[gmx-users] intel grompp with pathscale mdrun

2011-12-06 Thread Chris Neale

Dear users:

can I use a .tpr file created with an intel icc compilation of grompp 
and then do mdrun under a pathscale compilation of mdrun  ? (same 
version of gromacs)


I'm wondering if there would be some strange behaviour. It seems like it 
should be ok, but I wanted to be sure.


I ask because I can only compile mdrun with the pathscale compiler 
because make install hangs while make install-mdrun works fine. make 
install is hanging on making g_rms.o as previously posted: 
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2011-December/066682.html . 
I tried this again with the 4.0.12.1 version of the compiler and have 
the same result.


Thank you,
Chris.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


Re: [gmx-users] intel grompp with pathscale mdrun

2011-12-06 Thread Matthew Zwier
Should work just fine.

As far as compilation hanging...maybe hand-compile that .o with less
aggressive optimization flags, then try make again?

MZ

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Chris Neale chris.ne...@utoronto.ca wrote:
 Dear users:

 can I use a .tpr file created with an intel icc compilation of grompp and
 then do mdrun under a pathscale compilation of mdrun  ? (same version of
 gromacs)

 I'm wondering if there would be some strange behaviour. It seems like it
 should be ok, but I wanted to be sure.

 I ask because I can only compile mdrun with the pathscale compiler because
 make install hangs while make install-mdrun works fine. make install is
 hanging on making g_rms.o as previously posted:
 http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2011-December/066682.html . I
 tried this again with the 4.0.12.1 version of the compiler and have the same
 result.

 Thank you,
 Chris.
 --
 gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
 or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


[gmx-users] intel grompp with pathscale mdrun

2011-12-06 Thread chris . neale

Thank you Matthew.

your suggestion for the hanging .o compilation sounds good. I didn't  
try it because in the end the intel compiler produced the fastest  
executables in any event.


For those interested, here are my benchmarking speeds for one of my  
simulation systems (270,000 atoms) on 48 cores of an AMD magny-cours  
cluster at 2.1 GHz. I have no idea why the intel icc compiler  
outperforms the pathscale and pgi compilers on AMD computers, but that  
seems to be the case.


intel icc 12.0.5.220 = 3.733 ns/day
intel icc 12.0.5.220 with -msse3 = 3.765 ns/day
pathscale 4.0.12.1 = 3.467 ns/day
pgi 11.8 = 3.092 ns/day
pgi 11.8 with -tp istanbul -fast = 3.156 ns/day

Again, thank you,
Chris.

-- original message --

As far as compilation hanging...maybe hand-compile that .o with less
aggressive optimization flags, then try make again?

MZ

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Chris Neale chris.neale at  
utoronto.ca wrote:

Dear users:

can I use a .tpr file created with an intel icc compilation of grompp and
then do mdrun under a pathscale compilation of mdrun  ? (same version of
gromacs)

I'm wondering if there would be some strange behaviour. It seems like it
should be ok, but I wanted to be sure.

I ask because I can only compile mdrun with the pathscale compiler because
make install hangs while make install-mdrun works fine. make install is
hanging on making g_rms.o as previously posted:
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2011-December/066682.html . I
tried this again with the 4.0.12.1 version of the compiler and have the same
result.

Thank you,
Chris.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users at gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Previous message: [gmx-users] intel grompp with pathscale mdrun
Next message: [gmx-users] dihedral format in top file?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


RE: [gmx-users] intel grompp with pathscale mdrun

2011-12-06 Thread Rasale, Anupama
Hi Chris,
You can also try with open64. Let us know in case you face any issues 
in compiling and running. We will be glad to help you.

Thanks
Anupama

-Original Message-
From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On 
Behalf Of chris.ne...@utoronto.ca
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 8:15 AM
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] intel grompp with pathscale mdrun

Thank you Matthew.

your suggestion for the hanging .o compilation sounds good. I didn't  
try it because in the end the intel compiler produced the fastest  
executables in any event.

For those interested, here are my benchmarking speeds for one of my  
simulation systems (270,000 atoms) on 48 cores of an AMD magny-cours  
cluster at 2.1 GHz. I have no idea why the intel icc compiler  
outperforms the pathscale and pgi compilers on AMD computers, but that  
seems to be the case.

intel icc 12.0.5.220 = 3.733 ns/day
intel icc 12.0.5.220 with -msse3 = 3.765 ns/day
pathscale 4.0.12.1 = 3.467 ns/day
pgi 11.8 = 3.092 ns/day
pgi 11.8 with -tp istanbul -fast = 3.156 ns/day

Again, thank you,
Chris.

-- original message --

As far as compilation hanging...maybe hand-compile that .o with less
aggressive optimization flags, then try make again?

MZ

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Chris Neale chris.neale at  
utoronto.ca wrote:
 Dear users:

 can I use a .tpr file created with an intel icc compilation of grompp and
 then do mdrun under a pathscale compilation of mdrun  ? (same version of
 gromacs)

 I'm wondering if there would be some strange behaviour. It seems like it
 should be ok, but I wanted to be sure.

 I ask because I can only compile mdrun with the pathscale compiler because
 make install hangs while make install-mdrun works fine. make install is
 hanging on making g_rms.o as previously posted:
 http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2011-December/066682.html . I
 tried this again with the 4.0.12.1 version of the compiler and have the same
 result.

 Thank you,
 Chris.
 --
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users at gromacs.org
 http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at
 http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
 or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Previous message: [gmx-users] intel grompp with pathscale mdrun
Next message: [gmx-users] dihedral format in top file?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]


-- 
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists