Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack][Nova] deference between live-migration and migrate
Hey Eric. On 05/25/2012 10:54 AM, Eric Luo wrote: > I know that live-migration means "live migration" of an instance. Yes. Premise is that you use shared storage. > But what is this "migrate “ for ? And what does "Migrate a > server." mean here :)Does it mean "Migrates a *non-running *instance > to a new machine" here? For migration you don't need shared storage, local storage is sufficient. The instance will be stopped and afterwards will be moved to the target system of the migration. HTH, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] OpenStack Essex packages for openSUSE 12.1 and SLES11 SP2 available
Hello everyone. First of all: Thank you everyone for the great job you did! We are happy to be part of this community and looking forward to continue working with you. B1 Systems is happy to announce the availability of OpenStack Essex packages for openSUSE 12.1 and SLES11 SP2 on the Open Build Service of openSUSE. You can find the packages in the project isv:B1-Systems:OpenStack:release:Essex (https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=isv:B1-Systems:OpenStack:release:Essex). The dependencies packages to install these packages are located in the project isv:B1-Systems:OpenStack:release:Essex:requirements (https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=isv:B1-Systems:OpenStack:release:Essex:requirements). For more details have a look at http://wiki.openstack.org/Packaging/SUSE. Please note that it's unfortunately not possible to run OpenStack on of SLES11 SP2 out of the box at the moment because of several not yet fixed issues in the delivered python interpreter. Please contact us using openst...@b1-systems.de to receive patched packages for the python interpreter usable with SLES11 SP2. SUSE is working on patches and we'll keep you informed when OpenStack is working on SLES11 SP2 without the need of patching the Python interpreter. Soon we will publish an updated version of our technical whitepaper of OpenStack Essex on of SLES 11 SP2 and openSUSE 12.1 in german language - which will be available at http://www.b1-systems.de/openstack. We'll provide an english version of the document in the future. If you have any trouble using the packages, if you need further support or if you're looking for enterprise support for OpenStack please don't hesitate to contact us at openst...@b1-systems.de. Regards, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] regarding "3-Minute OpenStack Survey"
Hello together. First of all: Essex is out.. yeah :) I received a mail from dimensionalresearch.com with the subject "3-Minute OpenStack Survey" containing the attached text a few minutes ago. It's signed with "The OpenStack Team" (who is that?) and it's named "OpenStack Community Survey". Is this an official request of the OpenStack project initiated by the board? If so: I would really like to see that you write a short announcement before sending requests to participate in a survey. Also I want to now what you'll exactly do with the collected data and if the data will be published after finishing the survey. Bye, Christian. ---snip--- Hello OpenStack Supporter, We would like to invite you to complete a brief survey on your involvement with OpenStack. Your participation in this survey will help us understand the impact of OpenStack on the job market. We will share the findings of this survey with all participants. Responses to this survey will be used only for the purpose of this report and all individual answers will be kept strictly confidential. This survey is sponsored by OpenStack and conducted by Dimensional Research. If you are not the correct person at your company to answer this type of survey, please forward this email to the appropriate contact. Thank you! The OpenStack Team ---snap--- -- Christian Berendt Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Documenting public sites with VM images
Hi Lorin. On 04/02/2012 05:11 PM, Lorin Hochstein wrote: > I'm working on a doc update on where to download VM images that work > with OpenStack <https://review.openstack.org/6055>. So far, I've got > sections on CirrOS (Scott Moser's test image), Ubuntu and Fedora. Are > there any other projects out there that have downloadable images that we > can point users to? Images build with http://susestudio.com/ are usable with OpenStack, too. It's an easy way to build appliances for OpenSUSE and SLES 11 (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server). You've to register there (for free) using an OpenID to download or build images, but I think that's not that bad and that it's still a public site. As an example I built an OpenSUSE 12.1 (JeOS) image in appr. 2 minutes. http://susestudio.com/a/YRUrwO/testing-instance-for-openstack-opensuse-121 HTH, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] [solved] Re: Error starting nova-network
Hi Alex. > 2012-03-31 19:34:40 TRACE nova File > "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/nova/utils.py", line 939, in inner > 2012-03-31 19:34:40 TRACE nova lock = GreenLockFile(lock_file_path) > 2012-03-31 19:34:40 TRACE nova File > "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/nova/utils.py", line 861, in __init__ > 2012-03-31 19:34:40 TRACE nova self.tname = "-%x-%x" % (ident & > 0x, gident & 0x) > 2012-03-31 19:34:40 TRACE nova TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) > for &: 'NoneType' and 'int' > Any ideas? The exception is sponsored by of one of the issues in the python interpreter delivered by SUSE for SLES11 SP2. I will send you patched packages by private mail. The line 859 in nova/utils.py (ident = getattr(t, "ident", hash(t))) will fail on SLES11 SP2 at the moment. You can reproduce the bug this way to test if your python interpreter has the issue. ---snip--- import threading t = threading.current_thread() ident = t.ident if ident == None: print "ERROR: ident of current thread is None, ident of threads is NOT working" else: print ident ---snap--- If you have problems using our packages provided on the Open Build Service of OpenSUSE you can directly contact us using the address openst...@b1-systems.de. Bye, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Essex-4 milestone available for Keystone, Glance, Nova and Horizon
> You mean syncing swift with O-S milestones ? > Well, I'm not sure it needs to be "fixed". Yes. > Reason: Swift is useful without other components. > (Assuming stable API and conservative release cycle.) I can also use Glance without the other components, it's also included in the release cycles. I would find it more intuitive to have one release cycle for all core and incubator projects. At the moment only swift has an other release cycle. Did it have just said, there is no real problem... Bye, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux/Unix Consultant & Developer Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Essex-4 milestone available for Keystone, Glance, Nova and Horizon
Hi ttx. On 03/02/2012 11:18 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Swift does not follow the common milestones. The latest release is > 1.4.6, and tha last release available will be included in OpenStack > 2012.1 common release. We'll this be fixed in the future? Bye, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux/Unix Consultant & Developer Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Howto Nova setup with HA?
Hi Tristan. > So, we can run MySQL in master-master mode on multiple hosts, we can > run nova-api on serveral hosts and load balance those and RabbitMQ > has a cluster ha setup as well but is this the way to go? I can't > find a clear answer to this. I am hoping one can shine some light on > this! I would prefer to use MySQL Cluster: http://www.mysql.com/products/cluster/. You meant that with MySQL master-master? For RabbitMQ there are several ways to setup it: http://www.rabbitmq.com/ha.html. I think the customer site has to decide which HA setup they want use. All types have advantages and disadvantages. HTH, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] NFS for nova-volume
Hi Salman. On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:21:30 -0500 Salman A Baset wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has tried setting up nova-volume on NFS > backend without making any changes to nova-volume code? I think it's not possible to do that without any changes to the nova-volume code at the moment. We opened a report for this missing feature a long time ago: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/715102. But we had no time to finish the implementation. Feel free.. :) HTH, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!
Hello together. > I was wondering if the community could elevate devstack to a > "official" openstack project, instead of being a "unofficial > project". I think devstack.org is already some kind of official project (provided by Rackspace Cloud Builders). Where is the benefit of becoming a core project? At the moment I only see a lot of overhead (release management, downstream distribution, technical lead, feature frozen zones, ..) without any benefits. Also it would take a lot of efforts (see [0] for details) to set up a new core project. Devstack is an instrument to help and improve the development. I think a core component must have the opportunity to be used in a productive environment and should not "only" be used to support the development. Can you please describe in more detail what are the benefits of becoming a core project? An other point is that the official CI systems (and I think everybody else, too) are using devstack.org and and that the script is doing a well job. You're starting two discussions in this mail: Should devstack become a part of the core and should devstack be rewritten to Python. I think the discussions should be splitted and I don't see any motivation of the devstack.org developers to join the discussion of a Python rewrite at the moment (maybe I'm wrong). I don't find the definition and requirements of a core project at the moment, but I'm pretty sure that there exist some documents. Maybe it makes sense to define some kind of requirements about OpenStack specific tools used by the official CI, but that's an other discussion. [0] http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Approved/NewProjectProcess Bye, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] creating a mailinglist for packaging specific topics?
Hello together. I think it's a good idea to create a mailinglist for packaging specific topics. This list here is IMO not the right place for discussions on such topics, because a lot of people have to read (or at least they have to filter those mails into /dev/null) them and this will waste a huge amount of time, which could be spend more useful topics. The target of this list would be to coordinate the work of packagers of the different distributions to reach more and (hopefully) identical quality and to provide packages just in time with new releases/milestones. Also to have a single point of contact for upcoming packagers and maybe to provide similar sets of packages (for example same naming convention, same versions and so on). Here a few examples I want to discuss in more detail. * what is stability in the point of view of a distributor/packager (the discussion triggered yesterday on the OSDEM on the FOSDEM 2012). I think it's necessary that we have the same point of view to not have a very different "stability" on different distributions * is it possible (and how) to share efforts between the packaging for different distributions (for example I'm pretty sure that it's possible to create nearly the same SPECs for OpenSUSE/SLES and FedoraCore/RHEL) * is it useful to host all package definitions (SPECs and so on) at a central place (for example at Github in a project openstack/packages or somethink like that) so that everybody can commit to those definitions in an easy and defined way (using gerrit for reviews..)? * should there only be one package set for one distribution or is it better to have different package sets? (for example at the moment SUSE and we (B1) are providing packages on the OpenSUSE Build Service) Bye, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Devstack: euca-describe-availability-zones Warning: failed to parse error message from AWS: :1:0: syntax error None: None
Hi joe. > euca-describe-availability-zones but it failed as you can see below. Try using the "stack" user. This is working fine for me one a fresh devstack installation: cstack@devstack001:~$ cd devstack/ stack@devstack001:~/devstack$ source openrc stack@devstack001:~/devstack$ euca-describe-availability-zones AVAILABILITYZONEnovaavailable HTH, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Memory quota in nova-compute nodes.
Hi Jorge. > I would like to know if it's possible to configure quota in each > nova-compute node. For example, I set up a new hardware with 8 GB of memory > and install the nova-compute, but I wish only 4 GB of memory are used > (dedicated to nova-compute). Is it possible? If so, how can I configure > that? I can't remember such a function at the moment, but it's relative simple to implement such a feature (at least for Linux systems) using cgroups. Can you please describe your use case. At the moment I can't follow where I should use the feature. Why should I install nova-compute on a bare metal system with 32 GByte memory and only use 16 GByte memory? Bye, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Fwd: Re: resize of existing VM possible?
Bitte Diskussion auf der Maillingliste weiterfuehren. Ich weiss spontan nicht was "openst...@b1-systems.de" ist/macht. Ist das ein alter Verteiler? Der sollte geloescht werden und in Zukunft sollten fuer OenStack Themen ausschliesslich diese Liste genutzt werden. Original Message Subject: Re: resize of existing VM possible? Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:18:07 +0100 From: Christian Berendt Organization: B1 Systems GmbH To: baum...@b1-systems.de CC: Andre Naehring , openst...@b1-systems.de Tag zusammen. > ein Kunde benötigt das Feature das Image einer bestehenden VM zu > vergrößern - somit kann dann der Kunde dem die VM gehört in der VM die > LVM Partition ebenfalls vergrößern um dann mehr Volumes anzulegen oder > bestehende zu vergrößern. NOTE: Bitte im Bezug auf OpenStack immer von Instanzen und nicht von VMs sprechen. So ist der OpenStack Sprech... Momentan befindet sich dieses Feature in der Vorbereitung, die Flavour einer Instanz zu aendern und damit automatisch auch RAM, VCPUs und Storage entsprechend anzupassen. Bislang ist das noch nicht moeglich. Der bereits von mir erwaehnte Workaround ist die Verwendung von nova-volume. Man stellt ein zusaetzliches Volume der Instanz zur Verfuegung und erstellt darauf ein Physical Volume, welches man in die bestehende Volume Group einbindet. Danach ist es dann moeglich bestehende Logical Volumes zu vergroessern. Vom Prinzip her gehoert ein Base Image nie modifiert und vom Prinzip her gehoeren Nutzdaten auch nicht auf das Base Image. Warum muss der Kunde ein bestehendes Logical Volume vergroessern? Meiner Meinung nach ist da beim Design des Base Images schief gelaufen, der Fall sollte gar nicht auftreten. Die Nutzdaten gehoeren nicht im Klon des Base Images hinterlegt sondern auf separaten Volumes/Mountpoints welche _nur_ fuer die Nutzlast da sind. Diese Volumes/Mountpoints werden eben durch nova-volume zur Verfuegung gestellt. HTH, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Tel.: +49-171-5542175 Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Lieutenants (Again)
> I'm still looking for points of contact for the remaining sections. Added myself and my co-worker Andre Naehring to "packaging for SUSE" Bye, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Tel.: +49-171-5542175 Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Separation of IRC Channels
> Can't we just have a #openstack-dev to cover them all ? +1 -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Tel.: +49-171-5542175 Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] SLES11 SP1 and openSUSE packages based on the Cactus release are available
Dear all We proudly announce that packages based on the Cactus release for SLES11 SP1, as well as openSUSE 11.3 and 11.4 builds, are now available. You can find them on the openSUSE Build Service [0] in the project isv:B1-Systems:OpenStack [1]. Packages based on the latest development sources are available in the project isv:B1-Systems:devel:OpenStack [2]. If having any trouble using those packages, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards Christian [0] https://build.opensuse.org/ [1] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=isv%3AB1-Systems%3AOpenStack [2] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=isv%3AB1-Systems%3Adevel%3AOpenStack -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Tel.: +49-171-5542175 Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Design Summit - Fall 2011 Location Request
> Europe would be nice. +1 for Europe. I would prefer Berlin, but Amsterdam or Paris are also fine. @Stephen: Please contact me if the design summit will take place in Germany, maybe we can assist you. Bye, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Tel.: +49-171-5542175 Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Set your merge proposals to Work In Progress while you address fixes
Hi. If you think there is value in it, I can spend some cycles to generate a more ordered "to-review" list using launchpad API (looking up linked branches/bugs to evaluate each BMP priority). I think it's a good idea to see the priority of the corresponding bug report. Also it would be nice to see if it's a propsal for a blueprint or an open bug. Bye, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Tel.: +49 171 5542175 Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Using useful commit messages while merging code into trunk
Hi. Sometimes there are very useless commit messages after merging a propsal into trunk. Example: " 748. Did a pull from trunk to be sure I had the latest, then deleted the test directory. I guess it appeared when I started using venv. Doh. (detail)" or my own: " 747. reverted my changes from https://code.launchpad.net/~berendt/nova/lp722554/+merge/50579 and reused the existing db api methods to add the disabled services. Looks much better now :) i couldn't figure out how to uncommit and revert my changes in an already pushed branch, always ending in "ERROR: These branches have diverged.". So i created a new branch rev2 and a new proposal... (detail)" I think the problem is that per default the last commit message in the branch is used. We should always set a correct commit message in the merge propsal and we should don't merge code with useless commit messages. Bye, Christian. *** Visit us at CeBIT 2011! At our stand located in the Open Source Park in hall 2, booth-no.: D44/133 we demonstrate "Virtual System Cluster" and "Infrastructure Cloud with OpenStack" setups. On Wedensday between 9:00am and 11:59am we invite you to a traditional Bavarian breakfast at our stand. *** -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Tel.: +49-171-5542175 Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] documentation of flags, introducing of a naming convention for flags
Hi. At the moment we're using a lot of flags spread all over the code. a) we should create a useful documentation including all flags b) we should introduce a naming convention for new flags and we should rename existing flags example: all flags related to default values are starting with "default_", all flags related to a path are starting with "path_". Looks like most of the flags have good names at the moment, but I think we should write it down in the wiki or the developer documentation to reduce the possibility of bad names in the future. c) if it's possible we should collect all flags in one file At the moment the flags are defined in the files where they are used. I think it would be nice to have on file, for example nova/flags.py, including all flags used all over the code. Bye, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Tel.: +49-171-5542175 Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] removing of code in contrib/puppet
Hi. We want to remove the code in contrib/puppet. Anyone to raise concerns? https://code.launchpad.net/~berendt/nova/lp712681/+merge/49871 Lazy approval until wednesday (18:00 UTC). Bye, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Linux / Unix Consultant & Developer Tel.: +49-171-5542175 Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
