[Bug fortran/36234] Document lack of g77's "complex function name*16" syntax

[fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-10 20:03 
---
Subject: Bug 36234

Author: fxcoudert
Date: Thu Jun 10 20:02:39 2010
New Revision: 160569

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160569
Log:
PR fortran/38273
* gfortran.texi: Document that Cray pointers cannot be function
results.

PR fortran/36234
* gfortran.texi: Document lack of support for syntax
"complex FUNCTION name*16()", and existence of alternative
legacy syntax "complex*16 FUNCTION name()".

Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36234

[Bug fortran/36234] Document lack of g77's "complex function name*16" syntax

[fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-10 20:03 
---
Fixed.


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36234

[Bug fortran/36234] Document lack of g77's "complex function name*16" syntax

[fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-10 19:35 
---
Patch proposed at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-06/msg00098.html


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortra
   ||n/2010-06/msg00098.html
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Keywords||patch
   Last reconfirmed|2009-03-28 13:45:17 |2010-06-10 19:35:07
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36234

[Bug fortran/36234] Document lack of g77's "complex function name*16" syntax

[bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-25 02:03 ---
*** Bug 41160 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36234

[Bug fortran/36234] Document lack of g77's "complex function name*16" syntax

[fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-28 13:45 
---
I second Steve's opinion that we shouldn't add that legacy feature to gfortran.
A Google codesearch for
 lang:fortran "complex function" "*16" -"complex*16" function
returned only 1 use of this syntax!

Let's document it in the "Extensions not implemented in GNU Fortran" section of
our doc.


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Keywords||documentation
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-03-28 13:45:17
   date||
Summary|Support g77's "complex  |Document lack of g77's
   |function name*16" syntax|"complex function name*16"
   ||syntax


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36234