Re: [O] Documentation for NOBLOCKING property?

[Bastien]

Hi James,

James Harkins  writes:

> Was it intentional to omit this from the documentation?

I just documented this in master, thanks.

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [O] Documentation for NOBLOCKING property?

[Rasmus]

Hi,

James Harkins  writes:

> Just now, I needed to exempt a couple of subtrees from TODO dependency
> blocking. I found that you can do this by setting a subtree property
> NOBLOCKING.
>
> This option appears to be undocumented (by which I mean, it isn't
> mentioned in the manual's dependency checking page, and a web search
> for "orgmode todo noblocking" turned up pages about TODOs but none
> with any obvious reference to noblocking). I found the property by
> grepping the .el sources for "blocked" to find the org-todo function,
> and then scanning the function until I found something that looked
> like property access.
>
> Was it intentional to omit this from the documentation?
 
Indeed I have *never* heard of this.  I guess it should be documented or
something.

Would you provide a patch?

—Rasmus

-- 
Er du tosset for noge' lårt!

[O] Documentation for NOBLOCKING property?

[James Harkins]

Just now, I needed to exempt a couple of subtrees from TODO dependency 
blocking. I found that you can do this by setting a subtree property NOBLOCKING.

This option appears to be undocumented (by which I mean, it isn't mentioned in 
the manual's dependency checking page, and a web search for "orgmode todo 
noblocking" turned up pages about TODOs but none with any obvious reference to 
noblocking). I found the property by grepping the .el sources for "blocked" to 
find the org-todo function, and then scanning the function until I found 
something that looked like property access.

Was it intentional to omit this from the documentation?

hjh