWLiZ2I.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Also can't reproduce, downgrading
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 688785 important Bug #688785 [xbmc] xbmc: Fatal: can't open /dev/urandom: Bad address Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688785: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688785 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690425: sqldiff commands is incompatible with current Django
Package: python-django-extensions Version: 0.6+git201107051902-1 Severity: serious Hello, it looks like sqldiff in django_extensions has bitrotten considerably: $ ./manage.py sqldiff Traceback (most recent call last): File ./manage.py, line 10, in module execute_from_command_line(sys.argv) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py, line 443, in execute_from_command_line utility.execute() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py, line 382, in execute self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 196, in run_from_argv self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 232, in execute output = self.handle(*args, **options) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/django_extensions/management/commands/sqldiff.py, line 583, in handle if settings.DATABASE_ENGINE == 'dummy': File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/utils/functional.py, line 185, in inner return func(self._wrapped, *args) AttributeError: 'Settings' object has no attribute 'DATABASE_ENGINE' See: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.2/ref/settings/#deprecated-settings I replaced DATABASE_ENGINE with DATABASES[default][ENGINE], and now I hit: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7042463/django-postgres-transaction-managed-block-ended-with-pending-commit-rollback I commented out transaction usage and now I get this: $ ./manage.py sqldiff services Traceback (most recent call last): File ./manage.py, line 10, in module execute_from_command_line(sys.argv) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py, line 443, in execute_from_command_line utility.execute() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py, line 382, in execute self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 196, in run_from_argv self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 232, in execute output = self.handle(*args, **options) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/django_extensions/management/commands/sqldiff.py, line 612, in handle sqldiff_instance.find_differences() File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/django_extensions/management/commands/sqldiff.py, line 359, in find_differences self.find_field_type_differ(meta, table_description, table_name) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/django_extensions/management/commands/sqldiff.py, line 279, in find_field_type_differ model_type = self.strip_parameters(self.get_field_model_type(field)) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/django_extensions/management/commands/sqldiff.py, line 164, in get_field_model_type return field.db_type() TypeError: db_type() takes exactly 2 arguments (1 given) Finally, I passed django.db.connection to all db_type calls in sqldiff.py, and the command works, limited to the 'default' database. I copied https://raw.github.com/django-extensions/django-extensions/master/django_extensions/management/commands/sqldiff.py to /usr/share/pyshared/django_extensions/management/commands/sqldiff.py and it also worked, so a saner fix could probably be to just fetch the new sqldiff.py from upstream. Ciao, Enrico -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages python-django-extensions depends on: ii python 2.7.3~rc2-1 ii python-django 1.4.1-2 ii python-support 1.0.15 Versions of packages python-django-extensions recommends: ii libjs-jquery 1.7.2+debian-2.1 Versions of packages python-django-extensions suggests: ii python [python-profiler] 2.7.3~rc2-1 pn python-boto none pn python-keyczarnone ii python-pygraphviz 1.1-2 ii python-werkzeug 0.8.3+dfsg-1 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#687402: beanstalkd: proposed TPU (diff for NMU version 1.4.6-3.1)
On 13.10.2012 23:15, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:19:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 13.10.2012 20:22, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: Dear RMs, here's an almost identical patch (also, dropping -i as it's also deprecated, and adding VCS headers). On the whole, this looks fine; thanks. However: + * Bump up Standards-Version to 3.9.4 The d-d-a mail announcing the release of policy 3.9.4 specifically asked people *not* to do that. oh sorry about that; will upload with S-V set to 3.9.3 then. You could just have not bumped it at all instead. ;-) Approve hint added. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:29:21 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't really want transition sasl right now. Agreed that this patch is not acceptable. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#687405: Upstream fix hard to port to Debian
This FTBFS was fixed upstream. Unfortunately, the patch is hard to port to Debian, since many filenames were changes in the meantime. I have no time to look after this at the moment. Another option is to apply my patch instead of upstream's. My patch is rather messy, but it should be dropped anyway when the next version is packages, since that will benefit from the upstream fix. I leave this decision to the maintainer. Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#685540: getting the asterisk module loadable
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:02:56PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 12-10-13 at 04:08pm, Geert Stappers wrote: Here a message from the Utrecht BSP 2012. ( http://wiki.debian.org/BSP/2012/10/nl/Utrecht ) Bugreport 685540 is release critical according http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/other/testing.html so I spend some time on it and go it fixed. When compiling with asterisk installed, I get a loadable app_flite.so In other words: A build-depend on asterisk solves this issue. I believe your reasoning is flawed: Compiling _without_ adding a build-dependency on asterisk _also_ makes app_flite.so loadable. That does makes sense, at least it matches my observation: module was loadable after a recompile I gonna do a non-maintainer upload to the 10 days delay queue. Thanks for the attempt - but please cancel that misleading upload unless you can provide additional info contraditing what I wrote above. There was a `dput --delayed 10` down and after that a `dcut`. In ten day we know for sure that cancel was succesfull. If my `dcut` was unsuccesfull, we get a binNMU :-/ The specific issue needs only a simple binNMU, That information is now in this bugreport. which the release team has judged is wrong to do. Having the reason in this BR would be nice. The underlying issue is that asterisk fails to provide proper shlibs hinting, so that packages building against asterisk do not get versioned binary dependencies that can reveal leed for binNMU later on. That ? binary dependencies that can reveal need for binNMU later on. That underlying issue needs to be reported against asterisk and fixed there. The Debian maintainers of asterisk are in the Cc. Reporting the issue in a BR is now, wheezy release freeze, not done. Groeten Geert Stappers -- And is there a policy on top-posting vs. bottom-posting? Yes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#594753: Issues with Brasero 3.x (was: Cdrtools instead of libburnia)
Dear Debian Brasero 3.x users, I am CCing you all, but just reply to Tsu’s last message. Unfortunately all of your replies are not threaded correctly increasing work for the maintainers and people wanting to help. In the future, it would be awesome if you could follow the guide in the Wiki [1]. Please make sure to always CC all people involved in the bug thread. I am pretty sure for all the people following up here having issues with Brasero 3.x are experiencing bug #688229 [4]. Am Montag, den 10.09.2012, 18:58 +0430 schrieb Tsu Jan: The bug may be related to how Brasero uses libburnia+libisofs. For those with 3.x, it indeed was such a bug [2] and it is fixed now [3][4]. It would be helpful if you could test Brasero 3.4.1-4. Please start it with $ brasero -g | tee `date +%Y%m%d-%H%M`--brasero.log to capture the debugging output too. Debugging logs are important as otherwise nothing can be done about a bug. If you are still experiencing some issue, please submit a new report with the above log attached. […] Thanks, Paul [1] http://wiki.debian.org/BTS/FollowUpOnReports#preview [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685983 [3] http://git.gnome.org/browse/brasero/commit/?id=253031b69c5dcbcf079c445ec530afb7ccd9ea82 [4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688229 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#690067: syslog-ng-core: symlink conffile issues
Control: tag -1 + pending The easy fix is to remove debian/syslog-ng-core.conffiles. That has the downside of not allowing the user to easily change the symlink to point somewhere else (like a custom unit file) unless he diverts the file, which is kind of awkward. But alas, that's still less trouble than causing a mess with symlink conffiles, apparently. I've fixed it in my git tree, will poke GCS to pick it over for the next syslog-ng upload. -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 682691
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 682691 + wheezy
Bug #682691 {Done: Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org} [mysql-workbench]
[mysql-workbench] When quit MySQL Workbench, it get freezed
Added tag(s) wheezy.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
682691: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682691
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: syslog-ng-core: symlink conffile issues
Processing control commands: tag -1 + pending Bug #690067 [syslog-ng-core] symlink conffiles are not supported, causing problems for dpkg on upgrade/removal and incorrect debsums reports Added tag(s) pending. -- 690067: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690067 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 687405
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 687405 + pending Bug #687405 [src:audiofile] audiofile: FTBFS: test failed Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 687405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687405 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#687405: marked as done (audiofile: FTBFS: test failed)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 11:47:29 + with message-id e1tnmfj-0005vt...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#687405: fixed in audiofile 0.3.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687405, regarding audiofile: FTBFS: test failed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 687405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687405 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: audiofile Version: 0.3.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[5]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/test' [==] Running 1 test from 1 test case. [--] Global test environment set-up. [--] 1 test from AES [ RUN ] AES.AIFF [ OK ] AES.AIFF (1 ms) [--] 1 test from AES (1 ms total) [--] Global test environment tear-down [==] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (1 ms total) [ PASSED ] 1 test. PASS: aes [==] Running 12 tests from 1 test case. [--] Global test environment set-up. [--] 12 tests from ChannelMatrix [ RUN ] ChannelMatrix.ReadInt8 [ OK ] ChannelMatrix.ReadInt8 (0 ms) [ RUN ] ChannelMatrix.ReadInt16 [ OK ] ChannelMatrix.ReadInt16 (0 ms) [ RUN ] ChannelMatrix.ReadInt24 [ OK ] ChannelMatrix.ReadInt24 (1 ms) [ RUN ] ChannelMatrix.ReadInt32 [ OK ] ChannelMatrix.ReadInt32 (0 ms) [ RUN ] ChannelMatrix.ReadFloat [ OK ] ChannelMatrix.ReadFloat (0 ms) [ RUN ] ChannelMatrix.ReadDouble [ OK ] ChannelMatrix.ReadDouble (1 ms) [ RUN ] ChannelMatrix.WriteInt8 [ OK ] ChannelMatrix.WriteInt8 (0 ms) [ RUN ] ChannelMatrix.WriteInt16 [ OK ] ChannelMatrix.WriteInt16 (1 ms) [ RUN ] ChannelMatrix.WriteInt24 [ OK ] ChannelMatrix.WriteInt24 (0 ms) [ RUN ] ChannelMatrix.WriteInt32 [ OK ] ChannelMatrix.WriteInt32 (1 ms) [ RUN ] ChannelMatrix.WriteFloat [ OK ] ChannelMatrix.WriteFloat (1 ms) [ RUN ] ChannelMatrix.WriteDouble [ OK ] ChannelMatrix.WriteDouble (0 ms) [--] 12 tests from ChannelMatrix (5 ms total) [--] Global test environment tear-down [==] 12 tests from 1 test case ran. (29 ms total) [ PASSED ] 12 tests. PASS: channelmatrix [==] Running 12 tests from 12 test cases. [--] Global test environment set-up. [--] 1 test from Data [ RUN ] Data.Null [ OK ] Data.Null (0 ms) [--] 1 test from Data (0 ms total) [--] 1 test from Channels [ RUN ] Channels.Null [ OK ] Channels.Null (0 ms) [--] 1 test from Channels (0 ms total) [--] 1 test from Rate [ RUN ] Rate.Null [ OK ] Rate.Null (0 ms) [--] 1 test from Rate (0 ms total) [--] 1 test from Compression [ RUN ] Compression.Null [ OK ] Compression.Null (0 ms) [--] 1 test from Compression (0 ms total) [--] 1 test from SampleFormat [ RUN ] SampleFormat.Null [ OK ] SampleFormat.Null (0 ms) [--] 1 test from SampleFormat (1 ms total) [--] 1 test from ByteOrder [ RUN ] ByteOrder.Null [ OK ] ByteOrder.Null (0 ms) [--] 1 test from ByteOrder (0 ms total) [--] 1 test from DataOffset [ RUN ] DataOffset.Null [ OK ] DataOffset.Null (0 ms) [--] 1 test from DataOffset (0 ms total) [--] 1 test from FrameCount [ RUN ] FrameCount.Null [ OK ] FrameCount.Null (0 ms) [--] 1 test from FrameCount (1 ms total) [--] 1 test from AES [ RUN ] AES.Null [ OK ] AES.Null (0 ms) [--] 1 test from AES (0 ms total) [--] 1 test from Setup [ RUN ] Setup.Null [ OK ] Setup.Null (0 ms) [--] 1 test from Setup (0 ms total) [--] 1 test from File [ RUN ] File.Bad [ OK ] File.Bad (1 ms) [--] 1 test from File (1 ms total) [--] 1 test from Query [ RUN ] Query.Bad [ OK ] Query.Bad (0 ms) [--] 1 test from Query (0 ms total) [--] Global test environment tear-down [==] 12 tests from 12 test cases ran. (4 ms total) [ PASSED ] 12 tests. PASS: error PASS: floatto24 [==] Running 4 tests from 1 test case. [--] Global test environment set-up. [--] 4 tests from
Bug#680819: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:07:24 +0200 intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote: the Catalyst development environment is seriously broken and currently in Debian current testing/sid (to get and idea, see #683656, #680819, #680829, #680826, #665222). Agreed. We, Debian Perl Group, would like to fix that, and we have been working on it during DebCamp and DebConf accordingly. Sorry for the delay since then. Scope: three currently buggy packages are directly under the radar as far as freeze block/unblock decisions are concerned (libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl, libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl and libcatalyst-perl), and a few others are directly concerned due to being broken by the versions of libcatalyst-perl currently in testing and unstable. The diffs supplied originally in August are likely to be too large to be acceptable as unblocks and I've been wondering about an alternative solution for Wheezy. An alternative solution would be: 0: RM libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl | 0.15-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found. Removal of libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl possible. Closes: #680829 (Severity: serious) 1: RM libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl | 0.06-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Build-Depends: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl Dependency problem found. Dependency problem goes away due to 0: Removal of libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl possible. Closes: #680819 (Severity: serious) 2: RM libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl | 0.10-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: gitalist: gitalist-common # Broken Build-Depends: gitalist: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl (= 0.07) Dependency problem found. gitalist: $ rmadison gitalist gitalist | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | sid | source $ bts select source:gitalist severity:grave severity:serious 681435 665223 Removal of libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl possible. Closes: #680843 3: RM gitalist gitalist | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | source gitalist-common | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | all gitalist-fastcgi | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | all Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found. Closes: #681435 Closes: #665223 Not in testing. Worth removing from unstable? - update libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl to 0.17 (compatibility bugfix -only release) Instead: RM - update libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl to 0.07 (compatibility bugfix -only release) Instead: RM + libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl, possibly remove gitalist from unstable. I'll file the three RM bugs against release.debian.org (for removal from testing only) later today. I haven't decided whether it's worth removing gitalist at this stage. The one problematic bug is #680826 in libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl | 0.57-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: libcatalyst-modules-perl: libcatalyst-modules-perl # Broken Build-Depends: gitalist: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl libcatalyst-modules-perl: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl libcatalyst-plugin-unicode-encoding-perl: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl libmojomojo-perl: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl gitalist isn't a problem, libcatalyst-modules-perl and libmojomojo-perl are problems for fixing #680826. However, the original email to debian-release did not cover how that particular bug was to be fixed either. http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/08/msg01479.html -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpwqGDyXhwZK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: severity of 674156 is serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # breaks build of another package is RC severity 674156 serious Bug #674156 [gstreamer0.10-plugins-good] gstreamer0.10-plugins-good: rtpmp2tpay not working on some architectures Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 674156: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674156 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679669: Removal of underscore package from squeeze-backports?
Stuart Prescott stu...@debian.org writes: I modified the package in backports to not compress the *.js files: Indeed! Excellent. Is that diff better for the RC bug #679669 better than the one that is now there? (patches that fix rc bugs coming from squeeze-backports is a new and interesting direction) Your patch for #679669 simply drops the *.min.js, however other packages might rely on these files to be present. Replacing them with a symlink on the non-minified version like in the backports package seems safer to me. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689700:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:18:48PM -0700, Chuan-kai Lin wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: This causes unrelated packages to break. Please revert this change until wheezy is released, since it makes fixing bugs in testing harder than necessary for pacakges build-depending on bison. Hello Felipe, Could you provide example of such packages for the record ? I found the problem with the pari package, but it is not normally build with g++ so it does not affect Debian, hence the severity. Do you happen to know what is the correct procedure to revert the introduction of a new upstream release? Is it something that the release team can handle through a bug to release.debian.org? Hello Chuan-kai Did you report the bug upstream ? Maybe they could provide a fix. The only way to revert to an older upstream release is to reupload the old upstream release with a larger version number, either by raising the epoch field of by playing game like 2.6.2.really.2.5.0. It is generally not recommended to upload new upstream version during the freeze especially if they hae a large number of reverse dependencies or build-dependencies. Cheers, -- Bill. ballo...@debian.org Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679669: Removal of underscore package from squeeze-backports?
Your patch for #679669 simply drops the *.min.js, however other packages might rely on these files to be present. Replacing them with a symlink on the non-minified version like in the backports package seems safer to me. Ansgar agreed -- Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org GPG fingerprintBE65 FD1E F4EA 08F3 23D4 3C6D 9FE8 B8CD 71C5 D1A8 GPG fingerprint90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#684889: Confirmed, but FTBFS with patch (Re: eglibc: CVE-2012-3480)
Hi Bas, Bas Wijnen wrote: Encountered regressions that don't match expected failures: tst-cputimer1.out, Error 1 make: *** [/tmp/eglibc-2.13/stamp-dir/check_i686] Fout 1 Yeah, I don't think this is due to the patch. It's been mentioned in various places: e.g., [1] [2] I can't find a report of the tst-cputimer1 failures at http://sourceware.org/bugzilla, so if you have time to reproduce it with glibc trunk[3] and file one (feel free to cc me) then that would be great. Thanks, Jonathan [1] http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.16?action=diffrev1=25rev2=26 (2012-06-19) [2] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/glibc.html (r9956 2012-08-22, regarding glibc 2.16) [3] git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690150: libphone-ui: diff for NMU version 1:0.0.1+git20110825-2.1
tags 690150 + patch tags 690150 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libphone-ui (versioned as 1:0.0.1+git20110825-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. RMs: please consider unblocking. Regards. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits diff -Nru libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/changelog libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/changelog --- libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/changelog 2012-05-07 15:44:06.0 +0100 +++ libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 13:26:07.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libphone-ui (1:0.0.1+git20110825-2.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix doc dir transition from directory to symlink in Wheezy +upgrades (Closes: #690150) + + -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:26:05 +0100 + libphone-ui (1:0.0.1+git20110825-2) unstable; urgency=low * update standards to 3.9.3 diff -Nru libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/libphone-ui-dev.postinst libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/libphone-ui-dev.postinst --- libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/libphone-ui-dev.postinst 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/libphone-ui-dev.postinst 2012-10-14 13:24:05.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +#!/bin/sh +set -e + +# Replace documentation directory with symlink +docdir=/usr/share/doc/libphone-ui-dev +if [ -d $docdir ] [ ! -L $docdir ]; then +if rmdir $docdir 2/dev/null; then +ln -sf libphone-ui $docdir +fi +fi + +#DEBHELPER# + +exit 0 + signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: libphone-ui: diff for NMU version 1:0.0.1+git20110825-2.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 690150 + patch Bug #690150 [libphone-ui-dev] libphone-ui-dev: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze Added tag(s) patch. tags 690150 + pending Bug #690150 [libphone-ui-dev] libphone-ui-dev: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 690150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690150 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#685540: getting the asterisk module loadable
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:02:56PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: The underlying issue is that asterisk fails to provide proper shlibs hinting, so that packages building against asterisk do not get versioned binary dependencies that can reveal leed for binNMU later on. That ? binary dependencies that can reveal need for binNMU later on. That underlying issue needs to be reported against asterisk and fixed there. The Debian maintainers of asterisk are in the Cc. The library in question is /usr/sbin/asterisk . However: $ dpkg-gensymbols -O -pasterisk -e/usr/sbin/asterisk -d Scanning /usr/sbin/asterisk for symbol information File /usr/sbin/asterisk doesn't have a soname. Ignoring. Is there any way to force an SONAME (the major version number of Asterisk)? Also note that the res_* modules of asterisk may have exported modules (some other modules also have public symbols as well, but this shouldn't have happened). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com +972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com http://www.xorcom.com iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#623578: closed by Matthias Klose d...@debian.org (Bug#623578: fixed in gadfly 1.0.0-15)
On 2012-05-25 Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote: reopen 623578 found 623578 1.0.0-15 thanks Debian Bug Tracking System, le Thu 21 Apr 2011 18:51:09 +, a écrit : #623578: gadfly: build wrong version of the packaging during a binNMU It has been closed by Matthias Klose d...@debian.org. Err, no, the bug is still there, binNMUs still get built wrongly: drwxr-xr-x 7 samy samy 300 mai 25 02:58 gadfly-1.0.0/ -rw-r--r-- 1 samy samy 65K mai 25 02:58 python-kjbuckets_1.0.0-15_amd64.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 samy samy 896 mai 25 02:58 gadfly_1.0.0-15+b1_amd64.changes Hello, Afaict (Both by looking at 684625 which is not fixed and by checking the newest binNMU on my up to date testing system) we are currently still doing binNMUs with something equivalent to this: dch --bin-nmu foo dpkg-buildpackage -B Which works perfectly fine with gadfly: -rw-r--r-- 64708 Oct 14 08:53 python-kjbuckets_1.0.0-15+b1_i386.deb -rw-rw-r-- 970 Oct 14 08:53 gadfly_1.0.0-15+b1_i386.changes I get the same result if I add ', binary-only=yes' to debian/changelog. Please describe how the issue can be reproduced? This is apparently due to this: dh_gencontrol -a -- -v'$(kjb_version)' Why setting that particular version and not let it use the changelog version? The python-kjbuckets package has a diferent binary version (with an epoch added) than source and the other binary packages. thanks in advance, cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645487: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#645487: ensembl: includes GPL code without source
Steffen Möller steffen_moel...@gmx.de writes: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org writes: You are mixing up GPL and DFSG. GPL says that the source code needs to be provided at least at request (and it in this case it is pretty easy to obtain the source code). The general rule is, if you distribute binaries, you must distribute the complete corresponding source code too.[1] If you make object code available on a network server, you have to provide the Corresponding Source on a network server as well.[2] And having a jalview package in the archive does not help as this does not guarantee we have the source for the exact version of jalview bundled with ensembl. Ansgar [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#UnchangedJustBinary [2] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AnonFTPAndSendSources Formally speaking there is nothing to argue about. We should remove that .jar. To grant us some more time to orchestrate the individuals behind that package and get up to speed with the much progressed upstream developments, may I ask for an exempt for the Ensembl package, not harming too many in experimental, from [1] for another while, please? Can you give an estimate how long this would take? Temporary removal from the archive might be an option if it takes longer. The package could return once the issue is fixed (just like a new package). Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#687923: bacula: needs update for wheezy
Hi, CVE-2012-4430 was fixed in unstable and stable, thanks for that, but wheezy is still lacking the fix. This is because the unstable version cannot migrate due to it containing many auxilliary fixes. Could you coordinate with the release team to make an upload to testing-proposed-updates with the security fix? Thanks, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682824: hylafax: needs update for wheezy
Hi, This security issue was fixed in unstable, thanks for that, but wheezy is still lacking the fix. This is because the unstable version cannot migrate due to it containing many auxilliary fixes. Could you coordinate with the release team to make an upload to testing-proposed-updates with the security fix? thanks, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#674324: ruby-net-sftp: FTBFS: test failed
Package: ruby-net-sftp Followup-For: Bug #674324 Hi! I investigated this a little bit further. Here are my findings so far. There is a kind of conflict between two tests: - test_from_buffer_should_correctly_parse_buffer_and_return_attribute_object from test/protocol/04/test_attributes.rb - test_parse_attrs_packet_should_use_correct_attributes_class from test/protocol/01/test_base.rb which occurs with versions of ruby-mocha posterior to the commit I mentionned above. When run independently the tests pass. When the tests are run together, the method :from_buffer is not restored completely in its initial state after the call to expects method on Net::SFTP::Protocol::V01::Attributes: The method :from_buffer called on a child class of Net::SFTP::Protocol::V01::Attributes (e.g. Net:SFTP::Protocol::V04::Attributes) should return an object from the child class. But after the expect statement, it returns a Net::SFTP::Protol::V01::Attributes object, which is the cause of different results in computations, and thus results in test failure. [The same problem occurs when expects alters :from_buffer for Net::SFTP::Protocol::V04::Attributes and :from_buffer is called from test/protocol/06/test_attributes.rb] Attached a condensed test file which shows the issue, which could be run once the source package is unpacked and the patches applied with testrb -I test/ path/to/test-failure.rb from the root directory of the source package. Commenting the first test class of the file makes the second test pass. Since all the tests pass ok when run separately, it is not really a bug in ruby-net-sftp per se. Just tests broken by some subtle modification of ruby-mocha. If it turns out that my diagnostic is correct, I would propose the following: - clone this bug, with severity important (or even normal) to ruby-mocha, indicating that it affects ruby-net-sftp - close this one by commenting the tests 'test_parse_attrs_packet_should_use_correct_attributes_class' and wait for the bug in ruby-mocha to be closed to reactivate them. I am preparing a toy example reproducing this bug to send to ruby-mocha upstream. Cheers, Cédric _ test-failure.rb Description: application/ruby
Bug#688436: New plan
Hi, Reading the bug again, I realized you are doing the wrong thing here. You put a lot of effort into removing files which are automatically removed by purging the package. The bug is that your scripts _do_ remove the files, not that they don't. I'll prepare a fixed package and upload it to the delayed queue. Thanks, Bas signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#680826: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:07:25 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: The diffs supplied originally in August are likely to be too large to be acceptable as unblocks and I've been wondering about an alternative solution for Wheezy. Thanks for looking into this; but I'd rather have an opinion from the release team before we start to remove half of Catalyst from wheezy (and leaving the other half in a broken state). The one problematic bug is #680826 in libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl I don't think so ... gitalist isn't a problem, libcatalyst-modules-perl and libmojomojo-perl are problems for fixing #680826. However, the original email to debian-release did not cover how that particular bug was to be fixed either. http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/08/msg01479.html ... because it builds fine against the new Catalyst: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680826#13 (also mentioned in the above mail) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: R.E.M.: All The Way To Reno signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#688997: youtube-dl: Needs update to newer version to fix youtube downloading
Hi, On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 01:33:03PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 15:25:44 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: Too many changes? Which ones? Compared to my last upload, there aren't really. Compared to the version currently in wheezy. I see. Well, those are about 7 months of development (not so active, but...) But that is, in a sense, the nature of packages/programs that deal with web scrapping: all of them are highly subject to drastic changes. (Unfortunate, I know). But that affects youtube-dl, clive, cclive, get-flash-videos and many, many other packages in a similar vein. I want to work with you in getting youtube-dl in wheezy and, also, not breaking other programs like freevo. What can we do? Splitting the package in a part containing only data, describing how to parse, and one containing the actual code. The data-part will change depending on developments in youtube webui. In Debian stable, the code-part will only change in order to fix security or other really critical bugs. For keeping the data-part up to date, users should use debian-volatile. That's where the data-part shoud get uploaded to. Bye, Joost -- Being owned by someone used to be called slavery -- now it's called commitment. http://mdcc.cx/ --from the fortune cookies collection -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#656505: marked as done (taxbird: build-dependency on libgeier-dev needs to be versioned)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:48:42 +
with message-id e1tnpug-0005m0...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#656505: fixed in taxbird 0.18-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #656505,
regarding taxbird: build-dependency on libgeier-dev needs to be versioned
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
656505: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656505
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
package: taxbird
version: 0.18-1
severity: serious
tags: patch
Taxbird failed to build on most buildds with the following error
checking for GEIER... no
configure: error: Package requirements (libgeier = 0.13 libxml-2.0) were not
met:
Requested 'libgeier = 0.13' but version of libgeier is 0.12
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.
Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GEIER_CFLAGS
and GEIER_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
It seems that the problem is that configure is looking for libgier 0.13 but
your build-depends on libgier-dev is not versioned to match.
Please version your build-depends on libgier-dev correctly.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: taxbird
Source-Version: 0.18-1.1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
taxbird, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 656...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated taxbird package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:45:28 +0200
Source: taxbird
Binary: taxbird
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.18-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marvin Stark m...@der-marv.de
Changed-By: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org
Description:
taxbird- Free Elster client (German Tax Declarations)
Closes: 656505
Changes:
taxbird (0.18-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Fix build-dependency on libgeier-dev needs to be versioned:
- d/control: make build dependency on (latest) libgeier-dev versioned
- d/{control,rules}: calculate versioned libgeier0 runtime dependency
during build
(Closes: #656505)
Checksums-Sha1:
bc73054c910730045056362ebf394f247a4f231a 1768 taxbird_0.18-1.1.dsc
4b25d1c981f8994bf39fc8767fc88c62b76b52a3 12984 taxbird_0.18-1.1.diff.gz
1383d6996b02a4db8f98d5b27f1939a097f4ff5b 97546 taxbird_0.18-1.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
ac6a47a409ac22ff8fdf23f51c4b346bad68ee682e253ac8c97b9c7b382561e8 1768
taxbird_0.18-1.1.dsc
7727da633e70c251cf865ecd254aa491005f9a324aa9f62ad96f79b710dcea28 12984
taxbird_0.18-1.1.diff.gz
d02bf4d708d45351c1d027dbc47b488a7b3000bcd8776add7c8f723df2e5e80d 97546
taxbird_0.18-1.1_amd64.deb
Files:
22105f99fbe2370656abe96f3d251ca3 1768 gnome optional taxbird_0.18-1.1.dsc
8d9bc4da982af1ee03784477d5617e39 12984 gnome optional taxbird_0.18-1.1.diff.gz
7452d119237a729c27487eeacdb663ab 97546 gnome optional
taxbird_0.18-1.1_amd64.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=PlBH
-END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Bug#672030:
Hey Giovanni, I was wondering if you have heard anything from upstream on this issue yet? :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: retitle 638339 to blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 638339 blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later Bug #638339 [blcr-dkms] blcr-dkms: requires 2.[46] kernel version string Bug #651747 [blcr-dkms] linux-image-3.1.0-1-486: dist-upgrade requested linux-headers-3.1.0-1-486 for depmod, and that failed to install Bug #668348 [blcr-dkms] -amd64 kernel name suffix not understood by configure Bug #689729 [blcr-dkms] paraview: Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.2.0-3-amd64 (x86_64) Changed Bug title to 'blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later' from 'blcr-dkms: requires 2.[46] kernel version string' Changed Bug title to 'blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later' from 'linux-image-3.1.0-1-486: dist-upgrade requested linux-headers-3.1.0-1-486 for depmod, and that failed to install' Changed Bug title to 'blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later' from '-amd64 kernel name suffix not understood by configure' Changed Bug title to 'blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later' from 'paraview: Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.2.0-3-amd64 (x86_64)' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 638339: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638339 651747: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651747 668348: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668348 689729: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689729 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Bug: #652638 libuuid-perl: conflict with older doc-base versions to fix upgrade problems
Processing control commands: severity 652638 serious Bug #652638 [libuuid-perl] libuuid-perl: conflict with older doc-base versions to fix upgrade problems Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 652638: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652638 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Bug: #652638 libuuid-perl: conflict with older doc-base versions to fix upgrade problems
Processing control commands: severity 652638 serious Bug #652638 [libuuid-perl] libuuid-perl: conflict with older doc-base versions to fix upgrade problems Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 652638 to the same value. -- 652638: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652638 673913: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673913 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#673913: Bug: #652638 libuuid-perl: conflict with older doc-base versions to fix upgrade problems
Control: severity 652638 serious Hi! This problem *does* break squeeze-wheezy upgrades. So we need to deal with it as soon as possible. Reproducing it is simple enough -- install doc-base plus a random collection of doc-base packages then try to upgrade to wheezy. We seem to have three bugs against different packages in various states: #652638, #673913, #648954. What it comes down to is that in the middle of the dist-upgrade you will have: * perl-base from squeeze * dpkg from squeeze * doc-base from squeeze * libuuid-perl from *wheezy* and then some other -doc package will catch doc-base triggers. Unfortunately, dpkg is quite happy to run triggers on unconfigured packages (see #671711) and this is not going to change any time soon (and any fix could not be relied upon for squeeze-wheezy). This would mean that breaks/conflicts/depends are not going to be enough to ensure that the upgrade succeeds and that will only deconfigure one package or other and not suppress the triggers for doc-base. It also means that the only way we can fix this in wheezy would be in libuuid- perl unless someone wants to consider Pre-Depends (being careful not to force the running kernel off the system, e.g. a Pre-Depends of libuuid-perl on perl- base). Hope that's some useful further information... cheers Stuart -- Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org GPG fingerprintBE65 FD1E F4EA 08F3 23D4 3C6D 9FE8 B8CD 71C5 D1A8 GPG fingerprint90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: tagging 687320
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 687320 + pending Bug #687320 [grub-efi-amd64] grub-efi-amd64: Stuck at grub recovery prompt when USB media reader attached Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 687320: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687320 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#617613: Bug#690461: RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
I am not agreed with that and asked adding wheezy-ignore tag to the bug 617613 [1]. We are not able to add a relicensed opencascade version on this freeze-stage. But in general the problem seems to be resolved and new version will hopefully be packaged after the wheezy-release. Anton [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617613#163 2012/10/14 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: freecad contains GPLv2 code and links to OCTPL (non-GPL-compatible) libraries (bug #617613)/ This is supposed to be fixed soon as there is a new version of libopencascade under a BSD licence http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617613#153. Since the relicensed libopencascade is not available in Debian and probably will not get into wheezy, I think freecad should be removed from stable and testing. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#676841: marked as done (cairo-dock-core: segfault in cairo_dock_new_dialog() from libgldi.so3 when using log out applet)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:47:31 + with message-id e1tnqpb-0008pk...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#676841: fixed in cairo-dock 3.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #676841, regarding cairo-dock-core: segfault in cairo_dock_new_dialog() from libgldi.so3 when using log out applet to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 676841: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676841 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: cairo-dock-core Version: 3.0.0-2 Severity: important I have the log-out applet added to my dock. When I click any of the options in the Log out applet (such as Log out, Reboot, Shutdown,...), cairo-dock segfaults and is restarted automatically. No log out happens. cairo-dock is missing a -dbg package, so it seems impossible to get a complete stack trace. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x734c9729 in cairo_dock_new_dialog () from /usr/lib/libgldi.so.3 (gdb) thread apply all bt Thread 5 (Thread 0x7fffc6c56700 (LWP 27203)): #0 0x731caa93 in *__GI___poll (fds=optimized out, nfds=optimized out, timeout=-1) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:87 #1 0x7fffdcfe3e3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpulse.so.0 #2 0x7fffdcfd539c in pa_mainloop_poll () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/libpulse.so.0 #3 0x7fffdcfd59f9 in pa_mainloop_iterate () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/libpulse.so.0 #4 0x7fffdcfd5ab0 in pa_mainloop_run () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/libpulse.so.0 #5 0x7fffdcfe3def in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpulse.so.0 #6 0x7fffdcb8a423 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/pulseaudio/libpulsecommon-2.0.so #7 0x72ee7b50 in start_thread (arg=optimized out) at pthread_create.c:304 #8 0x731d56dd in clone () at .../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112 #9 0x in ?? () Thread 3 (Thread 0x7fffd71ae700 (LWP 27194)): #0 0x731caa93 in *__GI___poll (fds=optimized out, nfds=optimized out, timeout=-1) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:87 #1 0x751794d4 in g_main_context_poll (n_fds=1, fds=0xc05fb0, timeout=-1, context=0x7fffcc0011a0, priority=optimized out) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gmain.c:3440 #2 g_main_context_iterate (context=0x7fffcc0011a0, block=block@entry=1, dispatch=dispatch@entry=1, self=error reading variable: Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0xfa) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gmain.c:3141 #3 0x75179932 in g_main_loop_run (loop=0x7fffcc000f80) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gmain.c:3340 #4 0x772957f6 in gdbus_shared_thread_func (user_data=0x7fffcc001170) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./gio/gdbusprivate.c:277 #5 0x7519bdf5 in g_thread_proxy (data=0xc814f0) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gthread.c:801 #6 0x72ee7b50 in start_thread (arg=optimized out) at pthread_create.c:304 #7 0x731d56dd in clone () at .../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112 #8 0x in ?? () Thread 2 (Thread 0x7fffd79af700 (LWP 27193)): #0 pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at .../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_timedwait.S:216 #1 0x751b5525 in g_cond_wait_until (cond=cond@entry=0xec2548, mutex=mutex@entry=0xec2540, end_time=end_time@entry=705083450967) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gthread-posix.c:855 #2 0x7514fdb1 in g_async_queue_pop_intern_unlocked (queue=queue@entry=0xec2540, wait=wait@entry=1, end_time=end_time@entry=705083450967) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gasyncqueue.c:424 #3 0x751503fa in g_async_queue_timeout_pop (queue=0xec2540, timeout=timeout@entry=1500) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gasyncqueue.c:545 #4 0x7519c5b2 in g_thread_pool_wait_for_new_pool () at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gthreadpool.c:169 #5 g_thread_pool_thread_proxy (data=optimized out) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gthreadpool.c:366 #6 0x7519bdf5 in g_thread_proxy (data=0x6719e0) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gthread.c:801 #7 0x72ee7b50 in start_thread (arg=optimized out) at pthread_create.c:304 ---Type return to continue, or q return to quit--- #8 0x731d56dd in clone () at .../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112 #9 0x in ?? () Thread 1 (Thread 0x77fb9980 (LWP 27188)): #0 0x734c9729 in cairo_dock_new_dialog () from /usr/lib/libgldi.so.3 #1 0x734ccd4a in cairo_dock_build_dialog () from /usr/lib/libgldi.so.3 #2 0x734cd4b4
Bug#680818: Dropping libopenh323 build dependency
Jeroen Dekkers jer...@dekkers.ch wrote: The package currently in subversion should build without problems. I also did some other important fixes, but I'm not sure whether they are important enough to be acceptable during the freeze. The changelog is at http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-voip/yate/trunk/debian/changelog?revision=9912view=markup I've checked at this end and, no, the changelog at that revision would not be suitable for an unblock because of changes like: * Switch to debhelper level 9, enable hardening and multiarch (Closes: #680562) * Rewrite postinst and postrm * Add yate user to dialout group so it can use DAHDI devices * Add logrotate file (Closes: #503624) * Rename logfile to /var/log/yate.log * Update Standards-Version to 3.9.3 * Put libyateqt4.so in the yate-qt4 package I've done a local test build with just this line removed from debian/control: libopenh323-dev | libh323plus-dev (= 1.22.0~), and there would not be problems getting that change approved for an unblock, especially if you can show that the package works correctly in the comments in the unblock report. However, #689780 would also need to be fixed for yate to be unblocked. There is no mention of that bug in the linked changelog. -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpvPktH27y6v.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#689700:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Chuan-kai Lin chk...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: This causes unrelated packages to break. Please revert this change until wheezy is released, since it makes fixing bugs in testing harder than necessary for pacakges build-depending on bison. Do you happen to know what is the correct procedure to revert the introduction of a new upstream release? Is it something that the release team can handle through a bug to release.debian.org? No, I don't think the RT can do that. I think there are only 3 options: 1. Ignore this bug (not what I'd like) 2. Upload the old version again with an increased epoch (like 2:2.5.dfsg-1) 3. Upload the old version with a version like 1:2.6.2.dfsg+really2.5-1 I'm not sure if there is a correct procedure, I've seen both 2 and 3 done. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677861: lftp: FTBFS[kfreebsd-i386]: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef __int32_t gl_intptr_t'
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:00:55PM +0200, Noël Köthe wrote: forwarded 677861 http://univ.uniyar.ac.ru/pipermail/lftp-devel/2012-July/28.html thanks Hello Jakub, Am Samstag, den 11.08.2012, 14:04 +0200 schrieb Jakub Wilk: Thanks for the report and the comment. I forwarded it to the upstream mailinglist. N.b. I can't find your e-mail in the lftp-devel archives. yes, you were right. I asked Alexander the upstream author about and the mail was in the mailman queue. It was now approved and it is available in the mailinglist archive (see URL above). He will look at the problem. Thanks for the hint. Hi Noël, Do you have any plan for getting this fixed so that we can ship lftp with Wheezy? I can see that you've uploaded a new upstream version since this was reported (and 4.3.8-1 looks to build OK on a test machine for me), but the changes for from 4.3.6-1 (in current testing) to 4.3.8-1 (current unstable) are *huge*, way too big for the release team to accept them in my experience. I would expect that a focussed TPU upload with just the changes needed to fix kfreebsd building is much more likely to make it into wheezy. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Into the distance, a ribbon of black Stretched to the point of no turning back -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#652638: Pending fixes for bugs in the libuuid-perl package
tag 652638 + pending thanks Some bugs in the libuuid-perl package are closed in revision 4b29e3e6e3efab6c208949de65d27c1be9b8459f in branch 'master' by gregor herrmann The full diff can be seen at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libuuid-perl.git;a=commitdiff;h=4b29e3e Commit message: debian/control: conflict on doc-base 0.10.3 to avoid package installation failure due to symbol lookup errors when perl 5.14 and libuuid-perl get unpacked and trigger the old doc-base. Thanks: Martin Pitt for testing this in Ubuntu, Niko Tyni for the initial analysis, and Stuart Prescott for further triaging. Closes: #652638 LP: #902553 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the libuuid-perl package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 652638 + pending Bug #652638 [libuuid-perl] libuuid-perl: conflict with older doc-base versions to fix upgrade problems Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 652638: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652638 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: severity of 676648 is important, tagging 676648
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # only affects some systems severity 676648 important Bug #676648 [cheese] cheese: Cheese crashes/won't start with camera connected, but starts without camera Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' # needs proper backtrace tags 676648 + moreinfo Bug #676648 [cheese] cheese: Cheese crashes/won't start with camera connected, but starts without camera Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 676648: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676648 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#652638: marked as done (libuuid-perl: conflict with older doc-base versions to fix upgrade problems)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:33:52 + with message-id e1tnr8s-bq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#652638: fixed in libuuid-perl 0.02-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #652638, regarding libuuid-perl: conflict with older doc-base versions to fix upgrade problems to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 652638: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652638 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: perl Version: 5.14.2-4 Severity: serious On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:57:24AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: This is not a bug in liblocale-gettext-perl. It bites use every time that we upgrade to a perl version with an incompatible ABI. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479681 for more explanation. I just filed the bug against doc-base because one should not rely on Locale::gettext in maintainer scripts if we want those maintainer scripts to work during upgrades... Looking further the maintainer already did the right thing (that's why liblocale-gettext-perl is also not listed in the Depends field of doc-base) except it needs the environment variable to disable lazy bind, otherwise the error is not caught at load time but triggered at run-time. Thanks. I'm filing this new bug against perl so that we can add a Breaks against doc-base when #648937 is fixed. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libuuid-perl Source-Version: 0.02-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libuuid-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 652...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated libuuid-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:09:59 +0200 Source: libuuid-perl Binary: libuuid-perl Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.02-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Description: libuuid-perl - Perl extension for using UUID interfaces as defined in e2fsprogs Closes: 652638 Changes: libuuid-perl (0.02-5) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: conflict on doc-base 0.10.3 to avoid package installation failure due to symbol lookup errors when perl 5.14 and libuuid-perl get unpacked and trigger the old doc-base. Thanks to Martin Pitt for testing this in Ubuntu, Niko Tyni for the initial analysis, and Stuart Prescott for further triaging. (Closes: #652638) (LP: #902553) Checksums-Sha1: 3dc4b0533ace0061ee9f5501688e2661e446e0bc 1993 libuuid-perl_0.02-5.dsc 9c2eefad0f0d54c5371dc324859695274b959e75 2350 libuuid-perl_0.02-5.debian.tar.gz bf5597c9aa63da24eac19a0bf491def6bb131ee9 9742 libuuid-perl_0.02-5_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 93770c1bbba2ae2259edad81c293de47116397b3830836ecfcb14a99cbc7e2a0 1993 libuuid-perl_0.02-5.dsc dd340cfe70606e210c090858608cb6b9e9444df6cc276642564864abf1591497 2350 libuuid-perl_0.02-5.debian.tar.gz f0aa80dd26619dfb88651c96c959824669ddbb30f0efe7a039ccdb9d060228bc 9742 libuuid-perl_0.02-5_amd64.deb Files: a88ed9a8b2e99cb737ca9606dae709a6 1993 perl optional libuuid-perl_0.02-5.dsc 1e2ffd777e489aa1d74e00363c750b19 2350 perl optional libuuid-perl_0.02-5.debian.tar.gz 1af9ec9b060407a655c139383fed7095 9742 perl optional libuuid-perl_0.02-5_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQeuP+AAoJELs6aAGGSaoGnAUQAKrBBCd/eIINB6Ik+JImkjEb 2cP33OFYLwOxIE7HfIgQlU+H3DGvjuST47WHi6QRYCoxFuVzNM8C7qtfCSGgDTFp VWuXdYQlNi/nQpZi3Nv7+noeS3yXm5/+AAwWqpbM/NzdualvthcQKIwlP680+ttA ThjDML21VUa0OiJDGMue3VH+dwkTzvrDp+zXE+QwbIhpdVrB43ZXvOENvon8kobK Zapp0kKlmiwMyVnmmsXVHyowCiN47B0Kj3QL5iiBTcm0p30Jd00MdTa54Tbsvj+1 NL1BCppYQFh/Zfg5T7dsXOgpzaXGqn92y+R9VbRF83m4otrcoPi8fulfYQeCNl1j LsfvjQ7nh1gbvfSxVtEDH91lnCO5Rd/D1SMgGNtWPDZZzfDy2yKLWdd5BeKjkozX
Bug#684810: Debian bug 684810: rgl: FTBFS: copy not declared in this scope
On 14 October 2012 at 02:23, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
| Hello.
|
| The current version in testing is 798-1. It seems that 798-2 to 880-1
| did not manage to migrate from unstable to testing. This has not been
| a problem until the freeze. But 891-1 and 892-1 heavily modify 798-1.
| So late in the freeze process, the release team will never allow them
| to migrate to testing.
|
| I believe that you have to backport the patch from 879-2
| * src/types.h: Move copy() template definition which is what g++-4.7
| now requires to build the package (Closes: #667355)
| and maybe, if appropriate in testing, parts of the diff for 798-2
| * debian/control: Change Build-Depends: to libpng-dev (Closes: #662493)
| * debian/control: Set Build-Depends: to current R version
| * debian/control: Change Depends to ${R:Depends}
| into a new 798-1squeeze1 with minimal changes to 798-1. The process is
| described in detail at
| http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#t-p-u
|
| I may work on a diff if you miss time and give your consent, but I
| would rather avoid a NMU because I miss knowledge about rgl reverse
| dependencies, see the second question of
| http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#faq
I fear there is nothing I can do for you. The current version is in
unstable, and users can easily install it directly from CRAN -- which has ~
4000 packages of which we have maybe 150 in Debian. So people are used to
mixing and matching.
If this version in testing/stable does not mesh with the rest of
testing/stable, I'd say let us remove it. The next one will fill in.
Dirk
--
Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688590: update
Le 12/10/2012 17:39, Christian Grothoff a écrit :
After some more discussion with Bertrand, I've committed a patch to SVN
HEAD (SVN 24295) which allows the user to control NSS library
installation. There are a few possibilities:
1) If configure is run by root or using the '--with-sudo' option, NSS
plugins are by default installed to /lib (sane default for normal users)
2) If configure is run by a normal user and without the '--with-sudo'
option, NSS plugins are by default not installed _at all_.
3) If configure is run --with-nss=no, then NSS plugins are never
installed
4) If configure is run --with-nss=yes, then NSS plugins are always
installed to /lib, even if neither '--with-sudo' is given nor
configure is run as root. Installation will fail unless 'make install'
is run as root.
5) If configure is run --with-nss=$SOMEPATH, then NSS plugins are
always installed to $SOMEPATH. _This_ is likely the best option for
Debian packaging. You'd run like this:
./configure \
--prefix=/tmp/buildd/gnunet-0.9.X/debian/tmp/usr \
--with-nss=/tmp/buildd/gnunet-0.9.X/debian/tmp/lib
This way, most stuff will end up properly in
/tmp/buildd/gnunet-0.9.X/debian/tmp/usr/{lib,bin,share}
and NSS plugins in
/tmp/buildd/gnunet-0.9.X/debian/tmp/lib/
so when the /tmp/buildd/gnunet-0.9.X/debian/tmp/-prefix is mapped to '/'
by dpkg on install, all should be well.
Happy hacking!
Christian
Thank you very much Christian, this is a much cleaner fix than anything
I had in mind.
I'll upload a new revision of gnunet to mentors with this fix included.
Happy hacking!
Bertrand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679966: marked as done (ksh: cd ../name does not work)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:02:51 + with message-id e1tnrav-ea...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#679966: fixed in ksh 93u+-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #679966, regarding ksh: cd ../name does not work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 679966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679966 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: ksh Version: 93u+-1 Justification: renders package unusable Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, I've done this: sirius ~MOD/wmesa % ksh -c 'pwd; (cd ../alias; pwd); (cd ./../alias; pwd)' /home/hzoli/dev/wmesa /home/hzoli/dev /home/hzoli/dev/alias sirius ~MOD/wmesa % ksh --version version sh (ATT Research) 93u+ 2012-02-29 Notive that cd ../alias does not work, but cd ./../alias does. Setting CDPATH does not work. This used to work with the previous version, ksh-93u. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.4-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ksh depends on: ii libc6 2.13-34 ksh recommends no packages. ksh suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: ksh Source-Version: 93u+-1.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ksh, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 679...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org (supplier of updated ksh package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 22:53:44 +0100 Source: ksh Binary: ksh Architecture: source amd64 Version: 93u+-1.1 Distribution: testing-proposed-updates Urgency: low Maintainer: Oliver Kiddle okid...@yahoo.co.uk Changed-By: Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Description: ksh- Real, ATT version of the Korn shell Closes: 679966 Changes: ksh (93u+-1.1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix handling of cd ../../.. and similar (cddotdot.patch, Closes: #679966) Checksums-Sha1: c306d333bbd359e4cd411230c571150b60b969de 1659 ksh_93u+-1.1.dsc 0262b063ef3cfaf7ea005e2f2d7d5207df273b51 12589 ksh_93u+-1.1.debian.tar.gz 47967d185cf16f5b93a6ab3537ad0f7afa18fc58 1564264 ksh_93u+-1.1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 6f8c8a5f43705d6850dd31d9b3c107ced18868bd921219a9b640e6fb8adb108a 1659 ksh_93u+-1.1.dsc 7996ae9e7cc9aa22ceb7ac9b431d438bcedbc80bf4b586d20adcdecc85870b0f 12589 ksh_93u+-1.1.debian.tar.gz 3b70cb6f5525c6f37a035eb33d742c9223593982fb7e127cf4270c81fd7b4f6c 1564264 ksh_93u+-1.1_amd64.deb Files: 3cd14e82476d7b1bb45f3cd897b0ecab 1659 shells optional ksh_93u+-1.1.dsc 7600788bf443451326ad21f79a99498c 12589 shells optional ksh_93u+-1.1.debian.tar.gz 0c70e15ee4ace9db1cb285bc9ee2865e 1564264 shells optional ksh_93u+-1.1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQeeoMAAoJEFC7AtTIpr9hmLcQAJ0+jnrVYpk70voot+gMnUKP FXWBa+9AEOhagd/yNs42h734ORSwPIKAL2NsGpjs/p+/0AxtUydReC3/yJ3Adh4E hYnWSCL+vcQ+gdXqfFAt4axNTG5a8MxaAp8KgZznV8E2ZW916ZWW82zpnV6Po8nY npOkMM2RMW1FF8G+xW1QD/9PJYDM0JPWP6AzBb0wmc622z0Lf0YiMYU0/+SE4htQ 5rPiQv1eUlGtjCCcy2s6w7s75Bp3LJmfJkA5gBYp2lxLfJEwIyITksmuTv3ap6gC M8Y/EWXGV3Z0tMnbnUo92bBC/Ch8Ib+nxxC0q9EoFae9/fgXFlIRn2uYxGX8sEln J89osNTToAovhb95AVtbNrwrWjWegxKoRaVn/Vwd6kYvwF7ulxFeZAgrFjQB33MJ yqcnub87LhTjpfWwmNd4Q9LTcJI5U3HtuFb9B142pxjDjMWtl7cQhiYPSSZFNBKW l9NG6bBH4GX1O8GvI0RqxbfWHp8DxGR1dhDNYPGmbZyS4kLUjvaEJN/jwGafeTGf qLT4WtB4B9d8Hz87LKRkW2CPxUF7evyVrx3z3g1L7BTYkEy/1wiJ3IsLIa9wvqtu I52ZBM/mASzzpoxxPzJiR8GVQCE6Pam57IxNA+gjgPIq96sQmVfhoARbgA3DY1a9 2yfS+U8HTS6BNegwavPB =kwL1 -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote: Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't really want transition sasl right now. The only thing which broke was openldap due some really deep internal library symbols, which are not used anywhere else, and it's already fixed, so I don't think this deserves transition. Ok, looks like its been canceled. If the real breakage has already been dealt with, then wouldn't it be appropriate at this point to go ahead and just downgrade the severity to important. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#683555: release.debian.org: unblock: pear-horde-channel/4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello release team, Mathieu Parent uploaded a pear-horde-channel source package to unstable. This builds the pear-horde-channel binary package, which basically consists of just the file /usr/share/php/.channels/pear.horde.org.reg. This file is needed for building php-horde-activesync php-horde-alarm php-horde-argv php-horde-auth php-horde-autoloader php-horde-browser php-horde-cache [...] php-horde-vfs php-horde-view php-horde-xml-element php-horde-xml-wbxml (see (Bug #683554 RM: horde3 and reverse dependencies) for the complete list). In current testing, the pear-horde-channel binary package is created from the horde3 source package, which is scheduled for removal from Debian (Bug#683554: RM: horde3 and reverse dependencies). The debdiff of the old and new binary package is available from http://mdcc.cx/tmp/pear-horde-channel/pear-horde-channel_3.3.12%2bdebian0-2.2_vs_4.debdiff . The files debian/copyright as well as a full diff are available from http://mdcc.cx/tmp/pear-horde-channel/ . Unfortunately, the new pear-horde-channel Debian source package lacks instructions on how to recreate the generated file pear.horde.org.reg. I've just filed Bug #690463 reporting this issue. In the mean time, please allow pear-horde-channel/4 to enter Debian testing. Thank you for considering. Joost unblock: pear-horde-channel/4 PS: See Bug#683628 release-notes: Re: Horde and Kolab removed for even more background information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: found 683229 in 4.1.0-1~dfsg-2 ..., severity of 683229 is serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 683229 4.1.0-1~dfsg-2 Bug #683229 [yate] [yate-core] module regfile is missing but its config file exists Marked as found in versions yate/4.1.0-1~dfsg-2. retitle 683229 Binary package yate doesn't ship any module at all Bug #683229 [yate] [yate-core] module regfile is missing but its config file exists Changed Bug title to 'Binary package yate doesn't ship any module at all' from '[yate-core] module regfile is missing but its config file exists' severity 683229 serious Bug #683229 [yate] Binary package yate doesn't ship any module at all Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 683229: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683229 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688436: ampache: diff for NMU version 3.6-git408e713+dfsg-3.1
tags 688436 + patch
tags 688436 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ampache (versioned as 3.6-git408e713+dfsg-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
As you can see, I have only added ampache.prerm, where I remove the link
/etc/ampache/ampache.conf. The other files are automatically removed by dpkg.
It is removed on the remove action (not purge), just like the other links in
/etc. The files they link to are conffiles, and are properly removed by the
package only on purge.
Just now I'm thinking that you could also let the link be managed, by adding it
to ampache.links. Is there a reason you don't do that?
If you have any questions, including a request for sponsorship of a new
version, feel free to contact me.
Thanks,
Bas
diff -Nru ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/ampache.postrm
ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/ampache.postrm
--- ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/ampache.postrm 2012-09-22
23:59:04.0 +0200
+++ ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/ampache.postrm 2012-10-14
17:13:27.0 +0200
@@ -4,14 +4,6 @@
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
-#ampache.conf is left behind during purge so remove it manually this way
-#everything is removed on purge.
-ampconf_rm(){
- if [ -e /etc/ampache/ampache.conf ]; then
- rm -f /etc/ampache/ampache.conf
- fi
-}
-
restart_server(){
if [ -e /var/run/apache2.pid ]; then
service apache2 reload
@@ -24,7 +16,6 @@
if [ $re_start = false ]; then
printf Please restart the web server manually.
elif [ $re_start = true ]; then
- ampconf_rm
restart_server
else
printf unable to de-configure ampache, please do so
manually.\n
diff -Nru ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/ampache.prerm
ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/ampache.prerm
--- ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/ampache.prerm1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/ampache.prerm2012-10-14
17:18:01.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+#!/bin/sh -e
+
+# This link is created on postinst, so must be removed explicitly.
+rm -f /etc/ampache/ampache.conf
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0
diff -Nru ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/changelog
ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/changelog2012-09-22
16:21:57.0 +0200
+++ ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/changelog2012-10-14
17:15:09.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ampache (3.6-git408e713+dfsg-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Remove generated link in prerm. Closes: #688436
+
+ -- Bas Wijnen wij...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:31:58 +0200
+
ampache (3.6-git408e713+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove statements in debian/ampache.postrm that manually remove conffiles,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: ampache: diff for NMU version 3.6-git408e713+dfsg-3.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 688436 + patch Bug #688436 [ampache] ampache: postrm remove deletes configuration and logfiles Added tag(s) patch. tags 688436 + pending Bug #688436 [ampache] ampache: postrm remove deletes configuration and logfiles Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688436: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688436 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689283: Sorry, I uploaded this to unstable by accident
Hi, While I was fixing this bug, I had two problems: my mail system wasn't properly configured, so you didn't see my message announcing that I planned an NMU to DELAYED/5. And I forgot to use the delayed queue, so it is now in unstable already. I do think the bug is fixed with the upload, but I intended to give you some more time to do things your way, should that be different. Sorry about that. I hope this is no problem for you. Please let me know if I need to do anything to fix things up. Thanks, Bas signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#682256: Bug#668008: transition/unblock: uw-imap
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:12:19 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Unfortunately, Jonas's decision to upload without an SONAME bump broke all
packages that use libc-client (see bug #682256), due to an extra, internal
(and in this case unnecessarily strict) version check that fails.
The SONAME *shouldn't* have had to be changed as 2007f is merely a bugfix
release, except for an attempt to also support AIX 5.2, but that's nothing
that affects us. There are no ABI or API changes. See attached diff.
How about the patch below?
Cheers,
Julien
diff -Nru uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog
uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog
--- uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-06-29 13:32:24.0 +0200
+++ uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 20:02:14.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+uw-imap (8:2007f~dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Disable broken version check (closes: #682256)
+
+ -- Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:02:13 +0200
+
uw-imap (8:2007f~dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/2011_disable_version_check.patch
uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/2011_disable_version_check.patch
--- uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/2011_disable_version_check.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/2011_disable_version_check.patch
2012-10-14 19:59:55.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Index: uw-imap/src/c-client/mail.c
+===
+--- uw-imap.orig/src/c-client/mail.c
uw-imap/src/c-client/mail.c
+@@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ static void mail_string_setpos (STRING *
+
+ void mail_versioncheck (char *version)
+ {
++#if 0
+ /* attempt to protect again wrong .h */
+ if (strcmp (version,mailcclientversion)) {
+ char tmp[MAILTMPLEN];
+@@ -300,6 +301,7 @@ void mail_versioncheck (char *version)
+version,mailcclientversion);
+ fatal (tmp);
+ }
++#endif
+ }
+
+
diff -Nru uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/series
uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/series
--- uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/series2012-06-29 13:05:33.0
+0200
+++ uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/series2012-10-14 19:58:25.0
+0200
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
2002_mailspool.patch
2004_no_binaries_below_etc.patch
2010_disallow_escaping_home.patch
+2011_disable_version_check.patch
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#686085: FTBS imagemagick build on sparc
The GraphicsMagick 1.3.17 release fixes the SVG crasher bug. However, there is a small rendering flaw which causes the output to not be good enough for rendering the ImageMagick logo. I don't know the cause of this rendering flaw. ImageMagick does not seem to cause it if it is used to render its own logo but it exhibits a similar flaw with some other SVGs so it may be something image specific such as a rounding error. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer,http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679966: Bug#687779: ksh: diff for NMU version 93u+-1.1
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 23:40:45 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: tags 679966 + patch tags 679966 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ksh (versioned as 93u+-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/00. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. RMs: please clear for an upload to t-p-u, thanks. Uploaded and approved. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Sunday 14 October 19:03:08 UTC 2012 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html # # Source package in NEW: a href=http://packages.qa.debian.org/node;node/a tags 681361 + pending Bug #681361 [node] Rename /usr/sbin/node to /usr/sbin/ax25-node with depended legacy package Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: libmongodbx-class-perl tags 690451 + pending Bug #690451 [wnpp] ITP: libmongodbx-class-perl -- Flexible ORM for MongoDB databases Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 681361: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681361 690451: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690451 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: patch for xml2rfc #680291
Processing control commands: tags 680291 + patch Bug #680291 [xml2rfc] xml2rfc: fails to install, remove, distupgrade, and install again Added tag(s) patch. -- 680291: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680291 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#680291: patch for xml2rfc #680291
Control: tags 680291 + patch Hi dkg, TL;DR: Please upload the attached patch. Thank you for your help with the previous sgml-base related issue. Now we still have #680291 which affects upgrading from squeeze to wheezy and is a special case, because the squeeze version of xml2rfc does not clean /etc/sgml/xml2rfc.cat on either remove or purge. This is a policy violation, but there is little use in tracking it with a separate bug, as it was fixed with the sgml-base transition. However the left-over file can cause a conffile prompt on wheezy as was discovered by Andreas Beckmann. As promised I prepared a patch for this and tested it. I verified that the squeeze version of xml2rfc leaves /etc/sgml/xml2rfc.cat when being purged. With that file present I verified that the patched xml2rfc installs without a prompt. Can you please upload the patch or tell me to go ahead and NMU it? Once uploaded I can file an unblock request unless you wish to do this yourself. Helmut diff -Nru xml2rfc-1.36/debian/changelog xml2rfc-1.36/debian/changelog --- xml2rfc-1.36/debian/changelog 2012-08-31 20:16:57.0 +0200 +++ xml2rfc-1.36/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 21:12:37.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +xml2rfc (1.36-4.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Always remove /etc/sgml/xml2rfc.cat when it is not a conffile. +(Closes: #680291) + + -- Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:11:45 +0200 + xml2rfc (1.36-4) unstable; urgency=low * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no changes needed) diff -Nru xml2rfc-1.36/debian/preinst xml2rfc-1.36/debian/preinst --- xml2rfc-1.36/debian/preinst 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ xml2rfc-1.36/debian/preinst 2012-10-14 21:24:27.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +#!/bin/sh +set -e + +# xml2rfc version 1.35-1 as of Debian squeeze did not properly clean its +# package catalog upon removal or purge. This results in a conffile prompt when +# installing a dh_installcatalogs managed version. This is also known as +# #680291. The issue affects the upgrade from squeeze to wheezy. Once wheezy is +# released. This preinst file should be removed unless something else is added +# to it. +CENTCAT=/etc/sgml/xml2rfc.cat +if test -f $CENTCAT ! dpkg-query -S $CENTCAT /dev/null 21; then + mv $CENTCAT $CENTCAT.old +fi + +#DEBHELPER#
Bug#690486: twidge: gives a user error (Bad response: 404)
Package: twidge Version: 1.0.8.1+nmu1 Severity: grave Since 13th October 2012, the twidge client gives a user error (Bad response: 404) and is unable to tweet via the update command. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i486) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-486 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages twidge depends on: ii curl 7.21.0-1 Get a file from an HTTP, HTTPS or ii libc6 2.13-24Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.21.0-1 Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libffi5 3.0.9-3Foreign Function Interface library ii libgmp10 2:5.0.1+dfsg-7 Multiprecision arithmetic library twidge recommends no packages. twidge suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688436: ampache: diff for NMU version 3.6-git408e713+dfsg-3.1
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Bas Wijnen wij...@debian.org wrote: tags 688436 + patch tags 688436 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ampache (versioned as 3.6-git408e713+dfsg-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Bas, Thanks :) Looks good, please proceed with the NMU. Should I contact the release team for a freeze exception, or do you want to do that also? Kind regards Charlie Smotherman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690492: love: uses embedded copy of GLee
Package: love Version: 0.8.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: package gets rejected by ftp-master. LÖVE includes a copy of GLee, which is also packaged in Debian. It should use that package instead. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#690492: love_0.8.0-2_i386.changes REJECTED
notfound 690492 0.8.0-1 thanks On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 06:57:43PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:02:50PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: love: lintian output: 'embedded-library usr/bin/love-0.8: glee', automatically rejected package. love: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. I didn't touch that. I could override this error, but I shouldn't, because it is a valid error. I didn't fix it, but I still would like the other bugfixes to be included in stable (so I need to get the package included in unstable first). Update: this bug was already worked around in the Debian package: the files included by upstream are not used, and the debian library package is used instead. The embeded copy is in the upstream source, and that is an upstream bug (which should trigger the lintian warning). The question remains: how should I get this package into unstable? Thanks, Bas signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: love_0.8.0-2_i386.changes REJECTED
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 690492 0.8.0-1 Bug #690492 [love] love: uses embedded copy of GLee No longer marked as found in versions love/0.8.0-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 690492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690492 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688997: youtube-dl: Needs update to newer version to fix youtube downloading
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:38:41PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: Hi, On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 01:33:03PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 15:25:44 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: Too many changes? Which ones? Compared to my last upload, there aren't really. Compared to the version currently in wheezy. I see. Well, those are about 7 months of development (not so active, but...) But that is, in a sense, the nature of packages/programs that deal with web scrapping: all of them are highly subject to drastic changes. (Unfortunate, I know). But that affects youtube-dl, clive, cclive, get-flash-videos and many, many other packages in a similar vein. I want to work with you in getting youtube-dl in wheezy and, also, not breaking other programs like freevo. What can we do? Splitting the package in a part containing only data, describing how to parse, and one containing the actual code. The data-part will change depending on developments in youtube webui. In Debian stable, the code-part will only change in order to fix security or other really critical bugs. For keeping the data-part up to date, users should use debian-volatile. That's where the data-part shoud get uploaded to. Volatile doesn't exist anymore; see https://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile-announce/2012/msg0.html The list in that same mail of what qualifies for -updates includes: * Fixes to leaf packages that were broken by external changes (e.g. video downloading tools and tor). That clearly covers youtube-dl. As for splitting the package, that wouldn't make sense; changes to youtube typically require code changes to youtube-dl to work around, not data changes. Fortunately, the criteria for -updates do not require splitting the package. - Johs Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688847: libav: multiple CVEs in ffmpeg/libav
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org wrote: Source: libav Severity: grave Justification: user security hole Hi, it seems that a huge pile of CVE were allocated for ffmpeg/libav short status update: Most/all of the CVEs have now been backported upstream. Before releaseing 0.8.4, I need to review the list to ensure that nothing was forgotten. You can help with this by reviewing the list here: http://git.libav.org/?p=libav.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release/0.8 -- regards, Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679069: marked as done (CVE-2012-3356 / CVE-2012-3357)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:01:37 + with message-id e1tnvjz-et...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#679069: fixed in viewvc 1.1.5-1.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #679069, regarding CVE-2012-3356 / CVE-2012-3357 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 679069: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679069 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: viewvc Severity: grave Tags: security Please see http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q2/540 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q2/544 Cheers, Moritz ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: viewvc Source-Version: 1.1.5-1.3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of viewvc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 679...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org (supplier of updated viewvc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:12:07 + Source: viewvc Binary: viewvc viewvc-query Architecture: source all Version: 1.1.5-1.3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: David Martínez Moreno en...@debian.org Changed-By: Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org Description: viewvc - web interface for CVS and/or Subversion repositories viewvc-query - utility to query CVS and Subversion commit database Closes: 671482 679069 Changes: viewvc (1.1.5-1.3) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. . [ gregor herrmann ] * [SECURITY] Fix CVE-2012-3356 / CVE-2012-3357: - CVE-2012-3356: * security fix: complete authz support for remote SVN views - CVE-2012-3357: * security fix: log msg leak in SVN revision view with unreadable copy source Add patches CVE-2012-3356 and CVE-2012-3357, taken from upstream svn. (Closes: #679069) . [ Ben Hutchings ] * view_query: No longer allow an undocumented URL parameter to override the admin-declared SQL row limit, which could result in excessive CPU usage and memory consumption (CVE-2009-5024) (Closes: #671482) Checksums-Sha1: e8f722eefbd046db586ea358d7efb9122765 1462 viewvc_1.1.5-1.3.dsc 0408927320d2c8683ce9562d677f9c3bdf2243ee 29835 viewvc_1.1.5-1.3.diff.gz f8196929e603705c989753737d5ef4e26bf523e6 606516 viewvc_1.1.5-1.3_all.deb e334694ab1bd10908665c91ddafbdc72a9fd0c2f 12114 viewvc-query_1.1.5-1.3_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 411e3a36179603b5a097cbb6570a52b659ea131fd63d3b0406cecf04c8926eba 1462 viewvc_1.1.5-1.3.dsc 76e0f4201958c59f262c9b02a32ab7932f45a420e53536668b0b10d6116501e7 29835 viewvc_1.1.5-1.3.diff.gz 7dbe4d488d0e4c9bc8d6a53e7ed0e6586dca6a526ecf4873a26b399adbfc415c 606516 viewvc_1.1.5-1.3_all.deb 834d341965ffe1029e78a913b373de0a39de40eea6a84d87645da26b64f7ff68 12114 viewvc-query_1.1.5-1.3_all.deb Files: 3cdd704b2a03a593a04c08c86733ddc0 1462 vcs optional viewvc_1.1.5-1.3.dsc aa2e3704af494f107351a7a0a2662200 29835 vcs optional viewvc_1.1.5-1.3.diff.gz 6604f55ee46ad534b98f12caa37d0f84 606516 vcs optional viewvc_1.1.5-1.3_all.deb 78df85ec268919b90f9ab845ec434d98 12114 vcs optional viewvc-query_1.1.5-1.3_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQex37AAoJEFb2GnlAHawEZFwH/22cGocgU2vTgoD4OAdILy6U MFhaS+r6D1WR/NQ+i7odr+5vczdfFZwDrAnDgarXnQbb4BQwhGxxtOQmwpc32bBM /Zv6MiXFblD77JbUZCbhbYm2N+dWId4b1zU+GAaxdaN0tOCwOF2K4ZhfC5q0BbRa 0ZS6L+g5HbCdW63YuLap3kJkzNrwzxLNZwDdVOmk86Lp/zFThBdYqv4aYkMFHDh5 fXGj9YknStYiQF7scNEOG9C6l9yZxWyM0Gheh6ybcAk8bC2das+R/rFTFl3aIp4O 3UsgQFkJ9Al4MHewb8dZM0b/Dtvum45DUd0nsLEXqUiutRCkfAI8t1uSi9Ju4as= =UJzW -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Bug#690492: love_0.8.0-2_i386.changes REJECTED
Bas Wijnen wij...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 06:57:43PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:02:50PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: love: lintian output: 'embedded-library usr/bin/love-0.8: glee', automatically rejected package. love: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. I didn't touch that. I could override this error, but I shouldn't, because it is a valid error. I didn't fix it, but I still would like the other bugfixes to be included in stable (so I need to get the package included in unstable first). Update: this bug was already worked around in the Debian package: the files included by upstream are not used, and the debian library package is used instead. The embeded copy is in the upstream source, and that is an upstream bug (which should trigger the lintian warning). Are you sure the Debian package does not use the embedded copy? The lintian error seems to be triggered by the binary package (as it includes the path). Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682256: Bug#668008: transition/unblock: uw-imap
On söndagen den 14 oktober 2012, you stated the following: On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:12:19 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: Unfortunately, Jonas's decision to upload without an SONAME bump broke all packages that use libc-client (see bug #682256), due to an extra, internal (and in this case unnecessarily strict) version check that fails. The SONAME *shouldn't* have had to be changed as 2007f is merely a bugfix release, except for an attempt to also support AIX 5.2, but that's nothing that affects us. There are no ABI or API changes. See attached diff. How about the patch below? It might certainly be a good idea too disable that check permanently; it is rather redundant after all. diff -Nru uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog --- uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-06-29 13:32:24.0 +0200 +++ uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 20:02:14.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +uw-imap (8:2007f~dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Disable broken version check (closes: #682256) + + -- Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:02:13 +0200 + -- Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#623578: closed by Matthias Klose d...@debian.org (Bug#623578: fixed in gadfly 1.0.0-15)
reassign 623578 dpkg found 623578 1.16.0.2 done 623578 1.16.7 thanks Hello, Andreas Metzler, le Sun 14 Oct 2012 15:44:16 +0200, a écrit : Afaict (Both by looking at 684625 which is not fixed and by checking the newest binNMU on my up to date testing system) we are currently still doing binNMUs with something equivalent to this: dch --bin-nmu foo dpkg-buildpackage -B Which works perfectly fine with gadfly: -rw-r--r-- 64708 Oct 14 08:53 python-kjbuckets_1.0.0-15+b1_i386.deb -rw-rw-r-- 970 Oct 14 08:53 gadfly_1.0.0-15+b1_i386.changes I get the same result if I add ', binary-only=yes' to debian/changelog. Please describe how the issue can be reproduced? I can't reproduce any more with Wheezy apparently, only in Squeeze. My guess is that it's dpkg 1.16.7 which fixed the issue, marking as such. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#623578: closed by Matthias Klose d...@debian.org (Bug#623578: fixed in gadfly 1.0.0-15)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 623578 dpkg Bug #623578 [gadfly] gadfly: build wrong version of the packaging during a binNMU Bug reassigned from package 'gadfly' to 'dpkg'. No longer marked as found in versions gadfly/1.0.0-14 and gadfly/1.0.0-15. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #623578 to the same values previously set found 623578 1.16.0.2 Bug #623578 [dpkg] gadfly: build wrong version of the packaging during a binNMU Marked as found in versions dpkg/1.16.0.2. done 623578 1.16.7 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 623578: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623578 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: closing 623578
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: close 623578 1.16.7 Bug #623578 [dpkg] gadfly: build wrong version of the packaging during a binNMU Marked as fixed in versions dpkg/1.16.7. Bug #623578 [dpkg] gadfly: build wrong version of the packaging during a binNMU Marked Bug as done thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 623578: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623578 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#623578: closing 623578
close 623578 1.16.7 thanks -- Samuel War doesn't prove who's right, just who's left. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#673913: marked as done (upgrade failure in doc-base trigger: /usr/lib/perl5/auto/UUID/UUID.so: undefined symbol: Perl_xs_apiversion_bootcheck)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:27:42 +0100 with message-id 1350250062.4156.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#690466: unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #673913, regarding upgrade failure in doc-base trigger: /usr/lib/perl5/auto/UUID/UUID.so: undefined symbol: Perl_xs_apiversion_bootcheck to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 673913: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673913 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: doc-base Version: 0.10.2 Severity: serious Hi, I've made a dist-upgrade today of a 4 month old wheezy system and wanted to upgrade it to the latest versions. The upgrade failed while processing the doc-base trigger: Trigger für doc-base werden verarbeitet ... /usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/perl5/auto/UUID/UUID.so: undefined symbol: Perl_xs_apiversion_bootcheck dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von doc-base (--unpack): Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 127 zurück configured to not write apport reports Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: doc-base This left my system in a completely broken state. Neither dpkg --configure -a, apt-get -f install or apt-get dist-upgrade was able to proceed at this point: # apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... failed. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libperl5.14 : Depends: perl-base (= 5.14.2-9) but 5.12.4-6 is installed libuuid-perl : Depends: perl-base (= 5.14.2-3) but 5.12.4-6 is installed Depends: perlapi-5.14.2 perl : Depends: perl-base (= 5.14.2-9) but 5.12.4-6 is installed E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages. E: Unable to correct dependencies -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-486 Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages doc-base depends on: ii libuuid-perl 0.02-4+b2 ii libyaml-tiny-perl 1.51-1 doc-base recommends no packages. Versions of packages doc-base suggests: ii khelpcenter4 4:4.6.5-1+b1 ii rarian-compat 0.8.1-5 ii yelp 3.2.1+dfsg-1+b1 -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 18:19 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: Please unblock package libuuid-perl 0.02-5. This adds Conflicts: doc-base ( 0.10.3) and closes #652638. Unblocked; thanks. Also closing #673913, which is a symptom of the issue fixed by this change. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Bug#688231: Bug#690170: Bug#688231: acgvision-agent: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/acgvision/agent.ini
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:08:26 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: So this looks like a removal candidate to me: - last upload July 2010 - popcon: Inst: 7, Vote: 6 - no reverse (build) deps - and now 2 RC bugs And here's the removal request, filed by the MIA team thanks!): #690262 Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Simon and Garfunkel: Fifty Ways To Leave Your Lover signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#686148: schroot: Does not unmount /run/shm
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 686148 serious Bug #686148 [schroot] schroot: Does not unmount /run/shm Severity set to 'serious' from 'minor' tags 686148 + fixed-upstream pending Bug #686148 [schroot] schroot: Does not unmount /run/shm Added tag(s) pending and fixed-upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 686148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686148 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#686148: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#686148: schroot: Does not unmount /run/shm
severity 686148 serious tags 686148 + fixed-upstream pending thanks On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 09:42:16AM +0200, Daniel Dehennin wrote: I noticed several “/run/shm” in my mount since a moment but did not figure out where they came from. tmpfs on /run/shm type tmpfs (rw,relatime) After quitting the schroot, the “/run/shm” is still here. Thanks for reporting this. I've made this RC severity due to this giving an end user the ability to mount over the host /run/shm, which could cause problems on the host system. They can't alter the content of the fstab, but if they have root access in the chroot, they could place symlinks to arbitrary places on the host. In git, I've updated schroot-mount to use realpath(3) to canonicalise the path, which will remove all symlinks. We then ensure that any links outside the chroot will be resolved inside before mounting. This does have a limitation: we call realpath(3) on the host, so complex nested symlinks may resolve differently. But anyone using complex sets of nested links as mountpoints is insane! And even in this case, they will all get mounted inside the chroot, so there's no danger of compromising the host. This will fix the problem you reported. This might also need backporting to 1.4 and squeeze. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
