Re: [HCP-Users] FreeSurfer brain volume question

2017-11-22 Thread Chao Zhang
Thanks, Jennifer and Michael.

Best,
Chao

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Harms, Michael <mha...@wustl.edu> wrote:

>
>
> Hi,
>
> In FS, “Intracranial volume”, renamed to “EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol”
> (aka “eTIV”) in more recent FS versions, is solely based on the determinant
> of a talairach transform that is internal to FS.  That particular transform
> does not necessarily need to be accurate for FS to generate accurate
> surfaces/segmentations, so we did not QC it.  For that reason, I do not
> recommend using it.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> -MH
>
>
>
> --
>
> Michael Harms, Ph.D.
>
> ---
>
> Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
>
> Washington University School of Medicine
>
> Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
>
> 660 South Euclid Ave
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=660+South+Euclid+Ave=gmail=g>.
> Tel: 314-747-6173 <(314)%20747-6173>
>
> St. Louis, MO  63110  Email:
> mha...@wustl.edu
>
>
>
> *From: *<hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Chao Zhang <
> cha...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, November 22, 2017 at 2:25 PM
> *To: *"hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> *Subject: *[HCP-Users] FreeSurfer brain volume question
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> We were checking the FS brain volumes and found that out of the 1113
> subjects for 14 subjects the FS_BrainSeg_Vol is larger than the
> FS_IntraCranial_Vol (so that the column FS_BrainSegVol_eTIV_Ratio is larger
> than 1). We wonder if this is due to some error in calculating either of
> the two columns (FS_BrainSeg_Vol, FS_IntraCranial_Vol)? Thanks!
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Chao
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> HCP-Users mailing list
> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>
>
> --
>
> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected
> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you
> are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use,
> disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents
> of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email
> in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
>

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users


Re: [HCP-Users] FreeSurfer brain volume question

2017-11-22 Thread Harms, Michael

Hi,
In FS, “Intracranial volume”, renamed to “EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol” (aka 
“eTIV”) in more recent FS versions, is solely based on the determinant of a 
talairach transform that is internal to FS.  That particular transform does not 
necessarily need to be accurate for FS to generate accurate 
surfaces/segmentations, so we did not QC it.  For that reason, I do not 
recommend using it.

Cheers,
-MH

--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
---
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave.Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110  Email: 
mha...@wustl.edu

From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Chao Zhang 
<cha...@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 at 2:25 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: [HCP-Users] FreeSurfer brain volume question

Hi

We were checking the FS brain volumes and found that out of the 1113 subjects 
for 14 subjects the FS_BrainSeg_Vol is larger than the FS_IntraCranial_Vol (so 
that the column FS_BrainSegVol_eTIV_Ratio is larger than 1). We wonder if this 
is due to some error in calculating either of the two columns (FS_BrainSeg_Vol, 
FS_IntraCranial_Vol)? Thanks!

Best,
Chao







___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users


The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users


Re: [HCP-Users] FreeSurfer brain volume question

2017-11-22 Thread Elam, Jennifer
Hi Chao,

See this earlier list thread: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/hcp-users@humanconnectome.org/msg05148.html


As is stated in that thread, we don't recommend using the the IntraCranial 
volume estimate.


Best,

Jenn

Jennifer Elam, Ph.D.
Scientific Outreach, Human Connectome Project
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Neuroscience, Box 8108
660 South Euclid Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63110
314-362-9387
e...@wustl.edu<mailto:e...@wustl.edu>
www.humanconnectome.org<http://www.humanconnectome.org/>



From: hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org 
<hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Chao Zhang 
<cha...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 2:25:32 PM
To: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Subject: [HCP-Users] FreeSurfer brain volume question

Hi

We were checking the FS brain volumes and found that out of the 1113 subjects 
for 14 subjects the FS_BrainSeg_Vol is larger than the FS_IntraCranial_Vol (so 
that the column FS_BrainSegVol_eTIV_Ratio is larger than 1). We wonder if this 
is due to some error in calculating either of the two columns (FS_BrainSeg_Vol, 
FS_IntraCranial_Vol)? Thanks!

Best,
Chao







___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users


[HCP-Users] FreeSurfer brain volume question

2017-11-22 Thread Chao Zhang
Hi

We were checking the FS brain volumes and found that out of the 1113
subjects for 14 subjects the FS_BrainSeg_Vol is larger than the
FS_IntraCranial_Vol (so that the column FS_BrainSegVol_eTIV_Ratio is larger
than 1). We wonder if this is due to some error in calculating either of
the two columns (FS_BrainSeg_Vol, FS_IntraCranial_Vol)? Thanks!

Best,
Chao

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users