Re: Importing the root project into eclipse
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 14:33 -0500, Hiram Chirino wrote: I thinks that is because eclipse does not support nesting projects. Correct. Eclipse doesn't support nesting projects, so is there a way to run the root maven build from inside eclipse when using mevenide? Regards, Hiram mouli wrote: I don't think there is a root project. m:eclipse creates separate projects for each modules etc.. and we need to import those into eclipse. Regards, Mouli --- Nadeem Bitar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have been trying to setup geronimo inside eclipse and I am unable to figure out how to import the root project into eclipse. I checked out the geronimo project, ran maven eclipse, used the projecttransfer plugin[1] to import all modules into eclipse, but my root directory (geronimo) is still outside eclipse. Is that the intended behavior? Thanks, Nadeem [1]http://eclipse-tools.sourceforge.net/projecttransfer/ __ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
Re: Build Failure - org/apache/geronimo/deployment/service/GBeanAdapter
Dain, Thanks. --- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 10, 2005, at 5:11 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: Let me rephrase this question. Is getDeclaredMethod supposed to behave like this? Why is it trying to find GBeanAdaptor class. Shouldn't it give NoSuchMethodException? In that case the build will fail gracefully indicating that it is time to build openejb! I hope my question is not out of scope of Geronimo. Yes this is expected. Normally when a class, is loaded in Java it is not fully resolved. This means that the byte code was loaded and verified, but not all classes the loaded class depends on were loaded. This is an optimization by the VM engineers to even out load time of an application. When you call getDeclatedMethod, the class is fully resolved, which mean that all dependency classes are loaded and this can cause a NoClassDefFoundError. In this case this is caused by an inconsistent build which is a very abnormal case, so IMO not beneficial to add such a check to the code as it complicates the code. If this could happen in an official release (even if it were rare), I would support adding a check. I agree it is not likely to happen in an official release. Thanks Anita -dain __ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo! http://my.yahoo.com
