oh ok, i was not aware of the merging process between dssi~ and
plugin~. However i had some little issues with dssi~, that i'm
currently fixing. I'll send you a patch soon :)
regards
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Jamie Bullock wrote:
>
>
>
> On 18 Jan 2009, at 23:34, mou...@laposte.net wrote:
>
>> hi list,
>>
>> i patched plugin~ to make it run correctly and renamed the object to
>> ladspa~ to make it less confusing.
>> http://bitbucket.org/moumar/ladspa/
>>
>> Feel free to give me suggestions.
>
> My suggestion is that you try using dssi~. It supports LADSPA just the same
> as plugin~, but is more full-featured.
>
> It has been discussed recently that we bring the dssi~ Pd interface in line
> with plugin~ (It almost already is) and then simply rename it to plugin~,
> replacing the old one. I'd like to add LV2 support and ensure that dssi-vst
> support works as well.
>
> Then the generic name 'plugin~' becomes a bit more justified ;-)
>
> Jamie
>
>
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
