Re: New Proposal: EasyMacros
Eek. Just realized that this went unanswered! Sorry! Yes, a good next step is to email the Haskell-cafe list or to post on reddit.com/r/haskell. For the wiki page, I meant at the GHC developers' wiki, here: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc But it might be best to get feedback first. Richard On May 19, 2016, at 5:20 AM, Anton Felix Lorenzen wrote: > I am glad you like the idea. I fully understand > that it should be an extension first, I simply followed the > https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Process > > I am think I am not able to make a prime wiki page > (at least I wasn't able to find a button for this). > > Should I create a ghc wiki page? > Email the Haskell-cafe list? > > This is my first proposal and I m a bit lost here. > > Thanks, > Anton > ___ > Haskell-prime mailing list > Haskell-prime@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime ___ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
Re: Limber separators
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/06/16 08:44, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > Well, I'd really like to see the grammar relaxed to allow for redundant > leading separators so I could finally use my personal ideal > diff-friendly style: > > something = [ > , one > , thirteen > , two > , three > ] If your ideal style uses every entry on one line regardless of how short it is (in terms of character count), then surely simply 'ENTRY\n' is better than ', ENTRY\n'? At least my preference in that case would be no comma, or a trailing comma. - -- Alexander alexan...@plaimi.net https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXTq2NAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BZJMQAL5CGwQyVUJJP/oMUw7DpnI2 gXb/3uYF+Od6GAKLHZnPB4G2+fq7xXvINENki2T6u0/Va4FeQ/xTLrccR7j3o++1 c4LtxctUjpEz321Hi/v4Zq3JZL5XY6z39dZwUx0cMcCmUXk1+aVzmQGh1S4Y+/3E ICHyAOESUB6vlMeL492qVGtD6drkstuQaDTKn/kry/jTgnAabcIa9hJ5EWj4DMFW jTcpkDD8kLFTPlKN+ky8bN02RmMVkC8jZe5n1+S4WhWVK7Fixsib5nE5qaYl73Wq FCFf2b8FKkoCyAMTfJmdZt2yXgl30+/DAJa60E7I40uh98Ak1uH1V02cpOOVt3FU dgH1TWP/TP36VZ+HpJ85vdrbdioG5aQar4aeFVosd6vbIQNhiCKjcfR4aLo6C1Bg zfORQtpzqq11M6SHTZG91L4+Ti/y4vfFE/qnY1YhP5dpTblT7TJRP/s4eQwXnfYs GmhCOeev43P6mNL9TXyz4OkLzxrgdEzYWgdlGn88gg8dHIj5+BOxJNw9uJgb4iRq ovz+efoGGN3lk3prNeD6VO7BZ6WRu3mi7JJcX2nmjyfOGK2tQE9eYuFS/oevkJwE zFI7RAwi/UecN9jJ1do+zq/DBjQo2bRJnlswhwAdLxqhyyhxNuMvQdklibhlWsrZ Irj2614mavqB67f3Os7k =ojRm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
Re: Infrastructure status?
On 2016-06-01 at 08:41:05 +0200, M Farkas-Dyck wrote: [...] > So will we all become members of the Haskell organization on GitHub? Yes; there's already been a CLiC team for quite some time: https://github.com/orgs/haskell/teams/core-libraries-committee and I've set up a dual https://github.com/orgs/haskell/teams/core-language-committee team as well which I'll start to sending out membership invitations soon for if we can agree on doing this. Also noteworthy is that GitHub doesn't force you to use its Web-UI for commenting on pull-requests or replying to comments. You can also use email (if you prefer that) for replying to GitHub pull-requests or to comments you got delivered via email. Of course, this doesn't replace the mailing list, nor does it fully replace GitHub's UI which allows e.g. for inline commenting/annotating diffs/code while reviewing. ___ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
