Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 1:01 PM Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 07:25:32PM +0100, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: > > On 3/28/20 5:33 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote: > > > > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > > > > > > > I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: > > Thanks, Neel! > > > [snip] > > > > net/librsync2 > > > > sysutils/ioping > > > > sysutils/pick > > > Hi, > > > > > > If no one has already stepped up, I'd like to try my hand at maintaining > > > these three as a way of tentatively slowly coming back to FreeBSD. > > > > Sure! Could you submit appropriate patches to bugzilla? > > Bah, nevermind, people beat me to it for all three :) No worries :) > > G'luck, > Peter librsync2 and ioping were claimed a couple hours before you requested those ports, but pick was claimed about 90 minutes after. It's tobik@'s call as he took maintainership, but you did request it. Regardless of whether Tobias wants to retain maintainership, please take a look at https://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html and see if there are some other ports you'd be interested in maintaining. We'd love to lure you back to FreeBSD ports. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger ad...@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 07:25:32PM +0100, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: > On 3/28/20 5:33 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote: > > > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > > > > > I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: > Thanks, Neel! > > [snip] > > > net/librsync2 > > > sysutils/ioping > > > sysutils/pick > > Hi, > > > > If no one has already stepped up, I'd like to try my hand at maintaining > > these three as a way of tentatively slowly coming back to FreeBSD. > > Sure! Could you submit appropriate patches to bugzilla? Bah, nevermind, people beat me to it for all three :) No worries :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports
On 3/28/20 5:33 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote: Hi freebsd-ports@, I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: Thanks, Neel! [snip] net/librsync2 sysutils/ioping sysutils/pick Hi, If no one has already stepped up, I'd like to try my hand at maintaining these three as a way of tentatively slowly coming back to FreeBSD. Sure! Could you submit appropriate patches to bugzilla? Thanks! Mateusz ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote: > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: > [snip] > net/librsync2 > sysutils/ioping > sysutils/pick Hi, If no one has already stepped up, I'd like to try my hand at maintaining these three as a way of tentatively slowly coming back to FreeBSD. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports
Thanks for all your hard work Neel! On Friday, March 27, 2020, Neel Chauhan wrote: > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: > > databases/py-mysqlclient > deskutils/go-for-it > devel/grpc > devel/libnsutils > devel/libparserutils > devel/netsurf-buildsystem > devel/nsgenbind > dns/libnspsl > emulators/nestopia > graphics/cloudcompare > graphics/glfw > graphics/libnsbmp > graphics/libnsgif > graphics/maim > graphics/py-glfw > math/py-keras > multimedia/gtk-youtube-viewer > net/librsync2 > net/yaz > security/i2p > sysutils/ioping > sysutils/pick > sysutils/ttyd > sysutils/zrep > textproc/libcss > textproc/libwapcaplet > www/itop > www/libdom > www/libhubhub > www/mohawk > www/mongrel2 > www/netsurf > x11/slop > > I am no longer interested in maintaining Ports, after many months of > half-hearted work if not neglect. I still plan to contribute to FreeBSD, > just that my focus is now on the TCP/IP networking stack. > > Could someone please reset the maintainership of the ports above? > > -Neel > > === > > https://www.neelc.org/ > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote: > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: > > databases/py-mysqlclient > deskutils/go-for-it > devel/grpc > devel/libnsutils > devel/libparserutils > devel/netsurf-buildsystem > devel/nsgenbind > dns/libnspsl > emulators/nestopia > graphics/cloudcompare > graphics/glfw > graphics/libnsbmp > graphics/libnsgif > graphics/maim > graphics/py-glfw > math/py-keras > multimedia/gtk-youtube-viewer > net/librsync2 > net/yaz > security/i2p > sysutils/ioping > sysutils/pick > sysutils/ttyd > sysutils/zrep > textproc/libcss > textproc/libwapcaplet > www/itop > www/libdom > www/libhubhub > www/mohawk > www/mongrel2 > www/netsurf > x11/slop > > I am no longer interested in maintaining Ports, after many months of > half-hearted work if not neglect. I still plan to contribute to FreeBSD, > just that my focus is now on the TCP/IP networking stack. > > Could someone please reset the maintainership of the ports above? > Done, thanks for your past contributions. René ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership of my Ports
Hi freebsd-ports@, I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: databases/py-mysqlclient deskutils/go-for-it devel/grpc devel/libnsutils devel/libparserutils devel/netsurf-buildsystem devel/nsgenbind dns/libnspsl emulators/nestopia graphics/cloudcompare graphics/glfw graphics/libnsbmp graphics/libnsgif graphics/maim graphics/py-glfw math/py-keras multimedia/gtk-youtube-viewer net/librsync2 net/yaz security/i2p sysutils/ioping sysutils/pick sysutils/ttyd sysutils/zrep textproc/libcss textproc/libwapcaplet www/itop www/libdom www/libhubhub www/mohawk www/mongrel2 www/netsurf x11/slop I am no longer interested in maintaining Ports, after many months of half-hearted work if not neglect. I still plan to contribute to FreeBSD, just that my focus is now on the TCP/IP networking stack. Could someone please reset the maintainership of the ports above? -Neel === https://www.neelc.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
www/luakit: dropping maintainership
Hello, I moved on and I don't have the time and actually no freebsd system anymore to maintain the www/luakit port. There is still an update to the current version in bugzilla with minor issues. I'm dropping maintenance. If someone is going to pick it up and has questions, feel free to ask! Best Regards, Stefan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership for www/miniminiweb
On 20/12/2018 12:19 pm, Neel Chauhan wrote: Hi freebsd-ports@, May I please drop maintainership for www/miniminiweb only? However, I still want to maintain other ports. Thanks, Neel Chauhan You may at any time, no permission required :) Standard procedure applies to this as with any change, just: - submit a bugzilla issue with title: "cat/port: Reset MAINTAINER", with - a patch including the change, and - set maintainer-approval on the attachment to + (as current maintainer) Then someone will take care of it lastly, thank you for your efforts maintaining this (until now) and other ports Neel! ./koobs ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership for www/miniminiweb
Hi freebsd-ports@, May I please drop maintainership for www/miniminiweb only? However, I still want to maintain other ports. Thanks, Neel Chauhan === https://www.neelc.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership for emulators/gem5 ONLY
On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 18:46, wrote: > > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > Would it be possible to drop my maintainership for emulators/gem5 ONLY? I > still want to maintain my other Ports. Done! [4812 02:40:17.197 eax@fasteagle .../ports/emulators/gem5 !1!]∴svn diff (svn:ports)-[head:475627] Index: Makefile === --- Makefile (revision 481593) +++ Makefile (working copy) @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ PORTNAME= gem5 PORTVERSION= 0.0.${DATE} CATEGORIES= emulators -MAINTAINER= n...@neelc.org +MAINTAINER= po...@freebsd.org COMMENT= gem5 Simulator System BUILD_DEPENDS= swig3.0:devel/swig30 \ [4813 02:40:59.449 eax@fasteagle .../svn/ports/emulators/gem5]∴svn ci -F log -- Makefile SendingMakefile Transmitting file data .done Committing transaction... Committed revision 481594. -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership for emulators/gem5 ONLY
Hi freebsd-ports@, Would it be possible to drop my maintainership for emulators/gem5 ONLY? I still want to maintain my other Ports. Thank You, Neel Chauhan === https://www.neelc.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership for cad/meshlab ONLY
I have reset maintainership, thank you for your past efforts. René Op di 21 aug. 2018 om 17:36 schreef : > Hi freebsd-ports@ mailing list, > > I want to drop maintainership for this port: cad/meshlab > > Keep in mind that I want to keep maintainership for all my other ports. > > Thank You, > > Neel Chauhan > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership for cad/meshlab ONLY
Hi freebsd-ports@ mailing list, I want to drop maintainership for this port: cad/meshlab Keep in mind that I want to keep maintainership for all my other ports. Thank You, Neel Chauhan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership for pydio / softether / wmconfig
Hi, Koichiro IWAO wrote in <01010161bc060e73-5e01b825-b1eb-4f4a-a112-b280ae670da7-000...@us-west-2.amazonses.com>: me> me> I'll take the maintainership if nobody wants however me> I think security/softether and security/softether-devel me> should be maintained by the same maintainer. me> me> Sato-san, would you like to maintain net/softether as well? Yes, my time for FreeBSD is quite limited until AsiaBSDCon but I am considering to merge the two ports into one at least. Please send me a patch if you have. -- Hiroki pgp7fJGYHjdVq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Dropping maintainership
I can take over spice-gtk if there are no takers. On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Andreas Andersson < a.andersson@gmail.com> wrote: > I can take maintainership of databases/tile38 since we use it at work and > need to keep it updated anyway. > > 2018-02-22 13:55 GMT+01:00 Tobias Kortkamp : > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018, at 11:12, Oleg Ginzburg wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I stop participating in FreeBSD project because of such stupid things > as > > > https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html > > > Until this is removed or changed. For example, the current CoC can be > > shown > > > in case of a negative question "Are you 12 and/or your upbringing and > > > intellect is OK?". > > > Otherwise, show something similar to https://www.kde.org/code-of- > > conduct/ > > > > > > Please reset my maintainership for these ports: > > > > > > net-im/freetalk > > > sysutils/fusefs-zip > > > sysutils/ioping > > > www/itop > > > devel/libspice-server > > > devel/lua-lpeg > > > net/nakenchat > > > games/netherearth > > > www/phpliteadmin > > > sysutils/retail > > > deskutils/spice-gtk > > > databases/tile38 > > > x11-drivers/xf86-video-qxl > > > sysutils/zrep > > > > Done. > > ___ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > > > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership
Hi! > I can take maintainership of databases/tile38 since we use it at work and > need to keep it updated anyway. You have it. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 2 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership
I can take maintainership of databases/tile38 since we use it at work and need to keep it updated anyway. 2018-02-22 13:55 GMT+01:00 Tobias Kortkamp : > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018, at 11:12, Oleg Ginzburg wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I stop participating in FreeBSD project because of such stupid things as > > https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html > > Until this is removed or changed. For example, the current CoC can be > shown > > in case of a negative question "Are you 12 and/or your upbringing and > > intellect is OK?". > > Otherwise, show something similar to https://www.kde.org/code-of- > conduct/ > > > > Please reset my maintainership for these ports: > > > > net-im/freetalk > > sysutils/fusefs-zip > > sysutils/ioping > > www/itop > > devel/libspice-server > > devel/lua-lpeg > > net/nakenchat > > games/netherearth > > www/phpliteadmin > > sysutils/retail > > deskutils/spice-gtk > > databases/tile38 > > x11-drivers/xf86-video-qxl > > sysutils/zrep > > Done. > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership
Op 22/02/2018 om 11:12 schreef Oleg Ginzburg: > Hello, > > I stop participating in FreeBSD project because of such stupid things as > https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html > Until this is removed or changed. For example, the current CoC can be shown > in case of a negative question "Are you 12 and/or your upbringing and > intellect is OK?". > Otherwise, show something similar to https://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/ > > Please reset my maintainership for these ports: > > net-im/freetalk > sysutils/fusefs-zip > sysutils/ioping > www/itop > devel/libspice-server > devel/lua-lpeg > net/nakenchat > games/netherearth > www/phpliteadmin > sysutils/retail > deskutils/spice-gtk > databases/tile38 > x11-drivers/xf86-video-qxl > sysutils/zrep > > __ > WBR > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" So sad to see people go because of this, I hope you will return to the project because it is a nice community with a lot of nice people. For now thanks for your time on the ports. I hope you will continue your work on cbsd which is awesome. regards Johan Hendriks ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership, finally the Politically correctness hit the FreeBSD team
Em Qui, 2018-02-22 às 13:55 +0100, Tobias Kortkamp escreveu: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018, at 11:12, Oleg Ginzburg wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I stop participating in FreeBSD project because of such stupid things as > > https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html Dont you realize that PC kills innovation??? HIGH IQ people are NOT PC. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018, at 11:12, Oleg Ginzburg wrote: > Hello, > > I stop participating in FreeBSD project because of such stupid things as > https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html > Until this is removed or changed. For example, the current CoC can be shown > in case of a negative question "Are you 12 and/or your upbringing and > intellect is OK?". > Otherwise, show something similar to https://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/ > > Please reset my maintainership for these ports: > > net-im/freetalk > sysutils/fusefs-zip > sysutils/ioping > www/itop > devel/libspice-server > devel/lua-lpeg > net/nakenchat > games/netherearth > www/phpliteadmin > sysutils/retail > deskutils/spice-gtk > databases/tile38 > x11-drivers/xf86-video-qxl > sysutils/zrep Done. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership
Hello, Feel free to take my ports: audio/cueplayer audio/deadbeef audio/gvolwheel audio/lastfm-desktop audio/minitunes audio/rubygem-librmpd benchmarks/nosqlbench cad/qelectrotech converters/fondu converters/ocaml-base64 converters/ocaml-jsonm databases/p5-DR-Tarantool databases/p5-MR-Tarantool databases/php5-tarantool databases/py-tarantool databases/py-tarantool databases/rubygem-tarantool databases/tarantool databases/tarantool-c deskutils/conkyemail deskutils/conkyforecast deskutils/conkyforecast deskutils/plasma-applet-fancytasks deskutils/plasma-applet-simpleweatherforecast deskutils/znotes devel/avro devel/avro-c devel/avro-cpp devel/busybee devel/cityhash devel/libe devel/libpo6 devel/libxs devel/lockfree-malloc devel/msgpuck devel/ocaml-re devel/ocaml-uutf devel/py-avro devel/py-avro devel/py-palm devel/py-tarantool-queue devel/py-tarantool-queue devel/qross devel/rubygem-bin_utils devel/rubygem-murmurhash3 devel/rubygem-sumbur devel/smack emulators/gem5 graphics/easypaint graphics/impressive graphics/scantailor graphics/zint lang/angelscript misc/qmetro multimedia/clipgrab multimedia/mediadownloader multimedia/qt4-mobility net/openpgm net/rubygem-iproto net/toonel net-im/py-jabberbot net-im/py-xmpppy net-im/qxmpp net-im/qxmpp-qt5 net-im/vacuum-im net-mgmt/glpi-plugins-fusioninventory-server net-mgmt/p5-FusionInventory-Agent net-mgmt/qkismet net-mgmt/sx print/p5-Net-CUPS print/qpdfview russian/stardict-computer russian/stardict-engcom russian/stardict-pc science/massxpert science/qtresistors security/ckpass security/kqoauth security/libkpass security/retranslator sysutils/cpuburn sysutils/dmg2img sysutils/hfsexplorer sysutils/i2c-tools textproc/confetti textproc/ctpp2 textproc/libflate textproc/py-pyctpp2 textproc/py-pyctpp2 www/blastbeat www/mongrel2 www/p5-Catalyst-Model-Tarantool www/py-http-parser www/py-http-parser www/sxweb x11/leechcraft x11/xwinwrap x11-fonts/font-gost x11-fonts/pingwi x11-themes/cursor-chameleon-anthracite x11-themes/cursor-chameleon-darkskyblue x11-themes/cursor-chameleon-pearl x11-themes/cursor-chameleon-skyblue x11-themes/cursor-chameleon-white x11-themes/cursor-ecliz x11-themes/kde4-windeco-crystal x11-themes/kde4-windeco-dekorator - Veniamin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership
Hello, I stop participating in FreeBSD project because of such stupid things as https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html Until this is removed or changed. For example, the current CoC can be shown in case of a negative question "Are you 12 and/or your upbringing and intellect is OK?". Otherwise, show something similar to https://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/ Please reset my maintainership for these ports: net-im/freetalk sysutils/fusefs-zip sysutils/ioping www/itop devel/libspice-server devel/lua-lpeg net/nakenchat games/netherearth www/phpliteadmin sysutils/retail deskutils/spice-gtk databases/tile38 x11-drivers/xf86-video-qxl sysutils/zrep __ WBR ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership for pydio / softether / wmconfig
I'll take the maintainership if nobody wants however I think security/softether and security/softether-devel should be maintained by the same maintainer. Sato-san, would you like to maintain net/softether as well? 2018-02-22 05:50 に Tobias Kortkamp さんは書きました: On Wed, Feb 21, 2018, at 21:23, n...@arrishq.net wrote: Hello, I've stopped using FreeBSD (and now enjoy meltdown and spectre patches in time) and would - of course - like to drop maintainership for: security/softether www/pydio x11-wm/wmconfig Done. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership for pydio / softether / wmconfig
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018, at 21:23, n...@arrishq.net wrote: > Hello, > > I've stopped using FreeBSD (and now enjoy meltdown and spectre patches > in time) and would - of course - like to drop maintainership for: > > security/softether > www/pydio > x11-wm/wmconfig Done. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership for pydio / softether / wmconfig
Hello, I've stopped using FreeBSD (and now enjoy meltdown and spectre patches in time) and would - of course - like to drop maintainership for: security/softether www/pydio x11-wm/wmconfig Additionally I've ports for the Atlassian crowd (Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket, Bamboo, Bamboo Build Agent) and these might easily be adopted for the rest of Atlassian's software, though using this commercial software on FreeBSD might not make much sense because Atlassian won't provide any support, even with a valid unlimited users enterprise license. So these haven't been submitted yet. If someone wishes to maintain one of these ports, please drop me a note - virtual hugs won't be considered as offensive btw. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
dropping maintainership of some ports
Due to a change of jobs I'm planning to drop maintainership of a number of ports I no longer use or have test systems for. If you would like to maintain them, please let me know: databases/nagios-check_postgres_replication net/openmpi net/pypvm net/vncreflector www/trac-addcomment www/trac-discussion www/trac-downloads www/trac-email2trac www/trac-email2trac-postfix www/trac-fivestarvote www/trac-fullblog www/trac-fullblognotification www/trac-graphviz www/trac-iniadmin www/trac-math www/trac-mercurial www/trac-navadd www/trac-pydotorgtheme www/trac-tags www/trac-themeengine www/trac-ticketimport www/trac-vote www/trac-wikitopdf Thanks, Brooks pgpAlLb3i_LzW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Dropping maintainership of science/gramps!
On 11/02/12 09:27, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 1 November 2012 23:27, Da Rock > wrote: >> On 11/01/12 17:19, Anders Troback wrote: >>> >>> I do not use FreeBSD any more (I feel in love with >>> OpenBSD:-)) so please remove me as maintainer of the science/gramps >>> port. >>> >> I can take it over unless someone else is better suited (and actually uses >> the program). How do you go about doing this, though? > > Exactly as you just did. Done - you are now the maintainer! > > that all being said, I've pointed out some issues earlier on this list that are worth taking a look at, imo. -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://owl.apotheon.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Dropping maintainership of science/gramps!
On 1 November 2012 23:27, Da Rock wrote: > On 11/01/12 17:19, Anders Troback wrote: >> >> I do not use FreeBSD any more (I feel in love with >> OpenBSD:-)) so please remove me as maintainer of the science/gramps >> port. >> > I can take it over unless someone else is better suited (and actually uses > the program). How do you go about doing this, though? Exactly as you just did. Done - you are now the maintainer! -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of science/gramps!
On 11/01/12 17:19, Anders Troback wrote: I do not use FreeBSD any more (I feel in love with OpenBSD:-)) so please remove me as maintainer of the science/gramps port. I can take it over unless someone else is better suited (and actually uses the program). How do you go about doing this, though? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of science/gramps!
On 1 November 2012 03:19, Anders Troback wrote: > I do not use FreeBSD any more (I feel in love with > OpenBSD:-)) so please remove me as maintainer of the science/gramps > port. Done. You will be welcome back with open arms should you ever desire. :) -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership of science/gramps!
I do not use FreeBSD any more (I feel in love with OpenBSD:-)) so please remove me as maintainer of the science/gramps port. Br/Anders ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of devel/allegro and devel/allegro-devel
Following the top-posting :( Pierre-Jacques - Naram no longer maintains these ports. Would you like me to assign maintainer-ship to you? Thanks! -jgh On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:19:27AM +0200, Pierre-Jacques MIMIFIR thus spake: Dear Naram, If you're interested. I can make a new update for these two ports, maybe in next 2 weeks, the taget will probably is 4.4.2. Best Regards, Pierre-Jacques MIMIFIR 2012/8/16 Jason Helfman -- Forwarded message -- From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov Date: Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:56 PM Subject: Re: Dropping maintainership of devel/allegro and devel/allegro-devel To: Naram Qashat Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Naram Qashat wrote on 16.08.2012 04:41: I've realized that ever since I took over maintaining these two ports, I haven't kept them maintained. I am wanting to drop these two ports, if anyone else wishes to become their maintainers, I am perfectly fine with it. Thanks, Naram Qashat Done. -- Regards, Ruslan Hi, I just noticed that you put a new port in for a similarly dropped maintainership of the ports in the subject. Would you be interested in maintaining these? Thanks! -jgh -- Jason Helfman | FreeBSD Committer j...@freebsd.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Jason Helfman System Administrator experts-exchange.com http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_4830110.html E4AD 7CF1 1396 27F6 79DD 4342 5E92 AD66 8C8C FBA5 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of devel/allegro and devel/allegro-devel
Dear Naram, If you're interested. I can make a new update for these two ports, maybe in next 2 weeks, the taget will probably is 4.4.2. Best Regards, Pierre-Jacques MIMIFIR 2012/8/16 Jason Helfman > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov > Date: Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:56 PM > Subject: Re: Dropping maintainership of devel/allegro and > devel/allegro-devel > To: Naram Qashat > Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > > > Naram Qashat wrote on 16.08.2012 04:41: > > I've realized that ever since I took over maintaining these two ports, I >> haven't kept them maintained. I am wanting to drop these two ports, if >> anyone else wishes to become their maintainers, I am perfectly fine with >> it. >> >> Thanks, >> Naram Qashat >> > > Done. > > -- > Regards, > Ruslan > > Hi, > > I just noticed that you put a new port in for a similarly dropped > maintainership of the ports > in the subject. > Would you be interested in maintaining these? > > Thanks! > -jgh > > -- > Jason Helfman | FreeBSD Committer > j...@freebsd.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh > > > > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of devel/allegro and devel/allegro-devel
Naram Qashat wrote on 16.08.2012 04:41: I've realized that ever since I took over maintaining these two ports, I haven't kept them maintained. I am wanting to drop these two ports, if anyone else wishes to become their maintainers, I am perfectly fine with it. Thanks, Naram Qashat Done. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership of devel/allegro and devel/allegro-devel
I've realized that ever since I took over maintaining these two ports, I haven't kept them maintained. I am wanting to drop these two ports, if anyone else wishes to become their maintainers, I am perfectly fine with it. Thanks, Naram Qashat ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership for www/php5-redis
On 06.06.2011 16:52, Benedikt Niessen wrote: Hi, I am not using redis anymore and don't have the time to maintain this port in the future. Others have provided the last updates since my initial release. If anybody wants to take over, you are welcome. Hi, I'll be glad to maintain this port. -- Mikhail m.tsatse...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership for www/php5-redis
Hi, I am not using redis anymore and don't have the time to maintain this port in the future. Others have provided the last updates since my initial release. If anybody wants to take over, you are welcome. Thanks and regards, Benedikt ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Fwd: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 10:01:48PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'd like to take maintainership of > > astro/xearth > textproc/urlview done. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Fwd: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 04:13:37PM -0400, Greg Larkin wrote: > >> If no one else wants to maintain them, please reset the maintainer of the > >> following ports to po...@freebsd.org: > >> > > > > I'm interesting in maintaing of this ports: > > > >> multimedia/gpodder > >> sysutils/rdup > > > > Hi Ruslan, > > I just assigned those ports to you. Thank you for volunteering! I'd like to take maintainership of astro/xearth textproc/urlview -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Fwd: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/2/11 3:55 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Hi! > So can pleas anybody assign me as maintainer for this ports? > > Исходное сообщение > Тема: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports > Дата: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:12:54 +0400 > От: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov > Кому: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > > 27.04.2011 05:43, Charlie Kester пишет: >> >> Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these >> deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further >> discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers. >> So I'm stepping down. >> >> If no one else wants to maintain them, please reset the maintainer of the >> following ports to po...@freebsd.org: >> > > I'm interesting in maintaing of this ports: > >> multimedia/gpodder >> sysutils/rdup > Hi Ruslan, I just assigned those ports to you. Thank you for volunteering! Cheers, Greg -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2/EHEACgkQ0sRouByUApAy5QCgqmhRoaaPUyrgdtWmSmg84RPJ UE4An0Y8soBkAfbcq+2x0OdWR/w0k6A6 =4GI1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Fwd: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
03.05.2011 00:13, Greg Larkin пишет: multimedia/gpodder sysutils/rdup Hi Ruslan, I just assigned those ports to you. Thank you for volunteering! Cheers, Greg Thank you, Greg! -- Regards, Ruslan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Fwd: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
Hi! So can pleas anybody assign me as maintainer for this ports? Исходное сообщение Тема: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports Дата: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:12:54 +0400 От: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov Кому: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org 27.04.2011 05:43, Charlie Kester пишет: Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers. So I'm stepping down. If no one else wants to maintain them, please reset the maintainer of the following ports to po...@freebsd.org: I'm interesting in maintaing of this ports: multimedia/gpodder sysutils/rdup -- Regards, Ruslan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:23:23AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Maybe, if maintainer can "somehow easily" become ports committer, > this hurdle might be lower ? This has been discussed before. The barrier to entry is currently set at the "seems to be willing to work on FreeBSD over a period of many months, and a fair number of PRs." The problem with lowering it is that the Ports Collection is complex; new committers need to e.g. understand how a single port commit might affect other ports (e.g. broken INDEX), among many other things. Again, it's not a new idea; it's just that we have decided not to do it. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
Eitan Adler wrote: > > I've been told that we shouldn't be looking for reasons > > to save any unmaintained port, > > What you have been told is "no-one steps up to (a) fix the > problem, (b) take maintainership and (c) _continue_ with > maintainership ... > > If you are stepping up to do the work that is great and we thank > you for that! We we don't want is people who only volunteer for > part (a) and don't continue with (b) and (c). > > > and I was specifically told this in response to my > > efforts to identify ports that have a lot of users. > > Merely finding "popular" ports does not help. We need people > who have the time and energy to maintain the ports. My reading was that Charlie _was_ "stepping up to do the work" -- all 3 parts of it. Since there weren't any unmaintained ports that he personally uses, he was volunteering to take on some that he does _not_ personally use, as a service to the community. In order to achieve The Greatest Good For The Greatest Number (TM), he wanted a way to identify "popular" unmaintained ports. His proposed method of finding out _where his efforts would do the most good for the community_ was met not with constructive suggestions, nor even mere indifference, but with outright hostility. Can you blame him for getting fed up, especially since this is apparently not the first time he has encountered that sort of attitude from those who should know better? > I do not want to say that "we are a volunteer project" and as such > are forgiven however such a model does change how we must do > things ... FreeBSD is indeed a volunteer project. Driving away would-be volunteers like Charlie -- and others who will now hesitate to take on port maintainership after reading how he has been treated -- is not in the Project's best interest. I think several contributors to this thread owe both Charlie and the community an apology. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On 27 April 2011 13:54, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Eitan Adler wrote: >> Things like the gmake upgrade and new ports >> features take a lot of time. Furthermore adding a port seems to be a >> "trivial" task, however the committers have to (a) fix it up if it is >> formatted badly (b) test it in a tinderbox and only then (c) commit >> it. > > I use three boxes (for 8.1 i386, amd64 and 9-current amd64) to > test. I do not use a tinderbox, as I assume considerable complexity > to set one up. Nah, have a look at [1]. Easy as pie. > Does using a tinderbox make a large difference ? Yes! It finds hiccups in pkg-plist (very difficult to notice manually), it tests in different versions -- just add them to the queue. If you'd really like to try it out, I'll give you an account on my machine. Let me know. Chris [1] http://tinderbox.marcuscom.com/README/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
Eitan Adler wrote: > There is a lot of work that has to be done in the background even if > no new ports are added. Things like the gmake upgrade and new ports > features take a lot of time. Furthermore adding a port seems to be a > "trivial" task, however the committers have to (a) fix it up if it is > formatted badly (b) test it in a tinderbox and only then (c) commit > it. This takes more time than just "cvs commit". A lot of work has > been done in recent years to make this process faster and I'm sure > more could be done - but a lot of people don't realize how much work > goes on behind the scenes I think it is important to clean up ports because otherwise there is a big burden on the FreeBSD organization, and also on each individual user, when they upgrade their machine. I think on the other hand that some ports are especially important, and don't always receive the care they need, for reasons that i don't know. I have taken some time to look at some ports in the "lang" category that are unmaintained or are severely old. I have noted that eiffel 13a is deprecated and has an expiration date. Indeed i have found old copies of this software, and it seems that the people doing it have disappeared someway. However at least one is now listed as contributor to gobo-eiffel http://sourceforge.net/projects/gobo-eiffel/ which is not a freebsd port. There is the "official" eiffelstudio port, which has a valid download link but no maintainer, and smarteiffel which is maintained. I am more interested by the cmucl lisp compiler. In the ports we can find cmucl 19f which is maintained by Martin Cracauer, but is already quite old, and there is no maintainer for cmucl-extras. In fact the cmucl project does the work of providing precompiled stuff for various architectures (the lisp compiler is written in lisp so can only be compiled by a recent enough precompiled compiler, anyways) and in particular one finds freebsd binaries here: http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/snapshots/2011/04/ These binaries are compiled on freebsd_8.1, and there are two versions the unicode version and the non-unicode version, plus the cmucl-extra (localized messages, an adapted editor, called hemlock plus some goodies). So my point is, how is it that cmucl freebsd version finds care and love in the cmucl community, but that this does not extend to an adequate place in the freebsd ports? The other big lisp from the same ancestry, sbcl is better maintained, since the last version is 1.0.47, while freebsd is at 1.0.43, that is 6 months old. These lisps are *very* important for their use in the CAS software maxima, which is actively developed and used by a lot of people (in ancient times the traditional compiler for maxima was gcl but it seems it doesn't work well nowadays, and clisp is far too slow). But they are also important for many other uses, and at this point i see an important omission in the ports system. The "standard" way nowadys to install lisp packages is to use quicklisp http://www.quicklisp.org/beta/ and after that hundreds of applications can be installed automatically in the same way as cpan does for perl modules. Instead there are a select few lisp applications in the ports, which have a clisp and a sbcl slave port. This is strange. -- Michel TALON ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:35:58AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:49:58 +0200 > Erik Trulsson articulated: > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:15:43AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > > > On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 23:27:40 PDT John Marino wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > Every response from the committers ignored what I said I was trying > > > to do, and instead repeated the same old arguments about stale, > > > unfetchable, broken or superceded ports. That "talking points" No, no and no. If you have a copy of the upstream package the port was based upon and it is open source, you can 'fork' it. Create a project on sourceforge, or Berlioz, or somewhere, put the package there, announce it get some people together to maintain it. That has the advantage of having FreeBSD minded people maintaing it upstream. That's all. Easy Peasy. That's for unfetchable ports or even superceded ports. If you prefer an older program than a supposed newer suggested replacement, you can fork the older program. That's how it works. > > (Actually the policy is that unmaintained and non-working ports should > > be let to die, unless somebody steps up to fix the port and take > > maintainership.) Exactly. > > > > Nobody is stopping you from assuming maintainership of one or more of > > those unmaintained ports, and thus preventing them from being removed. > > I concur with Erik. I think you are totally missing the point of the > original post. The desired wish was to remove dead ports that could not > be fetched, or would not build. Possibly, even superseded ports; Right. - Diane -- - d...@freebsd.org d...@db.net http://www.db.net/~db Why leave money to our children if we don't leave them the Earth? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
> So, if the maintainers of the small leaf ports would be able > to commit their work themselves, it would free the ports committers > with the large ports projects on their hands to work on those ? > > Would this work ? If you look through this list's archives I actually proposed this idea myself once ;-) The problem is that (a) often maintainers don't do the work 100% well. I am not knocking everyone - but just because you _say_ you will do the work doesn't mean you _will_ do it. Furthermore becoming a committer implies a certain level of trust beyond just "you can submit patches" as you get shell access to the FreeBSD machines and other such things. > > I use three boxes (for 8.1 i386, amd64 and 9-current amd64) to > test. I do not use a tinderbox, as I assume considerable complexity > to set one up. You may want to mention that you use said three machines in the PR - it would be of service. Different committers have differing policies for what they will commit. Some will accept that, others will want tinderbox logs, and others will always test every patch themselves. > > Does using a tinderbox make a large difference ? Using a tinderbox ensures that a "clean" build works (ie that there are no missing dependencies). > I agree, the infrastructure is massive! 23,000 ports held together with Makefiles - I'm still surprised it works ;) -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
Eitan Adler wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Then you have misunderstood things. I don't think anybody would be > > unhappy if you (or anybody else) took maintainership of one or more of > > the currently unmaintained ports. > > > There are two things. Becoming a maintainer seems to be really easy. > > Becoming a maintainer requires that you commit to do the work to > ensure that a certain program works on FreeBSD. How easy this is > depends on you. Yes, that's how I handle it. > > Having one's PRs committed is a bit more difficult and sometimes > > takes 4-6 weeks (I had a case recently with 155399 and 155400). > > There is a lot of work that has to be done in the background even if > no new ports are added. I'm aware of this. What I see is that only a few ports committer do most of the commits of the small leaf ports. This would burn me out as well, if I had to do it 8-} So, if the maintainers of the small leaf ports would be able to commit their work themselves, it would free the ports committers with the large ports projects on their hands to work on those ? Would this work ? > Things like the gmake upgrade and new ports > features take a lot of time. Furthermore adding a port seems to be a > "trivial" task, however the committers have to (a) fix it up if it is > formatted badly (b) test it in a tinderbox and only then (c) commit > it. I use three boxes (for 8.1 i386, amd64 and 9-current amd64) to test. I do not use a tinderbox, as I assume considerable complexity to set one up. Does using a tinderbox make a large difference ? > This takes more time than just "cvs commit". A lot of work has > been done in recent years to make this process faster and I'm sure > more could be done - but a lot of people don't realize how much work > goes on behind the scenes I agree, the infrastructure is massive! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
If after this thread you still want to drop maintership I'd like the following: >>> deskutils/teapot >>> math/ised >>> security/ccrypt >>> sysutils/moreutils >>> sysutils/moreutils-parallel >> I've been told that we shouldn't be looking for reasons to save any > unmaintained port, What you have been told is "no-one steps up to (a) fix the problem, (b) take maintainership and (c) _continue_ with maintainership. Well, in that case, the port does not _deserve_ to live. After all, no-one cares about it. If they did, they'd take care of (a) thru (c) above." If you are stepping up to do the work that is great and we thank you for that! We we don't want is people who only volunteer for part (a) and don't continue with (b) and (c). This is because the work for fixing these ports falls on the rest of the community, and mainly the committers if it were to break again or when making "sweeping" changes to the tree. A large amount of the work that goes into things like a gmake or autotools upgrade is fixing individual ports that broke. If people step up to continue to maintain the now deprecated ports I see nothing wrong with helping them to do so. If that someone is you - even better! > and I was specifically told this in response to my > efforts to identify ports that have a lot of users. Merely finding "popular" ports does not help. We need people who have the time and energy to maintain the ports. I do not want to say that "we are a volunteer project" and as such are forgiven however such a model does change how we must do things. We can not "assign" ports to people, even committers, unless they agree to do the work. Furthermore we can use maintainership to judge popularity if indirectly and imperfectly. If no one steps up to do the work of all the port's users it is not that popular. If you are the one stepping up to do the work I would urge you continue! However merely pointing at the port and saying "this needs to be fixed" won't help as someone still has to fix it. > So I don't think current policy supports the conclusion that "we need to find > someone to take them soon." The policy is one of passiveness and this seems to be the main difference between the others and the you. Correct me if I am wrong but you believe that we should be trying as hard as we can to find somehow or someone to save these ports. Others believe that if someone wants to they can step up and do the work to save these ports. On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Then you have misunderstood things. I don't think anybody would be > unhappy if you (or anybody else) took maintainership of one or more of > the currently unmaintained ports. > There are two things. Becoming a maintainer seems to be really easy. Becoming a maintainer requires that you commit to do the work to ensure that a certain program works on FreeBSD. How easy this is depends on you. > Having one's PRs committed is a bit more difficult and sometimes > takes 4-6 weeks (I had a case recently with 155399 and 155400). There is a lot of work that has to be done in the background even if no new ports are added. Things like the gmake upgrade and new ports features take a lot of time. Furthermore adding a port seems to be a "trivial" task, however the committers have to (a) fix it up if it is formatted badly (b) test it in a tinderbox and only then (c) commit it. This takes more time than just "cvs commit". A lot of work has been done in recent years to make this process faster and I'm sure more could be done - but a lot of people don't realize how much work goes on behind the scenes -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:49:58 +0200 Erik Trulsson articulated: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:15:43AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > > On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 23:27:40 PDT John Marino wrote: > > > > > >You're just sulking because your idea of identifying popular ports > > >wasn't met with enthusiasm. > > > > > > > No, it's more than that. I got the distinct impression that many > > of the committers would be unhappy if I took maintainership of some > > of the ports I might identify as "popular", because it would > > interfere with their plans to trim the portstree. > > > Then you have misunderstood things. I don't think anybody would be > unhappy if you (or anybody else) took maintainership of one or more of > the currently unmaintained ports. > What plans there are, are not so much about trimming the portstree in > general but trimming the number of unmaintained ports. > > What is met with uninterest is your plans to identify "popular" ports. > > > > Re-read the thread. At every point I'm talking about looking for > > ports I (and others) might want to maintain, as a service to their > > users. Now ask yourself why I've been getting so much resistance > > to that, when we keep hearing how deprecated ports can be easily > > resurrected if someone steps up to maintain them? > > Actually you spend much time speaking about/looking for "popular" > ports and that is what is met with uninterest. > If you want to take maintainership of a port because you personally > use that port and want to have it working, that is great. > If you want to take maintainership of a port because you believe that > it is a "popular" port, then go ahead, just don't expect much help > with identifying such ports. > > > > > Every response from the committers ignored what I said I was trying > > to do, and instead repeated the same old arguments about stale, > > unfetchable, broken or superceded ports. That "talking points" > > response tells me that they didn't want me doing what I was doing > > to buck an already-established policy of letting unmaintained ports > > die unless and until someone complains. > > (Actually the policy is that unmaintained and non-working ports should > be let to die, unless somebody steps up to fix the port and take > maintainership.) > > Nobody is stopping you from assuming maintainership of one or more of > those unmaintained ports, and thus preventing them from being removed. I concur with Erik. I think you are totally missing the point of the original post. The desired wish was to remove dead ports that could not be fetched, or would not build. Possibly, even superseded ports; although that was not specifically mentioned I don't believe. In to many of those cases those ports have no formal maintainer. Unfortunately, some do. In any case, it was proposed that those said ports be removed. Ports that are current would not be affected. As you stated, your ports are current and in working order. This proposal would therefore not effect you unless I am also misreading the intent of the proposal. -- Jerry ✌ jerry+po...@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __ The more we disagree, the more chance there is that at least one of us is right. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
Hi! > > No, it's more than that. I got the distinct impression that many of the > > committers would be unhappy if I took maintainership of some of the > > ports I might identify as "popular", because it would interfere with > > their plans to trim the portstree. > Then you have misunderstood things. I don't think anybody would be > unhappy if you (or anybody else) took maintainership of one or more of > the currently unmaintained ports. There are two things. Becoming a maintainer seems to be really easy. Having one's PRs committed is a bit more difficult and sometimes takes 4-6 weeks (I had a case recently with 155399 and 155400). Maybe, if maintainer can "somehow easily" become ports committer, this hurdle might be lower ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 9 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:15:43AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 23:27:40 PDT John Marino wrote: > > > >You're just sulking because your idea of identifying popular ports > >wasn't met with enthusiasm. > > > > No, it's more than that. I got the distinct impression that many of the > committers would be unhappy if I took maintainership of some of the > ports I might identify as "popular", because it would interfere with > their plans to trim the portstree. Then you have misunderstood things. I don't think anybody would be unhappy if you (or anybody else) took maintainership of one or more of the currently unmaintained ports. What plans there are, are not so much about trimming the portstree in general but trimming the number of unmaintained ports. What is met with uninterest is your plans to identify "popular" ports. > Re-read the thread. At every point I'm talking about looking for ports > I (and others) might want to maintain, as a service to their users. Now > ask yourself why I've been getting so much resistance to that, when we > keep hearing how deprecated ports can be easily resurrected if someone > steps up to maintain them? Actually you spend much time speaking about/looking for "popular" ports and that is what is met with uninterest. If you want to take maintainership of a port because you personally use that port and want to have it working, that is great. If you want to take maintainership of a port because you believe that it is a "popular" port, then go ahead, just don't expect much help with identifying such ports. > > Every response from the committers ignored what I said I was trying to > do, and instead repeated the same old arguments about stale, > unfetchable, broken or superceded ports. That "talking points" response > tells me that they didn't want me doing what I was doing to buck an > already-established policy of letting unmaintained ports die unless and > until someone complains. (Actually the policy is that unmaintained and non-working ports should be let to die, unless somebody steps up to fix the port and take maintainership.) Nobody is stopping you from assuming maintainership of one or more of those unmaintained ports, and thus preventing them from being removed. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 23:27:40 PDT John Marino wrote: You're just sulking because your idea of identifying popular ports wasn't met with enthusiasm. No, it's more than that. I got the distinct impression that many of the committers would be unhappy if I took maintainership of some of the ports I might identify as "popular", because it would interfere with their plans to trim the portstree. Re-read the thread. At every point I'm talking about looking for ports I (and others) might want to maintain, as a service to their users. Now ask yourself why I've been getting so much resistance to that, when we keep hearing how deprecated ports can be easily resurrected if someone steps up to maintain them? Every response from the committers ignored what I said I was trying to do, and instead repeated the same old arguments about stale, unfetchable, broken or superceded ports. That "talking points" response tells me that they didn't want me doing what I was doing to buck an already-established policy of letting unmaintained ports die unless and until someone complains. Today wasn't the first time I've had this discussion with them. But it was the last straw as far as I'm concerned. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On 4/27/2011 8:09 AM, Charlie Kester wrote: I've been told that we shouldn't be looking for reasons to save any unmaintained port, and I was specifically told this in response to my efforts to identify ports that have a lot of users. So I don't think current policy supports the conclusion that "we need to find someone to take them soon." There, in a nutshell, you have the philosophical disagreement which led to my decision to be done with ports. I skimmed the entire conversation this morning. The summary is you have an opinion that apparently nobody else shares. I maintain 7 ports. The majority of these ports had already been deleted years ago, or should have already been deprecated. So after years, somebody (me) showed up with enough motivation to resurrect the ports. That's all people are saying: If the port is important enough, somebody will step up to save it or resurrect it. If that doesn't happen, then it doesn't deserve to be in the tree once it doesn't build anymore. If the powers-that-be want to deprecate all of these and lighten the load on the system and themselves, I no longer care. I know how to download a tarball and run through the configure/make/install routine, so I'll still be able to run the software I need. I thought I'd lend a hand to those who don't have those skills, but it doesn't seem that this contribution is welcomed or appreciated. "There are too many ports!" (Sorry if I'm ranting, I am still very angry about all this.) Obviously the maintenance of ports is appreciated and welcomed. You're just sulking because your idea of identifying popular ports wasn't met with enthusiasm. If the port really is popular, somebody will take it over, I'm sure. I don't know you, or your history of contributions, etc, so all I can judge is what I read today. I don't think this reaction shows a lot of character. Anyway, I'm sure your wish of returning all the ports to nobody will be granted and life will go on. As a FreeBSD user, thanks for effort that you did in the past. Regards, John ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
sorry for the top post, but shouolder is killing me. idea 1: can the 'summer of code' guys help us out with this. idea 2. why oh why can we not live with the fbsd and debian paradigm? the reason i've kept my domain here at home is because i like the flexibility i see. but keeping ports current is getting to be impossible. there are too many distros of every open src os and maybe if net and free [RE]-hjoined arms that 3rd idea would work. i'm sure that many of you guys kno w that aristotle was a polymath; he was as sharp as anybody i have ever studied. his highest 'virtue' was pragmatism.given the headaches with maintaining ports, and much more, isn' t it time to look in new directions? idea 4. axe the number of ports. if person x or y want to maintain a port of his ow n , outstanding. he can post a note to the lists. idea 5. beging a completely separate, independent group for orphaned ports [ for free, net, debian, ubuntu, redhat, foobar opsys. a last note: i started out as a porter. loved i t and excelled at it. but it never was easy. it's still 3/2 * bear|bitch|swine. ergo, i know why many of this list and org are slowing or dropping out. Enuf, -g . On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:43:43PM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:43:43 -0700 > From: Charlie Kester > Subject: Dropping maintainership of my ports > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > X-Mailer: Mutt 1.4.2.3i > > > Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these > deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further > discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers. > So I'm stepping down. > > If no one else wants to maintain them, please reset the maintainer > of the following ports to po...@freebsd.org: > > audio/mcplay > deskutils/osmo > deskutils/teapot > devel/argtable > devel/egypt > devel/gengetopt > devel/libXGP > devel/libYGP > finance/xinvest > finance/xquote > graphics/box > graphics/boxer > graphics/fly > graphics/sng > math/ised > misc/vifm > misc/xsw > multimedia/gpodder > multimedia/openshot > multimedia/photofilmstrip > security/beecrypt > security/ccrypt > security/nettle > security/ranpwd > sysutils/dircomp > sysutils/gaffitter > sysutils/iextract > sysutils/lookat > sysutils/moreutils > sysutils/moreutils-parallel > sysutils/ncdu > sysutils/rdup > textproc/tdhkit > x11/fbpanel > > > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.98a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 22:15:58 PDT Zhihao Yuan wrote: On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Charlie Kester wrote: Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers. So I'm stepping down. If no one else wants to maintain them, please reset the maintainer of the following ports to po...@freebsd.org: audio/mcplay deskutils/osmo deskutils/teapot devel/argtable devel/egypt devel/gengetopt devel/libXGP devel/libYGP finance/xinvest finance/xquote graphics/box graphics/boxer graphics/fly graphics/sng math/ised misc/vifm misc/xsw multimedia/gpodder multimedia/openshot multimedia/photofilmstrip security/beecrypt security/ccrypt security/nettle security/ranpwd sysutils/dircomp sysutils/gaffitter sysutils/iextract sysutils/lookat sysutils/moreutils sysutils/moreutils-parallel sysutils/ncdu sysutils/rdup textproc/tdhkit x11/fbpanel O-o-ok... philosophical differences. audio/mcplay and the 3 multimedia-related ports, + fbpanel, have many users, AFAIK, and require much works. We need to someone to take them soon. I don't know what you mean by "requires much works". The only ones of these ports that are not up-to-date are xquote and nettle. There is already an open PR to update nettle. All it needs is some attention from a committer. Frankly, xquote should be deprecated, as it's an old-style Motif app that's so ugly I'll bet no one uses it. I only took it (and the related xinvest) because they got reinstated after I pointed out they were still fetchable at a new location. Everything else is in good shape. I've been told that we shouldn't be looking for reasons to save any unmaintained port, and I was specifically told this in response to my efforts to identify ports that have a lot of users. So I don't think current policy supports the conclusion that "we need to find someone to take them soon." There, in a nutshell, you have the philosophical disagreement which led to my decision to be done with ports. If the powers-that-be want to deprecate all of these and lighten the load on the system and themselves, I no longer care. I know how to download a tarball and run through the configure/make/install routine, so I'll still be able to run the software I need. I thought I'd lend a hand to those who don't have those skills, but it doesn't seem that this contribution is welcomed or appreciated. "There are too many ports!" (Sorry if I'm ranting, I am still very angry about all this.) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Charlie Kester wrote: > > Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these > deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further > discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers. > So I'm stepping down. > > If no one else wants to maintain them, please reset the maintainer of the > following ports to po...@freebsd.org: > > audio/mcplay > deskutils/osmo > deskutils/teapot > devel/argtable > devel/egypt > devel/gengetopt > devel/libXGP > devel/libYGP > finance/xinvest > finance/xquote > graphics/box > graphics/boxer > graphics/fly > graphics/sng > math/ised > misc/vifm > misc/xsw > multimedia/gpodder > multimedia/openshot > multimedia/photofilmstrip > security/beecrypt > security/ccrypt > security/nettle > security/ranpwd > sysutils/dircomp > sysutils/gaffitter > sysutils/iextract > sysutils/lookat > sysutils/moreutils > sysutils/moreutils-parallel > sysutils/ncdu > sysutils/rdup > textproc/tdhkit > x11/fbpanel O-o-ok... philosophical differences. audio/mcplay and the 3 multimedia-related ports, + fbpanel, have many users, AFAIK, and require much works. We need to someone to take them soon. > > > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > -- Zhihao Yuan The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
27.04.2011 05:43, Charlie Kester пишет: Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers. So I'm stepping down. If no one else wants to maintain them, please reset the maintainer of the following ports to po...@freebsd.org: I'm interesting in maintaing of this ports: multimedia/gpodder sysutils/rdup -- Regards, Ruslan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership of my ports
Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers. So I'm stepping down. If no one else wants to maintain them, please reset the maintainer of the following ports to po...@freebsd.org: audio/mcplay deskutils/osmo deskutils/teapot devel/argtable devel/egypt devel/gengetopt devel/libXGP devel/libYGP finance/xinvest finance/xquote graphics/box graphics/boxer graphics/fly graphics/sng math/ised misc/vifm misc/xsw multimedia/gpodder multimedia/openshot multimedia/photofilmstrip security/beecrypt security/ccrypt security/nettle security/ranpwd sysutils/dircomp sysutils/gaffitter sysutils/iextract sysutils/lookat sysutils/moreutils sysutils/moreutils-parallel sysutils/ncdu sysutils/rdup textproc/tdhkit x11/fbpanel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On 9/28/10 2:34 AM, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > On Sep 27, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Charlie Kester wrote: > >> On Mon 27 Sep 2010 at 12:32:56 PDT Tobias Roth wrote: >>> x11/fbpanel : Desktop panel with taskbar, pager, launchbar and more >> >> I use this and can take maintainership. > > You have been set as the maintainer. Thanks Ruslan, Charlie and Steven! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Sep 27, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Charlie Kester wrote: > On Mon 27 Sep 2010 at 12:32:56 PDT Tobias Roth wrote: >> x11/fbpanel : Desktop panel with taskbar, pager, launchbar and more > > I use this and can take maintainership. You have been set as the maintainer. Thanks! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Mon 27 Sep 2010 at 12:32:56 PDT Tobias Roth wrote: x11/fbpanel : Desktop panel with taskbar, pager, launchbar and more I use this and can take maintainership. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
On Sep 27, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > 27.09.2010 23:32, Tobias Roth пишет: >> Hi >> >> I haven't been using FreeBSD as a desktop for a while now, and am thus >> dropping maintainerships of my ports. If anyone wants to step up and >> take over maintainership, please send me an email. For everything left >> over, I will send PRs to reset the maintainer to ports@ in about two weeks. >> >> The ports are >> >> audio/py-eyed3 : Python module for processing ID3 tags > > I want this one Updated MAINTAINER to cvs-...@yandex.ru Thanks!___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
27.09.2010 23:32, Tobias Roth пишет: Hi I haven't been using FreeBSD as a desktop for a while now, and am thus dropping maintainerships of my ports. If anyone wants to step up and take over maintainership, please send me an email. For everything left over, I will send PRs to reset the maintainer to ports@ in about two weeks. The ports are audio/py-eyed3 : Python module for processing ID3 tags I want this one devel/py-testoob : An advanced unit testing framework for PyUnit x11/fbpanel : Desktop panel with taskbar, pager, launchbar and more deskutils/gkrellm-gtodo : GKrellM2 plugin to tracks tasks and to-dos deskutils/gkrellm-reminder2 : GKrellM2 plugin that reminds you of events deskutils/gkrellm-timers : GKrellM2 plugin for the setting of countdowns misc/gkx86info2 : GKrellM2 plugin that prints the current clock speed net-p2p/gkrellm-gift : GKrellM2 plugin that monitors giFT transfers net/gkrellmmultiping2 : GKrellM2 multiping plugin sysutils/gkrellm-trayicons : GKrellM2 plugin to display definable icons as notifiers or launchers deskutils/treeline : maintainership already taken by Pawel Pekala, thanks! Thanks in advance, Tobias ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Regards, Ruslan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership of my ports
Hi I haven't been using FreeBSD as a desktop for a while now, and am thus dropping maintainerships of my ports. If anyone wants to step up and take over maintainership, please send me an email. For everything left over, I will send PRs to reset the maintainer to ports@ in about two weeks. The ports are audio/py-eyed3 : Python module for processing ID3 tags devel/py-testoob : An advanced unit testing framework for PyUnit x11/fbpanel : Desktop panel with taskbar, pager, launchbar and more deskutils/gkrellm-gtodo : GKrellM2 plugin to tracks tasks and to-dos deskutils/gkrellm-reminder2 : GKrellM2 plugin that reminds you of events deskutils/gkrellm-timers : GKrellM2 plugin for the setting of countdowns misc/gkx86info2 : GKrellM2 plugin that prints the current clock speed net-p2p/gkrellm-gift : GKrellM2 plugin that monitors giFT transfers net/gkrellmmultiping2 : GKrellM2 multiping plugin sysutils/gkrellm-trayicons : GKrellM2 plugin to display definable icons as notifiers or launchers deskutils/treeline : maintainership already taken by Pawel Pekala, thanks! Thanks in advance, Tobias ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership of two of my ports
I've decided to drop maintainership of two of my ports, since I haven't been able to give them the attention they are due: graphics/bmeps devel/dklibs bmeps and dklibs are by the same author, and bmeps depends on dklibs. So if someone take one of these, he should probably also take the other. Brief synopsis of the work that needs doing: Both ports have been out-of-date for a few months now. The previous version of both bmeps and dklibs introduced some Java utilities to the package, but I excluded these from the ports for the time being because I wasn't sure how to get them installed and running correctly. Perhaps someone more familiar with Java and with porting Java apps will take a look at this. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
dropping maintainership
Hello, unfortunately, I don't use FreeBSD anymore and I can no longer maintain the port security/amavis-stats. So I want to drop the maintainership, thanks. --- Mantas ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:12:17PM +0900, Ayumi Mitsui wrote: Hi Ayumi, > If not already reassigned, I can assume maintainership for those: > > > security/umit > > www/havp > Thanks for the offer, I've reassigned those two ports to you. Thanks, -erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Prediction is very difficult especially about the futureer...@freebsd.org pgpl6p0JHCF75.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Dropping maintainership
If not already reassigned, I can assume maintainership for those: > security/umit > www/havp -- Ayumi Mitsuihttp://ayu.commun.jp/ PGP: EE97 796C 77F6 CFC9 1FBC C56A 318B F019 E605 D988 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 01:56:33PM +0600, Elisey O. Savateev wrote: Hi Elisey, > Unfortunately, I no longer have time to maintain ports: > > www/rejik > graphics/gimp-greycstoration > security/umit > www/havp > > I would be glad if someone is willing to support themselves. > Thanks for your contributions so far, and I hope to see you back someday. I've reset maintainership of your ports. Best, -erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Prediction is very difficult especially about the futureer...@freebsd.org pgp030Bn4tsyd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Dropping maintainership
Unfortunately, I no longer have time to maintain ports: www/rejik graphics/gimp-greycstoration security/umit www/havp I would be glad if someone is willing to support themselves. --- Best regards, Elisey Savateev. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership for multimedia/handbrake
On Thursday 03 September 2009 17:24:46 Mel Flynn wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 26 August 2009 19:41:03 Jonathan wrote: > > I was hoping to fix the handbrake port and get it working properly over > > the summer but it didn't happen and now I'm in school full time. I > > don't have time to work on the port anymore and I don't want people to > > not try and update it because someone else is already maintaining it. > > > > If someone wants to take over this port let the list know and a ports > > committer will likely go ahead and assign it to you. > > Is this one of the problems you refer to? > kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Media region code is mismatched to logical > unit region > Followed by: > kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Retries Exhausted > kernel: ata1: FAILURE - non aligned DMA transfer attempted > kernel: unknown: setting up DMA failed K, this is something with FreeBSD and ata/dma, mplayer does the same. Until I find a DVD player that works, can't evaluate this port :/. Doesn't help to be with a US DVD player in Europe. -- Mel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership for multimedia/handbrake
Hi, On Wednesday 26 August 2009 19:41:03 Jonathan wrote: > I was hoping to fix the handbrake port and get it working properly over > the summer but it didn't happen and now I'm in school full time. I > don't have time to work on the port anymore and I don't want people to > not try and update it because someone else is already maintaining it. > > If someone wants to take over this port let the list know and a ports > committer will likely go ahead and assign it to you. Is this one of the problems you refer to? kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Media region code is mismatched to logical unit region Followed by: kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Retries Exhausted kernel: ata1: FAILURE - non aligned DMA transfer attempted kernel: unknown: setting up DMA failed handbrake becomes unkillable, machine can only be rebooted by power cycle. I'm interested in this port cause I'm looking for a solid alternative for the fragile multimedia/transcode. If this is one of the problems you're seeing and not something local to my test machine, I'll see what I can do and follow up through PR's. -- Mel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership for multimedia/handbrake
I was hoping to fix the handbrake port and get it working properly over the summer but it didn't happen and now I'm in school full time. I don't have time to work on the port anymore and I don't want people to not try and update it because someone else is already maintaining it. If someone wants to take over this port let the list know and a ports committer will likely go ahead and assign it to you. Jonathan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership for sysutils/zfs-snapshot-mgmt
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:36:45AM +0200, Marius Nünnerich wrote: > 2009/7/28 Marcin Simonides : > > Hello, > > > > I am the maintainer and author of zfs-snaphot-mgmt port - a crude (and a bit > > buggy) script for automatic snapshot creation and removal on ZFS. > > Since I am no longer using FreeBSD I cannot keep neither the port nor the > > script itself up-to-date. > > > > If someone, preferably one of the users, would like to take over the script > > and/or the port please contact me off the list. > > -- > > Marcin Simonides > > I'll take it. Thanks for your good work so far! I'm using it hourly ;) Thanks for the work you put in the port, Marcin. I just passed its maintainership to Marius. Lars pgpu5t0P2WFJU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Dropping maintainership of multimedia/gnome-subtitles
Done, thanks. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership for sysutils/zfs-snapshot-mgmt
2009/7/28 Marcin Simonides : > Hello, > > I am the maintainer and author of zfs-snaphot-mgmt port - a crude (and a bit > buggy) script for automatic snapshot creation and removal on ZFS. > Since I am no longer using FreeBSD I cannot keep neither the port nor the > script itself up-to-date. > > If someone, preferably one of the users, would like to take over the script > and/or the port please contact me off the list. > -- > Marcin Simonides I'll take it. Thanks for your good work so far! I'm using it hourly ;) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership of multimedia/gnome-subtitles
Hello, I am the maintainer for gnome-subtitles port - a nice subtitle editor written in Mono.NET. Since I am no longer using FreeBSD I cannot keep the port up-to-date (and the application has been updated recently). If someone would like to take over the maintainership, please do so. If you have any questions regarding the port, please contact me off-list, as I am not subscribed here. -- Marcin Simonides ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership for sysutils/zfs-snapshot-mgmt
Hello, I am the maintainer and author of zfs-snaphot-mgmt port - a crude (and a bit buggy) script for automatic snapshot creation and removal on ZFS. Since I am no longer using FreeBSD I cannot keep neither the port nor the script itself up-to-date. If someone, preferably one of the users, would like to take over the script and/or the port please contact me off the list. -- Marcin Simonides ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: dropping maintainership
* Chess Griffin (ch...@chessgriffin.com) wrote: > audio/streamripper > graphics/mypaint > irc/bip > multimedia/gpodder > > If anyone is interested in picking them up, please feel free to do so. I've taken mypaint. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: dropping maintainership
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 16, 2009 09:48:52 am Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Jun 16, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Chess Griffin > > wrote: > > audio/streamripper > > irc/bip > > I can take these two if not already claimed. > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" Sahil I see streamripper needs and update, claim that one via PR with update, and ping me, I will try claim it and transfer bip at the same time. Thomas - -- Thomas Abthorpe | FreeBSD Committer tabtho...@freebsd.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~tabthorpe -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAko3p7UACgkQ5Gm/jNBp8qCQEwCeOCWU9nCJY52ZlM800LyPq1Ed 1hUAnjuIjqZwm2UmvDrCXFuosYXxqubb =y8An -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: dropping maintainership
On Jun 16, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Chess Griffin wrote: audio/streamripper irc/bip I can take these two if not already claimed. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
dropping maintainership
Hello, Unfortunately, job and family demands are resulting in a lack of time to properly maintain the following ports, and thus I will need to drop their maintainership: audio/streamripper graphics/mypaint irc/bip multimedia/gpodder If anyone is interested in picking them up, please feel free to do so. Thanks. -- Chess Griffin pgpTdHkNoPykV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Dropping maintainership
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jona Joachim wrote: It's been a very nice time but unfortunately I'm not using FreeBSD anymore, so I have to give up maintainership for the following ports: Well i guess we should thank you for the good work! And thank you for not dropping the ports on the floor, but instead telling the community that you are leaving. /Chris -- http://www.arnold.se/chris/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership
m...@sysfault.org writes: > Jona Joachim : > > [...] >> games/gish-demo > > @Some committer: > Feel free to set me (m...@sysfault.org) as new maintainer (that saves us > all a PR ;-). Done. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Dropping maintainership
Jona Joachim : [...] games/gish-demo @Some committer: Feel free to set me (m...@sysfault.org) as new maintainer (that saves us all a PR ;-). Regards Marcus ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dropping maintainership
Hi! It's been a very nice time but unfortunately I'm not using FreeBSD anymore, so I have to give up maintainership for the following ports: audio/linux-freealut audio/soundconverter devel/aros-sdk devel/ruby-game devel/sdl_sge devel/tigcc games/gish-demo x11-toolkits/wxd Keep up the good work! Best regards, Jona ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"