Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rape Victim
Recently there was a show on television where the mother did not want anything to do with her child because she was forced to keep the child after she had been raped by a family member. --- On Mon, 10/6/08, Richard J. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Richard J. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rape Victim To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, October 6, 2008, 1:10 PM John posted: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IS0PJdE0Cs > "A person is either for abortion or against. There is no middle ground. If you are against abortion and pro life then to allow abortion for rape is still killing a person. There is no way to get out of this dilemma. Pro life says, every conception must go to term and deliver, no exceptions. Otherwise it is not about pro-life or choice. It is just a matter of drawing a line in the sand." - David http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IS0PJdE0Cs To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Rape Victim& the Atman-Self entering the body
The sould does not permently enter a body till the 1 st breath & may then easily leave for perhaps some time there after. the soul - Atman ius what is significant here not the body as we understand In a message dated 10/6/2008 12:10:37 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John posted: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IS0PJdE0Cs > "A person is either for abortion or against. There is no middle ground. If you are against abortion and pro life then to allow abortion for rape is still killing a person. There is no way to get out of this dilemma. Pro life says, every conception must go to term and deliver, no exceptions. Otherwise it is not about pro-life or choice. It is just a matter of drawing a line in the sand." - David http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IS0PJdE0Cs To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links **New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination. Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out! (http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew0001)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rape Victim
John posted: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IS0PJdE0Cs > "A person is either for abortion or against. There is no middle ground. If you are against abortion and pro life then to allow abortion for rape is still killing a person. There is no way to get out of this dilemma. Pro life says, every conception must go to term and deliver, no exceptions. Otherwise it is not about pro-life or choice. It is just a matter of drawing a line in the sand." - David http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IS0PJdE0Cs
[FairfieldLife] Re: Rape Victim
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IS0PJdE0Cs > John Ashcroft, the former attorney-general who oversaw the implementation of all federal laws in the United States, also held the same wacky views on abortion that Sarah Palin does. During his four year tenure as AG -- and, as such, oversaw the abortion laws of the United States -- not one of the approximately 5 million fetuses aborted in the United States were prevented from being sucked out of their mothers' wombs. Indeed, Ashcroft was asked this very question by Democrat pro-choice Senators during his confirmation process and he replied in kind (I paraphrase): as AG, I do not make the laws but on required to ensure their proper implementation even those that I personally oppose. Since the passage of Roe v Wade 35 years ago in 1973, we've had 23 years of pro-life Republican presidents. Of the 12 years of Democrat presidents, 4 of those years were run by Jimmy Carter who is more anti- abortion than any of the Republican presidents. Yet despite this overwhelming opposition to abortion on the part of the United States presidents over the past 35 years, not one of the approximately 45 million aborted fetuses that have taken place has been prevented from occuring. And please note that seven of the nine current sitting judges of the Supreme Court were appointed by the Republican presidents (only 2 were appointed by Clinton, the ONLY president since Roe v Wade to support pro-choice). If Sarah Palin were to ever become president, she would have zero power -- ZERO -- to influence the implementation of abortion laws in this country. Yes, she could appoint pro-life judges to the Supreme Court but we've seen how successful THAT'S been, haven't we!