[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127311] FILEOPEN DOCX: Microsoft Excel Object Worksheet in DOCX don't start a the right line

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127311

raal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected
 CC||r...@post.cz,
   ||szymon.k...@collabora.com

--- Comment #3 from raal  ---
This seems to have begun at the below commit.
Adding Cc: to Szymon Kłos; Could you possibly take a look at this one? Thanks

3e092e207e04ea141c59d25e8c71b1c74e2e1cfe is the first bad commit
commit 3e092e207e04ea141c59d25e8c71b1c74e2e1cfe
Author: Norbert Thiebaud 
Date:   Sat Jul 29 06:24:35 2017 -0700

source sha:505ce3a2ba3adeef46daecbf9b14c42cea211408


author  Szymon Kłos  2017-07-07 12:58:42 +0200
committer   Szymon Kłos  2017-07-08 09:28:09
+0200
commit  505ce3a2ba3adeef46daecbf9b14c42cea211408 (patch)
treeaab90b60e9c0c0ac5b7ea912dc3b25a8c45614cf
parent  3340ce30562832b584dd0576d9e0733aa03d867f (diff)
tdf#108544 edit in window (XLSX inside DOCX)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127311] FILEOPEN DOCX: Microsoft Excel Object Worksheet in DOCX don't start a the right line

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127311

raal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|6.4.0.0.alpha0+ Master  |6.0.1.1 release

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127340] New: FORMATTING: Hyperlink should wrap in cell like normal text

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127340

Bug ID: 127340
   Summary: FORMATTING: Hyperlink should wrap in cell like normal
text
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha0+ Master
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: thomas.le...@gmail.com

Created attachment 153874
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153874=edit
Screenshot of wrapping in Calc (left) and Writer (right)

In Calc and when Format > Cells... > 'Wrap text automatically' is activated,
hyperlinks wont wrap like normal strings do.

I don't see a benefit in this behavior (beside if it's technically not
possible) because cell input with a hyperlink behaves different then normal
input.

See attached screenshot of input wrap in Calc (with hyperlinks in the first
row, without hyperlinks in the second row) and text wrap in Writer.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120543] [META] Bugs and enhancements around hyperlinks in Calc

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120543

Thomas Lendo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||127340


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127340
[Bug 127340] FORMATTING: Hyperlink should wrap in cell like normal text
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127340] FORMATTING: Hyperlink should wrap in cell like normal text

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127340

--- Comment #2 from Thomas Lendo  ---
Created attachment 153876
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153876=edit
Writer hyperlink wrap test file

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127340] FORMATTING: Hyperlink should wrap in cell like normal text

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127340

--- Comment #1 from Thomas Lendo  ---
Created attachment 153875
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153875=edit
Calc test file for input wrap

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127340] FORMATTING: Hyperlink should wrap in cell like normal text

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127340

Thomas Lendo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||120543


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120543
[Bug 120543] [META] Bugs and enhancements around hyperlinks in Calc
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Re: Graphic rendering: primitive functions

2019-09-04 Thread cekkr
Thank you so much,
it is EXACTLY the answer that I was looking for

R



--
Sent from: 
http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/Dev-f1639786.html
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 116280] [META] Regressions introduced by the image handling refactoring

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116280

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||127310


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127310
[Bug 127310] Base/BASIC: RectangleShape object does not display an image by
setting its FillBitmap
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127310] Base/BASIC: RectangleShape object does not display an image by setting its FillBitmap

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127310

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||116280


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116280
[Bug 116280] [META] Regressions introduced by the image handling refactoring
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127310] Base/BASIC: RectangleShape object does not display an image by setting its FillBitmap

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127310

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|major   |normal
   Priority|high|medium

--- Comment #13 from Xisco Faulí  ---
(In reply to Alex Thurgood from comment #12)
> (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #11)
> 
> > 
> > @Alex Thurgood, Does it crash with a clean profile ?
> 
> @Xisco : the crash is a red herring, I think, with regard to this bug
> report, due to the space in the path to my image ("Macintosh HD" on Mac). I
> intend to report that as a separate bug.
> 
> The issue is, as Balint points out :
> 
> "com.sun.star.drawing.RectangleShape seems to be able to do it, but when I
> set its FillBitmap property, no image is shown"

I seee, then please fill the crash in a separate issue.
Regarding the RectangleShape issue, if I remember well, the code must be
adapted, I remember a similar issue about it. @Raal, do you remember?
Lowering severity anyway...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127310] Base/BASIC: RectangleShape object does not display an image by setting its FillBitmap

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127310

--- Comment #12 from Alex Thurgood  ---
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #11)

> 
> @Alex Thurgood, Does it crash with a clean profile ?

@Xisco : the crash is a red herring, I think, with regard to this bug report,
due to the space in the path to my image ("Macintosh HD" on Mac). I intend to
report that as a separate bug.

The issue is, as Balint points out :

"com.sun.star.drawing.RectangleShape seems to be able to do it, but when I set
its FillBitmap property, no image is shown"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Re: Graphic rendering: primitive functions

2019-09-04 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 07:41 -0700, cekkr wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm studying the working of windows rendering, in particular on OS X.
> Which parts of codes are strictly related to "primitive" functions
> for rendering on the different OSs? 
> 
> For be a little more clear, "ad absurdum" where I have to code for
> implement LibreOffice on a my theoretical graphic server?

As a sample, for bottom level drawing, you typically inherit from
SalGraphics in vcl/inc/salgdi.hxx and provide implementations of the
pure virtual methods of that, e.g.

virtual voiddrawPixel( long nX, long nY ) = 0;

vcl/headless/svpgdi.cxx is one such implementation that draws to a
cairo canvas and is reused by the gtk3 implementation.

FWIW the OSX one is in vcl/quartz/salgdi.cxx and
vcl/quartz/salgdicommon.cxx

That's the bottom level drawing stuff. See vcl/inc/salinst.hxx for the
entry point for creating toplevel frames, printers, off-screen virtual
drawing devices, and so on

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||99525

--- Comment #9 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Actually, (In reply to pedro.silva from comment #8)
> - Align to fixed Baseline / Reference Style:
> - Fixed Baseline / Reference Style:
> - Referenced line spacing / Paragraph style:
> 
> I think the 3rd would be a good because not only it's more clear it uses the
> same terminology from the Paragraph dialogue (Paragraph Styles > Indents &
> Spacing). To pair with this, in the Paragraph dialogue the group titled
> "Register-true" with the checkbox "Activate" would become:
> 
> - Referenced line spacing / Activate

Actually rather than "reference" (a paragraph style applied against the page)
the concept would be "registration"--now common in alignment of offset press
CMYK and half-tone image print work. But here it predates that considerably
coming from the folding of large folio paper sizes to impose the signatures
with correct sequence and alignment (front to back and across pages) -- when
accomplished the printing and binding is "register-true" and "folded with the
print".

But we have little support for imposing and printing 'folio, quarto, octavo,
duodecimo, sextodecimo' layouts. Just look at the Print dialog's pages per
sheet and order where we can not impose a multi-page print layout that would
correctly _fold_. That and a lack of means to provide bleeds, trim, and
registration marks means we can't directly perform DTP--and "register-true"
while correct is not really appropriate.

What we are able to do well is provide correct page to page registration of
textual content. As our pages are composed dynamically when paragraphs are
rendered the printing on pages will not register--page to page, column to
column. But when we enable "register-true" on page styles, and allow individual
paragraphs to pick up the alignment from the selected reference paragraph's
line height (its font height, internal leading, external leading) as a baseline
the documents textual content will register as if "imposed" correctly and then
"folded with the print", trimmed, and bound.

So, while "register-true" is a correct label--agree its etymology is obscure
and is really not helpful UX--but the action is still registration.

Rather than Reference, I would suggest:

Register line spacing / Reference style


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99525
[Bug 99525] [META] Enhance Draw's DTP capabilities
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||99525

--- Comment #9 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Actually, (In reply to pedro.silva from comment #8)
> - Align to fixed Baseline / Reference Style:
> - Fixed Baseline / Reference Style:
> - Referenced line spacing / Paragraph style:
> 
> I think the 3rd would be a good because not only it's more clear it uses the
> same terminology from the Paragraph dialogue (Paragraph Styles > Indents &
> Spacing). To pair with this, in the Paragraph dialogue the group titled
> "Register-true" with the checkbox "Activate" would become:
> 
> - Referenced line spacing / Activate

Actually rather than "reference" (a paragraph style applied against the page)
the concept would be "registration"--now common in alignment of offset press
CMYK and half-tone image print work. But here it predates that considerably
coming from the folding of large folio paper sizes to impose the signatures
with correct sequence and alignment (front to back and across pages) -- when
accomplished the printing and binding is "register-true" and "folded with the
print".

But we have little support for imposing and printing 'folio, quarto, octavo,
duodecimo, sextodecimo' layouts. Just look at the Print dialog's pages per
sheet and order where we can not impose a multi-page print layout that would
correctly _fold_. That and a lack of means to provide bleeds, trim, and
registration marks means we can't directly perform DTP--and "register-true"
while correct is not really appropriate.

What we are able to do well is provide correct page to page registration of
textual content. As our pages are composed dynamically when paragraphs are
rendered the printing on pages will not register--page to page, column to
column. But when we enable "register-true" on page styles, and allow individual
paragraphs to pick up the alignment from the selected reference paragraph's
line height (its font height, internal leading, external leading) as a baseline
the documents textual content will register as if "imposed" correctly and then
"folded with the print", trimmed, and bound.

So, while "register-true" is a correct label--agree its etymology is obscure
and is really not helpful UX--but the action is still registration.

Rather than Reference, I would suggest:

Register line spacing / Reference style


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99525
[Bug 99525] [META] Enhance Draw's DTP capabilities
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 99525] [META] Enhance Draw's DTP capabilities

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99525

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||127279


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
[Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127339] FILEOPEN DOCX Hyperlink inserted to image with bookmark target broken after export

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127339

Durgapriyanka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

--- Comment #3 from Durgapriyanka  ---
Thank you for reporting the bug. 

I can confirm the bug present in 

Version: 6.3.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: b6b28931435e44aca92b8c0e1659f701e3ed1a87
CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 6.1; UI render: default; VCL: win; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2019-01-30_06:57:04
Locale: en-US (en_US); UI-Language: en-US
Calc: threaded

and

LibreOffice 3.3.0 
OOO330m19 (Build:6)
tag libreoffice-3.3.0.4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Re: About putting back Firebird experimental

2019-09-04 Thread julien2412
Xisco Fauli wrote
> if we want to put it back to experimental, personally I would prefer to
> do it *only* in 6.3 and leave it as it's in master so we can test it and
> improve it.
> ...

It can be tested on master sources just by enabling experimental.
We already put in release notes for 6.3 that migration/Firebird part wasn't
experimental anymore.

If I remember well, we wanted to give a try to this part by putting it by
default.
Considering the number of bugs, we can see the test failed, we're not ready.
So the goal is to avoid letting it this part by default for next release
6.4.0 (except if we can fix enough bugs related to it of course).

Now, if somebody wants to revert the patch which reenabled experimental only
for this part, feel free to do it but I won't do it myself since I'm
strongly against it.

Julien




--
Sent from: 
http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/Dev-f1639786.html
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127170] The German documentation for time formats does not explain formatting differences of durations and wall clock time.

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127170

Eike Rathke  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||er...@redhat.com

--- Comment #3 from Eike Rathke  ---
(In reply to Albrecht Müller from comment #0)
> I observed some quite strange
> features of the time formatting mechanism, e.g. the time 23:57:00 gets
> formatted to “1437” using the format string “[MM]” but to “Minutes: [57]
> Month: 12” ( Version 6.0.4.2 (x64) on Windows) or to “Minutes: [12] Month:
> 12” (Version 6.2.6.2 Ubuntu) by the format string “"Minutes: "[MM]" Month:
> "M”. What is the correct interpretation of the format string parts “[MM]” or
> “MM”? How does it depend on the context?

This is a bit nasty as using both the [MM] and the M codes in one format seems
to trick out the type detection, i.e. after defining it the format at the end
is classified as Date format (see category where it's then assigned to). Now
datetime formats do not know anything about duration hence the first MM is
taken as a code for minute of time and the second M as a code for month, where
the wall clock minute value is 57. Note that also the brackets around [MM] are
displayed literally because in a datetime format they don't have a special
meaning. Then as a consequence when saving the document the format is saved as


  Minutes: [
  
  ] Month: 
  


which when loaded again results in the format code string

  "Minutes: ["MM"] Month: "M

but then both the MM and the M denote a month keyword because there isn't an
unquoted [MM]. This appears to be a bug (because in the file format there's the
number:minutes element) but I think it's not easily solvable due to the
ambiguity of MM.

I doubt there's a difference between Linux and Windows, but you simply tried to
load the saved document on the other platform, where it then behaves different
as explained.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125611] [META] DOCX (OOXML) Hyperlink-related issues

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125611

NISZ LibreOffice Team  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||127339


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127339
[Bug 127339] FILEOPEN DOCX Hyperlink inserted to image with bookmark target
broken after export
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127339] FILEOPEN DOCX Hyperlink inserted to image with bookmark target broken after export

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127339

NISZ LibreOffice Team  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||125611


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125611
[Bug 125611] [META] DOCX (OOXML) Hyperlink-related issues
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Re: About putting back Firebird experimental

2019-09-04 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 22/08/2019 à 12:12, Jean-Pierre Ledure a écrit :

Hi all,

> (3) the limits are different: e.g. VARCHAR max. length is < 2Gb in
> Hsqldb and  < 32K in Firebird, the max. length of a table row is < 2Gb
> in Firebird and <64K in Firebird, the max. length of a column name is
> 128B in Hsqldb and 31B in Firebird.
> 

And therein lies the problem, we have substituted the default db engine
for one that is less, or depending on how you look at it, otherwise
capable, in many respects...without providing the means for users of the
existing one to have their data survive the transition, or rather, we
let them believe that it will survive, and then fail at the task.

I feel we would do well to remember that this is people's live and
valuable data we are potentially messing with here, and not all of these
users are DBAs, in fact rather the contrary. It matters not a jot that
db engine XYZ can outperform db engine ABC under circumstance PQR if the
data that the user originally had gets screwed up, or if the yearbook,
contacts with photos, or multilingual accounts DB they were running no
longer functions correctly, or at all, they won't forgive us for it.

And yes, I appreciate that at some stage, a decision on whether we have
reached a sufficiently advanced stage of conversion therapy will need to
be taken and acted upon. The question then is what level of
success/failure is deemed acceptable ?


Alex

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127339] FILEOPEN DOCX Hyperlink inserted to image with bookmark target broken after export

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127339

--- Comment #2 from NISZ LibreOffice Team  ---
Created attachment 153873
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153873=edit
Example file from Word.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127339] FILEOPEN DOCX Hyperlink inserted to image with bookmark target broken after export

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127339

--- Comment #1 from NISZ LibreOffice Team  ---
Created attachment 153872
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153872=edit
Screenshot of the problem in Writer.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127339] New: FILEOPEN DOCX Hyperlink inserted to image with bookmark target broken after export

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127339

Bug ID: 127339
   Summary: FILEOPEN DOCX Hyperlink inserted to image with
bookmark target broken after export
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha0+ Master
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: libreoff...@nisz.hu

Description:
Hyperlink inserted to image with bookmark target in DOCX documents created with
Microsoft Word is broken when the document is opened in LibreOffice Writer.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a new document in Microsoft Word 2016.
2. Insert a bookmark.
3. Insert a page break.
4. Insert an image.
5. Select the image.
6. On the Insert tab, click Hyperlink.
7. Under Link to, click Place in This Document.
8. In the list, select the bookmark
9. Click on OK button.
10. Save the file as DOCX.
11. Open the same file in LibreOffice Writer.
12. Ctrl+Click the image.

Actual Results:
The hyperlink doesn’t work.

Expected Results:
The hyperlink should work in Writer.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: 1bad7f0b19e47a41a1919573f80785ec62c611af
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL; VCL: win; 
Locale: hu-HU (hu_HU); UI-Language: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127313] Copy word stats to clipboard as HTML table

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127313

Dieter Praas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needsUXEval
 Blocks||86066, 108747
 CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de,
   ||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org

--- Comment #1 from Dieter Praas  ---
I support this request. Same (or as alternative) in File => Properties =>
Statistics


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86066
[Bug 86066] [META] bugs and improvements to the statusbar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108747
[Bug 108747] [META] File properties/settings (meta data) bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 86066] [META] bugs and improvements to the statusbar

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86066

Dieter Praas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||127313


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127313
[Bug 127313] Copy word stats to clipboard as HTML table
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108747] [META] File properties/settings (meta data) bugs and enhancements

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108747

Dieter Praas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||127313


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127313
[Bug 127313] Copy word stats to clipboard as HTML table
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127313] Copy word stats to clipboard as HTML table

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127313

Dieter Praas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needsUXEval
 Blocks||86066, 108747
 CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de,
   ||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org

--- Comment #1 from Dieter Praas  ---
I support this request. Same (or as alternative) in File => Properties =>
Statistics


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86066
[Bug 86066] [META] bugs and improvements to the statusbar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108747
[Bug 108747] [META] File properties/settings (meta data) bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127337] FILEOPEN DOCX table column width changed in LO 6.4

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127337

--- Comment #3 from Durgapriyanka  ---
Thank you for reporting the bug. 

I can reproduce the bug in

LibreOffice 3.3.0 
OOO330m19 (Build:6)
tag libreoffice-3.3.0.4

But not in,

Version: 6.3.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: b6b28931435e44aca92b8c0e1659f701e3ed1a87
CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 6.1; UI render: default; VCL: win; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2019-01-30_06:57:04
Locale: en-US (en_US); UI-Language: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127338] New: Freeze and Split Cancel Each Other

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127338

Bug ID: 127338
   Summary: Freeze and Split Cancel Each Other
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 6.2.5.2 release
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: kit...@tutanota.com

Whenever the user chooses Split, it cancels a previously set freeze, and vice
versa.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127323] Cannot Ungroup

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127323

--- Comment #3 from m.a.riosv  ---
Works for me,
Version: 6.3.1.2 (x64)
Build ID: b79626edf0065ac373bd1df5c28bd630b4424273
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL; VCL: win; 
Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI-Language: en-US Calc: CL

Does it works using the Menu? Menu/Data/Group and Outline, if so, please verify
the shortcut Menu/Tools/Customize [Keyboard]

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 66756] FORMATTING: Bullets and numbering -- set incremental indent for all levels

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66756

Dieter Praas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de

--- Comment #9 from Dieter Praas  ---
I don't understand, why this report is set to UNCONFIRMED, after it was set to
REOPENED, because status was NEW before it was closed

=> NEW

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Graphic rendering: primitive functions

2019-09-04 Thread cekkr
Hello,
I'm studying the working of windows rendering, in particular on OS X.
Which parts of codes are strictly related to "primitive" functions for
rendering on the different OSs? 

For be a little more clear, "ad absurdum" where I have to code for implement
LibreOffice on a my theoretical graphic server?

Thank you,
Riccardo



--
Sent from: 
http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/Dev-f1639786.html
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127337] FILEOPEN DOCX table column width changed in LO 6.4

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127337

NISZ LibreOffice Team  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||bibisected, bisected,
   ||filter:docx, regression
 Blocks||10
 CC||jl...@mail.com,
   ||kelem...@ubuntu.com,
   ||nem...@numbertext.org


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
[Bug 10] [META] DOCX (OOXML) table-related issues
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 104444] [META] DOCX (OOXML) table-related issues

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10

NISZ LibreOffice Team  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||127337


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127337
[Bug 127337] FILEOPEN DOCX   table column width changed in LO 6.4
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127337] FILEOPEN DOCX table column width changed in LO 6.4

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127337

--- Comment #2 from NISZ LibreOffice Team  ---
Created attachment 153871
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153871=edit
The sample file

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127337] FILEOPEN DOCX table column width changed in LO 6.4

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127337

--- Comment #1 from NISZ LibreOffice Team  ---
Created attachment 153870
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153870=edit
The same sample file in Word and Writer 6.4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127337] New: FILEOPEN DOCX table column width changed in LO 6.4

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127337

Bug ID: 127337
   Summary: FILEOPEN DOCX   table column width changed in LO 6.4
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha0+ Master
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: libreoff...@nisz.hu

Description:
Table columns with text, the width depending on the text length can change, and
the text will be split into two or more lines as it can be seen in LO 6.4

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open attached file

Actual Results:
The column width should be the same as in Word, but it changes in LO 6.4
resulting in the text broken to two rows.

Expected Results:
Same column width


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Bibisected using bibisect-win32-6.2 to:
URL:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=fe847dda1751bc2c96ef646baa4f16bcc431c1e3
author: Justin Luth 
committer: Justin Luth 

summary: tdf#119760 writerfilter: cell border priority over tblBorder

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 104523] [META] DOCX (OOXML) ActiveX and Legacy form control related issues

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104523
Bug 104523 depends on bug 118169, which changed state.

Bug 118169 Summary: FILESAVE DOCX ActiveX form control saved incorrectly with 
Hungarian accented letters
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118169

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 123059] The problem of drawing the window, determining the position of the cursor (OpenGL)

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123059

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|6.3.0.4 release |6.2.0.3 release

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127196] LibreOffice crashes when trying to open printer properties.

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127196

--- Comment #6 from Julien Nabet  ---
I just noticed this part of initial comment:
"At least even opening printer properties from inside Windows Control Panel
also doesn't work".
So without talking about LO, you can't see printer properties on Windows.

Could you try to uninstall then reinstall driver by using last version from
here:
https://www.konicaminolta.eu/eu-en/support/download-centre ?
Indeed, it must work at least on Windows, if not it's not worth trying on LO.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125610] More Characters button is unreadable on macOS

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125610

--- Comment #5 from Xisco Faulí  ---
Reverting patch: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/78605/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 38194] Style indicator in document margin

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38194

--- Comment #28 from Heiko Tietze  ---
[1] https://extensions.libreoffice.org/extensions/formatted-dummy-text

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 38194] Style indicator in document margin

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38194

--- Comment #28 from Heiko Tietze  ---
[1] https://extensions.libreoffice.org/extensions/formatted-dummy-text

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 38194] Style indicator in document margin

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38194

--- Comment #27 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #26)
> Then I do not understand your mockup. I thought the blue parts show the
> character formatting of the marked text part.

I took the formatted dummy text example as available in this extensions [1] as
prototype. This dummy text has comments for testing purpose. Changes are only
made to the left margin and the content. Didn't I write some text?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 38194] Style indicator in document margin

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38194

--- Comment #27 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #26)
> Then I do not understand your mockup. I thought the blue parts show the
> character formatting of the marked text part.

I took the formatted dummy text example as available in this extensions [1] as
prototype. This dummy text has comments for testing purpose. Changes are only
made to the left margin and the content. Didn't I write some text?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125795] LO63b1: On macOS - in Calc the AutoFilter window/pane does not show all text/options

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125795

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Xisco Faulí  ---
Regression introduced by
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/89775fd396e413daaf0e71710211075450bdc0ed%5E%21
Closing as a duplicate of bug 125610

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 125610 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125795] LO63b1: On macOS - in Calc the AutoFilter window/pane does not show all text/options

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125795

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||bibisected, bisected,
   ||regression

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125610] More Characters button is unreadable on macOS

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125610

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mi...@filmsi.net

--- Comment #4 from Xisco Faulí  ---
*** Bug 125795 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127323] Cannot Ungroup

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127323

kit...@tutanota.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kit...@tutanota.com

--- Comment #2 from kit...@tutanota.com ---
Created attachment 153869
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153869=edit
Sample as requested

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127196] LibreOffice crashes when trying to open printer properties.

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127196

--- Comment #5 from Peter  ---
(In reply to Peter from comment #4)
> 6.2.6.2 (as downloaded about an hour before) looks the same. Rf.
> crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/crash_details/6310b87c-2f74-48d6-b410-
> 302c2006ba42

Version: 6.2.6.2 (x64)
Build-ID: 684e730861356e74889dfe6dbddd3562aae2e6ad
CPU-Threads: 8; BS: Windows 10.0; UI-Render: Standard; VCL: win; 
Gebietsschema: de-DE (de_DE); UI-Sprache: de-DE
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127336] Line wrapping disagreement between LibreOffice and OpenOffice

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127336

aweston  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||filter:odt
 CC||weston.anth...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127196] LibreOffice crashes when trying to open printer properties.

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127196

Peter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|1   |0
 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED

--- Comment #4 from Peter  ---
6.2.6.2 (as downloaded about an hour before) looks the same. Rf.
crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/crash_details/6310b87c-2f74-48d6-b410-302c2006ba42

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125296] Replace hard-coded chevron by themable icon

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125296

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
   |desktop.org |tion.org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127336] Line wrapping disagreement between LibreOffice and OpenOffice

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127336

--- Comment #3 from aweston  ---
Created attachment 153868
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153868=edit
Test ODT file

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127336] Line wrapping disagreement between LibreOffice and OpenOffice

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127336

--- Comment #2 from aweston  ---
Created attachment 153867
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153867=edit
OpenOffice screenshot

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127336] Line wrapping disagreement between LibreOffice and OpenOffice

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127336

--- Comment #1 from aweston  ---
Created attachment 153866
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153866=edit
LibreOffice screenshot

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-6-3' - vcl/source vcl/unx

2019-09-04 Thread Khaled Hosny (via logerrit)
 vcl/source/font/fontmetric.cxx |4 -
 vcl/source/fontsubset/sft.cxx  |5 +-
 vcl/unx/generic/fontmanager/fontconfig.cxx |   51 -
 vcl/unx/generic/glyphs/freetype_glyphcache.cxx |6 +-
 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 1fc306203b047e79d5b3f30cf615609f80b62fe4
Author: Khaled Hosny 
AuthorDate: Tue Aug 27 15:19:15 2019 +0200
Commit: Caolán McNamara 
CommitDate: Wed Sep 4 16:03:55 2019 +0200

Make Noto Color Emoji font work on Linux

Noto Color Emoji is a bitmap color font, Cairo knows how to scale such
fonts and FontConfig will identify them as scalable but not outline
fonts, so change the FontConfig checks to checks for scalability.

Make sft.cxx:doOpenTTFont() accept non-outline fonts, the text will not
show in PDF but that is not worse than the status quo.

Change-Id: I756c718296d2c43e3165cd2f07b11bbb981318d3
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/78218
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Khaled Hosny 
(cherry picked from commit dcf7792da2aa2a1ef774a124f7b21f68fff0fd15)
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/78589

diff --git a/vcl/source/font/fontmetric.cxx b/vcl/source/font/fontmetric.cxx
index 4e6c648be3c7..a9325fde9a21 100644
--- a/vcl/source/font/fontmetric.cxx
+++ b/vcl/source/font/fontmetric.cxx
@@ -485,8 +485,8 @@ void ImplFontMetricData::ImplCalcLineSpacing(const 
std::vector& rHheaDa
 if (mnAscent || mnDescent)
 mnIntLeading = mnAscent + mnDescent - mnHeight;
 
-SAL_INFO("vcl.gdi.fontmetric",
-  "fsSelection: "   << rInfo.fsSelection
+SAL_INFO("vcl.gdi.fontmetric", GetFamilyName()
+ << ": fsSelection: "   << rInfo.fsSelection
  << ", typoAscender: "  << rInfo.typoAscender
  << ", typoDescender: " << rInfo.typoDescender
  << ", typoLineGap: "   << rInfo.typoLineGap
diff --git a/vcl/source/fontsubset/sft.cxx b/vcl/source/fontsubset/sft.cxx
index 2ad41691f1ef..979783a5021a 100644
--- a/vcl/source/fontsubset/sft.cxx
+++ b/vcl/source/fontsubset/sft.cxx
@@ -1668,7 +1668,10 @@ static SFErrCodes doOpenTTFont( sal_uInt32 facenum, 
TrueTypeFont* t )
 /* TODO: implement to get subsetting */
 assert(t->goffsets != nullptr);
 } else {
-return SFErrCodes::TtFormat;
+// Bitmap font, accept for now.
+t->goffsets = static_cast(calloc(1+t->nglyphs, 
sizeof(sal_uInt32)));
+/* TODO: implement to get subsetting */
+assert(t->goffsets != nullptr);
 }
 
 table = getTable(t, O_hhea);
diff --git a/vcl/unx/generic/fontmanager/fontconfig.cxx 
b/vcl/unx/generic/fontmanager/fontconfig.cxx
index e13eb0a82716..8e3e9163d1ce 100644
--- a/vcl/unx/generic/fontmanager/fontconfig.cxx
+++ b/vcl/unx/generic/fontmanager/fontconfig.cxx
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ namespace
 
 class FontCfgWrapper
 {
-FcFontSet* m_pOutlineSet;
+FcFontSet* m_pFontSet;
 
 void addFontSet( FcSetName );
 
@@ -93,17 +93,14 @@ private:
 };
 
 FontCfgWrapper::FontCfgWrapper()
-: m_pOutlineSet( nullptr )
+: m_pFontSet( nullptr )
 {
 FcInit();
 }
 
 void FontCfgWrapper::addFontSet( FcSetName eSetName )
 {
-/*
-  add only acceptable outlined fonts to our config,
-  for future fontconfig use
-*/
+// Add only acceptable fonts to our config, for future fontconfig use.
 FcFontSet* pOrig = FcConfigGetFonts( FcConfigGetCurrent(), eSetName );
 if( !pOrig )
 return;
@@ -112,10 +109,12 @@ void FontCfgWrapper::addFontSet( FcSetName eSetName )
 for( int i = 0; i < pOrig->nfont; ++i )
 {
 FcPattern* pPattern = pOrig->fonts[i];
-// #i115131# ignore non-outline fonts
-FcBool bOutline = FcFalse;
-FcResult eOutRes = FcPatternGetBool( pPattern, FC_OUTLINE, 0, 
 );
-if( (eOutRes != FcResultMatch) || (bOutline == FcFalse) )
+// #i115131# ignore non-scalable fonts
+// Scalable fonts are usually outline fonts, but some bitmaps fonts
+// (like Noto Color Emoji) are also scalable.
+FcBool bScalable = FcFalse;
+FcResult eScalableRes = FcPatternGetBool(pPattern, FC_SCALABLE, 0, 
);
+if ((eScalableRes != FcResultMatch) || (bScalable == FcFalse))
 continue;
 
 // Ignore Type 1 fonts, too.
@@ -125,7 +124,7 @@ void FontCfgWrapper::addFontSet( FcSetName eSetName )
 continue;
 
 FcPatternReference( pPattern );
-FcFontSetAdd( m_pOutlineSet, pPattern );
+FcFontSetAdd( m_pFontSet, pPattern );
 }
 
 // TODO?: FcFontSetDestroy( pOrig );
@@ -216,16 +215,16 @@ namespace
 
 FcFontSet* FontCfgWrapper::getFontSet()
 {
-if( !m_pOutlineSet )
+if( !m_pFontSet )
 {
-m_pOutlineSet = FcFontSetCreate();
+m_pFontSet = FcFontSetCreate();
 addFontSet( FcSetSystem );
 addFontSet( FcSetApplication );
 
-

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125610] More Characters button is unreadable on macOS

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125610

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kenneth.schn...@icloud.com

--- Comment #3 from Xisco Faulí  ---
*** Bug 127302 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127336] New: Line wrapping disagreement between LibreOffice and OpenOffice

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127336

Bug ID: 127336
   Summary: Line wrapping disagreement between LibreOffice and
OpenOffice
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 6.2.5.2 release
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: weston.anth...@gmail.com

Description:
Under certain conditions, the word wrapping in a paragraph at the right margin
differs from how OpenOffice handles the word wrapping. My use case requires
LibreOffice to match what OpenOffice is currently doing with the word wrapping,
but I cannot find a way to achieve this consistently with the examples in the
Steps to Reproduce.

Steps to Reproduce:
Example 1
1. Open LibreOffice
2. Set the font to Courier New size 10.5
3. Set the left and right margins to 1 inch
4. Enter the following text (no trailing space after "Texts"): Text Text Text
Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Texts 
5. Save the document and open a copy in OpenOffice to compare side by side.


Example 2
1. Open the same document in LibreOffice.
2. In a new paragraph with the same style, enter the following text (note the
trailing space after "Texts"): Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text
Text Text Texts 
3. Save the document and open a copy in OpenOffice to compare side by side.


Example 3: 
1. Open the same document in LibreOffice.
2. In a new paragraph with the same style, enter the following text (note the
trailing space):  
3. Save the document and open a copy in OpenOffice to compare side by side.


Example 4: 
1. Open the same document in LibreOffice.
2. In a new paragraph with the same style, enter the following text (no
trailing space):

3. Save the document and open a copy in OpenOffice to compare side by side.



Actual Results:
Example 1:
 - LibreOffice: The word "Texts" does not wrap to the next line.
 - OpenOffice: The word "Texts" does not wrap to the next line.
 - The line wrapping results agree between the two applications in this
example.

Example 2:
 - LibreOffice: The word "Texts" does not wrap to the next line.
 - OpenOffice: The word "Texts" wraps to the next line.

Example 3:
 - LibreOffice: The first line of the paragraph contains 60 A's
 - OpenOffice: The first line of the paragraph contains 59 A's, and the 60th A
wraps to the next line.

Example 4:
 - LibreOffice: The first line of the paragraph contains 60 A's
 - OpenOffice: The first line of the paragraph contains 59 A's, and the 60th A
wraps to the next line.

Expected Results:
The line wrapping results agree between the two applications, or there is some
way to specify the wrapping behavior at the right margin.



Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes


OpenGL enabled: Yes

Additional Info:
Version: 6.2.5.2 (x64)
Build ID: 1ec314fa52f458adc18c4f025c545a4e8b22c159
CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL; VCL: win; 
Locale: en-US (en_US); UI-Language: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127302] "Save" button text white when pressing X on non-focused window in macOS

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127302

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org

--- Comment #3 from Xisco Faulí  ---
Same root caused as in bug 125610

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 125610 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127310] Base/BASIC: RectangleShape object does not display an image by setting its FillBitmap

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127310

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||r...@post.cz,
   ||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org

--- Comment #11 from Xisco Faulí  ---
It doesn't crash for me in

Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: e8b3df5b9b0eb0a93c25b6dc2e445ae44a7e3f78
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; 
Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US
Calc: threaded

nor in

Versión: 6.3.0.3 (x86)
Id. de compilación: c75130c129d9c5e43b76e4f26881b3db8bdb5c91
Subprocs. CPU: 1; SO: Windows 6.1; Repres. IU: predet.; VCL: win; 
Configuración regional: es-ES (es_ES); Idioma de IU: es-ES
Calc: threaded

@Alex Thurgood, Does it crash with a clean profile ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103378] [META] PDF export bugs and enhancements

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103378

--- Comment #8 from Xisco Faulí  ---
The content of attachment 128371 has been deleted for the following reason:

user's request

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127335] New: Pasting a URL on a cell in selection mode, does not trigger URL recognition; URL only recognized after cell content has been edited

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127335

Bug ID: 127335
   Summary: Pasting a URL on a cell in selection mode, does not
trigger URL recognition; URL only recognized after
cell content has been edited
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: Inherited From OOo
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: c...@nouenoff.nl

- Spreadsheet
- Make sure Autocorrect URL recognition is triggered
- Copy URL, e.g. https://www.libreoffice.org/
- Paste on cell in selection mode (so not in edit mode)
- Enter
  > No hyperlink is created

- Go back to cell
- F2, (go to end of text)
- Enter
  > No hyperlink is created

- Go back to cell
- F2, (go to end of text)
- add 'foo' or remove '/'
- Enter
  > Now a hyperlink is created

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127334] Regression: Incompatible changes in date/time arithmetic introduced between Version: 6.0.4.2 (x64) and version 6.2.6.2 (ubuntu)

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127334

Eike Rathke  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127334] Regression: Incompatible changes in date/time arithmetic introduced between Version: 6.0.4.2 (x64) and version 6.2.6.2 (ubuntu)

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127334

Eike Rathke  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127334] Regression: Incompatible changes in date/time arithmetic introduced between Version: 6.0.4.2 (x64) and version 6.2.6.2 (ubuntu)

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127334

--- Comment #1 from Eike Rathke  ---
Created attachment 153865
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153865=edit
Test file with added floating-point calculations to demonstrate why this is the
case.

The MINUTE() function was changed to return the integer wall clock minute not
rounded, as specified by ODF OpenFormula
https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part2.html#MINUTE

Applying MINUTE() to a calculated duration is problematic if rounded values are
expected. For this rather use ROUND(duration*24*60). In the attached document I
added column E with the underlying duration floating-point duration values,
column F with calculated minutes, and column G with the MINUTE() value
calculated from the duration, which illustrates the unexpected but correct
results. Column H uses ROUND() for the here expected calculation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127180] Firebird: propose migration + Firebird by default only in experimental

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127180

--- Comment #9 from Julien Nabet  ---
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #8)
> IMHO, I just think it should have been discussed in the ESC meeting before
> any action was taken...

I abandoned the cherry-pick for 6.3. (I just noticed the release notes
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/6.3/en indicating migration is
by default option).

About master, if someone wants to revert it, no problem but I won't do this
myself since I'm strongly against it because of all the reasons I quoted.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125460] LibreOffice freezes in attempt to open specific docx-file

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125460

--- Comment #7 from Noel Grandin  ---
The problem (AFAIK) is that the setSize() operation resets rotation, which
forces us to restore object rotation, which is very expensive when we are
applying rotation to a group object containing tons of sub-objects.

We will probably need a new method setSizeWithoutAffectingRotation(), and plumb
it down through the following stack, which will be tricky because svx/ is
tricky, and there are UNO interfaces in the way.

#0  SdrTextObj::NbcResize(Point const&, Fraction const&, Fraction const&)  at
svx/source/svdraw/svdotxtr.cxx:159

#1  SdrPathObj::NbcResize(Point const&, Fraction const&, Fraction const&) at
svx/source/svdraw/svdopath.cxx:2300

#2  SdrObject::Resize(Point const&, Fraction const&, Fraction const&, bool) 
at svx/source/svdraw/svdobj.cxx:1519

#3  SdrObjGroup::Resize(Point const&, Fraction const&, Fraction const&, bool) 
at svx/source/svdraw/svdogrp.cxx:613

#4  SdrObjGroup::SetSnapRect(tools::Rectangle const&) at
svx/source/svdraw/svdogrp.cxx:521


#5  svx_setLogicRectHack(SdrObject*, tools::Rectangle const&) at
svx/source/unodraw/unoshape.cxx:1126

#6  SvxShape::setSize(com::sun::star::awt::Size const&) at
svx/source/unodraw/unoshape.cxx:1245

#7  SvxShapeGroup::setSize(com::sun::star::awt::Size const&) at
svx/source/unodraw/unoshap2.cxx:167


#8  SwXShape::setSize(com::sun::star::awt::Size const&) at
sw/source/core/unocore/unodraw.cxx:2320

#9  writerfilter::dmapper::GraphicImport::lcl_attribute(unsigned int,
writerfilter::Value&)
at writerfilter/source/dmapper/GraphicImport.cxx:766

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 95600] Modify a cell that contains URL in Calc; unable to modify hyperlink in formula bar

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95600

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||c...@nouenoff.nl

--- Comment #12 from Cor Nouws  ---
still in 6.4 master.

pls note te idea in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96106#c2

   .. similar entries be added like in Writer: "Edit Hyperlink...", "Copy
Hyperlink", "Remove Hyperlink"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 122674] EDITING: hovering over a Comment text, changes Cursor to handpoint, when a hyperlink is under the Comment popup

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122674

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64)  |All
Summary|EDITING a Comment Hovering  |EDITING: hovering over a
   |over the Comment Text   |Comment text, changes
   |Changes Cursor to Handpoint |Cursor to handpoint, when a
   |When a Hyperlink is Under   |hyperlink is under the
   |the Comment Popup   |Comment popup
 OS|Windows (All)   |All
 CC||c...@nouenoff.nl

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127180] Firebird: propose migration + Firebird by default only in experimental

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127180

--- Comment #8 from Xisco Faulí  ---
IMHO, I just think it should have been discussed in the ESC meeting before any
action was taken...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 123159] Accessibility: No keyboard shortcut to open a HYPERLINK in Calc cells

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123159

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
Version|6.1.0.3 release |Inherited From OOo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 38194] Style indicator in document margin

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38194

--- Comment #26 from Regina Henschel  ---
Then I do not understand your mockup. I thought the blue parts show the
character formatting of the marked text part.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 38194] Style indicator in document margin

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38194

--- Comment #26 from Regina Henschel  ---
Then I do not understand your mockup. I thought the blue parts show the
character formatting of the marked text part.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 123811] HYPERLINK Function includes everything written in the cell

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123811

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|HYPERLINK Function Includes |HYPERLINK Function includes
   |Everything Written In The   |everything written in the
   |Cell|cell
Version|6.2.0.3 release |Inherited From OOo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127180] Firebird: propose migration + Firebird by default only in experimental

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127180

--- Comment #7 from Julien Nabet  ---
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #6)
> ...
> it was agreed in the ESC meeting to release 6.3 with the firebird migration
> enabled by default, it's not that we forgot to disable it before the
> release...

I don't understand what you mean, do you want I backport the patch on 6.3
branch? yes/no ?
About master branch, I thought it was ok to put back Firebird at experimental
since we're not ready obviously. If there are as still many Firebird bugs for
6.4.0, I think we should let Firebird in experimental only (See first link for
rationale + reactions of other QA DB people).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127170] The German documentation for time formats does not explain formatting differences of durations and wall clock time.

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127170

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||olivier.hallot@libreoffice.
   ||org,
   ||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
  Component|Calc|Documentation

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127333] FILEOPEN DOCX Table rows height changes

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127333

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
Version|6.4.0.0.alpha0+ Master  |4.3 all versions

--- Comment #4 from Xisco Faulí  ---
Reproduced in

Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: e8b3df5b9b0eb0a93c25b6dc2e445ae44a7e3f78
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; 
Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-6-3' - oox/source sw/qa

2019-09-04 Thread Tamás Zolnai (via logerrit)
 oox/source/ole/axbinarywriter.cxx|4 ++--
 sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/data/tdf118169.docx |binary
 sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/ooxmlexport13.cxx   |   11 +++
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 7d9f20a723a73300e05a9885c5f02516f771692d
Author: Tamás Zolnai 
AuthorDate: Wed Aug 28 16:24:59 2019 +0200
Commit: Xisco Faulí 
CommitDate: Wed Sep 4 15:30:07 2019 +0200

tdf#118169: ActiveX form control saved incorrectly with accented letters

Write out unicode strings without any compression.

Change-Id: I93cadc40bacbd679724c3404fd870cba48065650
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/78234
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tamás Zolnai 
Signed-off-by: Xisco Fauli 
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/78592

diff --git a/oox/source/ole/axbinarywriter.cxx 
b/oox/source/ole/axbinarywriter.cxx
index 89d2dc25351a..400e6fbde551 100644
--- a/oox/source/ole/axbinarywriter.cxx
+++ b/oox/source/ole/axbinarywriter.cxx
@@ -144,8 +144,8 @@ void AxBinaryPropertyWriter::writePairProperty( AxPairData& 
orPairData )
 
 void AxBinaryPropertyWriter::writeStringProperty( OUString& orValue )
 {
-sal_uInt32 nSize = orValue.getLength();
-setFlag(  nSize, AX_STRING_COMPRESSED );
+sal_uInt32 nSize = orValue.getLength() * 2;
+setFlag(  nSize, AX_STRING_COMPRESSED, false );
 maOutStrm.writeAligned< sal_uInt32 >( nSize );
 maLargeProps.push_back( ComplexPropVector::value_type( new StringProperty( 
orValue, nSize ) ) );
 startNextProperty();
diff --git a/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/data/tdf118169.docx 
b/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/data/tdf118169.docx
new file mode 100644
index ..2510fb3e59eb
Binary files /dev/null and b/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/data/tdf118169.docx differ
diff --git a/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/ooxmlexport13.cxx 
b/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/ooxmlexport13.cxx
index aab416a86f25..6a71a8e24747 100644
--- a/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/ooxmlexport13.cxx
+++ b/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/ooxmlexport13.cxx
@@ -414,6 +414,17 @@ DECLARE_OOXMLEXPORT_TEST(tdf127085, "tdf127085.docx")
 uno::Reference xShape(getShape(1), uno::UNO_QUERY);
 CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(sal_Int16(50), getProperty(xShape, 
"FillTransparence"));
 }
+
+DECLARE_OOXMLEXPORT_TEST(tdf118169, "tdf118169.docx")
+{
+// Unicode characters were converted to question marks.
+uno::Reference xControlShape(getShape(1), 
uno::UNO_QUERY);
+uno::Reference 
xPropertySet(xControlShape->getControl(), uno::UNO_QUERY);
+uno::Reference xServiceInfo(xPropertySet, 
uno::UNO_QUERY);
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(true, 
bool(xServiceInfo->supportsService("com.sun.star.form.component.CheckBox")));
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(OUString(u"őőő"), 
getProperty(xPropertySet, "Label"));
+}
+
 CPPUNIT_PLUGIN_IMPLEMENT();
 
 /* vim:set shiftwidth=4 softtabstop=4 expandtab: */
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127180] Firebird: propose migration + Firebird by default only in experimental

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127180

--- Comment #6 from Xisco Faulí  ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #5)
> (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #4)
> > I don't see the point of putting it in experimental in master and not doing
> > it in libreoffice 6.3. I would have done it the other way around, put it in
> > experimental in 6-3 and leave it as it's in master so it can be tested and
> > improved...
> > ...
> Done here https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/78597/ as you may have seen.
> 
> To test Firebird on master, we just have to put enable experimental. At
> least, we're sure now that there won't be a new version for the moment with
> Firebird enabled by default whereas there are quite some nasty bugs.

it was agreed in the ESC meeting to release 6.3 with the firebird migration
enabled by default, it's not that we forgot to disable it before the release...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127170] The German documentation for time formats does not explain formatting differences of durations and wall clock time.

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127170

--- Comment #2 from Albrecht Müller  ---
The documentation problem affects also the time functions (see following links)
as their documenation contains no hints at the pecularities of date and time
calculations (e.g. rounding behaviour, handling of inexact representation of
time values, handling of leap seconds https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second
etc.) either.

https://help.libreoffice.org/6.3/de/text/scalc/01/func_year.html?=CALC=WIN
https://help.libreoffice.org/6.3/de/text/scalc/01/func_month.html?=CALC=WIN
https://help.libreoffice.org/6.3/de/text/scalc/01/func_day.html?=CALC=WIN
https://help.libreoffice.org/6.3/de/text/scalc/01/func_hour.html?=CALC=WIN
https://help.libreoffice.org/6.3/de/text/scalc/01/func_minute.html?=CALC=WIN
https://help.libreoffice.org/6.3/de/text/scalc/01/func_second.html?=CALC=WIN

The problem seems to be inherited from the English version:
https://help.libreoffice.org/6.3/en-US/text/scalc/01/func_year.html?=CALC=WIN
https://help.libreoffice.org/6.3/en-US/text/scalc/01/func_month.html?=CALC=WIN
https://help.libreoffice.org/6.3/en-US/text/scalc/01/func_day.html?=CALC=WIN
https://help.libreoffice.org/6.3/en-US/text/scalc/01/func_hour.html?=CALC=WIN
https://help.libreoffice.org/6.3/en-US/text/scalc/01/func_minute.html?=CALC=WIN
https://help.libreoffice.org/6.3/en-US/text/scalc/01/func_second.html?=CALC=WIN

Without a clear specification there is no "expected behaviour" of date/time
calculations and results may vary considerably between different versions of
Calc.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127170] The German documentation for time formats does not explain formatting differences of durations and wall clock time.

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127170

Albrecht Müller  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
   ||7334

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127334] Regression: Incompatible changes in date/time arithmetic introduced between Version: 6.0.4.2 (x64) and version 6.2.6.2 (ubuntu)

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127334

Albrecht Müller  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||albrecht.muel...@astrail.de
   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
   ||7170,
   ||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
   ||5099

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127334] New: Regression: Incompatible changes in date/time arithmetic introduced between Version: 6.0.4.2 (x64) and version 6.2.6.2 (ubuntu)

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127334

Bug ID: 127334
   Summary: Regression: Incompatible changes in date/time
arithmetic introduced between Version: 6.0.4.2 (x64)
and version 6.2.6.2 (ubuntu)
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 6.2.6.2 release
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: albrecht.muel...@astrail.de

Created attachment 153864
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153864=edit
Different versions of Calc show different results of a few trivial date/time
calculations

Description:
To my knowledge no agreed upon specification exists which describes how
LibreOffice shall handle time and date calculations (see bug 127170).
Unexpected behaviour seem to get fixed on an "ad hoc" basis, see bug 125099
which should be "RESOLVED FIXED" from version 6.2.5 on. However, I observed
this problem with version 6.2.6.2. 

The attached example file reflects a situation where you have some kind of log
which contains date and time as separate entities. Time resolution is one
minute. In order to calculate durations you have to combine (= add) these date
and time values. The file contains 20 entries whose times differ by one minute
giving 19 time spans of one minute. These durations are formatted as time
values. An additional column uses the minutes function to calculate the minutes
count compares these values with the expected value which is always one. A cell
(D25) labeled "Errors:" sums up the differences between expected an calculated
values. This value should be zero.

How to reproduce:
Open attachment with different versions of Calc and observe the error count.

Actual results:
I observed that version 6.0.4.2 (x64) of Calc showed an error count of zero
while version 6.2.6.2 (ubuntu) gave 10.

Expected results:
Simple date/time calculations should show the same and correct results no
matter which version is used to open the spreadsheet file.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127327] GTK2 backend → Corrupted thumbnail generation (6.3.1 RC)

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127327

Julien Nabet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|serval2...@yahoo.fr |

--- Comment #13 from Julien Nabet  ---
It seems I can't understand anything about this tracker. Uncc myself to avoid
polluting.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 73092] EDITING: Repeat custom animation path does not remove (paint over with background) end position.

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73092

--- Comment #10 from Gregor  ---
Sorry Mark, still in:
Version: 6.3.0.4 (x64)
Build ID: 057fc023c990d676a43019934386b85b21a9ee99
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL; VCL: win; 
Locale: sv-SE (sv_SE); UI-Language: en-US
Calc: threaded
The repeat until end of slide does not completely paint over the final position
when repeating a custom motion path.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 123059] The problem of drawing the window, determining the position of the cursor (OpenGL)

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123059

E4D  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|1   |0
Version|6.2.0.3 release |6.3.0.4 release

--- Comment #9 from E4D  ---
Hello. The bug is still present.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 38194] Style indicator in document margin

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38194

--- Comment #25 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #24)
> Putting such information into the comment margin will conflict...

Comments go to the right document margin, the indicators are at left (at least
for LTR). Where exactly do you see the issue?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 38194] Style indicator in document margin

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38194

--- Comment #25 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #24)
> Putting such information into the comment margin will conflict...

Comments go to the right document margin, the indicators are at left (at least
for LTR). Where exactly do you see the issue?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127180] Firebird: propose migration + Firebird by default only in experimental

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127180

--- Comment #5 from Julien Nabet  ---
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #4)
> I don't see the point of putting it in experimental in master and not doing
> it in libreoffice 6.3. I would have done it the other way around, put it in
> experimental in 6-3 and leave it as it's in master so it can be tested and
> improved...
> ...
Done here https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/78597/ as you may have seen.

To test Firebird on master, we just have to put enable experimental. At least,
we're sure now that there won't be a new version for the moment with Firebird
enabled by default whereas there are quite some nasty bugs.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127327] GTK2 backend → Corrupted thumbnail generation (6.3.1 RC)

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127327

--- Comment #12 from Timur Davletshin  ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #11)
> So already fixed in 6.3 branch if prerelease 6.3.1 is ok?

No, it is not fixed. Only bug with black background of "About" dialog was
fixed. Thumbnails in current 6.3.1 builds are black.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127333] FILEOPEN DOCX Table rows height changes

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127333

NISZ LibreOffice Team  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kelem...@ubuntu.com,
   ||l.lu...@collabora.com,
   ||nem...@numbertext.org
   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38
   ||414
 Blocks||10
   Keywords||bibisected, bisected,
   ||filter:docx, regression


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
[Bug 10] [META] DOCX (OOXML) table-related issues
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 104444] [META] DOCX (OOXML) table-related issues

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10

NISZ LibreOffice Team  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||127333


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127333
[Bug 127333] FILEOPEN DOCX Table rows height changes
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127333] FILEOPEN DOCX Table rows height changes

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127333

--- Comment #3 from NISZ LibreOffice Team  ---
Created attachment 153863
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153863=edit
Example file from Word

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127327] GTK2 backend → Corrupted thumbnail generation (6.3.1 RC)

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127327

--- Comment #11 from Julien Nabet  ---
So already fixed in 6.3 branch if prerelease 6.3.1 is ok?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127333] FILEOPEN DOCX Table rows height changes

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127333

--- Comment #2 from NISZ LibreOffice Team  ---
Created attachment 153862
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153862=edit
Screenshot of the sample document side by side in LO4.2 Writer and LO 4.3
Writer

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127333] FILEOPEN DOCX Table rows height changes

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127333

--- Comment #1 from NISZ LibreOffice Team  ---
Created attachment 153861
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153861=edit
Screenshot of the original document side by side in Word and Writer

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 86899] [META] Requests for the addition of UNO commands

2019-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86899
Bug 86899 depends on bug 101977, which changed state.

Bug 101977 Summary: TRACK CHANGES: More uno commands for accepting/rejecting 
changes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101977

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

<    1   2   3   4   >