Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes lost in description terms
On Mon, 08 May 2006 01:28:59 +0200, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> send me a test file showing both >> >> Here it is. The first and third description terms containing footnotes >> are wrapped. The second term does not contain footnote and is not >> wrapped (it's the file committed in contexttest). > > it took me quitea while to find out that it's in the the description > preroll which meant that the calculated width was too small and > therefore the real thing wrapped Thanks much, it works fine. Regards, BG ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes lost in description terms
nico wrote:
> On Sun, 07 May 2006 19:52:23 +0200, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Thanks, it works fine.
>>>
>>> But as a side effect (not introduced by the patch) it seems that
>>> putting
>>> footnotes in a term sets a fixed width to this term: in the example the
>>> term wraps, even if I set width=broad in the description definition. If
>>> the term does not contain a footnote, it is not wrapped.
>>>
>> send me a test file showing both
>
> Here it is. The first and third description terms containing footnotes
> are wrapped. The second term does not contain footnote and is not
> wrapped (it's the file committed in contexttest).
it took me quitea while to find out that it's in the the description
preroll which meant that the calculated width was too small and
therefore the real thing wrapped
\long\def\nododonote#1#2%
{\doifnot{#1}{-}
{\ifconditional\pagewisenotes
\doifreferencefoundelse{\s!fnt:t:\internalfootreference}
{\ifnum\currentrealreference>\lastnotepage\relax
\globallet\lastnotepage\currentrealreference
\resetnumber[\currentnote]%
\fi}
{}%
\fi
\incrementnumber[\currentnote]%
\makesectionnumber[\currentnote]%
\let\lastnotenumber\composedsectionnumber
\dolastnotesymbol
\decrementnumber[\currentnote]}}
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes lost in description terms
On Sun, 07 May 2006 19:52:23 +0200, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks, it works fine. But as a side effect (not introduced by the patch) it seems that putting footnotes in a term sets a fixed width to this term: in the example the term wraps, even if I set width=broad in the description definition. If the term does not contain a footnote, it is not wrapped. send me a test file showing both Here it is. The first and third description terms containing footnotes are wrapped. The second term does not contain footnote and is not wrapped (it's the file committed in contexttest). Regards, BG test-002.tex Description: TeX document ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes lost in description terms
nico wrote: > On Sat, 06 May 2006 09:51:38 +0200, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> nico wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> When some footnotes are put in description terms, their number appears >>> in >>> the terms but their text don't appear at the bottom of the page. Is it a >>> known limitation? >>> >>> >> of boxed stuff, indeed, so we need to postpone and flush >> > > Thanks, it works fine. > > But as a side effect (not introduced by the patch) it seems that putting > footnotes in a term sets a fixed width to this term: in the example the > term wraps, even if I set width=broad in the description definition. If > the term does not contain a footnote, it is not wrapped. > send me a test file showing both Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes lost in description terms
On Sat, 06 May 2006 09:51:38 +0200, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nico wrote: >> Hello, >> >> When some footnotes are put in description terms, their number appears >> in >> the terms but their text don't appear at the bottom of the page. Is it a >> known limitation? >> > of boxed stuff, indeed, so we need to postpone and flush Thanks, it works fine. But as a side effect (not introduced by the patch) it seems that putting footnotes in a term sets a fixed width to this term: in the example the term wraps, even if I set width=broad in the description definition. If the term does not contain a footnote, it is not wrapped. Regards, BG ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes lost in description terms
nico wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When some footnotes are put in description terms, their number appears in
> the terms but their text don't appear at the bottom of the page. Is it a
> known limitation?
>
of boxed stuff, indeed, so we need to postpone and flush
\def\@@makedescription#1% in core-des.tex
{\postponefootnotes % added, we assume grouped usage
\def\currentdescription{#1}%
\executeifdefined
{@@description\descriptionparameter\c!location}
{\getvalue{@@description\v!left}}}
this gives me 7 footnotes
> Here is an example:
>
> \definedescription[descr][
>headstyle=bold,style=normal,align=left,location=hanging,
>width=broad,margin=1cm]
>
> \setupwhitespace[medium]
>
> \starttext
>
> Here is a footnote\footnote{In a simple paragraph}.
>
> \startdescr{This\footnote{A footnote} term contains\footnote{Another one} a
> footnote}
> This is a shorter item label, and some text\footnote{What about this?}
> that talks about it.
> The text is wrapped into a paragraph, with successive lines indented.
> \stopdescr
>
> \startdescr{This\footnote{More footnotes} term contains\footnote{Another
> again} a
> footnote}
> This is a shorter item label, and some text that talks about it.
> The text is wrapped into a paragraph, with successive lines indented.
> \stopdescr
>
> Here is a footnote\footnote{After the descriptions}.
>
> \stoptext
>
> Regards,
> BG
> ___
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>
--
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
