[Issue 3746] Misleding error message "OP has no effect in expression XXX), in void function
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE | Severity|minor |enhancement --- Comment #5 from yebblies 2011-06-12 23:21:28 PDT --- My bad, this is a request for a better error. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3437] No way to make conversions to string in pure functions.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3437 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2011-06-12 23:22:58 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 4850 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4850] std.conv.to isn't pure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4850 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alvcas...@yahoo.es --- Comment #4 from yebblies 2011-06-12 23:22:58 PDT --- *** Issue 3437 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3630] bad error location in "has no effect in expression" error
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3630 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 23:19:46 PDT --- *** Issue 3746 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3746] Misleding error message "OP has no effect in expression XXX), in void function
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@q1cc.net --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-06-12 23:18:47 PDT --- *** Issue 3855 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3746] Misleding error message "OP has no effect in expression XXX), in void function
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from yebblies 2011-06-12 23:19:46 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3630 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3855] Misleading error messages for return expression in void methods.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3855 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 23:18:46 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3746 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3765] User defined type contains few user defined types
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3765 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 23:01:31 PDT --- Works with current dmd (1.068 & 2.053) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2408] class declared as invariant cannot have static methods
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2408 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:55:49 PDT --- This works in current dmd 2.053. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3732] Not all COM interfaces inherit from IUnknown.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3732 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:52:43 PDT --- The correct solution would be to use extern(C++) interfaces. The bug is really in microsoft calling something a com class which isn't. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3730] Struct's explicit constructor can't initialize global variables
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3730 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:46:24 PDT --- This compiles without error in dmd2.053 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3729] Can't define opEquals for immutable types
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3729 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:44:10 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3659 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3607] Problems with struct opEquals and const
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3607 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:44:02 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3659 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3659] Too much exegesis on opEquals
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3659 --- Comment #8 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:44:10 PDT --- *** Issue 3729 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3659] Too much exegesis on opEquals
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3659 --- Comment #7 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:44:02 PDT --- *** Issue 3607 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1996] is ( Type Identifier : TypeSpecialization ) deduction error with inheritance
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1996 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:29:59 PDT --- All tests now pass with current dmd (1.068 & 2.053) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3321] debug flags
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3321 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jlqu...@optonline.net --- Comment #4 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:11:46 PDT --- *** Issue 3721 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3721] -debug flag doesn't behave as in spec
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3721 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:11:46 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3321 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5986] Function pointers wrongly typed
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5986 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:09:28 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3720 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3720] Taking address of member functions possible without an instance
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3720 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||raphael.lond...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:09:28 PDT --- *** Issue 5986 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1525] Can't instantiate template with bogus error messages
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1525 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-06-12 22:00:34 PDT --- Dmd now complains that V and C are undefined (dmd 1.068 & 2.053) which correctly identifies the problem. testx.d(1): Error: undefined identifier C, did you mean template k(U : V[C])? testx.d(1): Error: undefined identifier V, did you mean template k(U : V[_error_ ])? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2601] Extraneous cast introduced in member access
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2601 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2011-06-12 21:52:41 PDT --- I think array literals have become dynamic since then, so the case in comment 1 works. The case in comment 2 does not appear to be a bug, casting a static array to a dynamic array cannot result in an lvalue. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3360] segfault with alias this and inner classes
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3360 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 21:45:12 PDT --- Works in current dmd (2.053) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1370] Can't const-fold empty array literal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1370 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2011-06-12 21:40:40 PDT --- This works in current dmd 1.068 and 2.053. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3707] comma-terminated array initializers not allowed with mixin
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3707 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Platform|Other |All Version|2.038 |D1 OS/Version|Mac OS X|All --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 21:35:15 PDT --- This work correctly on D2, not on D1 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6153] Inserting to An Array!T inside an Array!(Array!T) causes a segfault.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6153 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||and...@metalanguage.com AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|and...@metalanguage.com -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6153] New: Inserting to An Array!T inside an Array!(Array!T) causes a segfault.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6153 Summary: Inserting to An Array!T inside an Array!(Array!T) causes a segfault. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: victor.v.carva...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Victor 2011-06-12 21:04:21 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=996) testcase See the attached test case. Running it causes a segfault on glibc. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6152] New: The std.concurrency.receive* family of functions is undocumented.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6152 Summary: The std.concurrency.receive* family of functions is undocumented. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: websites AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: blood.of.l...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Bernard Helyer 2011-06-12 17:56:19 PDT --- -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3624] http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/ has D Programming Language 2.0 at the top
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3624 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 15:57:34 PDT --- This was fixed at some point. The title now reads 'D Programming Language 1.0' -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3606] Problems with struct destructors and const structs
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-06-12 15:54:43 PDT --- The code now compiles. (dmd2.053) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3542] Unittest block does not require a closing bracket
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3542 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 15:47:49 PDT --- Correctly errors in dmd 2.053 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3499] Forward reference error with typeof() on a function
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3499 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 15:34:52 PDT --- This compiles without error on current dmd (1.068 & 2.053) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3448] __traits(compiles) returns true for a non-compilable template instantiation
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3448 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 15:27:30 PDT --- This seems to have the same root cause as bug 965 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2805] Many modules not marked as system
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2805 --- Comment #5 from yebblies 2011-06-12 15:22:34 PDT --- http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html I guess -safe was removed from the compiler in 2.037 The 'Function Safety' section in http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/function.html describes what the new safety spec is supposed to be. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2805] Many modules not marked as system
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2805 --- Comment #4 from Witold Baryluk 2011-06-12 15:15:57 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > No longer valid as the old safety scheme has been abandoned. Can you please give some references about it? I cannot find any information on digitalmars.com about it. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2805] Many modules not marked as system
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2805 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-06-12 15:07:22 PDT --- No longer valid as the old safety scheme has been abandoned. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3358] Several typeof(Class.method).stringof incoherence
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3358 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-06-12 14:55:23 PDT --- *** Issue 6117 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6117] Parameter names of equivalent function aliases are merged
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6117 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 14:55:23 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3358 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3358] Several typeof(Class.method).stringof incoherence
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3358 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johnaston@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2011-06-12 14:55:18 PDT --- *** Issue 5752 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5752] Incorrect memoisation during function parameter name introspection
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5752 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 14:55:18 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3358 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3256] getMember static foreach inconsistency
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3256 --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-06-12 14:47:08 PDT --- Probably not a bad idea. I'll start shoving the ones I close into a file. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3256] getMember static foreach inconsistency
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3256 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kenn...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-06-12 14:40:33 PDT --- I think we should create a unit-test for every "turns out it works now" bug. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2667] a few un-demanglable Undefined symbol in std.stdio? compiler bug?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2667 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #4 from yebblies 2011-06-12 14:30:49 PDT --- Probably not a bug, no test case given, over two years old. No indication that dmd is at fault. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3329] Static constructors not allowed in interfaces
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3329 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 14:28:28 PDT --- This compiles successfully: static constructors are now allowed in interfaces (dmd1.068 & dmd2.053) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3256] getMember static foreach inconsistency
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3256 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 14:05:04 PDT --- Closing as this works now (dmd2.053) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2911] Odd anomaly of implicit conversions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2911
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 14:09:40 PDT ---
Both statements currently error (dmd 2.053)
testx.d(4): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (c) of type wchar to
char
testx.d(6): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression ('\U') of type
const(wchar) to char
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6151] New: Make the GC functions weakly pure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6151 Summary: Make the GC functions weakly pure Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P4 Component: druntime AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: kenn...@gmail.com Blocks: 4850 --- Comment #0 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-06-12 13:09:53 PDT --- Original discussion: * http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/Should_GC.malloc_be_considered_pure_137919.html * http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/Re_Should_GC.malloc_be_considered_pure_137984.html * http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/Re_Should_GC.malloc_be_considered_pure_138177.html Due to practicality, allocation is allowed in pure function. By the same token, GC.malloc should also be 'pure'. GC functions being not weakly-pure is the reason why std.conv.to (bug 4850) and std.array.appender cannot be pure. Marking the GC functions are pure are easy, but the problem is the implication behind it. Technically, GC functions depend on global states, so they cannot be weakly pure. But then std.array.appender can never become pure without sacrificing performance. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6150] runnable/testsocket.d
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6150 --- Comment #1 from Brad Roberts 2011-06-12 11:41:52 PDT --- After a little research, trying to find where the test came from, I found that my past has come back to haunt me. The test came from the reporter of bug 268, which I fixed. The fix back then wasn't wrong and was unrelated to this problem. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1983] Big Hole in Const System
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1983 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schvei...@yahoo.com --- Comment #8 from Steven Schveighoffer 2011-06-12 11:28:15 PDT --- *** Issue 3656 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3656] delegate should specify 'this' decorations
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3656 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Steven Schveighoffer 2011-06-12 11:28:15 PDT --- Yes, it's a dupe. I also realize now that identifying the decorations for the this pointer makes delegates a lot less useful, so they shouldn't specify this decorations. I think even in the case where the function is shared, it's not important, the member function should handle the shared semantics properly. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 1983 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6148] Make templates smarter about instantiating with implicitly convertible arrays
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6148 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schvei...@yahoo.com --- Comment #4 from Steven Schveighoffer 2011-06-12 11:24:51 PDT --- Also, see bug 4998 as a possible solution, it can be modified to include more general cases besides literals. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3147] Incorrect value range propagation for addition
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3147 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfj1es...@sneakemail.com --- Comment #9 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-06-12 11:07:25 PDT --- *** Issue 5225 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6000] Value range propagation does not work with modulus (%) with a constant
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6000 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-06-12 11:06:25 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3147 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3147] Incorrect value range propagation for addition
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3147 --- Comment #8 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-06-12 11:06:25 PDT --- *** Issue 6000 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5225] Signed right shift operator is ridiculous
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5225 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||kenn...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-06-12 11:07:25 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3147 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3147] Incorrect value range propagation for addition
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3147 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC||kenn...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-06-12 11:05:38 PDT --- DMD pull #116. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/116 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3234] Range comparison with array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3234 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2011-06-12 10:23:54 PDT --- This was a documentation bug which has been fixed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4251] Hole in the const system: immutable values can be overwritten (const(T) is appendable to const(T)[])
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4251 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, patch CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-06-12 08:14:13 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/115 When implicitly converting types with indirections, only allow the following results: > completely mutable > completely non-mutable > exactly one mutable indirection > the same number of mutable indirections as before eg. > T*** => const(T***) allowed, full const > T*** => const(T**)* allowed, tail const > T*** => const(T*)** not allowed > T*** => const(T)*** not allowed > T*** => T*** allowed, same number of mutable indirections > immutable(T*)** => const(T*)** allowed, same number of mutable indirections etc This prevents (as far as I know) using implicit conversions to let a pointer to mutable and a pointer to immutable point to the same place using const conversions. eg. int** a = [new int].ptr; const(int)*** b = &a; *b = [new immutable(int)].ptr; The same applies to other reference types. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6121] Can't link with DMC C++ generated functions with long arguments
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6121 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2011-06-12 05:08:33 PDT --- This _is_ a name mangling problem. D's long is not the same as C's long (at least not on x86) and should not be mangled the same. There is currently no way to have dmd mangle a C or C++ function with a C long argument. As dmd is working as designed, I'm going to close this as invalid. You should reopen as an enhancement request if you think dmd should be changed to do things differently. (There is also already an enhancement request issue 2698 which would solve your problem) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5493] Able to overwrite immutable data by passing through ref function parameter
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5493 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #12 from yebblies 2011-06-12 00:50:41 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/114 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
