[Issue 3782] The POSIX sys/un.h header

2015-06-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782

Andrei Alexandrescu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|future  |D2

--


[Issue 3782] The POSIX sys/un.h header

2010-08-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3782


Lars T. Kyllingstad  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


--- Comment #5 from Lars T. Kyllingstad  2010-08-11 
02:45:10 PDT ---
Fixed DMD 2.048

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 3782] The POSIX sys/un.h header

2010-02-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3782



--- Comment #4 from Sean Kelly  2010-02-09 09:29:32 PST 
---
I'd like to use the latest revision of the spec.  Work on the headers simply
began before 2008 :-)

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 3782] The POSIX sys/un.h header

2010-02-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3782



--- Comment #3 from Lars T. Kyllingstad  2010-02-08 
22:55:53 PST ---
Ah, as you'll see from the doc comment in the file I used the Open Group site
as a source as well, only I used the POSIX:2008 specification (issue 7) at

  http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/

I see that the headers in druntime conform to POSIX:2004 (issue 6).  Is it a
point to try and keep all of them at the same POSIX version?  For this
particular one it doesn't matter, as it hasn't changed since 2004, so it's
simply a matter of changing the comment.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 3782] The POSIX sys/un.h header

2010-02-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3782


Sean Kelly  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED


--- Comment #2 from Sean Kelly  2010-02-08 20:03:46 PST 
---
Looks great at a glance.  And I'm not sure if I've said anywhere, but I use the
OpenGroup site as a reference for creating the headers:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/  I'll double check the header
against that and add it before the next release.  Thanks!  And by all means
submit more if you'd like.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 3782] The POSIX sys/un.h header

2010-02-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3782


Lars T. Kyllingstad  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Attachment #563|Minor correction:   |D implementation of
description|char->byte  |sys/un.h


-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 3782] The POSIX sys/un.h header

2010-02-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3782


Lars T. Kyllingstad  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #562 is|0   |1
   obsolete||


--- Comment #1 from Lars T. Kyllingstad  2010-02-08 
11:29:05 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=563)
Minor correction: char->byte

Oops... Wrote 'char' instead of 'byte' in the linux version.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---