[Bug fortran/32454] Bounds-check misses overflow of lhs array
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32454 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Daniel Franke 2010-12-29 15:22:44 UTC --- Same as the other. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 31059 ***
[Bug fortran/32454] Bounds-check misses overflow of lhs array
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-01 15:16 --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Fortran 95. Maybe using: > > integer, dimension(4) :: y > > is a better test case. > > It is caught at compile time: > y = [y, (99,i=1,4)] > 1 > Error: Different shape for array assignment at (1) on dimension 1 (4 and 8) Not if you write it as: n = 4 y = [y, (99,i=1,n)] -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32454
[Bug fortran/32454] Bounds-check misses overflow of lhs array
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-01 15:01 --- > I forgot to mention: I think this file is valid Fortran 2003 and only invalid > Fortran 95. Maybe using: > integer, dimension(4) :: y > is a better test case. It is caught at compile time: y = [y, (99,i=1,4)] 1 Error: Different shape for array assignment at (1) on dimension 1 (4 and 8) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32454
[Bug fortran/32454] Bounds-check misses overflow of lhs array
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords||accepts-invalid Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-07-03 10:25:41 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32454
[Bug fortran/32454] Bounds-check misses overflow of lhs array
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 12:33 --- I forgot to mention: I think this file is valid Fortran 2003 and only invalid Fortran 95. Maybe using: integer, dimension(4) :: y is a better test case. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32454
