[Issue 3974] ICE(init.c): Static array initializer with more elements than destination array
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3974 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.040 |D2 --
[Issue 3974] ICE(init.c): Static array initializer with more elements than destination array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3974 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Don 2010-05-05 19:08:06 PDT --- Fixed DMD2.044 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3974] ICE(init.c): Static array initializer with more elements than destination array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3974 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Don 2010-04-09 13:35:44 PDT --- Note to bearophile: The case where the number of elements is LESS than the array size (bug 3849) is quite different. Note that, for example, int [3] x = [ 2: 15]; is currently legal. This patch is slightly more general, in that it covers the cases like int[3] toomany = [ 2: 13, 1]; PATCH: init.c line 343 (in ArrayInitializer::semantic()). if (length == 0) error(loc, "array dimension overflow"); if (length > dim) dim = length; } +if (t->ty == Tsarray) +{ +size_t edim = ((TypeSArray *)t)->dim->toInteger(); +if (dim > edim) +{ +error(loc, "array initializer has %d elements, but array length is %d", dim, edim); +return new ExpInitializer(loc, new ErrorExp()); +} +} unsigned long amax = 0x8000; if ((unsigned long) dim * t->nextOf()->size() >= amax) error(loc, "array dimension %u exceeds max of %ju", dim, amax / t->nextOf()->size()); -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3974] ICE(init.c): Static array initializer with more elements than destination array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3974 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-03-16 05:20:36 PDT --- Regarding bug 3849, I did put both things in the same bug report because: - they are strongly semantically related, the compiler has to refuse fixed sized literals with a number of items different from the number specified on the left (this is true for nD arrays too); - The cause of this ICE can be related to the lack of tests over the number of items in the literal compared to the number on the left. So fixing one bug can even fix the other too, or it can be very quick to fix one when you fix the other. That's why I have not originally marked that as enhancement. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---