Re: [jos...@joshualokken.com: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0]
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:50:01AM -0700, Joshua Lokken wrote: > From: Joshua Lokken > To: freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org > Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:36:56 -0700 > Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 > > On Mar/31 09:03PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), > > > > Here is what happened since pkg 1.4.0: > >8 -- [snip] -- *< > > Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > > We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with > > the > > bug reports :) > > Bapt > > > > jrlokken@satellite:~ % uname -a > FreeBSD satellite.workgroup.local 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE > #1 r280923: Tue Mar 31 15:32:16 PDT 2015 > root@satellite.workgroup.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SATELLITE amd64 > > jrlokken@satellite:~ % pkg version -x kde > kcm-polkit-kde-0.0.20121008_3 = > kde-4.14.2 < > kde-base-artwork-4.14.2< > kde-baseapps-4.14.2_1 < > kde-runtime-4.14.2_3 < > kde-wallpapers-4.14.2 < > kde-workspace-4.11.13_2< > ... > > jrlokken@satellite:~ % pkg version kde > Child process pid=9630 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault > > Seems to work for day-to-day operation, but if I attempt to pass a bad > argument to pkg version, it segfaults. > > I know, I know... "Then don't pass bad arguments to pkg version :)" > Fixed will be in next beta/rc Best regards, Bapt pgpNOp83Hvp0O.pgp Description: PGP signature
[jos...@joshualokken.com: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0]
From: Joshua Lokken To: freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:36:56 -0700 Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 On Mar/31 09:03PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), > > Here is what happened since pkg 1.4.0: >8 -- [snip] -- *< > Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with > the > bug reports :) > Bapt jrlokken@satellite:~ % uname -a FreeBSD satellite.workgroup.local 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #1 r280923: Tue Mar 31 15:32:16 PDT 2015 root@satellite.workgroup.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SATELLITE amd64 jrlokken@satellite:~ % pkg version -x kde kcm-polkit-kde-0.0.20121008_3 = kde-4.14.2 < kde-base-artwork-4.14.2< kde-baseapps-4.14.2_1 < kde-runtime-4.14.2_3 < kde-wallpapers-4.14.2 < kde-workspace-4.11.13_2< ... jrlokken@satellite:~ % pkg version kde Child process pid=9630 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault Seems to work for day-to-day operation, but if I attempt to pass a bad argument to pkg version, it segfaults. I know, I know... "Then don't pass bad arguments to pkg version :)" -- Joshua Lokken pgpQwDsXEZQ99.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:35:43PM +0100, Big Lebowski wrote: > > > > Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > > We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with > > the > > bug reports :) > > > > Mine just did something like that: > > foobar# uname -a > FreeBSD foobar.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r280994M: Thu > Apr 2 20:16:53 CEST 2015 > r...@pd.valinor.palantiri.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FOOBAR amd64 > foobar [uname -a] ~/ > 15-04-03 > 3:33PM > foobar# pkg --version > 1.4.99.15 > foobar [pkg --version] ~/ > 15-04-03 > 3:33PM > foobar# pkg version > Child process pid=41119 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault > foobar [pkg version] ~/ > 15-04-03 > 3:33PM > foobar# pkg version -t 0.2.o.git20150311 0.2.o.20150402 > < > foobar [pkg version -t 0.2.o.git20150311 0.2.o.20150402] ~/ > 15-04-03 > 3:33PM > pd# Let me fix that :) Best regards, Bapt pgptyF_fLXsK2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
> > Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with > the > bug reports :) > Mine just did something like that: foobar# uname -a FreeBSD foobar.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r280994M: Thu Apr 2 20:16:53 CEST 2015 r...@pd.valinor.palantiri.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FOOBAR amd64 foobar [uname -a] ~/ 15-04-03 3:33PM foobar# pkg --version 1.4.99.15 foobar [pkg --version] ~/ 15-04-03 3:33PM foobar# pkg version Child process pid=41119 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault foobar [pkg version] ~/ 15-04-03 3:33PM foobar# pkg version -t 0.2.o.git20150311 0.2.o.20150402 < foobar [pkg version -t 0.2.o.git20150311 0.2.o.20150402] ~/ 15-04-03 3:33PM pd# ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
>> I just wanted to take the time to thank you for all the >> work you've put into this. >> >> Thanks! > > Thanks much appreciated, I want to share that with vsevolod@ and az@ who also > spent a lot of time working on it! > Indeed, HUGE THANKS for what you guys are doing with pkg - I cant wait to see that OS X integration in action (and other things as well), you rock! S. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 07:21:19AM -0700, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:03:23 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote > > > Hi all, > > > > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), > > > .. > > Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > > We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with > > the bug reports :) > > > > Plan is to release 1.5.0 as soon as possible > > > > Best regards, > > Bapt > Hello, Baptiste. > I just wanted to take the time to thank you for all the > work you've put into this. > > Thanks! Thanks much appreciated, I want to share that with vsevolod@ and az@ who also spent a lot of time working on it! Best regards, Bapt pgpXzG081o0eW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:03:23 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote > Hi all, > > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), > .. > Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with > the bug reports :) > > Plan is to release 1.5.0 as soon as possible > > Best regards, > Bapt Hello, Baptiste. I just wanted to take the time to thank you for all the work you've put into this. Thanks! --Chris ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 01:56:38PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > On 1 Apr 2015, at 05:03, Rui Paulo wrote: > > > > That is expected. WITH_PKG=devel is a make(1) option that only affects > > ports (non-binary pkgs). > > Are you sure? I have it in make.conf on one of my systems where I never > build ports manually (and don't even have a ports tree installed) and there I > get this: > > $ pkg -v > 1.4.99.13 > > In a jail on the same machine without the make.conf entry, I get the stable > version. This is how I've been testing pkg-devel for a while. Is there a > different recommended way? > That is because you enforced installing pkg-devel one day via: pkg install pkg-devel probably then it will stay on pkg-devel :) pkg itself is not aware of make.conf Best regards Bapt pgp6UBoFxwzrv.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
On 1 Apr 2015, at 05:03, Rui Paulo wrote: > > That is expected. WITH_PKG=devel is a make(1) option that only affects ports > (non-binary pkgs). Are you sure? I have it in make.conf on one of my systems where I never build ports manually (and don't even have a ports tree installed) and there I get this: $ pkg -v 1.4.99.13 In a jail on the same machine without the make.conf entry, I get the stable version. This is how I've been testing pkg-devel for a while. Is there a different recommended way? David ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 11:48:27AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Excerpt from Baptiste Daroussin: > > - Initial support for OS X > - Initial support for NetBSD/EdjeBSD > > How would pkg-1.5.0 integrate with NetBSD pkgsrc? > > I didn't think there were any plans to port FreeBSD ports to NetBSD. Or is > such a plan in the works? > There are people looking at integrating pkg with pkgsrc yes, don't know the status, (pkg is already in pkgsrc-wip but no further integration for what I do know And yes you are right it is EdgeBSD not EdjeBSD sorry. Best regards, Bapt pgpwv8cOvqD9U.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
Excerpt from Baptiste Daroussin: - Initial support for OS X - Initial support for NetBSD/EdjeBSD How would pkg-1.5.0 integrate with NetBSD pkgsrc? I didn't think there were any plans to port FreeBSD ports to NetBSD. Or is such a plan in the works? EdjeBSD should be EdgeBSD. A little spelling error can be critical when trying to find something on the Internet. Web site is edgebsd.org (I just went there). Tom ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
On Mar 31, 2015, at 17:24, Sergei Vyshenski wrote: > Instead, the following succeded: > # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg-devel > # make reinstall > ... > # pkg -v > 1.4.99.16 That is expected. WITH_PKG=devel is a make(1) option that only affects ports (non-binary pkgs). -- Rui Paulo ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
Hi, On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Add WITH_PKG=devel in your build make.conf > then pkg upgrade will want you to upgrade to 1.4.99.16 (which is pkg 1.5.0 > beta1) > This does not work for me. # cat /etc/make.conf |grep PKG WITH_PKGNG=yes WITH_PKG=devel # pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (218 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (218 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Your packages are up to date. # pkg -v 1.4.12 # pkg info |grep pkg pkg-1.4.12 Package manager Instead, the following succeded: # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg-devel # make reinstall ... # pkg -v 1.4.99.16 All the best, Sergei ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:19:15PM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote: > On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 21:03 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), > > Hey Baptiste, > > Great work to you and all those involved in this project! I'm grateful > to have such an awesome tool. > > For those of us who run our own package repos via Poudriere, what kinds > of changes should we expect to make once pkg 1.5.0 is released? Do we > need to do a full rebuild of our package repo? I'm also assuming that > the upgrade path from 1.4.x to 1.5.0 will simply be as easy as running > `pkg upgrade`, right? > > Thanks again for your hard work. > Add WITH_PKG=devel in your build make.conf then pkg upgrade will want you to upgrade to 1.4.99.16 (which is pkg 1.5.0 beta1) Best regards, Bapt pgpmXuAYEDP8s.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 21:03 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), Hey Baptiste, Great work to you and all those involved in this project! I'm grateful to have such an awesome tool. For those of us who run our own package repos via Poudriere, what kinds of changes should we expect to make once pkg 1.5.0 is released? Do we need to do a full rebuild of our package repo? I'm also assuming that the upgrade path from 1.4.x to 1.5.0 will simply be as easy as running `pkg upgrade`, right? Thanks again for your hard work. Thanks, Shawn signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part