[Marxism] Gattaca and the nervous nineties

[Philip Ferguson via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Some diverting but fascinating reading for the New Year:

Gattaca and the nervous nineties:
https://rdln.wordpress.com/2017/01/07/from-the-vaults-gattaca-and-the-nervous-nineties/

Ken MacLeod on science fiction after the 'end of history':
https://rdln.wordpress.com/2015/06/09/from-the-vaults-science-fiction-after-the-end-of-history-1998/
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] Fwd: Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant to Close by 2021 - The New York Times

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*



http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/06/nyregion/indian-point-nuclear-power-plant-shutdown.html

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] Fwd: Re: [lbo-talk] Behind the News: Heightened Intra-capitalist Conflict under Secular Stagnation

[Ralph Johansen via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Louis Proyect wrote

Louis Proyect wrote

On 1/6/17 3:10 PM, Ralph Johansen via Marxism wrote:

   One faction wants to provoke a crisis with Russia to provide a pretext
   for expanded military spending (e.g. Boeing and Lockheed Martin) while
   the other wants to integrate Russia into the global capitalist system
   more deeply to obtain its vast natural resources (e.g. ExxonMobil). This
   latter faction is also in alliance with the vulture capitalists (Mercer)
   and Wall Street investment banks (Goldman Sachs)



Okay, let me see if I understand this. Those ten thousand articles in 
Alternet, CommonDreams, Huffington Post, Counterpunch, ZNet, Salon, 
Truthdig and Truthout calling attention to the internecine ties between 
Goldman-Sachs and the Clinton campaign were wrong. In reality, 
Goldman-Sachs was part of a stealthy faction under the leadership of 
Breitbart.com that preferred Trump because he wanted to "integrate 
Russia into the global capitalist system".


I don't mind vulgar Marxism if there is at least a modicum of 
intelligence at work. This is pure drivel.


That ain't quite the way I heard it, Lou.

David Martin leads off with, "The CIA is not a creature of the executive 
branch but of Wall Street and the corporatocracy, and, just like capital 
itself, it is rife with contradictions and conflicts."


Then he writes, "One faction wants to provoke a crisis with Russia to 
provide a pretext for expanded military spending (e.g. Boeing and 
Lockheed Martin) while the other wants to integrate Russia into the 
global capitalist system more deeply to obtain its vast natural 
resources (e.g. ExxonMobil). This latter faction is also in alliance 
with the vulture capitalists (Mercer) and Wall Street investment banks 
(Goldman Sachs) that profit from financial speculation and crises, but 
the volatility and the deflation from financial crises negatively affect 
the production planning and commodity realization for global commodity 
producers with a manufacturing base in China (e.g. Silicon Valley)."


I read the second part, the "also", as consistent with saying along with 
all the media you cite that Goldman Sachs, who "profit from financial 
speculation and crises,", Mercer (who combine management of "human 
capital' with mergers and acquisitions) and Wall Street, have their 
fingers in both pies and, whatever David Martin means, don't they? They 
may lean toward the likely power, in this election Hillary, but their 
advantage is that they always hedge their bets, and they manage to 
profit no matter which faction emerges.


And while Hillary, Schumer and all their Democrat friends are deep with 
Wall Street, "rife with contradictions and conflicts," Trump, who is all 
over the place hedging bets, has appointed a 
second-generation-in-the-family Goldman Sachs alumnus, Steve Mnuchin, as 
his Secretary of the Treasury, and as his chief counsel and strategist 
Stephen K. Bannon, also a Goldman Sachs alumnus; while his noise against 
Wall Street played well to his intended audience. And Trump, like the 
other players joined at the capitalist, imperialist and 
white-supremacist Deep State hip as Paul Street says, appears to be 
letting everyone know that he is now the guy in charge and they'd better 
get aboard before the train rolls.


That's how I understand it.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] Fwd: Lemisch's On Active Service Now Available Online | New Politics

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

At the tumultuous 1969 meeting of the American Historical Association, I 
presented a paper, “Present-Mindedness Revisited: Anti-Radicalism as a 
Goal of American Historical Writing Since World War II” (there is a 
description of this presentation and the atmosphere at the AHA in Peter 
Novick’s chapter, “Collapse of Comity,” in That Noble Dream: The 
‘Objectivity Question’ and the American Historical Profession. The paper 
had an interesting history after that first presentation. After much 
positive (and negative) attention at the AHA meeting and in the New York 
Times and elsewhere, I submitted it serially to the American Historical 
Review and then to the Journal of American History. It received 
stunningly negative readings. R.K Webb of AHR wrote: (3/27/70) “I wonder 
if the activism of the New Left historians today, unlike the activism 
you so deplore in your article, may not be a bar to serious scholarship 
that can appeal to any scholar outside the sect itself...” Marty Ridge 
at the JAH (a nice man) sent me (7/17/70) a fifteen-page handwritten 
negative report from his anonymous reader, who wrote, “Lemisch is 
certainly the Tony Galento [an unorthodox boxer] of the Left I don’t 
know how you can tell him that he certainly cannot do it in the pages of 
the Journal. He probably believes that he can, which says something 
about how far he and his ilk are estranged from civilization [emphasis 
added].” Ridge himself wrote, “This essay more than any that I have read 
in the last several years has disturbed me.”


full: http://newpol.org/content/lemischs-active-service-now-available-online


--
Support Louis Proyect biography project
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/publish-the-biography-of-socialist-louis-proyect#/
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] Putin Ordered ‘Influence Campaign’ Aimed at U.S. Election, Report Says

[Steven L. Robinson via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*




Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), who on Thursday suggested it was time to start 
throwing rocks at Russia for interfering in our 
election, will lead the Senate Armed Services Committees new 
subcommittee on cyber threats, after being hand-picked by committee chairman 
and close friend Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).










Graham has been the Senates most vocal Republican challenging Trump over 
the president-elects repeated efforts to downplay and discredit the 
intelligence communitys findings that Russian operatives were behind a 
series of election-related hacks. A declassified report released Friday by U.S. 
intelligence agencies concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a 
comprehensive cyber campaign to disrupt the election and aspired to 
help Trumps campaign.

Full at: 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/01/06/senate-gops-biggest-trump-critic-to-lead-congress-most-public-russian-hacking-investigation/?utm_term=.6f54aa4f314d=nl_politics-pm=1
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] Fwd: Re: [lbo-talk] Behind the News: Heightened Intra-capitalist Conflict under Secular Stagnation

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

On 1/6/17 3:10 PM, Ralph Johansen via Marxism wrote:

One faction wants to provoke a crisis with Russia to provide a pretext
for expanded military spending (e.g. Boeing and Lockheed Martin) while
the other wants to integrate Russia into the global capitalist system
more deeply to obtain its vast natural resources (e.g. ExxonMobil). This
latter faction is also in alliance with the vulture capitalists (Mercer)
and Wall Street investment banks (Goldman Sachs)



Okay, let me see if I understand this. Those ten thousand articles in 
Alternet, CommonDreams, Huffington Post, Counterpunch, ZNet, Salon, 
Truthdig and Truthout calling attention to the internecine ties between 
Goldman-Sachs and the Clinton campaign were wrong. In reality, 
Goldman-Sachs was part of a stealthy faction under the leadership of 
Breitbart.com that preferred Trump because he wanted to "integrate 
Russia into the global capitalist system".


I don't mind vulgar Marxism if there is at least a modicum of 
intelligence at work. This is pure drivel.


--
Support Louis Proyect biography project
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/publish-the-biography-of-socialist-louis-proyect#/
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] Putin Ordered ‘Influence Campaign’ Aimed at U.S. Election, Report Says

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

NY Times, Jan. 6 2017
Putin Ordered ‘Influence Campaign’ Aimed at U.S. Election, Report Says
By DAVID E. SANGER

WASHINGTON — American intelligence officials have concluded that 
Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, “ordered an influence campaign in 
2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election,” and turned from seeking 
to “denigrate” Hillary Clinton to developing “a clear preference for 
President-elect Trump.”


The conclusions were part of a declassified intelligence report, ordered 
by President Obama, that was released Friday afternoon. Its main 
conclusions were described to Donald J. Trump by intelligence officials 
earlier in the day, and he responded by acknowledging that Russia sought 
to hack into the Democratic National Committee, but said nothing about 
the conclusion that Mr. Putin had sought to aid his candidacy, other 
than that it had no effect on the outcome.


The report, a damning and surprisingly detailed account of Russia’s 
efforts to undermine the American electoral system and Mrs. Clinton in 
particular, went on to assess that Mr. Putin “aspired to help 
President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting 
Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.”


The report described a broad campaign that included covert operations, 
including cyberactivities, with “trolling” and “fake news.”


In the unclassified version of the report, the intelligence agencies 
also concluded “with high confidence” that Russia’s main military 
intelligence unit, the G.R.U., created the “persona” called Guccifer 2.0 
and a website, DCLeaks.com, to release the emails of the Democratic 
National Committee and the chairman of the Clinton campaign, John D. 
Podesta.


Participating in the briefing were James R. Clapper Jr., the director of 
national intelligence; John O. Brennan, the director of the C.I.A.; Adm. 
Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency; and 
James B. Comey, the director of the F.B.I.


--
Support Louis Proyect biography project
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/publish-the-biography-of-socialist-louis-proyect#/
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] Fwd: Re: [lbo-talk] Behind the News: Heightened Intra-capitalist Conflict under Secular Stagnation

[Ralph Johansen via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

 Forwarded Message 
Subject: 	Re: [lbo-talk] Behind the News: Heightened Intra-capitalist 
Conflict under Secular Stagnation

Date:   Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:53:52 -0800
From:   Ralph Johansen 
To: lbo-t...@lbo-talk.org


/On Dec 14 03:27:22 PST 2016 /*David Martin **davidtmartin at 
gmail.com** 
wrote


*The CIA is not a creature of the executive branch but of Wall Street 
and the corporatocracy, and, just like capital itself, it is rife with 
contradictions and conflicts. Looking at Steve Bannon's resume -- from 
the Security Studies program at Georgetown (the academic arm of U.S. 
intelligence agencies) and naval intelligence officer to Goldman Sachs 
and Hollywood propaganda films and Breitbart, I can say with a high 
degree of confidence that he is a covert operative serving an 
intelligence agency with a non-official cover. (I've known operatives 
with similar resumes as well as look at John Perkins' resume as an EHM). 
So what we are witnessing is factional warfare breaking out within the 
CIA and military, as one faction stole the election from another. One 
faction wants to provoke a crisis with Russia to provide a pretext for 
expanded military spending (e.g. Boeing and Lockheed Martin) while the 
other wants to integrate Russia into the global capitalist system more 
deeply to obtain its vast natural resources (e.g. ExxonMobil). This 
latter faction is also in alliance with the vulture capitalists (Mercer) 
and Wall Street investment banks (Goldman Sachs) that profit from 
financial speculation and crises, but the volatility and the deflation 
from financial crises negatively affect the production planning and 
commodity realization for global commodity producers with a 
manufacturing base in China (e.g. Silicon Valley). Like a "Godfather," 
Trump is now threatening the other faction with shots across the bow to 
get them in line. It is no accident that in midst of this conflict that 
Trump created a crisis with phone call with the President of Taiwan -- 
threatening to disrupt the GVCs of Sillicon Valley) or that he has 
threatened the largest military contractors with loss of contracts (e.g. 
Air Force One, F-35). That is, Trump is creating crises that threaten 
the other faction from which they must seek his protection -- and force 
them to kneel before the Godfather and kiss his ring, while he rewards 
the vulture capitalists, Wall Street investment banks, Big OIl, and 
CIA/military faction who support him with cabinet posts. A little carrot 
and stick from the carrot face and yellow top.


What do you think? What am I missing in this analysis? Thx! D



This morning Glenn Greenwald untangled much of the toxic snare that 
official Washington and its media outlets have been weaving around 
Assange, Snowden and his own organization and what they represent, 
comparing it with how they attacked Ellsberg, in a sorry world of very 
few people, now mostly exiled, in a position to say publicly and having 
the courage to report what is crying out for exposure.


In the dialogue with Amy Goodman 
(https://www.democracynow.org/2017/1/6/what_impact_will_trump_presidency_have) 
Greenwald describes the open animosity toward the whistle blowers and 
toward Trump displayed all over a part of the power grid that includes 
the Democrats and the CIA.


All of which called to my mind what you have written here. Without 
further information it's hard to judge accurately, but the perspective 
you offer is well to keep in mind, because from other information coming 
out it comports with the way sides have been chosen toward Russia.


When you put together Trump dissing Lockheed Martin and Boeing, Wall 
Street and the intelligence community; the position that Silicon Valley 
and the technology companies have taken toward Trump ("By attacking 
companies like Amazon (for tax avoidance) and Apple (for outsourcing 
labor on its products), Mr. Trump was able to signal his opposition to 
the technological elites just as he went after Hillary Clinton’s highly 
paid speeches to Goldman Sachs." 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/18/opinion/silicon-valley-helped-create-trump-and-thats-bad-for-it.html); 
Trump's unusual phone call to the head of the Taiwan government in a 
"shot across the bow" to China (and by implication on the rentiers in 
Silicon Valley and 

[Marxism] Joyce Appleby, Historian of Capitalism and American Identity, Is Dead at 87

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

NY Times, Jan. 6 2017
Joyce Appleby, Historian of Capitalism and American Identity, Is Dead at 87
By SEWELL CHAN

Joyce Appleby, a distinguished historian and author who argued that 
ideas about capitalism and liberty were fundamental in shaping the 
identity of early Americans, died on Dec. 23 at her home in Taos, N.M. 
She was 87.


The cause was complications of pneumonia, her daughter, Ann Lansburgh 
Caylor, said.


Dr. Appleby, a former journalist who began her Ph.D. training at 32 
while caring for three children, rose to the top ranks of the 
discipline, serving as president of the Organization of American 
Historians, the American Historical Association and the Society for 
Historians of the Early American Republic.


She wrote several books, contributed to others and edited several more; 
she was 84 when her final book, “Shores of Knowledge: New World 
Discoveries and the Scientific Imagination,” was published.


She was also a scholar of Thomas Jefferson and wrote a brief biography 
of him, published in 2003.


Dr. Appleby was part of a generation of historians who examined the 
ideologies and beliefs that animated the American Revolution. These 
scholars took seriously the ideas of the founding generation, breaking 
with Progressive Era historians like Charles A. Beard, who had dismissed 
revolutionary ideas as rhetorical cover for the founders’ economic 
interests. But the scholars were not united in their interpretation.


Following a path laid by Caroline Robbins, historians like Bernard 
Bailyn and Gordon S. Wood emphasized civic republicanism, a set of 
beliefs that focused on the threat of power to liberty and the need to 
put the common good above personal self-interest. They traced the 
Americans’ revolutionary beliefs to the so-called radical Whigs of 
17th-century England, thinkers like Algernon Sidney and James 
Harrington, who feared a slide toward despotism.


Dr. Appleby challenged this view.

“The classical republican convictions that Bailyn ascribed to America’s 
founders drew on a vocabulary of political pathology to predict tyranny, 
chaos, usurpations and conspiracies,” Dr. Appleby said in a 2012 
lecture. “Locke was turned into an eccentric figure, the center now 
being held by an inherited way of interpreting events harking back to 
Renaissance fears about power lusts.


“Classical republicanism involved several propositions: that change 
generally brought degeneration, or worse, and that history pointed to 
the instability of all political orders. Civic virtue, where leaders put 
the common good above their own interests, formed the only bulwark 
against decay.”


In books like “Capitalism and a New Social Order: The Republican Vision 
of the 1790s” (1984) and “Liberalism and Republicanism in the Historical 
Imagination” (1992). Dr. Appleby argued that the revolutionaries were 
more individualistic and optimistic than they had been given credit for.


John Locke and Adam Smith had as much influence on founders like 
Jefferson as the radical Whigs — if not more, she said. In her view, the 
revolutionaries believed that the public good would arise out of the 
harmonious pursuit of private interests in a market economy.


“For me, liberalism had entered American consciousness as a potent brew 
blended from 17th-century entrepreneurial attitudes and the 
Enlightenment’s endorsement of liberty and reason,” Dr. Appleby said in 
the 2012 lecture. “Because nature had endowed human beings with the 
capacity to think for themselves and act on their own behalf, 
representative government seemed the perfect fit for them.


“Rather than classical republicanism’s fixation on social traumas, 
liberalism was optimistic, moving forward with the rational, 
self-improving individual who was endowed with natural rights to be 
exercised in a widened ambit of freedom.”


Or, as she put it in a 2007 essay on the intellectual underpinnings of 
American democracy, “Fear moved aside to make room for hope.”


The debate between liberalism and republicanism, especially active in 
the 1970s, eventually subsided. A new generation of social historians 
analyzed the concerns of marginalized groups — workers, women, free and 
enslaved African-Americans, and Native Americans, among others. Later 
still, a new cohort of scholars, influenced by postmodernism and 
cultural studies, looked at how human consciousness is shaped by language.


Dr. Appleby did not reject postmodernism and multiculturalism out of 
hand, but she feared that they had taken history too far toward 
relativism. In “Telling the Truth About History” (1994), she and the 
historians Lynn Hunt and Margaret C. Jacob waded into 

[Marxism] Fwd: What Turkey Has Become

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

As I sat down to write this article, my wife turned to me from her 
computer and said that there was a terrorist bombing in Izmir.


Almost every week lately, there is another incident that can be tied to 
ISIS whether or not it actually takes “credit”. On New Year’s Eve, we 
were at her brother-in-law Mehmet’s apartment on the upper west side of 
Manhattan sitting down for dinner with Prosecco, the poor man’s 
Champagne, when the news broke about the terrorist attack on the Reina 
nightclub in the Beşiktaş district of Istanbul. When I first met Mehmet 
on a visit to Istanbul in 2003, he anticipated that this sort of thing 
would eventually begin to take place in Turkey. He thought that the war 
in Iraq could spill over into Turkey and that it would be best for his 
family to relocate to the USA. This is pretty much what has happened.


ISIS is a product of the invasion of Iraq, a war that Turkey opposed and 
whose decision was welcomed by the left. While most people might 
remember the AKP as key to voting down a resolution that would have 
permitted Turkey to be a staging ground for the invasion, the truth is 
that its opposition was based more on cash than principle. Like a mafia 
gang, it offered the USA a deal. A fifty-two-billion-dollar aid package 
would buy Turkey’s backing but when Bush refused to pay more than half 
of that, the AKP nixed the deal.


In fact, the baksheesh economy prevailed in Syria as well, the 
“anti-imperialist” country often depicted as the polar opposite of NATO 
member Turkey. Clifford Krause reported in the NY Times on January 2nd, 
2003 that the Bush administration was “surprised and gratified by 
Syria’s recent vote in the United Nations Security Council in favor of 
the resolution demanding Iraq allow weapons inspectors to return or face 
possible military action.”


full: http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/01/06/what-turkey-has-become/


--
Support Louis Proyect biography project
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/publish-the-biography-of-socialist-louis-proyect#/
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] Fwd: Will Washington’s New Pro-Moscow, Anti-Beijing Gang Drive a Wedge Through the BRICS in 2017?

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

I was going to write an article about the collapse of the BRICS 
mythology. Patrick Bond beat me to the punch and did a better job than I 
ever could.


http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/01/06/will-washingtons-new-pro-moscow-anti-beijing-gang-drive-a-wedge-through-the-brics-in-2017/



--
Support Louis Proyect biography project
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/publish-the-biography-of-socialist-louis-proyect#/
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] Fwd: Those Radical Bohemians!

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Paul Buhle reviews "Rebel Crossings: New Women, Free Lovers and 
Radicalism in Britain and the United States" by Sheila Rowbotham.


http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/01/06/those-radical-bohemians/



--
Support Louis Proyect biography project
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/publish-the-biography-of-socialist-louis-proyect#/
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com