Re: Request Freeze Exemption for libtrace3 version 3.0.7-1
On 10/04/2010 10:58 PM, Matt Brown wrote: On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: On 0, Matt Brown ma...@debian.org wrote: Please let me know if you will grant an exception for this package? Please go ahead and tell us when the package hits unstable. I've just uploaded it now. Apologies for the ridiculous delay - the feeble excuse is that my signing subkey had expired and I therefore had to wait for a keyring update. epic fail on my part... :) If you're still willing to grant the exception after all this time it would be much appreciated. Unblocked. Thanks. -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4caac009.4090...@dogguy.org
Bug#599077: unblock: ocaml/3.11.2-2
tags 599077 + confirmed thanks On 10/04/2010 11:14 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Yes, the diff looks ok. (Although I see it's been fixed in git since March...) Yes, we were waiting for a bigger update and somehow forgotten about the committed changes (until a recent ping from a user). I'll upload the package this evening. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4caabf43.3050...@debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#599077: unblock: ocaml/3.11.2-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 599077 + confirmed Bug #599077 [release.debian.org] unblock: ocaml/3.11.2-2 Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 599077: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599077 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12862586915422.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Please unblock libvirt 0.8.3-2
Hi, libvirt 0.8.3-2 adds an important upgrade notice since probing of disk image types got disabled by upstream. It also fixes a minor issue with Xen block device statistics. Please unblock, debdiff attached. Cheers, -- Guido diff -Nru libvirt-0.8.3/debian/changelog libvirt-0.8.3/debian/changelog --- libvirt-0.8.3/debian/changelog 2010-08-06 23:06:40.0 +0200 +++ libvirt-0.8.3/debian/changelog 2010-09-29 14:07:46.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +libvirt (0.8.3-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * [4097bbd] New patch 0007-Fix-block-statistics-with-newer-versions- +of-Xen.patch. Fix block statistics with newer versions of Xen +(Closes: #596004) - thanks to Gerald Turner for the patch + * [d554da3] Explain disk image probing changes (Closes: #594962) + + -- Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:00:38 +0200 + libvirt (0.8.3-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Guido Günther ] diff -Nru libvirt-0.8.3/debian/libvirt-bin.NEWS libvirt-0.8.3/debian/libvirt-bin.NEWS --- libvirt-0.8.3/debian/libvirt-bin.NEWS 2010-08-06 23:06:40.0 +0200 +++ libvirt-0.8.3/debian/libvirt-bin.NEWS 2010-09-29 13:29:13.0 +0200 @@ -7,3 +7,19 @@ anything. -- Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:58:35 +0200 + +libvirt (0.8.3-2) unstable; urgency=low + + Disk format probing is disabled now by default for security reasons + (CVE-2010-2237). You need to explicitly add a driver type element to your + disk devices in the domain XML: + + disk ... + driver name='qemu' type='qcow2'/ + ... + /disk + + Alternatively you can reenable probing by setting allow_disk_format_probing=1 + in /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf but this is insecure. + + -- Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:10:02 +0200 diff -Nru libvirt-0.8.3/debian/patches/0007-Fix-block-statistics-with-newer-versions-of-Xen.patch libvirt-0.8.3/debian/patches/0007-Fix-block-statistics-with-newer-versions-of-Xen.patch --- libvirt-0.8.3/debian/patches/0007-Fix-block-statistics-with-newer-versions-of-Xen.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ libvirt-0.8.3/debian/patches/0007-Fix-block-statistics-with-newer-versions-of-Xen.patch 2010-09-29 13:05:45.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +From: =?UTF-8?q?Guido=20G=C3=BCnther?= a...@sigxcpu.org +Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:57:35 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] Fix block statistics with newer versions of Xen + +Apparently the xen block device statistics moved from +/sys/devices/xen-backend/vbd-%d-%d/statistics/%s +to +/sys/bus/xen-backend/devices/vbd-%d-%d/statistics/%s + +* src/xen/block_stats.c: try the extra path in case of failure to + find the statistics in /sys + +Origin: upstream, http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=8a70113a9949fd482151f2962dd760364525a996 +Closes: #596004 +--- + src/xen/block_stats.c | 12 + 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/src/xen/block_stats.c b/src/xen/block_stats.c +index 6e7a5c3..1d875f2 100644 +--- a/src/xen/block_stats.c b/src/xen/block_stats.c +@@ -118,6 +118,18 @@ read_bd_stat (int device, int domid, const char *str) + int64_t r; + + snprintf (path, sizeof path, ++ /sys/bus/xen-backend/devices/vbd-%d-%d/statistics/%s, ++ domid, device, str); ++r = read_stat (path); ++if (r = 0) return r; ++ ++snprintf (path, sizeof path, ++ /sys/bus/xen-backend/devices/tap-%d-%d/statistics/%s, ++ domid, device, str); ++r = read_stat (path); ++if (r = 0) return r; ++ ++snprintf (path, sizeof path, + /sys/devices/xen-backend/vbd-%d-%d/statistics/%s, + domid, device, str); + r = read_stat (path); +-- diff -Nru libvirt-0.8.3/debian/patches/series libvirt-0.8.3/debian/patches/series --- libvirt-0.8.3/debian/patches/series 2010-08-05 23:20:55.0 +0200 +++ libvirt-0.8.3/debian/patches/series 2010-09-29 13:05:45.0 +0200 @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ 0004-fix-Debian-specific-path-to-hvm-loader.patch 0005-Terminate-nc-on-EOF.patch 0006-patch-qemuMonitorTextGetMigrationStatus-to-intercept.patch +0007-Fix-block-statistics-with-newer-versions-of-Xen.patch
Bug#599082: marked as done (unblock: neverball/1.5.4-3)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Oct 2010 09:31:59 +0200 with message-id 4caad46f.2010...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#599082: unblock: neverball/1.5.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #599082, regarding unblock: neverball/1.5.4-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 599082: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599082 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi! Would you please unblock neverball/1.5.4-3 as it fixes #598614, a FTBFS on mips? I tried to keep the changes (full debdiff attached) minimal: $ debdiff neverball_1.5.4-2.dsc neverball_1.5.4-3.dsc |diffstat debian/patches/sepperate-data-and-bin | 13 ++ debian/patches/series |1 neverball-1.5.4/debian/changelog |8 ++ neverball-1.5.4/debian/control|2 - neverball-1.5.4/debian/rules | 44 ++ 5 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) I should mention, that this upload doesn't really fix the FTBFS. Building neverball on mips works, but upstream doesn't allow sepperation of builind the data files and the actuall binaries, and building the data files does take ages on mips. I could successfully build 1.5.4-2 on gabrielli, but it more than two days. During the build, nothing get's printed, so recent last binNMU got terminated. The fix now sepperates the build of the executables and the data; allthough the resulting debian/rules looks strange, I tested it quite carefully and it works. Best regards, Alexander -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.6 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de...@euro) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash diff -u neverball-1.5.4/debian/rules neverball-1.5.4/debian/rules --- neverball-1.5.4/debian/rules +++ neverball-1.5.4/debian/rules @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode. #export DH_VERBOSE=1 +include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make + CFLAGS = -Wall -g ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) @@ -16,39 +18,61 @@ INSTALL_PROGRAM += -s endif -build: build-stamp -build-stamp: +build: build-arch build-indep + +build-arch: build-arch-stamp +build-arch-stamp: patch dh_testdir # Set HOME to an existent directory as a workaround for #544835. Note that # HOME isn't actually used, but some buildds set it to a non-existent # directory, and PhysicsFS currently fails if the directory doesn't exist # (see #553174). $(MAKE) DATADIR=/usr/share/games/neverball LOCALEDIR=/usr/share/locale \ - HOME=$(CURDIR) + HOME=$(CURDIR) executables # Rename icons for .desktop files. cp dist/neverball_128.png dist/neverball.png cp dist/neverputt_128.png dist/neverputt.png touch $@ -clean: +build-indep: build-indep-stamp +build-indep-stamp: patch + dh_testdir + # we build in binary-indep, as dpkg-buildpackage -B insist on + # calling the general build target + touch $@ + +clean: unpatch dh_testdir dh_testroot - rm -f build-stamp + rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp [ ! -f Makefile ] || $(MAKE) clean rm -f dist/neverball.png dist/neverputt.png dh_clean -install: build +install: install-arch + +install-arch: dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean -k - dh_installdirs - dh_install + dh_installdirs -a + dh_install -a # Build architecture-independent files here. -binary-indep: build install +binary-indep: build-indep dh_testdir -i dh_testroot -i + # Set HOME to an existent directory as a workaround for #544835. Note that + # HOME isn't actually used, but some buildds set it to a non-existent + # directory, and PhysicsFS currently fails if the directory doesn't exist + # (see #553174). + $(MAKE) DATADIR=/usr/share/games/neverball LOCALEDIR=/usr/share/locale \ + HOME=$(CURDIR) data + dh_testdir + dh_testroot + dh_clean -k + dh_installdirs -i + dh_install -i dh_installchangelogs -i CHANGES dh_installdocs -i dh_link -i @@ -60,7 +84,7 @@ dh_builddeb -i # Build architecture-dependent files here. -binary-arch: build install +binary-arch: build-arch install-arch dh_testdir -a dh_testroot -a dh_installchangelogs -a CHANGES diff -u neverball-1.5.4/debian/control neverball-1.5.4/debian/control --- neverball-1.5.4/debian/control +++ neverball-1.5.4/debian/control @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: apr-util_1.2.12+dfsg-8+lenny5_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apr-util_1.2.12+dfsg-8+lenny5_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apr-util_1.2.12+dfsg-8+lenny5_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apr-util_1.2.12+dfsg-8+lenny5_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apr-util_1.2.12+dfsg-8+lenny5_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apr-util_1.2.12+dfsg-8+lenny5_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apr-util_1.2.12+dfsg-8+lenny5_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apr-util_1.2.12+dfsg-8+lenny5_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apr-util_1.2.12+dfsg-8+lenny5_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apr-util_1.2.12+dfsg-8+lenny5_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apr-util_1.2.12+dfsg-8+lenny5_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apr-util_1.2.12+dfsg-8+lenny5_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bogofilter_1.1.7-1+lenny1_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1p32qw-0002gl...@franck.debian.org
Choosing a stable+2 release name BEFORE the freeze
Hi, This may have been said before, if so, my apologies. I've noticed that, each time, the stable+2 release name is chosen when stable+1 is frozen. I have, on one of my package (DTC-Xen), the feature to (de)bootstrap a virtual machine. Because of this, the default Debian flavor is asked through debconf. Of course, I wish to enable my users to select stable+1 as a flavor. But the issue is that, only when Squeeze was frozen, I got to know that Squeeze+1 would be called Wheezy. Of course, I then needed to ask for an unblock, so that I could add the new Debian flavor name on my debconf answer list. Now, I suspect that I wouldn't be the only one in this case (I'm quite sure I saw at least one more instance of the same issue). So, my request is quite simple. Could the name for the release after Wheezy be chosen when Squeeze is release? To me, that would be the relevant moment to decide, I can't see a case where we would need it more early (but I do see issues if it's decided later). That way, anyone working on some SID packages would be able to have the name of Wheezy+1 wired-in if needed, before Wheeze is frozen, and get a chance to avoid an unblock... Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4caaeb86.6090...@debian.org
Re: Choosing a stable+2 release name BEFORE the freeze
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:10:30PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: So, my request is quite simple. Could the name for the release after Wheezy be chosen when Squeeze is release? Nah. And it's not that likely that you could do something useful with it anyway. (Given that we don't support skipping releases and it's possible that you cannot debootstrap the new one with an environment two versions earlier.) Kind regards, Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#599174: unblock: mldonkey/3.0.3-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, Please unblock package mldonkey. Last changelog entry: mldonkey (3.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * Add myself to Uploaders * Add Danish debconf translation (Closes: #599126) -- Stéphane Glondu glo...@debian.org Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:44:57 +0200 unblock mldonkey/3.0.3-2 Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101005095526.30812.35429.report...@korell.up7.fr
Re: Bug#576651: marked as done (metacity: assertion failure at startup)
Hi, On 05/10/10 01:21, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: metacity (1:2.30.1-3) unstable; urgency=low . [ Josselin Mouette ] * 05_36_workspaces.patch: patch from Bas van Sisseren. Fix assertion failure when more than 16 workspaces are defined. Closes: #576651, #586207, #598016. . [ Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ] * debian/patches/05_36_workspaces.patch: - Apply the patch to the correct file. Please unblock metacity 1:2.30.1-3. It fixes an important bug. Thanks, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4caafe25.6030...@debian.org
Re: [request-tracker-maintainers] Pending updates for request-tracker3.8
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 02:09:45PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 16/09/2010 20:05, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I've attached the diff from testing to this email, and the diffstat is
below. If you prefer an upload now with the expectation of another
once I've fixed #595054, let me know.
I can unblock the attached changes (if you upload). When #595054 is fixed,
you'll be able to request another freeze exception (and would be simpler
for us to review since it will a one-fix-release).
I plan to upload the attached fix for #595054 this evening. Shout if
you'd prefer something done differently.
changelog |9 +
po/cs.po|2 -
po/de.po|2 -
po/es.po| 15
po/fr.po|2 -
po/gl.po|2 -
po/it.po|4 +-
po/ja.po|2 -
po/pt.po|2 -
po/ru.po|6 +--
po/sv.po|2 -
po/vi.po| 82
request-tracker3.8.init | 31 ++
rules |1
14 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
Cheers,
Dominic.
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)
Index: debian/request-tracker3.8.init
===
--- debian/request-tracker3.8.init (revision 0)
+++ debian/request-tracker3.8.init (revision 880)
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+#
+### BEGIN INIT INFO
+# Provides: request-tracker3.8
+# Required-Start:$remote_fs $syslog
+# Required-Stop: $remote_fs $syslog
+# Default-Start: 2 3 4 5
+# Default-Stop: 0 1 6
+# Should-Start: mysql postgresql
+# Should-Stop: mysql postgresql
+# X-Start-Before:apache2
+# X-Stop-After: apache2
+# Short-Description: Dummy init script to enforce web/database server startup ordering
+# Description: This init script exists so that MySQL or PostgreSQL database servers,
+# if present, will be started before Apache. This is a workaround for the problem in RT
+# where if mod_perl is being used, inability to contact the database server when Apache is
+# being started will cause the web server to fail to start up.
+### END INIT INFO
+
+. /lib/lsb/init-functions
+
+case $1 in
+start|stop|restart|force-reload)
+# we don't have anything to do, but that's okay
+;;
+*)
+log_action_msg Usage: /etc/init.d/request-tracker3.8 {start|stop|restart|force-reload}
+exit 1
+esac
+
+exit 0
Index: debian/po/gl.po
===
--- debian/po/gl.po (revision 872)
+++ debian/po/gl.po (working copy)
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@
PO-Revision-Date: 2009-04-16 21:52+0200\n
Last-Translator: marce villarino mvillar...@users.sourceforge.net\n
Language-Team: Galician proxe...@trasno.net\n
+Language: gl\n
MIME-Version: 1.0\n
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n
-Language: gl\n
X-Generator: Lokalize 0.2\n
Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=n != 1;\n
Index: debian/po/pt.po
===
--- debian/po/pt.po (revision 872)
+++ debian/po/pt.po (working copy)
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@
PO-Revision-Date: 2010-09-03 18:28+0100\n
Last-Translator: Américo Monteiro a_monte...@netcabo.pt\n
Language-Team: Portuguese tra...@debianpt.org\n
+Language: pt\n
MIME-Version: 1.0\n
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n
-Language: pt\n
X-Generator: Lokalize 1.0\n
Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n
Index: debian/po/cs.po
===
--- debian/po/cs.po (revision 872)
+++ debian/po/cs.po (working copy)
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@
PO-Revision-Date: 2010-09-03 14:17+0200\n
Last-Translator: Miroslav Kure ku...@debian.cz\n
Language-Team: Czech debian-l10n-cz...@lists.debian.org\n
+Language: cs\n
MIME-Version: 1.0\n
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n
-Language: cs\n
#. Type: string
#. Description
Index: debian/po/ru.po
===
--- debian/po/ru.po (revision 872)
+++ debian/po/ru.po (working copy)
@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@
PO-Revision-Date: 2010-09-04 08:14+0400\n
Last-Translator: Yuri Kozlov yu...@komyakino.ru\n
Language-Team: Russian debian-l10n-russ...@lists.debian.org\n
+Language: ru\n
MIME-Version: 1.0\n
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n
-Language: ru\n
X-Generator: Lokalize 1.0\n
-Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10=2 n%
-10=4 (n%10010 || n%100=20) ? 1 : 2);\n
+Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10=2 n
+%10=4 (n%10010 || n%100=20) ? 1 : 2);\n
#. Type: string
#.
Bug#599191: unblock: blas/1.2-8 (yet to be uploaded)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Dear Release Team, This is a permission to upload and request to unblock blas. A gcc bug implies that we build with -O2 on amd64. Sadly, this also means kfreebsd-amd64. So, here is the change I request: --- packages/blas/trunk/debian/rules 2010/03/03 17:33:18 36253 +++ packages/blas/trunk/debian/rules 2010/10/04 13:28:00 36911 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ GCC:=gcc F77FLAGS:= -pipe -g -fomit-frame-pointer -ifneq (,$(filter $(ARCH),amd64)) +ifneq (,$(findstring amd64,$(ARCH))) # See bug #569436. -O3 causes some optimisation issues F77FLAGS:=$(F77FLAGS) -O2 else Thanks. Kumar -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- Hesitating to act because the whole vision might not be achieved, or because others do not yet share it, is an attitude that only hinders progress. -- Mahatma Gandhi signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: stable proposed update: ser2net, fixing #535159
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 09:47:02PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Thanks. Please go ahead with the upload. Uploaded. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things.Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 3221 2323190 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010100515.gs30...@torres.zugschlus.de
Please unblock ffmpeg_4:0.5.2-6
Hi,
Please unblock ffmpeg_4:0.5.2-6. It fixes CVE-2010-3429.
thanks!
Diff inline:
Changes at tags/debian/0.5.2-5
Modified debian/changelog
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index ee4457a..61ed386 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+ffmpeg (4:0.5.2-6) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Fix several security issues in flicvideo.c.
+Fixes: CVE-2010-3429, Closes: #598590
+ * Raising severity to high because of security issue.
+
+ -- Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:59:39 +0200
+
ffmpeg (4:0.5.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
[ Dominic Evans ]
New debian/patches/fix-CVE-2010-3429.patch
diff --git a/debian/patches/fix-CVE-2010-3429.patch
b/debian/patches/fix-CVE-2010-3429.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..8d07a13
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/fix-CVE-2010-3429.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+From: michael
+Subject: Fix several security issues in flicvideo.c
+
+This fixes CVE-2010-3429
+
+backport r25223 by michael
+
+--- a/libavcodec/flicvideo.c (revision 25324)
b/libavcodec/flicvideo.c (revision 25325)
+@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
+ int pixel_skip;
+ int pixel_countdown;
+ unsigned char *pixels;
+-int pixel_limit;
++unsigned int pixel_limit;
+
+ s-frame.reference = 1;
+ s-frame.buffer_hints = FF_BUFFER_HINTS_VALID | FF_BUFFER_HINTS_PRESERVE
| FF_BUFFER_HINTS_REUSABLE;
+@@ -254,10 +254,13 @@
+ av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, Undefined opcode (%x) in
DELTA_FLI\n, line_packets);
+ } else if ((line_packets 0xC000) == 0x8000) {
+ // last byte opcode
+-pixels[y_ptr + s-frame.linesize[0] - 1] = line_packets
0xff;
++pixel_ptr= y_ptr + s-frame.linesize[0] - 1;
++CHECK_PIXEL_PTR(0);
++pixels[pixel_ptr] = line_packets 0xff;
+ } else {
+ compressed_lines--;
+ pixel_ptr = y_ptr;
++CHECK_PIXEL_PTR(0);
+ pixel_countdown = s-avctx-width;
+ for (i = 0; i line_packets; i++) {
+ /* account for the skip bytes */
+@@ -269,7 +272,7 @@
+ byte_run = -byte_run;
+ palette_idx1 = buf[stream_ptr++];
+ palette_idx2 = buf[stream_ptr++];
+-CHECK_PIXEL_PTR(byte_run);
++CHECK_PIXEL_PTR(byte_run * 2);
+ for (j = 0; j byte_run; j++, pixel_countdown -=
2) {
+ pixels[pixel_ptr++] = palette_idx1;
+ pixels[pixel_ptr++] = palette_idx2;
+@@ -299,6 +302,7 @@
+ stream_ptr += 2;
+ while (compressed_lines 0) {
+ pixel_ptr = y_ptr;
++CHECK_PIXEL_PTR(0);
+ pixel_countdown = s-avctx-width;
+ line_packets = buf[stream_ptr++];
+ if (line_packets 0) {
+@@ -454,7 +458,7 @@
+ int pixel_countdown;
+ unsigned char *pixels;
+ int pixel;
+-int pixel_limit;
++unsigned int pixel_limit;
+
+ s-frame.reference = 1;
+ s-frame.buffer_hints = FF_BUFFER_HINTS_VALID | FF_BUFFER_HINTS_PRESERVE
| FF_BUFFER_HINTS_REUSABLE;
+@@ -504,6 +508,7 @@
+ } else {
+ compressed_lines--;
+ pixel_ptr = y_ptr;
++CHECK_PIXEL_PTR(0);
+ pixel_countdown = s-avctx-width;
+ for (i = 0; i line_packets; i++) {
+ /* account for the skip bytes */
+@@ -515,13 +520,13 @@
+ byte_run = -byte_run;
+ pixel= AV_RL16(buf[stream_ptr]);
+ stream_ptr += 2;
+-CHECK_PIXEL_PTR(byte_run);
++CHECK_PIXEL_PTR(2 * byte_run);
+ for (j = 0; j byte_run; j++, pixel_countdown -=
2) {
+ *((signed short*)(pixels[pixel_ptr])) =
pixel;
+ pixel_ptr += 2;
+ }
+ } else {
+-CHECK_PIXEL_PTR(byte_run);
++CHECK_PIXEL_PTR(2 * byte_run);
+ for (j = 0; j byte_run; j++, pixel_countdown--)
{
+ *((signed short*)(pixels[pixel_ptr])) =
AV_RL16(buf[stream_ptr]);
+ stream_ptr += 2;
+@@ -612,7 +617,7 @@
+ if (byte_run 0) {
+ pixel= AV_RL16(buf[stream_ptr]);
+ stream_ptr += 2;
+-CHECK_PIXEL_PTR(byte_run);
++CHECK_PIXEL_PTR(2 * byte_run);
+ for (j = 0; j byte_run;
Re: Please unblock ffmpeg_4:0.5.2-6
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 15:45:41 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Hi, Please unblock ffmpeg_4:0.5.2-6. It fixes CVE-2010-3429. Done. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#590878: marked as done (sound-juicer: repeatable segmentation fault when extracting)
On 03/10/10 21:42, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le dimanche 03 octobre 2010 à 17:54 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : * Drop libcdio build-dependency since the backend is broken and causes crashes. Closes: #590878. Shouldn't there be a build-conflicts or --disable-foo configure option then, to prevent it being accidentally enabled? That would be a build-conflict then, since there is no such option :( Done. Please unblock 2.28.2-3. Regards, Emilio sound-juicer (2.28.2-3) unstable; urgency=low * Add libcdio-dev to build conflicts so the libcdio backend won't be accidentally enabled. -- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:18:39 +0200 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cab2b87.8010...@debian.org
Re: Bug#590878: marked as done (sound-juicer: repeatable segmentation fault when extracting)
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 15:43:35 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: sound-juicer (2.28.2-3) unstable; urgency=low Unblocked, thanks. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#599191: marked as done (unblock: blas/1.2-8 (yet to be uploaded))
Your message dated Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:08:06 +0200 with message-id 20101005140806.gg10...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#599191: unblock: blas/1.2-8 (yet to be uploaded) has caused the Debian Bug report #599191, regarding unblock: blas/1.2-8 (yet to be uploaded) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 599191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599191 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Dear Release Team, This is a permission to upload and request to unblock blas. A gcc bug implies that we build with -O2 on amd64. Sadly, this also means kfreebsd-amd64. So, here is the change I request: --- packages/blas/trunk/debian/rules 2010/03/03 17:33:18 36253 +++ packages/blas/trunk/debian/rules 2010/10/04 13:28:00 36911 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ GCC:=gcc F77FLAGS:= -pipe -g -fomit-frame-pointer -ifneq (,$(filter $(ARCH),amd64)) +ifneq (,$(findstring amd64,$(ARCH))) # See bug #569436. -O3 causes some optimisation issues F77FLAGS:=$(F77FLAGS) -O2 else Thanks. Kumar -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- Hesitating to act because the whole vision might not be achieved, or because others do not yet share it, is an attitude that only hinders progress. -- Mahatma Gandhi signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 08:21:50 -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: This is a permission to upload and request to unblock blas. A gcc bug implies that we build with -O2 on amd64. Sadly, this also means kfreebsd-amd64. So, here is the change I request: Unblocked. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Removing
Hi,
In our effort to remove old libraries, I would like to remove
libgmime2.2a-cil from gmime2.2. We would have liked not to ship
gmime2.2 with Squeeze at all, but that wasn't possible. However
the Mono bindings are not used by any package, and they are
superseded by the 2.4 bindings, so I would like to know whether
you would accept such a change into Squeeze.
Thanks for considering,
Emilio
emi...@saturno:~/deb/pkg-gnome/packages/unstable/build-area$ debdiff
gmime2.2_2.2.25-{1.1,2}.dsc
diff -u gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/changelog gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/changelog
--- gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/changelog
+++ gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+gmime2.2 (2.2.25-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Drop libgmime2.2a-cil.
+
+ -- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org Fri, 21 May 2010 16:10:54 +0200
+
gmime2.2 (2.2.25-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload
reverted:
--- gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/libgmime2.2a-cil.docs
+++ gmime2.2-2.2.25.orig/debian/libgmime2.2a-cil.docs
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-AUTHORS
-README
-TODO
diff -u gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/control gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/control
--- gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/control
+++ gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/control
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Section: libs
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Mirco Bauer mee...@debian.org
-Uploaders: Debian GNOME Maintainers
pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
+Uploaders: Debian GNOME Maintainers
pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
po...@debian.org
Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0),
gnome-pkg-tools (= 0.10),
libglib2.0-dev,
@@ -17,10 +17,6 @@
gtk-doc-tools (= 1.8),
docbook-utils,
sharutils
-Build-Depends-Indep: cli-common-dev (= 0.4.4),
- mono-devel (= 2.4.3),
- libgtk2.0-cil-dev (= 2.4.0),
- gtk-sharp2-gapi (= 2.4.0)
Standards-Version: 3.8.0
Homepage: http://spruce.sourceforge.net/gmime/
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-gnome/packages/unstable/gmime2.2
@@ -58,9 +53,0 @@
-
-Package: libgmime2.2a-cil
-Replaces: libgmime2.2-cil
-Conflicts: libgmime2.2-cil
-Architecture: all
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${cli:Depends}
-Description: CLI binding for the MIME library
- GMime is a set of utilities for parsing and creating messages using
- the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension (MIME).
reverted:
--- gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/libgmime2.2a-cil.links
+++ gmime2.2-2.2.25.orig/debian/libgmime2.2a-cil.links
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-usr/lib/pkgconfig/gmime-sharp-2.2.pc usr/lib/pkgconfig/gmime-sharp.pc
reverted:
--- gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/libgmime2.2a-cil.installcligac
+++ gmime2.2-2.2.25.orig/debian/libgmime2.2a-cil.installcligac
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-/usr/lib/cli/gmime-sharp-2.2/gmime-sharp.dll
reverted:
--- gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/libgmime2.2a-cil.install
+++ gmime2.2-2.2.25.orig/debian/libgmime2.2a-cil.install
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-usr/share/gapi-2.0
-usr/lib/pkgconfig/gmime-sharp-2.2.pc
-usr/lib/mono/gac/gmime-sharp/2.2*/* /usr/lib/cli/gmime-sharp-2.2
diff -u gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/rules gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/rules
--- gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/rules
+++ gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/rules
@@ -3,8 +3,6 @@
# Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode.
#export DH_VERBOSE=1
-export MONO_SHARED_DIR=$(CURDIR)
-
include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make
include /usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1/rules/uploaders.mk
@@ -19,7 +17,7 @@
configure-stamp: patch
dh_testdir
- ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info --enable-gtk-doc --disable-rpath
--enable-largefile --enable-rfc2047-workarounds CSC=/usr/bin/mono-csc
+ ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info --enable-gtk-doc --disable-rpath
--enable-largefile --enable-rfc2047-workarounds
touch configure-stamp
@@ -27,9 +25,6 @@
build-stamp: configure
dh_testdir
- # unpack signing key
- cd debian uudecode gmime-sharp.snk.uu
-
$(MAKE)
touch build-stamp
@@ -41,7 +36,7 @@
[ ! -f Makefile ] || $(MAKE) -C docs/reference maintainer-clean-local
[ ! -f Makefile ] || $(MAKE) distclean
- rm -rf .wapi libgmime gmime.h libgmime.spec debian/gmime-sharp.snk
+ rm -rf .wapi libgmime gmime.h libgmime.spec
dh_clean
rm -rf debian/patched
@@ -62,9 +57,6 @@
binary-indep: build install
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
- # CLI Policy 3.2.4
- mv $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/pkgconfig/gmime-sharp.pc \
- $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/pkgconfig/gmime-sharp-2.2.pc
# move files to where they supposedly belong
dh_install -i --sourcedir=debian/tmp
dh_installdocs -i
@@ -75,13 +67,9 @@
dh_strip -i
dh_compress -i
dh_fixperms -i
- dh_clifixperms -i
dh_makeshlibs -i
- dh_makeclilibs -i -V
- dh_installcligac -i
dh_installdeb -i
dh_shlibdeps -i
- dh_clideps -i -d
dh_gencontrol -i
dh_md5sums -i
dh_builddeb -i
diff -u
Bug#599082: unblock: neverball/1.5.4-3
reopen 599082 thanks Hi! * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org [101005 09:31]: Would you please unblock neverball/1.5.4-3 as it fixes #598614, a FTBFS on mips? Sorry, seems my request came too soon. https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=neverball lists 1.5.4-3 on mips as Build-attempt, so something still fails (can't understand it; it worked on gabrielli!). So I close this unblock request, and wait for the build logs. Arg, sorry for the confussion. It appreas I didn't read the the above webpage correctly :( neverball has been sucessfully built on all archs. I would therefore ask you to unblock it. Best Regards, Alexander signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#599082: unblock: neverball/1.5.4-3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 599082
Bug #599082 {Done: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org}
[release.debian.org] unblock: neverball/1.5.4-3
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
599082: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599082
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12862951518842.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Choosing a stable+2 release name BEFORE the freeze
Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:10:30PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: So, my request is quite simple. Could the name for the release after Wheezy be chosen when Squeeze is release? Nah. And it's not that likely that you could do something useful with it anyway. (Given that we don't support skipping releases and it's possible that you cannot debootstrap the new one with an environment two versions earlier.) Kind regards, Philipp Kern I think that, as always, I expressed myself like a shit. :) Let me try again, because the above shows I didn't explain well (there's no relationship at all with skipping releases, or even debootstrap the new one with an environment two versions earlier). August, Squeeze isn't frozen, in my DTC-Xen, you can choose, as a debootstrap option: Etch, Lenny, Squeeze. I can't have wheezy, because I don't know it's name yet. July, Squeeze is frozen, DTC-Xen is in it, but it wont be able to setup Wheezy. So I had to add it, and ask the release team to accept a change in my package, just in order to add the new name. There was no other way so that the version in stable knows how to install the testing distribution with debootstrap. So yes, I couldn't do anything with the name, except ... have it stored in my package in SID to prepare the future, so that my package in stable can debootstrap stable+1. Does it make sense now? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cab4da2.3090...@debian.org
Bug#599082: marked as done (unblock: neverball/1.5.4-3)
Your message dated Tue, 5 Oct 2010 18:30:10 +0200 with message-id 20101005163010.gh10...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#599082: unblock: neverball/1.5.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #599082, regarding unblock: neverball/1.5.4-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 599082: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599082 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi! Would you please unblock neverball/1.5.4-3 as it fixes #598614, a FTBFS on mips? I tried to keep the changes (full debdiff attached) minimal: $ debdiff neverball_1.5.4-2.dsc neverball_1.5.4-3.dsc |diffstat debian/patches/sepperate-data-and-bin | 13 ++ debian/patches/series |1 neverball-1.5.4/debian/changelog |8 ++ neverball-1.5.4/debian/control|2 - neverball-1.5.4/debian/rules | 44 ++ 5 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) I should mention, that this upload doesn't really fix the FTBFS. Building neverball on mips works, but upstream doesn't allow sepperation of builind the data files and the actuall binaries, and building the data files does take ages on mips. I could successfully build 1.5.4-2 on gabrielli, but it more than two days. During the build, nothing get's printed, so recent last binNMU got terminated. The fix now sepperates the build of the executables and the data; allthough the resulting debian/rules looks strange, I tested it quite carefully and it works. Best regards, Alexander -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.6 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de...@euro) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash diff -u neverball-1.5.4/debian/rules neverball-1.5.4/debian/rules --- neverball-1.5.4/debian/rules +++ neverball-1.5.4/debian/rules @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode. #export DH_VERBOSE=1 +include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make + CFLAGS = -Wall -g ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) @@ -16,39 +18,61 @@ INSTALL_PROGRAM += -s endif -build: build-stamp -build-stamp: +build: build-arch build-indep + +build-arch: build-arch-stamp +build-arch-stamp: patch dh_testdir # Set HOME to an existent directory as a workaround for #544835. Note that # HOME isn't actually used, but some buildds set it to a non-existent # directory, and PhysicsFS currently fails if the directory doesn't exist # (see #553174). $(MAKE) DATADIR=/usr/share/games/neverball LOCALEDIR=/usr/share/locale \ - HOME=$(CURDIR) + HOME=$(CURDIR) executables # Rename icons for .desktop files. cp dist/neverball_128.png dist/neverball.png cp dist/neverputt_128.png dist/neverputt.png touch $@ -clean: +build-indep: build-indep-stamp +build-indep-stamp: patch + dh_testdir + # we build in binary-indep, as dpkg-buildpackage -B insist on + # calling the general build target + touch $@ + +clean: unpatch dh_testdir dh_testroot - rm -f build-stamp + rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp [ ! -f Makefile ] || $(MAKE) clean rm -f dist/neverball.png dist/neverputt.png dh_clean -install: build +install: install-arch + +install-arch: dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean -k - dh_installdirs - dh_install + dh_installdirs -a + dh_install -a # Build architecture-independent files here. -binary-indep: build install +binary-indep: build-indep dh_testdir -i dh_testroot -i + # Set HOME to an existent directory as a workaround for #544835. Note that + # HOME isn't actually used, but some buildds set it to a non-existent + # directory, and PhysicsFS currently fails if the directory doesn't exist + # (see #553174). + $(MAKE) DATADIR=/usr/share/games/neverball LOCALEDIR=/usr/share/locale \ + HOME=$(CURDIR) data + dh_testdir + dh_testroot + dh_clean -k + dh_installdirs -i + dh_install -i dh_installchangelogs -i CHANGES dh_installdocs -i dh_link -i @@ -60,7 +84,7 @@ dh_builddeb -i # Build architecture-dependent files here. -binary-arch: build install +binary-arch: build-arch install-arch dh_testdir -a dh_testroot -a dh_installchangelogs -a CHANGES diff -u neverball-1.5.4/debian/control neverball-1.5.4/debian/control --- neverball-1.5.4/debian/control +++ neverball-1.5.4/debian/control @@
Re: Choosing a stable+2 release name BEFORE the freeze
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:09:06 +0800 Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:10:30PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: So, my request is quite simple. Could the name for the release after Wheezy be chosen when Squeeze is release? Nah. And it's not that likely that you could do something useful with it anyway. (Given that we don't support skipping releases and it's possible that you cannot debootstrap the new one with an environment two versions earlier.) Indeed. Nobody can test any packages with Wheezy - as Wheezy will be when it is actually available - so how can it possibly be safe to put a frozen version into a stable release when the target of that version is not even testable? August, Squeeze isn't frozen, in my DTC-Xen, you can choose, as a debootstrap option: Etch, Lenny, Squeeze. I can't have wheezy, because I don't know it's name yet. July, Squeeze is frozen, DTC-Xen is in it, but it wont be able to setup Wheezy. So I had to add it, and ask the release team to accept a change in my package, just in order to add the new name. There was no other way so that the version in stable knows how to install the testing distribution with debootstrap. So yes, I couldn't do anything with the name, except ... have it stored in my package in SID to prepare the future, so that my package in stable can debootstrap stable+1. I understand how this could be thought of as helping with things like debootstrap, multistrap and others but can you really be certain that the version of your package in Squeeze is really going to work with Wheezy? Most of these packages go backwards in time, not forwards. We can test that previous releases work with the tools - future releases are likely to break stuff and you may well need new options or new behaviour to work with future releases. Certainly had this problem with multistrap - apt 0.8.x was updated during the freeze and broke many patterns of previous behaviour and led to a lot of work to get multistrap in Squeeze to even work with Squeeze, let alone Wheezy. -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/ pgpwHwfb8YcAT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#599210: unblock: munin/1.4.5-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock x-debbugs-cc: mu...@packages.debian.org Hi, please unblock munin/1.4.5-3 which only has targeted changes for squeeze: three bashisms in plugins are fixed, the ejabberd plugin has been fixed to work with the ejabberd version in squeeze, the way apache is restarted has been improved plus a documentation update. If they didnt only affect one plugin, 594695 and 595899 would be important and 597599 serious. munin (1.4.5-3) unstable; urgency=low [ Tom Feiner ] * Added patch 101-dash-bash-fw_conntrack.patch, fixing fw_conntrack plugin which reports incorrect values for total.warning and total.critical (Closes: #594695) * Added patch 102-snort-bashism.patch fixing snort_* config bashism. Thanks to Gerald Turner for the patch (Closes: #595899). * Existence of /etc/apache2/conf.d/ does not mean apache2 is installed. (Closes: #581363) * Add patch to adapt ejabberd CLI to ejabberd version found in squeeze. Thanks to Gerald Turner for the patch! (Closes: #597599) [ Holger Levsen ] * Added some tipps to get started into README.Debian. (Closes: #594528) Thanks, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#599077: unblock: ocaml/3.11.2-2
On 04/10/2010 23:14, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 15:31 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
I'd like to ask for a freeze-exception for ocaml. The only change is
in the ocaml-mode (an Emacs mode made for OCaml). It fixes a
compilation error when byte-compiling oacml-mode with xemacs21. We
workearounded the issue by disabling the byte-compilation for a few
files (the others byte-compile fine).
I didn't upload ocaml yet. I'm just wondering if you such an upload
would be ok for you.
Yes, the diff looks ok. (Although I see it's been fixed in git since
March...)
It's being uploaded.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
me...@{dogguy.org,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cab5b12.9060...@debian.org
Bug#595921: Future unblock: frama-c/20100401+boron+dfsg-5
On 07/09/2010 20:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 11:54 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
I received a tiny patch from upstream which fixes a performance bug
that could lead to a stack overflow error (a crash) during large
analyses.
[...]
Would it be ok for upload an updated Frama-C package with this change
only? Uploading a new Frama-C would require rebuilding Why as well on
all architectures because it provides a plugin for Frama-C which
contains a hash of some internal modules of Frama-C (that's needed by
OCaml).
Please go ahead, and let us know once the package has been accepted.
Uploaded.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
me...@{dogguy.org,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cab5e91.7090...@debian.org
RM: fprint from squeeze
Dear release team, Please remove pam-fprint (#599187), libfprint (#599186) and fprint-demo (#599187) from testing. As explained in here[1], we found it not suitable for Squeeze release, yet, and hence this software is heavily targeted to user security we would like to proceed with the removal. Thanks in advance, Dererk ref: 1. http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/fingerforce-devel/2010-August/000323.html -- BOFH excuse #344: Network failure - call NBC signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#599212: Upgrade hylafax to 2:6.0.5-3 in squeeze
Package: release.debian.org Hi all, I am requesting to migrate hylafax 2:6.0.5-3 from unstable to testing. This request follow current freeze guidelines since it fixes two important bugs #597693 and #514950 and hylafax priority is extra, and the packages are already sitting in unstable since 12 days. There are more changes: a few about documentation or translation. And, lastly, a few fixes in upstream code. The new version differ from current version for several reason: 1. new upstream version (a minor update) mainly include upstream what was already applied as Debian patches. There are also four new fixes, as detailed below. 2. changes in init.d file fix an important problem reported as #514950 on Debian BTS and a different problem reported against Ubuntu BTS that required a PS_PERSONALITY variable assignment 3. #597693 was really a problem in dependency. Previous packages where changing the AWK path according the the AWK program installed on the build system. That was a major bug, I think. 4. hylafax.po for Italian has been updated Detail on upstream differences: code change (fix): * Allow any as answer method for FIFO messages (2010-01-22) * Correctly check for long lines when checking for the last match (2010-02-05) * Fix calls to pdf2fax/ps2fax in ConvertFile (2010-04-02) * notify: FaxMaster notifications wildcard fixups (2010-05-05) * Bug 928: issues with installClient target of Hylafax (2010-05-05) * faxq: better capturing of failed conversion output (2010-08-10) documentation update and typo correction * Typo in CONFIG_UNIXTRANSPORT define checks (2009-11-06) * Updates LibTIFF homepage URLs (2010-02-05) * Updated ftp site address in setup error message (2010-03-05) patches from Debian * manpages: Updates from debian (2010-05-05) * pdf2fax/ps2fax: Use -dMaxStripSize=0 (2010-05-05) * Fixes compilation on some platforms (2010-06-24) * Class2: Fix hangup cause handling (2010-08-30) * Compiler warning cleanup (2010-08-30) Thank you very much, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1286297700.2994.30.ca...@scarafaggio
Bug#599214: unblock: multistrap/2.1.7
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package multistrap Approval request prior to upload: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/10/msg00070.html The upload has now been made, please unblock multistrap/2.1.7 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101005182503.3791.57054.report...@dwarf.codehelp
Re: RM: fprint from squeeze
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 14:34 -0300, Dererk wrote: Please remove pam-fprint (#599187), libfprint (#599186) and fprint-demo (#599187) from testing. As explained in here[1], we found it not suitable for Squeeze release, yet, and hence this software is heavily targeted to user security we would like to proceed with the removal. Removal hint added. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1286303504.30627.0.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#595921: marked as done (Future unblock: frama-c/20100401+boron+dfsg-5)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:38:10 +0100
with message-id 1286303890.30627.3.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#595921: Future unblock: frama-c/20100401+boron+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #595921,
regarding Future unblock: frama-c/20100401+boron+dfsg-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
595921: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595921
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi release team,
I received a tiny patch from upstream which fixes a performance bug
that could lead to a stack overflow error (a crash) during large
analyses. The patch is as follows:
Index: src/value/kf_state.ml
===
--- src/value/kf_state.ml (revision 9760)
+++ src/value/kf_state.ml (revision 9761)
@@ -44,7 +44,8 @@
try Value.is_accessible (Kstmt (Kernel_function.find_first_stmt kf))
with Kernel_function.No_Statement - false)
-let mark_as_called kf = Is_Called.add kf true
+let mark_as_called kf = Is_Called.replace kf true
(* * *)
(** {2 Callers} *)
There is no bug report for this issue (yet) since I got the patch
directly from upstream.
Would it be ok for upload an updated Frama-C package with this change
only? Uploading a new Frama-C would require rebuilding Why as well on
all architectures because it provides a plugin for Frama-C which
contains a hash of some internal modules of Frama-C (that's needed by
OCaml).
And yes, the runtime dependencies of Why are somehow broken since it
doesn't reflect the need of at least the version of Frama-c which was
used during the build. I intended to work on that but didn't find
time. It will be fixed for Wheezy.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500,
'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 19:21 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 07/09/2010 20:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 11:54 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Would it be ok for upload an updated Frama-C package with this change
only? Uploading a new Frama-C would require rebuilding Why as well on
all architectures because it provides a plugin for Frama-C which
contains a hash of some internal modules of Frama-C (that's needed by
OCaml).
[...]
Uploaded.
Unblocked, and binNMUs scheduled.
Regards,
Adam
---End Message---
Bug#599077: marked as done (unblock: ocaml/3.11.2-2)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:40:06 +0100
with message-id 1286304006.30627.4.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#599077: unblock: ocaml/3.11.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #599077,
regarding unblock: ocaml/3.11.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
599077: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599077
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hello,
I'd like to ask for a freeze-exception for ocaml. The only change is
in the ocaml-mode (an Emacs mode made for OCaml). It fixes a
compilation error when byte-compiling oacml-mode with xemacs21. We
workearounded the issue by disabling the byte-compilation for a few
files (the others byte-compile fine).
I didn't upload ocaml yet. I'm just wondering if you such an upload
would be ok for you.
The diff is below:
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ocaml (3.11.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/ocaml-mode.emacs-install: do not byte-compile camldebug.el
+and inf-caml.el for xemacs21 (Closes: #508813, LP: #464587).
+
+ -- Mehdi Dogguy me...@debian.org Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:19:55 +0200
+
ocaml (3.11.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Stephane Glondu ]
diff --git a/debian/ocaml-mode.emacsen-install
b/debian/ocaml-mode.emacsen-install
index 2512296..a23b159 100644
--- a/debian/ocaml-mode.emacsen-install
+++ b/debian/ocaml-mode.emacsen-install
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ install -m 755 -d ${ELCDIR}
cd ${ELDIR}
case ${FLAVOR} in
xemacs21)
- FILES=`ls *.el | grep -v caml-emacs`
+ FILES=`ls *.el | egrep -v caml-emacs\|camldebug.el\|inf-caml.el`
;;
*)
Regards,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.33-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 19:06 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 04/10/2010 23:14, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 15:31 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
I'd like to ask for a freeze-exception for ocaml. The only change is
in the ocaml-mode (an Emacs mode made for OCaml). It fixes a
compilation error when byte-compiling oacml-mode with xemacs21. We
workearounded the issue by disabling the byte-compilation for a few
files (the others byte-compile fine).
I didn't upload ocaml yet. I'm just wondering if you such an upload
would be ok for you.
Yes, the diff looks ok. (Although I see it's been fixed in git since
March...)
It's being uploaded.
Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
---End Message---
Bug#599217: unblock: gnome-keyring/2.30.3-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock gnome-keyring for squeeze.
gnome-keyring (2.30.3-2) unstable; urgency=high
.
* 10_debugging_output.patch: new patch. Stop spewing sensitive
information in the system logs. Note that it does *not* spew actual
keys or passphrases. This bug was introduced in 2.30.
Credits go to Romain Françoise for the discovery.
Patch attached.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
`-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling
Index: gnome-keyring-2.30.3/daemon/prompt/gkd-prompt.c
===
--- gnome-keyring-2.30.3.orig/daemon/prompt/gkd-prompt.c 2010-10-05 19:15:30.151925967 +0200
+++ gnome-keyring-2.30.3/daemon/prompt/gkd-prompt.c 2010-10-05 19:15:39.399424728 +0200
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
#include sys/wait.h
-#define DEBUG_PROMPT 1
+#define DEBUG_PROMPT 0
#define DEBUG_STDERR 0
enum {
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#599217: marked as done (unblock: gnome-keyring/2.30.3-2)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:04:28 +0200
with message-id 4cab76bc.8050...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#599217: unblock: gnome-keyring/2.30.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #599217,
regarding unblock: gnome-keyring/2.30.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
599217: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599217
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock gnome-keyring for squeeze.
gnome-keyring (2.30.3-2) unstable; urgency=high
.
* 10_debugging_output.patch: new patch. Stop spewing sensitive
information in the system logs. Note that it does *not* spew actual
keys or passphrases. This bug was introduced in 2.30.
Credits go to Romain Françoise for the discovery.
Patch attached.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
`-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling
Index: gnome-keyring-2.30.3/daemon/prompt/gkd-prompt.c
===
--- gnome-keyring-2.30.3.orig/daemon/prompt/gkd-prompt.c 2010-10-05 19:15:30.151925967 +0200
+++ gnome-keyring-2.30.3/daemon/prompt/gkd-prompt.c 2010-10-05 19:15:39.399424728 +0200
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
#include sys/wait.h
-#define DEBUG_PROMPT 1
+#define DEBUG_PROMPT 0
#define DEBUG_STDERR 0
enum {
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 10/05/2010 08:57 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock gnome-keyring for squeeze.
gnome-keyring (2.30.3-2) unstable; urgency=high
.
* 10_debugging_output.patch: new patch. Stop spewing sensitive
information in the system logs. Note that it does *not* spew actual
keys or passphrases. This bug was introduced in 2.30.
Credits go to Romain Françoise for the discovery.
Unblocked.
Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
---End Message---
Re: [request-tracker-maintainers] Pending updates for request-tracker3.8
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 12:02:56PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 02:09:45PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: I can unblock the attached changes (if you upload). When #595054 is fixed, you'll be able to request another freeze exception (and would be simpler for us to review since it will a one-fix-release). I plan to upload the attached fix for #595054 this evening. Shout if you'd prefer something done differently. changelog |9 + po/cs.po|2 - po/de.po|2 - po/es.po| 15 po/fr.po|2 - po/gl.po|2 - po/it.po|4 +- po/ja.po|2 - po/pt.po|2 - po/ru.po|6 +-- po/sv.po|2 - po/vi.po| 82 request-tracker3.8.init | 31 ++ rules |1 14 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) Now uploaded. If you could unblock request-tracker3.8/3.8.8-5 I'd be most obliged. Cheers, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101005190015.gs4...@urchin.earth.li
Bug#599214: marked as done (unblock: multistrap/2.1.7)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:14:42 +0200 with message-id 4cab7922.7090...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#599214: unblock: multistrap/2.1.7 has caused the Debian Bug report #599214, regarding unblock: multistrap/2.1.7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 599214: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599214 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package multistrap Approval request prior to upload: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/10/msg00070.html The upload has now been made, please unblock multistrap/2.1.7 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 10/05/2010 08:25 PM, Neil Williams wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package multistrap Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ ---End Message---
Bug#599143: marked as done (unblock: lastfm/1:1.5.4.26862+dfsg-5)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:01:37 +0100 with message-id 1286308897.30627.62.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#599143: unblock: lastfm/1:1.5.4.26862+dfsg-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #599143, regarding unblock: lastfm/1:1.5.4.26862+dfsg-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 599143: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599143 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package lastfm. It fixes a security issue: http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-3362 unblock lastfm/1:1.5.4.26862+dfsg-5 Thanks, Mike ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 23:15 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Please unblock package lastfm. It fixes a security issue: http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-3362 Unblocked. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: freetype_2.3.7-2+lenny4_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.3.7-2+lenny4_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.3.7-2+lenny4_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.3.7-2+lenny4_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.3.7-2+lenny4_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.3.7-2+lenny4_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.3.7-2+lenny4_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.3.7-2+lenny4_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.3.7-2+lenny4_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.3.7-2+lenny4_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.3.7-2+lenny4_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.3.7-2+lenny4_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1p3ddy-0007zb...@franck.debian.org
Release Team meeting minutes (and release update)
Hello, As previously announced[RT:PM], the Debian Release Team held a meeting on 2 and 3 Oct, 2010 in Paris, France. The meeting was kindly sponsored by IRILL[RT:PMS]. The attendees were Adam D. Barratt (adsb), Luk Claes (luk), Julien Cristau (jcristau), Mehdi Dogguy (mehdi), Philipp Kern (pkern) and Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw). Documentation = We improved the documentation related to Point Releases[CL:PR] and documented the procedure for Releases[CL:RE]. We also updated the Release Team wiki[RT:WI] page and we'll be adding more information in the upcoming weeks. Stable Updates and Volatile === We discussed how Volatile will evolve based on our experiences managing it. Considering the fact that there is nothing in volatile-sloppy for Lenny and that having a separate archive is painful, we would like to propose a plan for a new workflow for Squeeze: [ urgent-upload ] [ upload ] \ / | [ security ][ p-u-NEW ] (visualised by queue-viewer) | | accept | [ p-u ] -- autobuilding, users testing urgent uploads --/ | / | [ stable-updates ] | \ | point release[1] \ | [ stable ] [1] Point releases: include removals, updates ready to be cherry-picked from proposed-updates, but all updates from stable-updates are included. The Volatile Team and the Release Team share the same members, we would like to merge the Volatile Team into the Release Team and change the suite name to 'stable-updates'. The new dynamics allow maintainers to do only one upload instead of separate uploads to stable and volatile. The Release Team can then copy the package to the appropriate suite; if it is an urgent upload, it will be made available quickly to our users through stable-updates. During a point release, we will merge proposed-updates, security and stable-updates into the point release. We are planning to have a stable point release every two months and an oldstable point release evert four months in between two stable point releases. We would like to create a new list for users to receive announcements about new packages in stable-updates and requests for testing of packages in proposed-updates. The final name for this list has not yet been decided; the current suggestions include debian-stable-announce. Have a look at #598939. Release notes and upgrade reports = The release notes for Squeeze are progressing well and a call for translations will be made soon. This means that if you are aware of an issue that should be mentioned in the release notes, you need to make sure a bug is filed for it, preferrably with proposed wording, *now*. Once this has occurred, we will be encouraging the testing of new installs of Squeeze and upgrades from Lenny to Squeeze. As a result of these tests there will be a number of bug reports against the installation-reports and upgrade-reports pseudo-packages (dealing both with successful upgrades and problems with the process) which will need processing, categorising and reassigning to the affected packages. If you are interested in helping with this process, please contact us. Release Update (Squeeze Status) === Freeze Status (Unblock Policy) -- The Release Team would like to remind everybody that we are under deep freeze. We are updating the current unblock policy to get stricter rules: A new version may only contain changes falling in one of the following categories (compared to the version in testing): - fixes for release critical bugs (i.e., bugs of severity critical, grave and serious) in all packages; - changes for release goals, if they are not invasive; - translation updates - documentation fixes Please upload packages fitting this description to unstable, then request the freeze exception by filing a bug against release.debian.org. You don't need to include the full diff (which we re-generate from the uploaded packages anyway), but please include the relevant changelog entries. Transitions and removals All transitions are done and we do not plan any new transitions. Recently, the Release Team had to made some decisions between package upgrades and package removals. Please understand that when you say allow a new version or remove the old one, both options are valid from the Release Team's point of view and we may end up deciding in favour of the removal. Another important request: please, do not upload packages to t-p-u because you uploaded newer versions to unstable, always contact the Release Team. Bug Squashing Parties - The Release Team is still concerned about the number of release critical bugs affecting testing. We are still optimistic that
Bug#598835: unblock: mina2/2.0.0+dfsg-1
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 16:09 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: Please unblock package mina2, it contains final release (squeeze as RC1 for now). Upstream fixed lots of major issues : https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10670styleName=Htmlversion=12313701 Why are there a bunch of .releaseBackup files in the source package? Even ignoring those, the diffstat against the RC1 package is 136 files changed, 3004 insertions(+), 1713 deletions(-) which is still quite large for an update at this stage of the freeze. * Enable rxtx support: - d/control: Add Build-Depends on librxtx-java. - d/build.xml: Enable build of transport-serial module. - d/rules: Include RXTXcomm.jar in classpath. Why was this support not enabled earlier? New dependencies and features aren't really appropriate at this stage. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1286310701.30627.130.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [php-maint] Freeze exception: php5
On Saturday 02 October 2010 06:47:49 Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 23:52:48 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
I would like to ask for a freeze exception to upload 5.3.3 to unstable
and be the version shipped in Squeeze.
959 files changed, 78731 insertions(+), 47717 deletions(-)
Pure debdiff is misleading:
debdiff -w *dsc | filterdiff -x '*/tests/*' -x '*win32*' -x '*debian/*' -x
'*TSRM/*' -x '*configure*' -x '*README*' -x '*NEWS*' -x '*pcrelib*' -x
'*mysqlnd*' -x '*/build/*' -x '*oci8/*' -x '*libsqlite*' -x '*pear/*' -x
'*litespeed*' -x '*milter*' -x '*nsapi*' -x '*dsp' -x '*dsw' -x '*vcproj' -x
'*32' -x '*vc6' -x '*date/lib/*' -x '*Zend/zend_language_scanner.c' -x
'*Zend/zend_ini_parser.output' -x '*Zend/zend_ini_parser.c' -x '*cp5022x*' -
x '*jisx0201*' -x '*sjis*' -x '*sapi/fpm/*' | diffstat
277 files changed, 4307 insertions(+), 2052 deletions(-)
Explanation:
tests, win32, dsp, dsw, vcproj, vc6: I guess they don't need an explanation
NEWS, README: docu
configure, zend_ini_parser;{output,c}, zend_language_scanner, date/lib:
autogenerated files.
libsqlite, mysqlnd, litespeed, nsapi, milter, TSRM, pcrelib, oci8: we don't
use any of that stuff
build/: shtool update, build-time only
pear/: although there were changes in pear, diff'ing a binary container is not
fair
jisx*, cp50*, sjis: support for encodings
sapi/fpm: new SAPI
And from the remaining changes:
ext/mysqli/mysqli_fe.c| 647
ARG_INFO added, nothing to worry about
and there are similar cases where the changes are win32-specific, macros
cleanup, or the like.
Not to mention that there's a regressions test suite. Talking about it:
$ filterdiff -i '*/tests/*' -x '*oci8*' diff | diffstat | tail -n1
415 files changed, 8815 insertions(+), 2827 deletions(-)
(it's the same poor changes metric that is used to rule out new versions, so
I think it's fair if I include it.)
If you want ditch the work that has been done by upstream, my fellow
maintainers, and other contributors, go ahead. Just beware that the current
version in testing isn't ready.
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201010051537.01471.geiss...@debian.org
Re: Bugfixes for icinga-core
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:41 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: Alexander Wirt schrieb am Friday, den 24. September 2010: Hi, I know I'm late.. But we discovered some bugs in icinga 1.0.2 which would be nice to get fixed for squeeze. So we backported the fixes and I attached them to this mail. It would be nice if I could do a bugfix upload for icinga. *snip* Please go ahead and upload. I uploaded the package a few days ago. Any news about it? Or should I open a bug for testing migration? For the record, zobel unblocked the package and it has migrated. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1286311141.30627.145.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: python-shapely
On 09/30/2010 09:33 AM, Pietro Battiston wrote: Il giorno gio, 30/09/2010 alle 08.27 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy ha scritto: On 09/29/2010 11:13 PM, Pietro Battiston wrote: Could python-shapely 1.2.1-2 be unblocked? It only brings fixes to the manual and runs the tests provided. It also adds libgeos-c1 (= 3.1.0), python-numpy, python (=2.5) | python-ctypes in the Build-Depends field, without mentioning them in the changelog. Could you please explain why you need those? For the tests - which are mentioned in the changelog. I'm sorry I thought it was natural (I explicitely mentioned the versioned dependency on debhelper because that seemed to me far less obvious). Unblocked… sorry for the delay. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cab8c59.4000...@dogguy.org
Unblock xserver-xorg-video-geode
Greetings, Would it be possible to unblock xserver-xorg-video-geode 2.11.9-5 that is currently sitting in unstable? Compared to 2.11.9-3, this package contains two fixes for hardware support issues, plus it introduces native support for one laptop vendor's non-standard LCD resolution. I was gonna wait until the 10 day period was over before requesting the unblock but noticing that we keep on getting closer to the release, I figured that I might as well ask now. Best Regards, Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikdvykea4xxcwf+axt+7k7m35d10-=wg8rbp...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#599226: unblock: bidiui/0.9.5-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package bidiui bidiui provdies an extension for icedove. The current version of bidiui in testing doesn't support icedove 3.0.x (which is also in testing). The version in sid (0.9.5-1) does support 3.0.x. There's no point in releasing with the current version of bidiui, so please unblock the package or remove the current one from testing. Thanks. unblock bidiui/0.9.5-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101005204227.19932.45915.report...@desktop
Re: Bug#599120: r-base-core embeds liblzma
Dear Release Team,, On 4 October 2010 at 22:44, Stefan Fritsch wrote: | Package: r-base-core | Version: 2.11.1-6 | Severity: important | Tags: security | | r-base-core contains an embedded version of liblzma, which makes | security updates a headache. | | It seems to already contain code for linking dynamically but | it lacks the build-dependency on the lzma-dev package. I have not | tested that it actually works, though. | | If the package is easily fixed to link dynamically, please ask | the release team if the could unblock the updated package for | squeeze. Thanks. r-base 2.11.1-7 seems to have been built everywhere now. I would kindly ask you to unblock it for 'squeeze'. The package is unchanged from 2.11.1-6 with the sole difference the addition of libzma-dev to the Build-Depends, an oversight I had already corrected in the 2.12.0 pre-releases currently in experimental. Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/19627.38076.427317.129...@max.nulle.part
Re: Bugfixes for icinga-core
Adam D. Barratt schrieb am Tuesday, den 05. October 2010: On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:41 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: Alexander Wirt schrieb am Friday, den 24. September 2010: Hi, I know I'm late.. But we discovered some bugs in icinga 1.0.2 which would be nice to get fixed for squeeze. So we backported the fixes and I attached them to this mail. It would be nice if I could do a bugfix upload for icinga. *snip* Please go ahead and upload. I uploaded the package a few days ago. Any news about it? Or should I open a bug for testing migration? For the record, zobel unblocked the package and it has migrated. Jupp, seen. Thank you very much Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101005214657.gc13...@nelson.snow-crash.org
Please unblock jhbuild 2.29.2-2
Hi, Please unblock jhbuild 2.29.2-2. It removes some files that are downloaded from the net if they are not present. This is better since they will always be up to date. Network access is not problematic since you need it to download a package to build it anyway. Thanks, Emilio jhbuild (2.29.2-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/install: - Removed, let's not ship the modulesets and patches so that they are downloaded as needed from the intertubes, where they should be up to date. -- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:40:09 +0200 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4caba0d8.4030...@debian.org
Re: Removing
On 10/05/2010 04:19 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi,
In our effort to remove old libraries, I would like to remove
libgmime2.2a-cil from gmime2.2. We would have liked not to ship
gmime2.2 with Squeeze at all, but that wasn't possible. However
the Mono bindings are not used by any package, and they are
superseded by the 2.4 bindings, so I would like to know whether
you would accept such a change into Squeeze.
Thanks for considering,
Emilio
emi...@saturno:~/deb/pkg-gnome/packages/unstable/build-area$ debdiff
gmime2.2_2.2.25-{1.1,2}.dsc
diff -u gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/changelog gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/changelog
--- gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/changelog
+++ gmime2.2-2.2.25/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+gmime2.2 (2.2.25-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Drop libgmime2.2a-cil.
+
+ -- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org Fri, 21 May 2010 16:10:54
+0200
+1 from me for this change in squeeze.
This will prevent potential gmime-sharp users to use the unused (no
rdeps) and deprecated version by accident.
Mirco Bauer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cab9ff5.60...@debian.org
Bug#598880: unblock: gdm3/2.30.5-3
Le dimanche 03 octobre 2010 à 12:59 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 20:33:03 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: last but not least (for today), I’m asking for an unblock of gdm3. Didn't that have a window focus issue? This one is fixed in 2.30.5-4, together with a handful of other bugs. I’ll have a look at the xkbcomp issue… later… when I have another evening to spend on that. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#599232: unblock: pkg-config/0.25-1.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pkg-config This fixes bug #591547: pkg-config (0.25-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * pkg.m4: Apply commit 2b86e9b from upstream, to fix compatibility with autoconf (= 2.66). (Closes: #591547) -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org Sun, 03 Oct 2010 17:13:29 +0100 unblock pkg-config/0.25-1.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101005223331.7103.13719.report...@arneb.retout.co.uk
Request for unblocking: bugfixes for xfe filemanager
Hello, I know I'm very late, but the updated version of xfe is in unstable since three days with the exception of a few architectures, which are already built since two days but not moved into the repository: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=xfe Would it possible to unblock xfe 1.32.1-6 which is currently in unstable, when all architectures finally be in the repository? Compared with version 1.32.1-4 (in testing) the new version have this updates: * update of german translation. * package xfe-themes as dependency of package xfe. (Closes: #570205) and resolved circular dependency. (Closes: #598843) * Fix: remove unsupported Bugs field in debian/control. (Closes: #591217) * Use correct upstream licenses in debian/copyright and use new format. * Fix: file-open error of program xfpack. (Closes: #593215) Because of the bugfixes it would be important for all user in the next stable Squeeze. Best Regards, Joachim (Germany) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#599232: marked as done (unblock: pkg-config/0.25-1.1)
Your message dated Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:13:16 +0100 with message-id 1286320396.30627.458.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#599232: unblock: pkg-config/0.25-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #599232, regarding unblock: pkg-config/0.25-1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 599232: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599232 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pkg-config This fixes bug #591547: pkg-config (0.25-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * pkg.m4: Apply commit 2b86e9b from upstream, to fix compatibility with autoconf (= 2.66). (Closes: #591547) -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org Sun, 03 Oct 2010 17:13:29 +0100 unblock pkg-config/0.25-1.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 23:33 +0100, Tim Retout wrote: Please unblock package pkg-config This fixes bug #591547: Pre-emptively unblocked from your blog post. :-) Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Re: Support for Natty and Wheezy in xen-tools for Squeeze?
Hi Mehdi, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 22/09/2010 13:52, Axel Beckert wrote: Attached the debdiff. I don't expect any further changes for 4.2 (and therefore 4.2-1) except in changelogs, documentation, and source code comments. ok, please go ahead and let me know once the package has been accepted. 4.2 is released upstream now[1], 4.2-1 is uploaded to unstable: Debian FTP Masters wrote: Subject; xen-tools_4.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Ok, so here's again the debian changelog entry for 4.2-1. With the exception of mentioning the updated debian/copyright plus the first and last line it hasn't changed from my last mail/last debdiff: xen-tools (4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release - Fixes several cases of broken or incomplete config files with unexpected or seldom parameter combinations. (Closes: #484652) - Updates examples in /etc/xen-tools.conf to better reflect current state - Allows usage of xvc* as serial console as used as default by older Xen versions. - Preliminary support for Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty) and Debian 7.0 (Wheezy) (Closes: #597521) - Switches default mirror for EoL'ed Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid) and Debian 4.0 (Etch) to the distributions' archives for old releases. * Does no more try extract the upstream changelog during debian package build. The commit which introduced this problem has been reverted. Document more clearly in debian/README.source how to build the package from a checked out copy of the git repository, especially that the upstream changelog has to be generated first out of the VCS log. (Closes: #595883) * Update debian/copyright: Add Stephane Jourdois to list of authors. -- Axel Beckert a...@debian.org Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:01:49 +0200 git shortlog of what happened since I sent the debdiff in my last mail: Axel Beckert (11): README: Remove obsolete paragraph about older versions of Ubuntu README: Remove nearly obsolete comment on LP#539814 as it's fixed in lucid-proposed-updates Move Stephane to the list of primary authors Encode AUTHORS in UTF-8 README: Reword some paragraphs; add xt-guess-suite-and-mirror Update authorship and copyright in bin/* and debian/copyright Some TODOs for xen-update-image Add Jorge Armando Medina to list of contributors Update comment about Radu being Debian package maintainer in list of contributors Move availability info to the end of the README's About section debian/changelog: UNRELEASED - unstable Dmitry Nedospasov (4): Minor Changes to README Add note for fs=xfs, sort options alphabetically Alphabetical order Minor changes to documentation of xen-create-image All changes mentioned in the shortlog above (and therefore since my last mail) are only in either documentation files or in the POD part of perl scripts: git diff --stat since then: AUTHORS | 10 ++-- README| 45 ++- TODO |8 +++ bin/xen-create-image | 123 + bin/xen-create-nfs| 12 ++-- bin/xen-delete-image | 13 ++-- bin/xen-list-images | 11 ++-- bin/xen-resize-guest | 10 ++-- bin/xen-update-image | 13 ++-- bin/xt-create-xen-config | 13 ++-- bin/xt-customize-image| 11 ++-- bin/xt-guess-suite-and-mirror |8 ++- bin/xt-install-image | 13 ++-- debian/changelog |5 +- debian/copyright |6 +- 15 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 145 deletions(-) The big amount of changes in bin/xen-create-image was the reordering of list of options, the remaining changes in bin/ were mostly copyright updates. I'd be happy if this upload could be unblocked for Squeeze. [1] http://xen-tools.org/software/xen-tools/releases.html Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Choosing a stable+2 release name BEFORE the freeze
Neil Williams wrote:
Most of these packages go backwards in time, not forwards. We
can test that previous releases work with the tools - future releases
are likely to break stuff and you may well need new options or new
behaviour to work with future releases.
Certainly had this problem with multistrap - apt 0.8.x was updated
during the freeze and broke many patterns of previous behaviour and
led to a lot of work to get multistrap in Squeeze to even work with
Squeeze, let alone Wheezy.
The thing is, my package here isn't debootstrap or multistrap. It USES
deboostrap only, which is very different. Don't you think it's really
probable that, when Squeeze will be out, and Wheezy exists, there will
be at least a backported version of {deboot,multi}strap available that
will be able to bootstrap testing when running stable? If you tell the
above, then why debootstrap in stable even has the option to boostrap
SID or stable+1? It doesn't make sense to me why debootstrap would have
the option, and other packages shouldn't.
Anyway, all this isn't a so big deal, I just wanted to share my thoughts
with others. :)
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cabd83f.7020...@debian.org
Re: Bug#597864: libproxy0 not functional without libmozjs2d
On 23/09/10 23:45, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le jeudi 23 septembre 2010 à 19:55 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : That's not true. libproxy can autodetect the proxy configuration from several places, libmozjs being one of them. But if you don't have it, it can still autodetect it from GConf (for GNOME), some KDE mechanism (I'm not a KDE guy!), your environment, a configuration file... so we don't force anything to be installed, because you most likely have installed something so that libproxy can autodetect the proxy settings. libmozjs is necessary to parse JavaScript in proxy.pac files. It would be really interesting to build again libproxy with Webkit/JavaScriptCore support. The circular dependency loop makes it hard, but it avoids this situation. We could enable it again, I doubt there will be a soname bump in any of the 3 libraries in Squeeze. RT: I disabled webkit support in libproxy to break a dependency loop (libproxy - webkit - libsoup - libproxy) because of a transition. Would it be acceptable if I enabled it back for Squeeze? Gustavo, I guess there are no plans of splitting JSC into its own tarball upstream? Regards, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cabfb71.2000...@debian.org
Re: dict-gcide upload
Hello Release Team, Can you please comment on this request ? Ritesh On Monday 04 Oct 2010 15:49:39 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Sorry. I missed to attach the diff. On Monday 04 Oct 2010 09:18:35 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Hello Release Team, Will it be okay to upload dict-gcide (0.48-7) to Unstable ? This package has been uploaded to experimental today. This package is owned by the QA group and did not have a maintianer. I intend to maintain it. There is no active upstream but the amount of information this lexical database has is worthy enough to continue maintain it. So hopefully, as Debian, we'll have to carry further maintenance. Discussion around this package can be found here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=436119 Please suggest. I'd like to see it land into Squeeze. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#599246: unblock: hpcc/1.4.1-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package hpcc hpcc was blocked in unstable because of atlas. Now that atlas has migrated, it would be nice to have the new version of hpcc in squeeze too. Of course, the changes are quite huge, but it's a low popcon, low impact package (no reverse dependencies), and it's not very complex, so it's unlikely that it will introduce breakages. The current squeeze version is not suitable for a release IMHO, in particular due to the changes in 1.4.0-2. unblock hpcc/1.4.1-1 Changelog: hpcc (1.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. -- Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:09:48 +0200 hpcc (1.4.0-2) unstable; urgency=high * Link dynamically against libcblas and libatlas (oops). As a consequence, fix FTBFS. Closes: #577889. -- Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:26:55 +0200 hpcc (1.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Change maintainer to Debian Science. * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format -- Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:18:10 +0200 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (700, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101006054846.11058.70718.report...@beothuk
