Re: [HACKERS] My review for the patch "Table command"
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unicron, >> 4. Since it is just an alternative to "select * from Table", I think >> this feature is unneccessary. > Heh. I agree, but tell that to the SQL committee. > I don't think we need to argue out the merits of adding standard syntax. We can, however, argue the merits of making extensive documentation changes to document such a useless "feature". regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] My review for the patch "Table command"
Unicron, 4. Since it is just an alternative to "select * from Table", I think this feature is unneccessary. Heh. I agree, but tell that to the SQL committee. I don't think we need to argue out the merits of adding standard syntax. This patch is Ready for Code Review. --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[HACKERS] My review for the patch "Table command"
Hi I have completed the review for Patch "Table command", Here is results 1. The patch actually implements that. 2. The feature work as advertised. 3. So far, I have not found any possible dangers that can be caused by this pacth 4. Since it is just an alternative to "select * from Table", I think this feature is unneccessary. Unicron
