Re: unbind (all) key bindings
* On 25 Nov 2013, Martin Vegter wrote: > > I would like to unbind all key bindings, so that I can explicitly define > only those, that I am actually going to use. > > While googling, I have discovered that I am not the only one having this > problem. There even seems to be a patch called "unbind": > > http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/mutt/#unbind > > but only for version 1.4 and 1.5.1. I am using mutt version > 1.5.21-6.2+deb7u1, so I am not sure if that would work. Hi Martin - I think the other responses on this thread are appropriate, and you should consider whether you really want to unbind everything. That said, as the author of the unbind patch that you cited: no, it won't work with a current mutt. It's very out of date. I took some time to update and improve the patch and you'll find the result here: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mutt.devel/21157 (For anyone familiar with the unbind saga and its intricacies, this patch finally does a real unbind, not a bind to noop.) -- David Champion • d...@bikeshed.us
Re: unbind (all) key bindings
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 01:31:14AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 01:41:55PM +, Martin Orwin wrote:
> > I understand your concerns about this but I don't think you'll find it a
> > problem in the long run. I occasionally hit the wrong key and there is
> > always a way of undoing what I've done (aside from saying 'no' when Mutt
> > actually asks me if I really want to do something, which personally I
> > like). Shift-W let's me unclear a flag I've accidentally set and ctrl-c
> > ('do you want to exit mutt?') gets me out of any other situation (just
> > remember to type n(o) when it asks). There will be other more
> > sophisticated ways of getting out of certain situations, but for me these
> > two work and are enough. As to all the other key-bound functions, it
> > doesn't matter that you don't use them. It's a big tool box and over the
> > time I've used Mutt I've learned to use some of the tools when I've felt
> > the need to do something (limit patterns for example). I think you might be
> > throwing the baby out with the bathwater if you disable all the keybindings
> > as then you may need to work out how to reinstate some function or other
> > when you feel the need to use it.
> >
> > I'd say stick with Mutt as it is, I did, and in a few weeks time I think
> > you'll find that the keybinding thing is a non-issue. Just my thoughts.
> > Whatever you choose to do, once you get used to it, it's the best email
> > client out there IMHO (apart from when I get those pesky complex html
> > messages and have to use the Gmail web interface!).
>
> I notice you are using mutt as the MUA. How did you manage to screw up
> this post so badly?
I see my error. Apologies. I'm not sure how that happened.
Re: unbind (all) key bindings
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 01:41:55PM +, Martin Orwin wrote:
> I understand your concerns about this but I don't think you'll find it a
> problem in the long run. I occasionally hit the wrong key and there is
> always a way of undoing what I've done (aside from saying 'no' when Mutt
> actually asks me if I really want to do something, which personally I like).
> Shift-W let's me unclear a flag I've accidentally set and ctrl-c ('do you
> want to exit mutt?') gets me out of any other situation (just remember to
> type n(o) when it asks). There will be other more sophisticated ways of
> getting out of certain situations, but for me these two work and are enough.
> As to all the other key-bound functions, it doesn't matter that you don't use
> them. It's a big tool box and over the time I've used Mutt I've learned to
> use some of the tools when I've felt the need to do something (limit patterns
> for example). I think you might be throwing the baby out with the bathwater
> if you disable all the keybindings as then you may need to work out how to
> reinstate some function or other when you feel the need to use it.
>
> I'd say stick with Mutt as it is, I did, and in a few weeks time I think
> you'll find that the keybinding thing is a non-issue. Just my thoughts.
> Whatever you choose to do, once you get used to it, it's the best email
> client out there IMHO (apart from when I get those pesky complex html
> messages and have to use the Gmail web interface!).
I notice you are using mutt as the MUA. How did you manage to screw up
this post so badly?
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
