Re: [go-nuts] Are there any implicit type conversions in Go?

2017-05-13 Thread Jan Mercl 
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 8:19 PM st ov  wrote:

> Go appears to be very strict when using types. Even aliases need to be
explicitly cast.
>
> Are there any contexts where types are implicitly cast? Or must all type
conversions be specified?

cast != conversion

Otherwise for example:

- Ideal constants are implicitly converted according to context in which
they appear.
- If valid, any value is implicitly converted to the appropriate interface
type on assignment/when used as a function argument.

-- 

-j

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[go-nuts] Are there any implicit type conversions in Go?

2017-05-13 Thread st ov 
Go appears to be very strict when using types. Even aliases need to be 
explicitly cast.

Are there any contexts where types are implicitly cast? Or must all type 
conversions be specified?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.