Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Introducing ldso switching to BLAS/LAPACK
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:37 PM Benda Xu wrote: > > Mike Gilbert writes: > > > This looks a lot safer than yesterday's patch since there are no > > ebuild removals here. > > Thank you Mike. > > > If/when you do want to remove old ebuilds, I suggest creating a github > > PR, and let the CI bot check reverse dependencies. > > Yeah, that would have been a much safer way to remove ebuilds. > > > This was actually done for the change that was reverted yesterday, but > > it seems like the CI results were ignored and the commit was pushed > > regardless. > > Yesterday the original pull requests by Mo did not remove ebuilds. It > was only when I started to adopt the PR that I saw > > > RepoMan scours the neighborhood... > > repo.eapi-deprecated 1 > >virtual/cblas/cblas-1.0.ebuild: 5 > > after which I impulsively killed it. Ah, that makes more sense.
[gentoo-dev] Re: Why aren't GSoC projects affecting ::gentoo discussed on regular mls?
Hi Marek, Marek Szuba writes: > On 2019-06-27 04:16, Benda Xu wrote: > >> Michał, you were overreacting to the word "GSoC" since our original RFC >> at gentoo-dev. Please, just ignore GSoC when you are executing your >> experise of QA. Gentoo should be developed independently, regardless of >> whether any development effort is supported by 3rd party. > [...] >> Personally I don't regard the GSoC selection and decision process >> interesting to all the Gentoo devs. > > In my opinion Michał has got a very good point regarding potential PR > consequences of us rejecting GSoC work. I agree with you. > Of course it can be done, I've seen my share of student projects of > various sort getting binned immediately after implementation - but > more often than not it shows a lack of of foresight, at best, on > behalf of institutions which requested manpower for such projects. Agreed, too. It is the mentor's duty to facilitate a win-win outcome to our student, Gentoo and Google, by being more careful on visions and planning. > Yes, it is good for you to have eventually brought this to -dev - but > IMHO it really is too late. In the future, I would STRONGLY advise > having a general discussion before having even a single line of code > written. In retrospect, I was overconfident about my technical judgement. I will take your advice. Thank you, Marek. Yours, Benda
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Introducing ldso switching to BLAS/LAPACK
Mike Gilbert writes: > This looks a lot safer than yesterday's patch since there are no > ebuild removals here. Thank you Mike. > If/when you do want to remove old ebuilds, I suggest creating a github > PR, and let the CI bot check reverse dependencies. Yeah, that would have been a much safer way to remove ebuilds. > This was actually done for the change that was reverted yesterday, but > it seems like the CI results were ignored and the commit was pushed > regardless. Yesterday the original pull requests by Mo did not remove ebuilds. It was only when I started to adopt the PR that I saw > RepoMan scours the neighborhood... > repo.eapi-deprecated 1 >virtual/cblas/cblas-1.0.ebuild: 5 after which I impulsively killed it. I should take this lesson and be more careful removing ebuilds. Yours, Benda
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Why aren't GSoC projects affecting ::gentoo discussed on regular mls?
On 2019-06-27 04:16, Benda Xu wrote: > Michał, you were overreacting to the word "GSoC" since our original RFC > at gentoo-dev. Please, just ignore GSoC when you are executing your > experise of QA. Gentoo should be developed independently, regardless of > whether any development effort is supported by 3rd party. [...] > Personally I don't regard the GSoC selection and decision process > interesting to all the Gentoo devs. In my opinion Michał has got a very good point regarding potential PR consequences of us rejecting GSoC work. Of course it can be done, I've seen my share of student projects of various sort getting binned immediately after implementation - but more often than not it shows a lack of of foresight, at best, on behalf of institutions which requested manpower for such projects. Yes, it is good for you to have eventually brought this to -dev - but IMHO it really is too late. In the future, I would STRONGLY advise having a general discussion before having even a single line of code written. -- MS
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Introducing ldso switching to BLAS/LAPACK
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:16 AM wrote: > > From: Benda Xu > > The following 2 patches are to introduce the runtime switching > mechanism to BLAS/LAPACK libraries in Gentoo. > > This feature is turned off by default and only the reference > BLAS/LAPACK is used to satisfy the dependencies. It can be enabled by > USE=eselect-ldso. > > > Sorry for the glitch to the tree caused by my mistake yesterday. I am > looking forward to your review. I am cross posting to -dev and -sci > so as to attract atention from all interested parties. This looks a lot safer than yesterday's patch since there are no ebuild removals here. If/when you do want to remove old ebuilds, I suggest creating a github PR, and let the CI bot check reverse dependencies. This was actually done for the change that was reverted yesterday, but it seems like the CI results were ignored and the commit was pushed regardless.
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/6] acct-user/rtkit: Add 'rtkit' user (UID 133)
Same UID as in Arch Linux. Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba --- acct-user/rtkit/metadata.xml | 8 acct-user/rtkit/rtkit-0.ebuild | 12 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-user/rtkit/metadata.xml create mode 100644 acct-user/rtkit/rtkit-0.ebuild diff --git a/acct-user/rtkit/metadata.xml b/acct-user/rtkit/metadata.xml new file mode 100644 index 000..3e5026ee375 --- /dev/null +++ b/acct-user/rtkit/metadata.xml @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ + +http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd";> + + + mare...@gentoo.org + Marek Szuba + + diff --git a/acct-user/rtkit/rtkit-0.ebuild b/acct-user/rtkit/rtkit-0.ebuild new file mode 100644 index 000..0e63e6514a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/acct-user/rtkit/rtkit-0.ebuild @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +# Copyright 2019 Gentoo Authors +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 + +EAPI=7 + +inherit acct-user + +DESCRIPTION="User for the Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon" +ACCT_USER_ID=133 +ACCT_USER_GROUPS=( rtkit ) + +acct-user_add_deps -- 2.21.0
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 6/6] acct-user/syncthing: Add 'syncthing' user (UID 499)
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba --- acct-user/syncthing/metadata.xml | 8 acct-user/syncthing/syncthing-0.ebuild | 14 ++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-user/syncthing/metadata.xml create mode 100644 acct-user/syncthing/syncthing-0.ebuild diff --git a/acct-user/syncthing/metadata.xml b/acct-user/syncthing/metadata.xml new file mode 100644 index 000..3e5026ee375 --- /dev/null +++ b/acct-user/syncthing/metadata.xml @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ + +http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd";> + + + mare...@gentoo.org + Marek Szuba + + diff --git a/acct-user/syncthing/syncthing-0.ebuild b/acct-user/syncthing/syncthing-0.ebuild new file mode 100644 index 000..136d34e4cdb --- /dev/null +++ b/acct-user/syncthing/syncthing-0.ebuild @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +# Copyright 2019 Gentoo Authors +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 + +EAPI=7 + +inherit acct-user + +DESCRIPTION="User for the system-wide net-p2p/syncthing server" +ACCT_USER_ID=499 +ACCT_USER_HOME=/var/lib/syncthing +ACCT_USER_HOME_PERMS=0770 +ACCT_USER_GROUPS=( syncthing ) + +acct-user_add_deps -- 2.21.0
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/6] acct-group/syncthing: Add 'syncthing' group (GID 499)
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba --- acct-group/syncthing/metadata.xml | 8 acct-group/syncthing/syncthing-0.ebuild | 9 + 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-group/syncthing/metadata.xml create mode 100644 acct-group/syncthing/syncthing-0.ebuild diff --git a/acct-group/syncthing/metadata.xml b/acct-group/syncthing/metadata.xml new file mode 100644 index 000..3e5026ee375 --- /dev/null +++ b/acct-group/syncthing/metadata.xml @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ + +http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd";> + + + mare...@gentoo.org + Marek Szuba + + diff --git a/acct-group/syncthing/syncthing-0.ebuild b/acct-group/syncthing/syncthing-0.ebuild new file mode 100644 index 000..4e7ab771bb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/acct-group/syncthing/syncthing-0.ebuild @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +# Copyright 2019 Gentoo Authors +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 + +EAPI=7 + +inherit acct-group + +DESCRIPTION="Group for the system-wide net-p2p/syncthing server" +ACCT_GROUP_ID=499 -- 2.21.0
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/6] acct-user/burp: Add 'burp' user (UID 498)
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba --- acct-user/burp/burp-0.ebuild | 12 acct-user/burp/metadata.xml | 8 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-user/burp/burp-0.ebuild create mode 100644 acct-user/burp/metadata.xml diff --git a/acct-user/burp/burp-0.ebuild b/acct-user/burp/burp-0.ebuild new file mode 100644 index 000..f6c78b24856 --- /dev/null +++ b/acct-user/burp/burp-0.ebuild @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +# Copyright 2019 Gentoo Authors +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 + +EAPI=7 + +inherit acct-user + +DESCRIPTION="User for the app-backup/burp server" +ACCT_USER_ID=498 +ACCT_USER_GROUPS=( burp ) + +acct-user_add_deps diff --git a/acct-user/burp/metadata.xml b/acct-user/burp/metadata.xml new file mode 100644 index 000..3e5026ee375 --- /dev/null +++ b/acct-user/burp/metadata.xml @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ + +http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd";> + + + mare...@gentoo.org + Marek Szuba + + -- 2.21.0
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/6] acct-group/rtkit: Add 'rtkit' group (GID 133)
Same GID as in Arch Linux. Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba --- acct-group/rtkit/metadata.xml | 8 acct-group/rtkit/rtkit-0.ebuild | 9 + 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-group/rtkit/metadata.xml create mode 100644 acct-group/rtkit/rtkit-0.ebuild diff --git a/acct-group/rtkit/metadata.xml b/acct-group/rtkit/metadata.xml new file mode 100644 index 000..3e5026ee375 --- /dev/null +++ b/acct-group/rtkit/metadata.xml @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ + +http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd";> + + + mare...@gentoo.org + Marek Szuba + + diff --git a/acct-group/rtkit/rtkit-0.ebuild b/acct-group/rtkit/rtkit-0.ebuild new file mode 100644 index 000..9361f86968b --- /dev/null +++ b/acct-group/rtkit/rtkit-0.ebuild @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +# Copyright 2019 Gentoo Authors +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 + +EAPI=7 + +inherit acct-group + +DESCRIPTION="Group for the Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon" +ACCT_GROUP_ID=133 -- 2.21.0
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/6] acct-group/burp: Add 'burp' group (GID 498)
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba --- acct-group/burp/burp-0.ebuild | 9 + acct-group/burp/metadata.xml | 8 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-group/burp/burp-0.ebuild create mode 100644 acct-group/burp/metadata.xml diff --git a/acct-group/burp/burp-0.ebuild b/acct-group/burp/burp-0.ebuild new file mode 100644 index 000..f9d68d05dab --- /dev/null +++ b/acct-group/burp/burp-0.ebuild @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +# Copyright 2019 Gentoo Authors +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 + +EAPI=7 + +inherit acct-group + +DESCRIPTION="Group for the app-backup/burp server" +ACCT_GROUP_ID=498 diff --git a/acct-group/burp/metadata.xml b/acct-group/burp/metadata.xml new file mode 100644 index 000..3e5026ee375 --- /dev/null +++ b/acct-group/burp/metadata.xml @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ + +http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd";> + + + mare...@gentoo.org + Marek Szuba + + -- 2.21.0
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] User/group assignment: burp, rtkit, syncthing
Thank you for your feedback, here is the second version of the patch set. Changes: - shifted the IDs for burp and syncthing into the appropriate LSB range; the Wiki page has been updated accordingly. * * * Here is the RFC for acct-* packages corresponding to users and groups created by packages I currently maintain. This is also a request to reserve the respective UIDs/GIDs, namely: Groups: - burp - 498 - rtkit - 133 - syncthing - 499 Users: - burp - 498 - rtkit - 133 - syncthing - 499
