Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Repoman subversion support
On 14-05-2008 16:27:28 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2008-05-14 00:32 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał(a):
> > Merged in r10325 with some minor changes (removed the 'svn update' bit
> > until someone remembers why exactly it's there
>
> During committing, only files, which are being committed, are being
> updated, so `svn up` is certainly a good idea. Please add it.
Details here are that the code did this:
if vcs == "cvs":
myf=open(checkdir+"/CVS/Entries","r")
if vcs == "svn":
myf=os.popen("svn update > /dev/null; svn list")
genone's remark here refers to this `svn update`, of which I don't
recall any more why I added it. All I know is that I think I needed it
for some reason to get a correct output of "list". However, I have no
proof here, so he removed the svn update, which gives a non-announced
possible modification of the local repository.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
--
gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Repoman subversion support
2008-05-14 00:32 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał(a): > Merged in r10325 with some minor changes (removed the 'svn update' bit > until someone remembers why exactly it's there During committing, only files, which are being committed, are being updated, so `svn up` is certainly a good idea. Please add it.
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] show binhosts as "repository"
On 14-05-2008 00:45:10 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Mon, 12 May 2008 20:53:35 +0200 > Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The following patch shows the url to the binhost in an emerge -av as > > repository name, instead of "unknown". Unfortunately the patch > > doesn't store the binhost url, such that portage can't show where the > > package comes from when unmerged. > > Not sure if this is the right thing to do, or if the reponame in those > cases should be the one from the source repo that was used to generate > those binary packages. Not saying that the binhost name here is > useless, quite the opposite, just a bit concerned about mixing > different things here. The idea behind it is that the repo_name of the binhost is not necessarily useful. In many cases it will contain the default repo_name value, since people just create binpkgs with a standard Portage install. I agree it is a hack. Perhaps a combination of the repo_name and its url would be the best. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
