Re: [sc-dev] line break in a text box attached to a cell
I was wondering why OOo considers the necessity to convert a line break to a series of paragraphs in the context of a shape (is that what text boxes are called ?) attached to a cell. I already found a number of instances in other files where the structure: text:p style1text:span style2text1/text:span/text:p text:p style1text:span style2text2/text:span/text:p text:p style1text:span style2text3/text:span/text:p was used by OOo to implement an MS file line break. For a number of reasons (not related to OOo but to tools that access the xml OOo generates) this is not a practical and logical way to represent a line break since the paragraph should encompass the whole set of strings and the line break should be implemented as an inline part of the paragraph. I may be wrong in my interpretation of what a paragraph is though. Looks perfectly natural to me: A text box contains a number of paragraphs, each with some amount of text. Line breaks as shown in your example, to fit the text into the box, are usually automatic. Manual line breaks are the exception. I am sorry I have to insist. I am not talking about text fitting into a box but about the contents of content.xml. Imported Excel text boxes line breaks are interpreted as paragraphs, but OOo line breaks in the same context are not. Why the difference ? I think that is a bug: text:p text:style-name=P1 text:span text:style-name=T1１２／２８日にＳＲＧ殿と /text:span /text:p text:p text:style-name=P1 text:span text:style-name=T1ＭＴＧをおこなう予定で あり、/text:span text:span text:style-name=T1text:line-break//text:span text:span text:style-name=T1その場にて解消予定日が 決定される。/text:span /text:p The above text is displayed as: (beginning of imported line break) １２／２８日にＳＲＧ殿と(end) (beginning of imported line break) ＭＴＧをおこなう予定であり、 (OOo inline line break that I added manually) その場にて解消予定日が決定される。 (end) I understand that this is not specifically a SC problem so I will CC the xml OD list too. Thank you for your answers. Jean-Christophe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc-dev] Spreadsheet functions' issues
Hi, Eike Rathke schrieb: Last year ;) Muthu Subramanian sent me a mail in which he asked whether we're already working on specific issues he picked to work on. I asked him to repeat the question on the mailing list because I want to keep discussion public, but he didn't show up since. Nevertheless I investigated the issues he listed and following is the status, or was on December 15th. On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 23:33:40 +0530, Muthu Subramanian wrote: Function Incompatibility http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3866 : NETWORKDAYS http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32269 : SERIESSUM Daniel, your AddIn area: are you planning to work on it? These are minor changes (input checking only), you can fix them, otherwise I may do it when working on other add-in issues. Daniel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
