[FairfieldLife] Re: Wisdom from Socrates

2008-01-25 Thread shempmcgurk
If the 162,145 messages on this forum were subject to the Triple 
Filter Test, there'd probably be about 63.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In ancient Greece, Socrates was reputed to hold knowledge in high 
esteem.
> One day an acquaintance met the great philosopher and said, "Do you 
know
> what I just heard about your friend?"
> 
> "Hold on a minute," Socrates replied. "Before telling me anything 
I'd like
> you to pass a little test. It's called the Triple Filter Test."
> 
> "Triple filter?"
> 
> "That's right," Socrates continued. "Before you talk to me about my 
friend,
> it might be a good idea to take a moment and filter what you're 
going to
> say. That's why I call it the triple filter test.
> 
> The first filter is Truth. Have you made absolutely sure that what 
you are
> about to tell me is true?"  (Sathyam?)
> 
> "No," the man said, "actually I just heard about it and..."
> 
> "All right," said Socrates. "So you don't really know if it's true 
or not.
> Now let's try the second filter, the filter of goodness. Is what 
you are
> about to tell me about my friend something good?" (Priyam?)
> 
> "No, on the contrary..."
> 
> "So," Socrates continued, "you want to tell me something bad about 
him, but
> you're not certain it's true. You may still pass the test though, 
because
> there's one filter left: the filter of usefulness. Is what you want 
to tell
> me about my friend going to be useful to me?" (Hitham?)
> 
> "No, not really."
> 
> "Well," concluded Socrates, "if what you want to tell me is neither 
true nor
> good nor even useful, why tell it to me at all?"
> 
>  
> 
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.11/1242 - Release Date: 
1/24/2008
> 8:32 PM
>




[FairfieldLife] Re: Wisdom from Socrates

2008-01-25 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  
> 
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:21 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wisdom from Socrates
> 
>  
> 
> > Rich Archer fails all 3 tests but still continues. What a world...
> > 
> > And Nabby passes them all so unerringly. Never untruthful, never 
> negative,
> > never useless. Someone for us all to emulate.
> 
> I pass the first, fail on the second. 
> But usefulness, I simply have no way of knowing.
> 
> So you're never untruthful? Is there anyone else on this board who 
can say
> that? On this earth?

Knowingly untruthful ? No.



RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wisdom from Socrates

2008-01-25 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:21 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wisdom from Socrates

 

> Rich Archer fails all 3 tests but still continues. What a world...
> 
> And Nabby passes them all so unerringly. Never untruthful, never 
negative,
> never useless. Someone for us all to emulate.

I pass the first, fail on the second. 
But usefulness, I simply have no way of knowing.

So you’re never untruthful? Is there anyone else on this board who can say
that? On this earth?


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.11/1242 - Release Date: 1/24/2008
8:32 PM
 


[FairfieldLife] Re: Wisdom from Socrates

2008-01-25 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  
> 
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 4:44 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wisdom from Socrates
> 
>  
> 
> Rich Archer fails all 3 tests but still continues. What a world...
> 
> And Nabby passes them all so unerringly. Never untruthful, never 
negative,
> never useless. Someone for us all to emulate.

I pass the first, fail on the second. 
But usefulness, I simply have no way of knowing.
I'll give you 1/4 of a point, or thereabouts, on "usefulness" since 
I'm in a good mood today, and since your obsession about other 
peoples sex-life and rumourmonging probably is not all 
you "contribute" here. 
:-)



RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wisdom from Socrates

2008-01-25 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 4:44 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wisdom from Socrates

 

Rich Archer fails all 3 tests but still continues. What a world...

And Nabby passes them all so unerringly. Never untruthful, never negative,
never useless. Someone for us all to emulate.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.11/1242 - Release Date: 1/24/2008
8:32 PM
 


[FairfieldLife] Re: Wisdom from Socrates

2008-01-25 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In ancient Greece, Socrates was reputed to hold knowledge in high 
esteem.
> One day an acquaintance met the great philosopher and said, "Do you 
know
> what I just heard about your friend?"
> 
> "Hold on a minute," Socrates replied. "Before telling me anything 
I'd like
> you to pass a little test. It's called the Triple Filter Test."
> 
> "Triple filter?"
> 
> "That's right," Socrates continued. "Before you talk to me about my 
friend,
> it might be a good idea to take a moment and filter what you're 
going to
> say. That's why I call it the triple filter test.
> 
> The first filter is Truth. Have you made absolutely sure that what 
you are
> about to tell me is true?"  (Sathyam?)
> 
> "No," the man said, "actually I just heard about it and..."
> 
> "All right," said Socrates. "So you don't really know if it's true 
or not.
> Now let's try the second filter, the filter of goodness. Is what 
you are
> about to tell me about my friend something good?" (Priyam?)
> 
> "No, on the contrary..."
> 
> "So," Socrates continued, "you want to tell me something bad about 
him, but
> you're not certain it's true. You may still pass the test though, 
because
> there's one filter left: the filter of usefulness. Is what you want 
to tell
> me about my friend going to be useful to me?" (Hitham?)
> 
> "No, not really."
> 
> "Well," concluded Socrates, "if what you want to tell me is neither 
true nor
> good nor even useful, why tell it to me at all?"

Rich Archer fails all 3 tests but still continues. What a world...