Re: Clean up inconsistencies in engraver-init.ly and performer-init.ly (issue 199460043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)
LGTM. It would be nice if David's checker script could be added, too. https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/diff/20001/ly/performer-init.ly File ly/performer-init.ly (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/diff/20001/ly/performer-init.ly#newcode174 ly/performer-init.ly:174: \accepts ChordNames I wonder whether it makes sense to sort the many \accept lines alphabetically... https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Clean up inconsistencies in engraver-init.ly and performer-init.ly (issue 199460043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)
please review https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)
https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/diff/20001/lily/spanner.cc File lily/spanner.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/diff/20001/lily/spanner.cc#newcode394 lily/spanner.cc:394: /* On 2015/02/06 21:47:11, lemzwerg wrote: Minor nit: Please use spaces, not tabs. Done. https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
The status of Lilypond and Guile 2?
Hi, I was wondering what the current status of Guile 2 support in Lilypond is? The dev/guilev2 branch hasn't been touched since 2014-10-13. It is becoming more and more impossible to run Lilypond on modern Linux distributions (for example see https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10969). Is there any relief in sight? Cheers, Edward ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Google Summer of Code
Urs Liska writes: > Am 08.02.2015 um 17:35 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Urs Liska writes: >> >>> * One of the most crucial project is missing from the list: Guile 2.0 >>> migration. Here it is the other way round: David has explained why >>> this actually would be a good GSoC project. >> I think it has ceased being a good GSoC project since I have fixed all >> the low-hanging fruit already. The main problem now is a fundamental >> change in GUILE 2.0 garbage collection that is inherently incompatible >> with our data structures. Getting this under control is a single quite >> hard task which probably, to a good degree, has to be tackled by the >> GUILE programmers themselves. I am currently doing preparatory work for >> that. >> > > Ah OK. Does that mean it's becoming more probable to have this in the > foreseeable future or rather the contrary? It means that people said they wanted to take a look at it. It's not the first time, however. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Google Summer of Code
Am 08.02.2015 um 17:35 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: * One of the most crucial project is missing from the list: Guile 2.0 migration. Here it is the other way round: David has explained why this actually would be a good GSoC project. I think it has ceased being a good GSoC project since I have fixed all the low-hanging fruit already. The main problem now is a fundamental change in GUILE 2.0 garbage collection that is inherently incompatible with our data structures. Getting this under control is a single quite hard task which probably, to a good degree, has to be tackled by the GUILE programmers themselves. I am currently doing preparatory work for that. Ah OK. Does that mean it's becoming more probable to have this in the foreseeable future or rather the contrary? ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Google Summer of Code
Urs Liska writes: > * One of the most crucial project is missing from the list: Guile 2.0 >migration. Here it is the other way round: David has explained why >this actually would be a good GSoC project. I think it has ceased being a good GSoC project since I have fixed all the low-hanging fruit already. The main problem now is a fundamental change in GUILE 2.0 garbage collection that is inherently incompatible with our data structures. Getting this under control is a single quite hard task which probably, to a good degree, has to be tackled by the GUILE programmers themselves. I am currently doing preparatory work for that. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Google Summer of Code
Am 08.02.2015 um 15:45 schrieb James Lowe: On 07/02/15 23:47, Urs Liska wrote: Am 08.02.2015 um 00:12 schrieb James Lowe: On 07/02/15 21:06, David Garfinkle wrote: Hi, I'm a Math, CS, and music student at McGill and I just read about the google student summer program. I would love to help develop LilyPond! How can I get involved/what projects are up for grabs/do I suggest my own project? http://lilypond.org/google-summer-of-code.html But David should note that this page is quite out-of-date. Actually it isn't at all. This page was updated December last year - 2 months ago. I was asked specifically to *update* this page and it seems it has been done. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=5e7bd5c0a08893881d2c65d1440005455b43027f So if there is anything that is not relevant then let's remove it. OK, I have the following problems with that page. Sorry if I seem to have failed to express these when you were actually working on the page: * Is the grace notes issue up-to-date in so far as Mike Solomon and Carl Sorensen are available as mentors (I mean, without mentors a project is not really possible)? * MusicXML should definitely be considered in the context of actual development taking place in the Frescobaldi context. At least it should be harmonized with that effort. And: same question as above: Are Reinhold Kainhofer and Mike Solomon actually available as mentors? * Slurs and ties: There has been significant work by Janek Warchoł preparing the task of improving ties. OTOH David Kastrup has strongly expressed the opinion that this project isn't really suitable for GSoC. * One of the most crucial project is missing from the list: Guile 2.0 migration. Here it is the other way round: David has explained why this actually would be a good GSoC project. Urs James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Google Summer of Code
On 07/02/15 23:47, Urs Liska wrote: > > Am 08.02.2015 um 00:12 schrieb James Lowe: >> On 07/02/15 21:06, David Garfinkle wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm a Math, CS, and music student at McGill and I just read >>> about the google student summer program. I would love to help >>> develop LilyPond! How can I get involved/what projects are up >>> for grabs/do I suggest my own project? >> http://lilypond.org/google-summer-of-code.html > > But David should note that this page is quite out-of-date. Actually it isn't at all. This page was updated December last year - 2 months ago. I was asked specifically to *update* this page and it seems it has been done. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=5e7bd5c0a08893881d2c65d1440005455b43027f So if there is anything that is not relevant then let's remove it. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
