Re: [digitalradio] Re: Half Square Antenna
For what it's worth, I've done it both ways. With a voltage feed it is easy for the coax to leave the antenna on the ground and just use a screen for a ground. With current feed at the corners, the coax is up in the air and needs to leave at right angles to the vertical wire, but no tuned circuit is needed, and no RF ground. 73, Skip KH6TY kf4hou wrote: Hey Tom Which is the better way of feeding the Half Square what is the plus and minus of both? Voltage vs. Current Fed
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Half Square Antenna
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:29 AM, kf4hou wrote: > > > > Hey Tom > > Which is the better way of feeding the Half Square what is the plus and minus > of both? Voltage vs. Current Fed > "The antenna may be fed at the bottom or at a corner. When fed at a corner, the feed point is a lowimpedance, current-feed. When fed at the bottom of one of the wires against a small ground counterpoise, the feed point is a high-impedance, voltage-feed." http://rudys.typepad.com/ant/files/antenna_halfsquare_array.pdf Andy K3UK
[digitalradio] Re: Half Square Antenna
Hey Tom Which is the better way of feeding the Half Square what is the plus and minus of both? Voltage vs. Current Fed > > I used a half square on 17 meters in Colorado in 1995 at the bottom of the > sunspot cycle. I voltage fed it with a parallel LC network and one 1/4 wave > radial. The flat top phasing line was only 13 feet off of the ground with > the antenna broadside Europe and the Pacific. The results: 100 countries in > 30 days with 100 watts. A serious DX antenna. > > I also put up a half square on 160 in Colorado, with the same voltage feed. > I linear loaded each 1/4 wave leg into two each 1/8 wave 64 foot sections > and it worked fantastic. I had a big signal with 100 watts. > > 73 & GUD DX, > Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O > Lakeland, FL, USA > n...@... > > > NZ4O Amateur & SWL Autobiography: http://www.nz4o.org >
