[Issue 8723] Error: function called with argument types:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com Resolution||INVALID -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8723] Error: function called with argument types:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723 Maxim Fomin changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8723] Error: function called with argument types:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-09-25 13:10:26 PDT --- And why on earth would you _need_ a prototype? This isn't C. We're not forced to declare functions higher up in a file before using them. Ideally, prototypes wouldn't even _exist_. They're an artifact of C's poor compilation model. Unfortunately, they're necessary for .di files, so we have them, but there's no reason whatsoever to be declaring a prototype in a .d file. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8723] Error: function called with argument types:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-09-25 12:12:49 PDT --- According to D specs I think there are no bugs here. So at best those are two enhancement requests. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8723] Error: function called with argument types:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723 --- Comment #2 from Maxim Fomin 2012-09-25 11:35:45 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why is that clearly a bug? You gave two functions with identical function > signatures. The only time that you give function prototypes in D are when > you're _not_ providing the source (e.g. inside of .di files or version(D_Ddoc) > blocks). No, I gave one function prototype (declaration) and one function definition with similar name and type. The former has to be binded to the latter. This is how C works and D should follow it in this regard. There is no reason for assuming that prototypes and definitions are separated between different modules and no reason for making feigned ambiguity between function body and its own declaration. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8723] Error: function called with argument types:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723
--- Comment #3 from Maxim Fomin 2012-09-25 11:37:57 PDT
---
By the way, following code is not compiled either (for the same reason):
struct S;
struct S {}
void main()
{
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8723] Error: function called with argument types:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8723 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-09-25 09:51:18 PDT --- Why is that clearly a bug? You gave two functions with identical function signatures. The only time that you give function prototypes in D are when you're _not_ providing the source (e.g. inside of .di files or version(D_Ddoc) blocks). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
