RouteViews is looking for host at AMS-IX
Hi NANOG, Without going into too much detail, RouteViews is looking for a new host at AMS-IX. Our current host has made a considerable effort to keep our collector connected, but has be unable to find a suitable long term solution with AMS-IX. If you would like to help, and have VM resources capable of hosting a linux VM at AMS-IX, please contact me off list. Thanks, - David
Re: Routeviews
Sent from my Samsung device Original message From: John Kemp <k...@network-services.uoregon.edu> Date: 2016-12-17 13:30 (GMT-05:00) To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Routeviews It's back/renewed as of... Domain Name: ROUTEVIEWS.ORG Domain ID: D48496876-LROR WHOIS Server: Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com Updated Date: 2016-12-16T18:41:42Z Creation Date: 2000-12-14T23:05:47Z John Kemp On 12/16/16 9:44 AM, John Kemp wrote: > > We're looking at it now. Thanks. > > John Kemp > > On 12/16/16 9:21 AM, Marty Strong via NANOG wrote: >> Looks like somebody didn’t renew the domain >> >> $ whois routeviews.org >> Domain Name: ROUTEVIEWS.ORG >> Domain ID: D48496876-LROR >> WHOIS Server: >> Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com >> Updated Date: 2016-12-16T10:30:46Z >> Creation Date: 2000-12-14T23:05:47Z >> Registry Expiry Date: 2017-12-14T23:05:47Z >> Sponsoring Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC >> Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 2 >> Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited >> https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited >> Domain Status: autoRenewPeriod https://icann.org/epp#autoRenewPeriod >> Registrant ID: C11717-NS >> Registrant Name: Perfect Privacy, LLC >> Registrant Organization: Network Solutions LLC >> Registrant Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West >> Registrant Street: care of Network Solutions (DOMAIN-RESALE) >> Registrant Street: FL >> Registrant City: Jacksonville >> Registrant State/Province: FL >> Registrant Postal Code: 32217 >> Registrant Country: US >> Registrant Phone: +1.5707088780 >> Registrant Phone Ext: >> Registrant Fax: +1.5707088780 >> Registrant Fax Ext: >> Registrant Email: pendingrenewalordelet...@networksolutions.com >> Admin ID: C11717-NS >> Admin Name: Perfect Privacy, LLC >> Admin Organization: Network Solutions LLC >> Admin Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West >> Admin Street: care of Network Solutions (DOMAIN-RESALE) >> Admin Street: FL >> Admin City: Jacksonville >> Admin State/Province: FL >> Admin Postal Code: 32217 >> Admin Country: US >> Admin Phone: +1.5707088780 >> Admin Phone Ext: >> Admin Fax: +1.5707088780 >> Admin Fax Ext: >> Admin Email: pendingrenewalordelet...@networksolutions.com >> Tech ID: C11717-NS >> Tech Name: Perfect Privacy, LLC >> Tech Organization: Network Solutions LLC >> Tech Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West >> Tech Street: care of Network Solutions (DOMAIN-RESALE) >> Tech Street: FL >> Tech City: Jacksonville >> Tech State/Province: FL >> Tech Postal Code: 32217 >> Tech Country: US >> Tech Phone: +1.5707088780 >> Tech Phone Ext: >> Tech Fax: +1.5707088780 >> Tech Fax Ext: >> Tech Email: pendingrenewalordelet...@networksolutions.com >> Name Server: NS1.PENDINGRENEWALDELETION.COM >> Name Server: NS2.PENDINGRENEWALDELETION.COM >> DNSSEC: unsigned >>>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-12-16T17:19:44Z <<< >> >> For more information on Whois status codes, please visit >> https://icann.org/epp >> >> Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist >> persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in >> the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is >> provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and >> Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is >> intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data >> only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this >> data to(a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, >> telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or >> solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing >> customers; or (b) enable high volume, automate >> >> Regards, >> Marty Strong >> -- >> Cloudflare - AS13335 >> Network Engineer >> ma...@cloudflare.com >> +44 7584 906 055 >> smartflare (Skype) >> >> https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/13335 >>
Re: Routeviews
It's back/renewed as of... Domain Name: ROUTEVIEWS.ORG Domain ID: D48496876-LROR WHOIS Server: Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com Updated Date: 2016-12-16T18:41:42Z Creation Date: 2000-12-14T23:05:47Z John Kemp On 12/16/16 9:44 AM, John Kemp wrote: > > We're looking at it now. Thanks. > > John Kemp > > On 12/16/16 9:21 AM, Marty Strong via NANOG wrote: >> Looks like somebody didn’t renew the domain >> >> $ whois routeviews.org >> Domain Name: ROUTEVIEWS.ORG >> Domain ID: D48496876-LROR >> WHOIS Server: >> Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com >> Updated Date: 2016-12-16T10:30:46Z >> Creation Date: 2000-12-14T23:05:47Z >> Registry Expiry Date: 2017-12-14T23:05:47Z >> Sponsoring Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC >> Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 2 >> Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited >> https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited >> Domain Status: autoRenewPeriod https://icann.org/epp#autoRenewPeriod >> Registrant ID: C11717-NS >> Registrant Name: Perfect Privacy, LLC >> Registrant Organization: Network Solutions LLC >> Registrant Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West >> Registrant Street: care of Network Solutions (DOMAIN-RESALE) >> Registrant Street: FL >> Registrant City: Jacksonville >> Registrant State/Province: FL >> Registrant Postal Code: 32217 >> Registrant Country: US >> Registrant Phone: +1.5707088780 >> Registrant Phone Ext: >> Registrant Fax: +1.5707088780 >> Registrant Fax Ext: >> Registrant Email: pendingrenewalordelet...@networksolutions.com >> Admin ID: C11717-NS >> Admin Name: Perfect Privacy, LLC >> Admin Organization: Network Solutions LLC >> Admin Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West >> Admin Street: care of Network Solutions (DOMAIN-RESALE) >> Admin Street: FL >> Admin City: Jacksonville >> Admin State/Province: FL >> Admin Postal Code: 32217 >> Admin Country: US >> Admin Phone: +1.5707088780 >> Admin Phone Ext: >> Admin Fax: +1.5707088780 >> Admin Fax Ext: >> Admin Email: pendingrenewalordelet...@networksolutions.com >> Tech ID: C11717-NS >> Tech Name: Perfect Privacy, LLC >> Tech Organization: Network Solutions LLC >> Tech Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West >> Tech Street: care of Network Solutions (DOMAIN-RESALE) >> Tech Street: FL >> Tech City: Jacksonville >> Tech State/Province: FL >> Tech Postal Code: 32217 >> Tech Country: US >> Tech Phone: +1.5707088780 >> Tech Phone Ext: >> Tech Fax: +1.5707088780 >> Tech Fax Ext: >> Tech Email: pendingrenewalordelet...@networksolutions.com >> Name Server: NS1.PENDINGRENEWALDELETION.COM >> Name Server: NS2.PENDINGRENEWALDELETION.COM >> DNSSEC: unsigned > Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-12-16T17:19:44Z <<< >> >> For more information on Whois status codes, please visit >> https://icann.org/epp >> >> Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist >> persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in >> the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is >> provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and >> Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is >> intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data >> only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this >> data to(a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, >> telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or >> solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing >> customers; or (b) enable high volume, automate >> >> Regards, >> Marty Strong >> -- >> Cloudflare - AS13335 >> Network Engineer >> ma...@cloudflare.com >> +44 7584 906 055 >> smartflare (Skype) >> >> https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/13335 >>
Re: Routeviews
We're looking at it now. Thanks. John Kemp On 12/16/16 9:21 AM, Marty Strong via NANOG wrote: > Looks like somebody didn’t renew the domain > > $ whois routeviews.org > Domain Name: ROUTEVIEWS.ORG > Domain ID: D48496876-LROR > WHOIS Server: > Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com > Updated Date: 2016-12-16T10:30:46Z > Creation Date: 2000-12-14T23:05:47Z > Registry Expiry Date: 2017-12-14T23:05:47Z > Sponsoring Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC > Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 2 > Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited > https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited > Domain Status: autoRenewPeriod https://icann.org/epp#autoRenewPeriod > Registrant ID: C11717-NS > Registrant Name: Perfect Privacy, LLC > Registrant Organization: Network Solutions LLC > Registrant Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West > Registrant Street: care of Network Solutions (DOMAIN-RESALE) > Registrant Street: FL > Registrant City: Jacksonville > Registrant State/Province: FL > Registrant Postal Code: 32217 > Registrant Country: US > Registrant Phone: +1.5707088780 > Registrant Phone Ext: > Registrant Fax: +1.5707088780 > Registrant Fax Ext: > Registrant Email: pendingrenewalordelet...@networksolutions.com > Admin ID: C11717-NS > Admin Name: Perfect Privacy, LLC > Admin Organization: Network Solutions LLC > Admin Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West > Admin Street: care of Network Solutions (DOMAIN-RESALE) > Admin Street: FL > Admin City: Jacksonville > Admin State/Province: FL > Admin Postal Code: 32217 > Admin Country: US > Admin Phone: +1.5707088780 > Admin Phone Ext: > Admin Fax: +1.5707088780 > Admin Fax Ext: > Admin Email: pendingrenewalordelet...@networksolutions.com > Tech ID: C11717-NS > Tech Name: Perfect Privacy, LLC > Tech Organization: Network Solutions LLC > Tech Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West > Tech Street: care of Network Solutions (DOMAIN-RESALE) > Tech Street: FL > Tech City: Jacksonville > Tech State/Province: FL > Tech Postal Code: 32217 > Tech Country: US > Tech Phone: +1.5707088780 > Tech Phone Ext: > Tech Fax: +1.5707088780 > Tech Fax Ext: > Tech Email: pendingrenewalordelet...@networksolutions.com > Name Server: NS1.PENDINGRENEWALDELETION.COM > Name Server: NS2.PENDINGRENEWALDELETION.COM > DNSSEC: unsigned Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-12-16T17:19:44Z <<< > > For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp > > Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist > persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in > the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is > provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and > Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is > intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data > only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this > data to(a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, > telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or > solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing > customers; or (b) enable high volume, automate > > Regards, > Marty Strong > -- > Cloudflare - AS13335 > Network Engineer > ma...@cloudflare.com > +44 7584 906 055 > smartflare (Skype) > > https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/13335 >
Routeviews
Looks like somebody didn’t renew the domain $ whois routeviews.org Domain Name: ROUTEVIEWS.ORG Domain ID: D48496876-LROR WHOIS Server: Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com Updated Date: 2016-12-16T10:30:46Z Creation Date: 2000-12-14T23:05:47Z Registry Expiry Date: 2017-12-14T23:05:47Z Sponsoring Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 2 Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited Domain Status: autoRenewPeriod https://icann.org/epp#autoRenewPeriod Registrant ID: C11717-NS Registrant Name: Perfect Privacy, LLC Registrant Organization: Network Solutions LLC Registrant Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West Registrant Street: care of Network Solutions (DOMAIN-RESALE) Registrant Street: FL Registrant City: Jacksonville Registrant State/Province: FL Registrant Postal Code: 32217 Registrant Country: US Registrant Phone: +1.5707088780 Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: +1.5707088780 Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email: pendingrenewalordelet...@networksolutions.com Admin ID: C11717-NS Admin Name: Perfect Privacy, LLC Admin Organization: Network Solutions LLC Admin Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West Admin Street: care of Network Solutions (DOMAIN-RESALE) Admin Street: FL Admin City: Jacksonville Admin State/Province: FL Admin Postal Code: 32217 Admin Country: US Admin Phone: +1.5707088780 Admin Phone Ext: Admin Fax: +1.5707088780 Admin Fax Ext: Admin Email: pendingrenewalordelet...@networksolutions.com Tech ID: C11717-NS Tech Name: Perfect Privacy, LLC Tech Organization: Network Solutions LLC Tech Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West Tech Street: care of Network Solutions (DOMAIN-RESALE) Tech Street: FL Tech City: Jacksonville Tech State/Province: FL Tech Postal Code: 32217 Tech Country: US Tech Phone: +1.5707088780 Tech Phone Ext: Tech Fax: +1.5707088780 Tech Fax Ext: Tech Email: pendingrenewalordelet...@networksolutions.com Name Server: NS1.PENDINGRENEWALDELETION.COM Name Server: NS2.PENDINGRENEWALDELETION.COM DNSSEC: unsigned >>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-12-16T17:19:44Z <<< For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to(a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing customers; or (b) enable high volume, automate Regards, Marty Strong -- Cloudflare - AS13335 Network Engineer ma...@cloudflare.com +44 7584 906 055 smartflare (Skype) https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/13335
Re: Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?
PCH maintains routing archives here: https://www.pch.net/resources/Raw_Routing_Data/ In aggregate, our AS3856 collects routes from 1307 distinct ASNs spread across 82 IXPs. > *From:* Kurt Kraut via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> > *Date:* December 8, 2015 at 08:24:31 PST > *To:* NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> > *Subject:* *Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?* > *Reply-To:* Kurt Kraut <lis...@kurtkraut.net > <mailto:lis...@kurtkraut.net>> > > Hi, > > > For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous > Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS > in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response > from them since July. > > Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used > resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives. > > Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the > point of view of my routers have of the internet? > > > Best regards, > > > Kurt Kraut
Re: Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?
Hi, I'm still on the h...@routeviews.org alias. I haven't seen any mail from Kurt Kraut. so I would suspect that something is being filtered someplace. perhaps we can interceed to identify that issue. thanks joel On 12/8/15 8:24 AM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote: > Hi, > > > For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous > Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS > in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response > from them since July. > > Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used > resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives. > > Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the > point of view of my routers have of the internet? > > > Best regards, > > > Kurt Kraut > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?
RIPE stats also takes a feed similarly. On 12/9/2015 01:24 AM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote: Hi, For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response from them since July. Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives. Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the point of view of my routers have of the internet? Best regards, Kurt Kraut
Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?
Hi, For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response from them since July. Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives. Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the point of view of my routers have of the internet? Best regards, Kurt Kraut
Re: Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?
routeviews peering tuned up this weekend... in ashburn equinix. kemp and his folk are normally quite respsnsive, are you sure your mail got to them? On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Paul S. <cont...@winterei.se> wrote: > RIPE stats also takes a feed similarly. > > > On 12/9/2015 01:24 AM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous >> Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS >> in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response >> from them since July. >> >> Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used >> resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives. >> >> Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the >> point of view of my routers have of the internet? >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> Kurt Kraut > >
Re: Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?
The problem being discussed here relates to: route-views.saopaulo.routeviews.org We do have a lot of outstanding requests for that collector. But there are some issues there that we need to discuss with the exchange. We'll work on getting that moving forward. Apologies for the lack of response. John Kemp h...@routeviews.org On 12/8/15 8:24 AM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote: > Hi, > > > For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous > Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS > in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response > from them since July. > > Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used > resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives. > > Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the > point of view of my routers have of the internet? > > > Best regards, > > > Kurt Kraut >
new RouteViews collector at NWAX: route-views.nwax.routeviews.org
Just brought online Details at: http://www.routeviews.org/nwax.html We would welcome a few more NWAX peers at this point. Thanks to NWAX and IOVATION, -- John Kemp RouteViews Engineer NOC: n...@routeviews.org MAIL: h...@routeviews.org WWW: http://www.routeviews.org
cert's routeviews mirror
Someone asked me for the link... http://routeviews-mirror.cert.org/ John Kemp h...@routeviews.org
routeviews+BGPmon resources
The NANOG60 Talk:
https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/monday.general.olschanowsky.routeviews.33.pdf
BGPmon Homepage
http://bgpmon.netsec.colostate.edu/
BGPmon Mailing List
http://www.netsec.colostate.edu/mailman/listinfo/bgpmon
BGPmon v7.3.3 Download
http://bgpmon.netsec.colostate.edu/index.php/download
BGPmon CPAN Modules e.g.
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/B/BG/BGPMON/
BGPmon-core
BGPmon-Archiver
BGPmon-AnalyticsDB
BGPmon-CPM
RouteViews BGPmon Dedicated Instances
(rv2) livebgp-route-views2.routeviews.org
(rv3) livebgp-route-views3.routeviews.org
(rv6) livebgp-route-views6.routeviews.org
(paix) livebgp-paix.routeviews.org
(linx) livebgp-linx.routeviews.org
RouteViews BGPmon Consolidating Instances
(rv2+3+6) livebgp.routeviews.org
(paix+linx) livebgpix.routeviews.org
RouteViews MRT Archives
{http,ftp}://archive.routeviews.org/
rsync –list-only archive.routeviews.org::routeviews
rsync –av archive.routeviews.org::routeviews/bgpdata .
If you plan on utilizing one of the BGPmon live feeds for
an extended period, we would appreciate an e-mail. Please
let us know your intended usage and the subnet you will
be coming in from. For the RouteViews Instances, mail to
h...@routeviews.org. For general BGPmon questions,
bgp...@netsec.colostate.edu.
The RouteViews Instances are considered a test platform.
So while we do monitor, we are still debugging and doing
updates. Feel free to ask if you have questions or comments.
John Kemp
RouteViews Network Engineer
h...@routeviews.org
Re: 32-bit ASes at routeviews
On 12/16/12 2:48 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: Looking for 32-bit AS numbers, I get some strange results from routeviews: route-viewssh ip bgp regexp _23456_ BGP table version is 2393809200, local router ID is 128.223.51.103 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 31.177.16.0/22 128.223.253.10 0 3582 3701 3356 23456 3.1043 i * 46.29.72.0/21129.250.0.11 285 0 2914 12389 12389 12389 12389 23456 3.627 i * 46.243.96.0/21 154.11.11.1130 0 852 174 39704 39704 23456 3.787 i * 91.208.62.0/24 154.11.11.1130 0 852 174 39704 39704 23456 3.787 i * 91.217.87.0/24 194.85.40.15 0 3267 174 23456 3.661 i * 91.230.169.0/24 208.51.134.254 13905 0 3549 29152 29152 29152 29152 23456 23456 23456 23456 3.1426 i * 91.238.8.0/24194.85.40.15 0 3267 8220 23456 3.2040 i * 111.235.148.0/22 194.85.40.15 0 3267 9498 9730 23456 i * 141.0.176.0/21 129.250.0.11 285 0 2914 12389 12389 12389 12389 23456 3.627 i Unless I missed something, AS 23456 is supposed to show up as a stand-in for 32-bit ASNs on 16-bit BGP implementations, not in _addition_ to 32-bit ASNs. So the penultimate line would make sense if the other lines weren't there and the others don't make sense period. Maybe a bug in the IOS they're running? route-viewssh ver Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Or is something else going on? Off topic, this reminds me I would rather have ASPLAIN again. We switched a couple of years ago on a particular user request. If there is no objection, I would love to switch back ASAP. This would be on route-views, and on route-views3. Just asking if others concur? -- John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org) RouteViews Engineer NOC: n...@routeviews.org MAIL: h...@routeviews.org WWW: http://www.routeviews.org
Re: 32-bit ASes at routeviews
On 18/12/2012 22:24, John Kemp wrote: If there is no objection, I would love to switch back ASAP. This would be on route-views, and on route-views3. Just asking if others concur? rfc5396. I'd say go for it. Nick
Re: 32-bit ASes at routeviews
Off topic, this reminds me I would rather have ASPLAIN again. We switched a couple of years ago on a particular user request. listening to those pesky users, eh? If there is no objection, I would love to switch back ASAP. This would be on route-views, and on route-views3. Just asking if others concur? makes sense to me randy
Re: 32-bit ASes at routeviews
+1 On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: Off topic, this reminds me I would rather have ASPLAIN again. We switched a couple of years ago on a particular user request. listening to those pesky users, eh? If there is no objection, I would love to switch back ASAP. This would be on route-views, and on route-views3. Just asking if others concur? makes sense to me randy
Re: 32-bit ASes at routeviews
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:48:13PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: Looking for 32-bit AS numbers, I get some strange results from routeviews: route-viewssh ip bgp regexp _23456_ BGP table version is 2393809200, local router ID is 128.223.51.103 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 31.177.16.0/22 128.223.253.10 0 3582 3701 3356 23456 3.1043 i * 46.29.72.0/21129.250.0.11 285 0 2914 12389 12389 12389 12389 23456 3.627 i * 46.243.96.0/21 154.11.11.1130 0 852 174 39704 39704 23456 3.787 i * 91.208.62.0/24 154.11.11.1130 0 852 174 39704 39704 23456 3.787 i * 91.217.87.0/24 194.85.40.15 0 3267 174 23456 3.661 i * 91.230.169.0/24 208.51.134.254 13905 0 3549 29152 29152 29152 29152 23456 23456 23456 23456 3.1426 i * 91.238.8.0/24194.85.40.15 0 3267 8220 23456 3.2040 i * 111.235.148.0/22 194.85.40.15 0 3267 9498 9730 23456 i * 141.0.176.0/21 129.250.0.11 285 0 2914 12389 12389 12389 12389 23456 3.627 i Unless I missed something, AS 23456 is supposed to show up as a stand-in for 32-bit ASNs on 16-bit BGP implementations, not in _addition_ to 32-bit ASNs. So the penultimate line would make sense if the other lines weren't there and the others don't make sense period. Maybe a bug in the IOS they're running? route-viewssh ver Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Or is something else going on? This can happen when a old 2-byte only routers are doing prepends with the neighbor address (4-byte). Then the magic in the 4-byte AS RFC to fix up ASPATH has no chance to work and you will see 23456. -- :wq Claudio
Re: 32-bit ASes at routeviews
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote: This can happen when a old 2-byte only routers are doing prepends with the neighbor address (4-byte). Then the magic in the 4-byte AS RFC to fix up ASPATH has no chance to work and you will see 23456. After a careful re-read of RFC4893 section 4.2.3 Processing Received Updates, I am fairly sure it is either an implementation issue with the involved 4-octet ASN routers, or else their transit providers are using as-path-*expand* when learning their routes for some reason (customers ask for the strangest things.) The specification for 4-octet AS refers to old and new BGP speakers, which I'll do here: When NEW speaker receives a route from an OLD speaker, its job is to make AS_PATH and AS4_PATH the same length by using ASNs from from AS_PATH, which cannot have been inserted into AS4_PATH by the OLD speaker(s) that do not support the Attribute. If a NEW speaker implements as-path-prepend incorrectly, and puts 23456 (AS_TRANS) into AS4_PATH instead of his real ASN, then the route passes through some OLD speakers and out to a NEW one again, the second NEW speaker has no opportunity to reconstruct the correct path. On the other hand, if an OLD speaker is configured for as-path-*expand* as it learns routes from a NEW speaker, then it may insert AS_TRANS into the AS_PATH but no entries are being pushed to AS4_PATH. This is a limitation of the specification and cannot be avoided. In effect, the use of as-path-* expand* at a NEW-OLD boundary where the NEW router has a 4-octet ASN and OLD router is performing *expand* means the correct AS_PATH cannot be rebuilt. -- Jeff S Wheeler j...@inconcepts.biz Sr Network Operator / Innovative Network Concepts
Re: 32-bit ASes at routeviews
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:48:13 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum said: Looking for 32-bit AS numbers, I get some strange results from routeviews: Unless I missed something, AS 23456 is supposed to show up as a stand-in for 32-bit ASNs on 16-bit BGP implementations, not in _addition_ to 32-bit ASNs. So the penultimate line would make sense if the other lines weren't there and the others don't make sense period. Maybe a bug in the IOS they're running? Or is something else going on? I think you've just found a number of AS's that are at high risk of being mystified when D-root shuts down 7 months from now. :) pgpUH9BatnO6U.pgp Description: PGP signature
32-bit ASes at routeviews
Looking for 32-bit AS numbers, I get some strange results from routeviews: route-viewssh ip bgp regexp _23456_ BGP table version is 2393809200, local router ID is 128.223.51.103 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 31.177.16.0/22 128.223.253.10 0 3582 3701 3356 23456 3.1043 i * 46.29.72.0/21129.250.0.11 285 0 2914 12389 12389 12389 12389 23456 3.627 i * 46.243.96.0/21 154.11.11.1130 0 852 174 39704 39704 23456 3.787 i * 91.208.62.0/24 154.11.11.1130 0 852 174 39704 39704 23456 3.787 i * 91.217.87.0/24 194.85.40.15 0 3267 174 23456 3.661 i * 91.230.169.0/24 208.51.134.254 13905 0 3549 29152 29152 29152 29152 23456 23456 23456 23456 3.1426 i * 91.238.8.0/24194.85.40.15 0 3267 8220 23456 3.2040 i * 111.235.148.0/22 194.85.40.15 0 3267 9498 9730 23456 i * 141.0.176.0/21 129.250.0.11 285 0 2914 12389 12389 12389 12389 23456 3.627 i Unless I missed something, AS 23456 is supposed to show up as a stand-in for 32-bit ASNs on 16-bit BGP implementations, not in _addition_ to 32-bit ASNs. So the penultimate line would make sense if the other lines weren't there and the others don't make sense period. Maybe a bug in the IOS they're running? route-viewssh ver Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Or is something else going on?
Re: Routeviews
h...@routeviews.org is known to work. joel On 10/9/10 9:16 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote: hello, anyone from university of oregon or routeviews project ( routeviews.org ) here ? please contact me off-list please. thanks mehmet
Routeviews
hello, anyone from university of oregon or routeviews project ( routeviews.org ) here ? please contact me off-list please. thanks mehmet
OIX Routeviews
Excuse the OT post, I can't seem to send mail to routeviews.org and this is a last resort. A while ago, David Meyer asked if anyone was still using the sho ip bgp format rib on routeviews.org. For a few months the rib dump process has been broken. Are the sho ip bgp ribs gone for good? jas
Re: OIX Routeviews
Jason, Excuse the OT post, I can't seem to send mail to routeviews.org and this is a last resort. Did you try [EMAIL PROTECTED] In any event... A while ago, David Meyer asked if anyone was still using the sho ip bgp format rib on routeviews.org. For a few months the rib dump process has been broken. Are the sho ip bgp ribs gone for good? No, the 'show ip bgp' RIBs aren't gone. We're just not screen scraping them from route-views.routeview.org any longer, Rather, John Heasly wrote some code that generates 'sh ip bgp' format from the MRT RIB dumps. These can be found on archive.routeviews.org. Let us know if you can't find what you need. Thanks, Dave signature.asc Description: Digital signature
routeviews outage this afternoon
routeviews took an outage this afternoon due to a power issue in the UO switch room. We are mostly back up and running. Sorry for any inconvenience. Dave signature.asc Description: Digital signature
