Re: Mooch a regex

[Tobias Leich]

hi, what's in ${BaseTag}? Is it a regex rule or just a plain string? 
(Because that matters in Perl 6)


Am 12.01.2016 um 01:55 schrieb ToddAndMargo:

Hi All,

Would yo all terribly mind if I ask how to do this Perl 5 regex
in Perl 6?  (I learn best by example.)



if ( $ClickLine =~ /aes256/ and /${BaseTag}/ ) {
  push ( @WebClickHere, $ClickLine );

   if ( $Line =~ m{select id=\"(.*?)[-]} ) {
  my $VerLine = $1;
  push ( @WebVersions,  $VerLine );
   }
}


Many thanks,
-T

Mooch a regex

[ToddAndMargo]

Hi All,

Would yo all terribly mind if I ask how to do this Perl 5 regex
in Perl 6?  (I learn best by example.)



if ( $ClickLine =~ /aes256/ and /${BaseTag}/ ) {
  push ( @WebClickHere, $ClickLine );

   if ( $Line =~ m{select id=\"(.*?)[-]} ) {
  my $VerLine = $1;
  push ( @WebVersions,  $VerLine );
   }
}


Many thanks,
-T

--
~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~

panda and documentation

[mt1957]

L.s.

I have written my documentation in separate pod files. How do I mention 
this in the META.info file and

where will panda install the documentation

Greetings
Marcel

Re: order of input using Capture

[mt1957]

On 01/11/2016 06:58 PM, mt1957 wrote:

Thanks for the information I didn't know about this detail.

What about the order of input, when a call is made and a Capture 
created the order is preserved
otherwise the arguments would be bound to the wrong values isn't it? 
But the example shows otherwise.
Aha, I understand now, named argument are repositioned to the back while 
the rest is still the same order but at the front

Re: order of input using Capture

[mt1957]

Thanks for the information I didn't know about this detail.

What about the order of input, when a call is made and a Capture created 
the order is preserved
otherwise the arguments would be bound to the wrong values isn't it? But 
the example shows otherwise.

Re: order of input using Capture

[Philip Hazelden]

Sorry, that first sentence was imprecise: `a` is a named arg, as compared
to the pair `(e=>2)`, which is a positional arg by virtue of the parens.

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:01 PM Philip Hazelden 
wrote:

> You're passing `a` as a named arg, and `e` as a positional arg. .list only
> returns the positional args, and .elems only counts those. You can use
> .hash to get the named args. Alternatively, if you replace `a=>1` with
> `(a=>1)` or `'a'=>1`, it should show up in the .list and .elems counts.
>
> See: http://doc.perl6.org/type/Capture
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:56 PM mt1957  wrote:
>
>> L.s.
>>
>> I've seen that the order of input to a Capture is not kept. Is this a bug?
>>
>> REPL interaction;
>>
>>  > my Capture $c = \(a=>1,10,{w=>2},[2,3],(e=>2),(b=>3,),Buf.new(^3))
>> \(10, {:w(2)}, [2, 3], :e(2), (:b(3),), Buf.new(0, 1, 2), :a(1))
>>
>>  > for $c.list -> $item { $item.WHAT.say;}
>> (Int)
>> (Hash)
>> (Array)
>> (Pair)
>> (List)
>> (Buf)
>>
>> Last item is missing, a pair :a(1). $c.elems reports 6 elements. I'm not
>> sure but there was a bug report about it I believe.
>>
>> Greetings
>> Marcel Timmerman
>>
>

Re: order of input using Capture

[Philip Hazelden]

You're passing `a` as a named arg, and `e` as a positional arg. .list only
returns the positional args, and .elems only counts those. You can use
.hash to get the named args. Alternatively, if you replace `a=>1` with
`(a=>1)` or `'a'=>1`, it should show up in the .list and .elems counts.

See: http://doc.perl6.org/type/Capture

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:56 PM mt1957  wrote:

> L.s.
>
> I've seen that the order of input to a Capture is not kept. Is this a bug?
>
> REPL interaction;
>
>  > my Capture $c = \(a=>1,10,{w=>2},[2,3],(e=>2),(b=>3,),Buf.new(^3))
> \(10, {:w(2)}, [2, 3], :e(2), (:b(3),), Buf.new(0, 1, 2), :a(1))
>
>  > for $c.list -> $item { $item.WHAT.say;}
> (Int)
> (Hash)
> (Array)
> (Pair)
> (List)
> (Buf)
>
> Last item is missing, a pair :a(1). $c.elems reports 6 elements. I'm not
> sure but there was a bug report about it I believe.
>
> Greetings
> Marcel Timmerman
>

order of input using Capture

[mt1957]

L.s.

I've seen that the order of input to a Capture is not kept. Is this a bug?

REPL interaction;

> my Capture $c = \(a=>1,10,{w=>2},[2,3],(e=>2),(b=>3,),Buf.new(^3))
\(10, {:w(2)}, [2, 3], :e(2), (:b(3),), Buf.new(0, 1, 2), :a(1))

> for $c.list -> $item { $item.WHAT.say;}
(Int)
(Hash)
(Array)
(Pair)
(List)
(Buf)

Last item is missing, a pair :a(1). $c.elems reports 6 elements. I'm not 
sure but there was a bug report about it I believe.


Greetings
Marcel Timmerman

Re: perl 6 for rhel?

[Darren Duncan]

Red Hat is quite conservative.  Usually what happens in situations like this 
when you want more up to date stuff you get it from alternate repositories that 
make Red Hat compatible packages.  See also repositories for Fedora or Cent OS. 
-- Darren Duncan


On 2016-01-10 11:16 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:

On 01/10/2016 11:05 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:02 AM, ToddAndMargo mailto:toddandma...@zoho.com>> wrote:

Anyone know if Perl 6 will be available for Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 7 any time soon?


That's up to Red Hat. Considering that they refuse to fix their Perl 5
packaging which has been fundamentally broken (not to mention ancient)
throughout EL5 and EL6, don't hold your breath.


I posted I posted

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297077
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296363

but no response back