Re: Inconsistent dnf provides result
On 6/1/19 12:29 PM, Georg Sauthoff wrote: On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:28:37AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 6/1/19 10:40 AM, Georg Sauthoff wrote: $ mkdir -p o ; rpm2cpio dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm | cpio -di -D o -v Why are you going through cpio, instead of just using rpm itself? because I want to read the man-page without installing the package. It looks like you do have the man page anyway, just in a different directory. But you could file a bug on the "lcgdm" package in bugzilla. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
F30 FTBFS Packages - Help Please?
Hi, After I upgraded to F30, I checked my system for packages that had not been built for F30. I removed most of the leaf ones, but the ones that were required by important packages, I went ahead and fixed in pull requests. As these FTBFS were not fixed during the F30 cycle by the package mantainers, unsurprisingly, my PRs were ignored. Can some provenpackager help merge these (and preferably build + update them in F30)? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtommath/pull-request/3 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/syslinux/pull-request/1 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/linux-atm/pull-request/1 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fcoe-utils/pull-request/3 The fixes are mostly straightforward. The only one that's a bit more complicated is the fcoe-utils one, which has a bunch of C string handling changes. Thanks, Scott ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Inconsistent dnf provides result
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 4:06 PM José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Saturday, 1 June 2019 20.29.33 WEST Georg Sauthoff wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:28:37AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > On 6/1/19 10:40 AM, Georg Sauthoff wrote: > > > > $ mkdir -p o ; rpm2cpio dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm | > > > > cpio -di -D o -v> > > > Why are you going through cpio, instead of just using rpm itself? > > > > because I want to read the man-page without installing the package. > > Probably I am missing something obvious but what is wrong with > > rpm -qpl dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm > ? > > -q query > -p package > -l list files He wants to *read* the man page, not merely know that it exists. No idea why it might be a ghost file? But in the meantime, install it in a "mock" setup or a VM to read it or install it and then unstall it, if you're in a rush. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
3DConnection device detected as a trackpoint by X
I'm trying to connect my 3DConnection Space Pilot to Fedora to use in CAD but X is grabbing the device and treating it like a mouse. I maintain the spacenavd package and need to find a why to block X from grabbing the device... [1152888.005974] usb 1-6: new low-speed USB device number 4 using xhci_hcd [1152888.307811] usb 1-6: New USB device found, idVendor=046d, idProduct=c625, bcdDevice= 3.12 [1152888.307815] usb 1-6: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=1, SerialNumber=0 [1152888.307817] usb 1-6: Product: SpacePilot HP [1152888.307819] usb 1-6: Manufacturer: 3Dconnexion [1152888.428039] input: 3Dconnexion SpacePilot HP as /devices/pci:00/:00:01.3/:02:00.0/usb1/1-6/1-6:1.0/0003:046D:C625.0007/input/input26 [1152888.480322] hid-generic 0003:046D:C625.0007: input,hidraw4: USB HID v1.10 Multi-Axis Controller [3Dconnexion SpacePilot HP] on usb-:02:00.0-6/input0 Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Inconsistent dnf provides result
On Saturday, 1 June 2019 20.29.33 WEST Georg Sauthoff wrote: > On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:28:37AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 6/1/19 10:40 AM, Georg Sauthoff wrote: > > > $ mkdir -p o ; rpm2cpio dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm | > > > cpio -di -D o -v> > > Why are you going through cpio, instead of just using rpm itself? > > because I want to read the man-page without installing the package. Probably I am missing something obvious but what is wrong with rpm -qpl dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm ? -q query -p package -l list files -- José Abílio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Inconsistent dnf provides result
On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 09:29:33PM +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote: > > $ rpm -qlp dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm > > /etc/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.logrotate > > /etc/logrotate.d/dpmcopyd > > /usr/lib/.build-id > > /usr/lib/.build-id/70/bf043a9b1a0954bb464faa59261f8edb0564d3 > > /usr/lib/systemd/system/dpmcopyd.service > > /usr/lib64/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd > > /usr/lib64/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.8 > > This still looks wrong. > > > /usr/sbin/dpmcopyd > > /usr/share/dpm-mysql > > /usr/share/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.service > > /usr/share/man/man8/dpmcopyd.8.gz > > Strange. > > > I don't know why cpio isn't seeing the files. Did you try installing the This is caused by use of the %ghost directive in the %files section of the .spec file: %files -n dpm-copy-server-mysql %{_libdir}/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd %ghost %{_sbindir}/dpmcopyd %doc %{_libdir}/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.8* %ghost %{_mandir}/man8/dpmcopyd.8* Apparently %ghost marks those files as belonging to the package but doesn't include them in the package. Thus, they aren't part of the cpio archive. Common use-case for this seems to be log-files - such that they are removed on package removal. Anyhow, those lines look like a bug to me: %doc %{_libdir}/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.8* %ghost %{_mandir}/man8/dpmcopyd.8* And the other question now is: Should `dnf provides` include ghost files in its output? I mean, the package really doesn't provide those ghost files ... Best regards Georg -- 'Apple denies that, based on their common meaning, the words "app store" together denote a store for apps.' http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/20/apple_amazon_trademark_spat/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Inconsistent dnf provides result
Hello, On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:28:37AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/1/19 10:40 AM, Georg Sauthoff wrote: > > $ mkdir -p o ; rpm2cpio dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm > > | cpio -di -D o -v > Why are you going through cpio, instead of just using rpm itself? because I want to read the man-page without installing the package. > $ rpm -qlp dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm > /etc/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.logrotate > /etc/logrotate.d/dpmcopyd > /usr/lib/.build-id > /usr/lib/.build-id/70/bf043a9b1a0954bb464faa59261f8edb0564d3 > /usr/lib/systemd/system/dpmcopyd.service > /usr/lib64/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd > /usr/lib64/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.8 This still looks wrong. > /usr/sbin/dpmcopyd > /usr/share/dpm-mysql > /usr/share/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.service > /usr/share/man/man8/dpmcopyd.8.gz Strange. > I don't know why cpio isn't seeing the files. Did you try installing the > package? I don't want to do that because it pulls in a whole bunch of other No. > dependencies I don't want. Exactly. Best regards Georg ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20190601.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 47 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 8/146 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 408063 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408063 ID: 408074 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408074 ID: 408096 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408096 ID: 408103 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408103 ID: 408116 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408116 ID: 408117 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408117 ID: 408143 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408143 ID: 408160 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408160 ID: 408177 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408177 ID: 408192 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408192 Soft failed openQA tests: 71/146 (x86_64), 18/24 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 408046 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408046 ID: 408047 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408047 ID: 408048 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408048 ID: 408049 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408049 ID: 408056 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408056 ID: 408057 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408057 ID: 408058 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfsiso_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408058 ID: 408059 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408059 ID: 408061 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408061 ID: 408073 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408073 ID: 408077 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408077 ID: 408078 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408078 ID: 408079 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408079 ID: 408080 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408080 ID: 408081 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408081 ID: 408089 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408089 ID: 408097 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408097 ID: 408101 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408101 ID: 408128 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408128 ID: 408129 Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408129 ID: 408131 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408131 ID: 408132 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408132 ID: 408133 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408133 ID: 408134 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408134 ID: 408135 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408135 ID: 408136 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408136 ID: 408137 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408137 ID: 408138 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408138 ID: 408139 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/408139 ID
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190601.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190531.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190601.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:9 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 76 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 142.15 KiB Size of dropped packages:252.76 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 1.41 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 32.41 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: LXDE raw-xz armhfp Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-LXDE-armhfp-Rawhide-20190601.n.0-sda.raw.xz Image: Games live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Games-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20190601.n.0.iso Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20190601.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz Image: Cinnamon live x86_64 Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Cinnamon-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20190601.n.0.iso Image: Python_Classroom raw-xz armhfp Path: Labs/armhfp/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-armhfp-Rawhide-20190601.n.0-sda.raw.xz Image: Design_suite live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Design_suite-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20190601.n.0.iso Image: SoaS raw-xz armhfp Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-SoaS-armhfp-Rawhide-20190601.n.0-sda.raw.xz Image: Container_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20190601.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz Image: Xfce live x86_64 Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Xfce-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20190601.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Astronomy_KDE live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20190531.n.0.iso Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20190531.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Mate live i386 Path: Spins/i386/iso/Fedora-MATE_Compiz-Live-i386-Rawhide-20190531.n.0.iso Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree aarch64 Path: Silverblue/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20190531.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: pass-pwned-0-0.1.20190516git884856e.fc31 Summary: Password-Store extension for Have I Been Pwned RPMs:pass-pwned Size:10.00 KiB Package: rust-pulldown-cmark0.2-0.2.0-1.fc31 Summary: Pull parser for CommonMark RPMs:rust-pulldown-cmark0.2+default-devel rust-pulldown-cmark0.2+gen-tests-devel rust-pulldown-cmark0.2+getopts-devel rust-pulldown-cmark0.2-devel Size:132.15 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: ovirt-guest-agent-1.0.16-1.fc31 Summary: The oVirt Guest Agent RPMs:ovirt-guest-agent-common ovirt-guest-agent-gdm-plugin ovirt-guest-agent-kdm-plugin ovirt-guest-agent-pam-module Size:252.76 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: anaconda-31.14-1.fc31 Old package: anaconda-31.13-1.fc31 Summary: Graphical system installer RPMs: anaconda anaconda-core anaconda-dracut anaconda-gui anaconda-install-env-deps anaconda-live anaconda-tui anaconda-widgets anaconda-widgets-devel Size: 20.82 MiB Size change: 81.91 KiB Changelog: * Fri May 31 2019 Martin Kolman - 31.14-1 - Require langtable-0.0.44, drop langtable-data requirement (mfabian) - Extend the format data with the mountable property (vponcova) - Add DBus support for supported file system types (vponcova) - Add DBus support for getting format type data (vponcova) - Add DBus support for gathering mount point requests (vponcova) - Move tests for partitioning modules to new files (vponcova) - Add DBus support for populating a device tree (vponcova) - Don't define the __eq__ method of DBusData (vponcova) - Add DBus support for mounting the existing system (vponcova) - Extend the function mount_existing_system (vponcova) - Add DBus support for finding existing operating system (vponcova) - Simplify generate_string_from_data (vponcova) - Define the __eq__ method of DBusData (vponcova) Package: asterisk-16.4.0-1.fc31 Old package: asterisk-16.2.1-1.fc31 Summary: The Open Source PBX RPMs: asterisk asterisk-ael asterisk-alembic asterisk-alsa asterisk-calendar asterisk-corosync asterisk-curl asterisk-dahdi asterisk-devel asterisk-fax asterisk-festival asterisk-hep asterisk-iax2 asterisk-ices asterisk-ldap asterisk-lua asterisk-mgcp asterisk-minivm asterisk-misdn asterisk-mobile asterisk-mwi-external asterisk-mysql asterisk-odbc asterisk-ooh323 asterisk-oss asterisk-pjsip asterisk-portaudio asterisk-postgresql asterisk-radius asterisk-sip asterisk-skinny asterisk-snmp asterisk-sqlite asterisk-tds asterisk-unistim asterisk-voicemail asterisk-voicemail-imap asterisk-voicemail-odbc asterisk-voicemail-plain Size: 48.88 MiB Size change: 3.10 MiB Changelog: * Fri May 31 2019 Jared K. Smith - 16.4.0-1 - Update to upstream 16.4.0 release for bug fixes Package: cmake-3.14.5-1.fc31 Old package: cmake-3.14.4-1.fc31 Summary: Cross-platform make system RPMs: cmake cmake-data cmake-doc cmake-filesystem cmake-gui cmake-rpm-macros
Re: Inconsistent dnf provides result
On 6/1/19 10:40 AM, Georg Sauthoff wrote: $ mkdir -p o ; rpm2cpio dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm | cpio -di -D o -v ./etc/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.logrotate ./usr/lib/.build-id ./usr/lib/.build-id/70/bf043a9b1a0954bb464faa59261f8edb0564d3 ./usr/lib64/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd ./usr/lib64/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.8 ./usr/share/dpm-mysql ./usr/share/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.service 1589 blocks $ ls -l o/usr/share/man/man8/dpmcopyd.8.gz ls: cannot access 'o/usr/share/man/man8/dpmcopyd.8.gz': No such file or directory That means there is no /usr/share/man/man8/dpmcopyd.8.gz - just: Why are you going through cpio, instead of just using rpm itself? $ rpm -qlp dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm /etc/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.logrotate /etc/logrotate.d/dpmcopyd /usr/lib/.build-id /usr/lib/.build-id/70/bf043a9b1a0954bb464faa59261f8edb0564d3 /usr/lib/systemd/system/dpmcopyd.service /usr/lib64/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd /usr/lib64/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.8 /usr/sbin/dpmcopyd /usr/share/dpm-mysql /usr/share/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.service /usr/share/man/man8/dpmcopyd.8.gz I don't know why cpio isn't seeing the files. Did you try installing the package? I don't want to do that because it pulls in a whole bunch of other dependencies I don't want. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Inconsistent dnf provides result
Hello, I noticed a case where the `dnf provides` output is inconsistent. That means the actual rpm package doesn't provide the requested file: # cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora release 29 (Twenty Nine) # dnf provides /usr/share/man/man8/dpmcopyd.8.gz dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64 : DPM copy server with MySQL database : back-end Repo: updates Matched from: Filename: /usr/share/man/man8/dpmcopyd.8.gz But: $ dnf download dpm-copy-server-mysql Last metadata expiration check: 1:46:49 ago on Sat 01 Jun 2019 05:31:01 PM CEST. dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm $ mkdir -p o ; rpm2cpio dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm | cpio -di -D o -v ./etc/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.logrotate ./usr/lib/.build-id ./usr/lib/.build-id/70/bf043a9b1a0954bb464faa59261f8edb0564d3 ./usr/lib64/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd ./usr/lib64/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.8 ./usr/share/dpm-mysql ./usr/share/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.service 1589 blocks $ ls -l o/usr/share/man/man8/dpmcopyd.8.gz ls: cannot access 'o/usr/share/man/man8/dpmcopyd.8.gz': No such file or directory That means there is no /usr/share/man/man8/dpmcopyd.8.gz - just: ./usr/lib64/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.8 Ok, I guess I could open a bug against dpm-copy-server-mysql - regarding fixing the location of the manpage. But what about the `dnf provides` output? It looks like something is going wrong in the process that generates the file-index. Should I open a bug for this, as well? And where? Best regards Georg -- 'The complexity for minimum component costs has increased at a rate of roughly a factor of two per year ... Certainly over the short term this rate can be expected to continue, if not to increase.' (Moore's law, 1965) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Rawhide 20190601.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 31 Rawhide 20190601.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Notable package version changes: anaconda - 20190529.n.0: anaconda-31.13-1.fc31.src, 20190601.n.0: anaconda-31.14-1.fc31.src Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/31 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_Rawhide_20190601.n.0_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_Rawhide_20190601.n.0_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_Rawhide_20190601.n.0_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_Rawhide_20190601.n.0_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_Rawhide_20190601.n.0_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_Rawhide_20190601.n.0_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_31_Rawhide_20190601.n.0_Security_Lab Thank you for testing! -- Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Modularity tooling intro?
> However, I want to do it on my own infrastructure and hence use the lower-level tooling such as mbs-manager/mock and local git repos rather than fedpkg/koji/dist-git. Sorry I missed your above message. Maybe you can open the ticket at below repository's issue page. https://pagure.io/fm-orchestrator fm-orchestrator repository is including module-build-service, and mbs-manager. I remember "mbs-build local" command worked for the local build in late 2017. But I could not find the command now. -- Jun Aruga / He - His - Him ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: how to set passwrod for Fedora LiveCD (Fedora 30)?
Yes, liveuser does not ask for a password anymore. On Saturday, June 1, 2019, 1:59:44 AM CDT, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/31/19 8:30 PM, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > I wanted to say that while I was not able to set the password, some > update on Fedora (can't see another reason) has fixed the problem with > liveuser in the sense that it can log in without asking for a password. Does that mean everything's good now? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: how to set passwrod for Fedora LiveCD (Fedora 30)?
Yes, that is correct. I did not realize that it was encrypted. Thanks! On Saturday, June 1, 2019, 1:59:13 AM CDT, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/31/19 7:31 PM, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > I am sorry to say that this does not do anything in the sense that I > still can not get into the liveCD/ I tried setting a password 'fedora" > even in order to make sure that something was included, but I can not > access the livecd installation (slim screen). > > Are there more lines that should be added before or after > > user --groups=wheel --name=myuser --password="" You tried logging in as "myuser"? The password there is expected to be encrypted unless you use the --plaintext parameter as well. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stale packages in Fedora 30
On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 08:37:08AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:23:14AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote: > > On Fri, 31 May 2019, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > > > >On 5/30/19 2:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > >>Since I was looking at a copy of the F30 repo for amd64, here's a list > > >>of a bunch of packages whose dist tag suggests they haven't rebuilt > > >>successfully in any currently-supported Fedora release. I'm sure some > > >>of these are incompletely retired or there's otherwise some good reason > > >>for it, this is just to raise visibility. > > > > > >Almost half of these are noarch packages (178 out of 441---see > > >list at the bottom). > > > > > >For instance, dia-gnomeDIAicons is a noarch package, specifically > > >data for 'dia' diagram editor. It actually works, and even > > >contains reasonable and useful network diagram icons. > > > > > >Its packaging _is_ confusing because the actual icon collection is > > >called RIB-network. > > > > > >What could be the reason that a noarch package was not rebuilt for > > >newer release? It's just a bunch of files... > > > > dia-gnomeDIAicons specifically appears to be in some sort of weird > > state. No builds appear to have been *attempted* since F21. > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=13728 > It seems nothing is intrinsically wrong with the package. > I rebuilt it in rawhide, to reduce the list of stale packages. https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8403 > > Also it has a source rpm checked into dist-git. :P > Most likely because the sources were not in the cache, so somebody > committed them to dist-git instead. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stale packages in Fedora 30
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:23:14AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Fri, 31 May 2019, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > >On 5/30/19 2:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > >>Since I was looking at a copy of the F30 repo for amd64, here's a list > >>of a bunch of packages whose dist tag suggests they haven't rebuilt > >>successfully in any currently-supported Fedora release. I'm sure some > >>of these are incompletely retired or there's otherwise some good reason > >>for it, this is just to raise visibility. > > > >Almost half of these are noarch packages (178 out of 441---see > >list at the bottom). > > > >For instance, dia-gnomeDIAicons is a noarch package, specifically > >data for 'dia' diagram editor. It actually works, and even > >contains reasonable and useful network diagram icons. > > > >Its packaging _is_ confusing because the actual icon collection is > >called RIB-network. > > > >What could be the reason that a noarch package was not rebuilt for > >newer release? It's just a bunch of files... > > dia-gnomeDIAicons specifically appears to be in some sort of weird > state. No builds appear to have been *attempted* since F21. > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=13728 It seems nothing is intrinsically wrong with the package. I rebuilt it in rawhide, to reduce the list of stale packages. > Also it has a source rpm checked into dist-git. :P Most likely because the sources were not in the cache, so somebody committed them to dist-git instead. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org