[Proto-Scripty] Re: in JavaScript (using Prototype)
On Aug 27, 5:43 am, Johan Arensman wrote: > I'm fully against marquee's in the first place but you also have an option > to add the attribute data-duration to your element. If you're making a class > to replace a depricated functionality you shouldn't use this way to add > features or configuration to it. I'm not sure I understand? Isn't data- the new HTML5 way to do custom element configuration? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: AJAX callbacks are not executed atomically?
Same difference.
Since the AJAX calls are Async you have no control over what gets completed
first or what gets interrupted by what.
If script a does a complex query taking 2.2 seconds and returns a large data
set while script b does a simple query that takes .02 seconds and returns
100 bytes, script b will almost certainly interrupt script a.
You have two options (as far as I know), you can daisy chain the calls and
thereby guarantee the call/completion order or you can create your own
semaphore process and lock (sleep) the onComplete of script b until script a
clears the "i'm done" flag.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:56 PM, JoJo wrote:
> I don't need A to finish before B. I need A's callbacks to not be cut
> off by B's instantiation.
>
> On Sep 24, 12:44 pm, Phil Petree wrote:
> > If you want a() to finish before b() and b() to finish before c() then
> you
> > will have to daisy chain in the onComplete code.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:21 PM, JoJo wrote:
> > > I have several lines of code that I want to run atomically (no context
> > > switches to other code). Please look at the following barebones
> > > example that illustrates the issue:
> >
> > > //=
> >
> > > function doAjax() {
> > > console.info('making request');
> > > new Ajax.Request(
> > > url, {
> > > onSuccess: function() {
> > > console.info('success');
> > > },
> > > onFailure: function() {
> > >console.info('failure');
> > > },
> > > onComplete: function() {
> > >console.info('complete');
> > > }
> > > }
> > > );
> > > }
> >
> > > doAjax();
> > > doAjax();
> >
> > > //=
> >
> > > If the processor is "faster" than the network, I expect the output to
> > > be :
> >
> > > making request
> > > making request
> > > success
> > > complete
> > > success
> > > complete
> >
> > > However, under certain conditions, success+complete is sometimes not
> > > atomic. Here's some output that I have seen:
> >
> > > (A) making request
> > > (A) success
> > > (B) making request
> > > (A) complete
> > > (B) success
> > > (B) complete
> >
> > > This is against my expectations and breaks my code logic - the website
> > > fails to function when complete does not IMMEDIATELY follow success.
> > > Can someone shed some light on why this is happening? I thought AJAX
> > > is only asynchronous while waiting for the server and should become
> > > synchronous as it's executing the callback code...
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>
> >
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: AJAX callbacks are not executed atomically?
I believe I solved the problem. I had a queue of work orders. One of
these work orders queued up another work order, so it was a nested
AJAX request - BAD IDEA!
On Sep 24, 12:56 pm, JoJo wrote:
> I don't need A to finish before B. I need A's callbacks to not be cut
> off by B's instantiation.
>
> On Sep 24, 12:44 pm, Phil Petree wrote:
>
> > If you want a() to finish before b() and b() to finish before c() then you
> > will have to daisy chain in the onComplete code.
>
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:21 PM, JoJo wrote:
> > > I have several lines of code that I want to run atomically (no context
> > > switches to other code). Please look at the following barebones
> > > example that illustrates the issue:
>
> > > //=
>
> > > function doAjax() {
> > > console.info('making request');
> > > new Ajax.Request(
> > > url, {
> > > onSuccess: function() {
> > > console.info('success');
> > > },
> > > onFailure: function() {
> > > console.info('failure');
> > > },
> > > onComplete: function() {
> > > console.info('complete');
> > > }
> > > }
> > > );
> > > }
>
> > > doAjax();
> > > doAjax();
>
> > > //=
>
> > > If the processor is "faster" than the network, I expect the output to
> > > be :
>
> > > making request
> > > making request
> > > success
> > > complete
> > > success
> > > complete
>
> > > However, under certain conditions, success+complete is sometimes not
> > > atomic. Here's some output that I have seen:
>
> > > (A) making request
> > > (A) success
> > > (B) making request
> > > (A) complete
> > > (B) success
> > > (B) complete
>
> > > This is against my expectations and breaks my code logic - the website
> > > fails to function when complete does not IMMEDIATELY follow success.
> > > Can someone shed some light on why this is happening? I thought AJAX
> > > is only asynchronous while waiting for the server and should become
> > > synchronous as it's executing the callback code...
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] IE9 Drag-Drop
Hi, > > Are other people seeing issues with script.aculo.us' drag and drop in > the latest beta of IE 9? I know what to do about this is a bit > complicated because it might be their bug. But we also don't want a > core feature like that not working when it gets released. we've encountered that issue in each of our products using scripty, drag & drop is broken in IE9. Our Quick Fix: Setting the X-UA-Header for Internet Explorer so it uses IE8-mode to render the pages. Regards Marcus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] IE9 Drag-Drop
Are other people seeing issues with script.aculo.us' drag and drop in the latest beta of IE 9? I know what to do about this is a bit complicated because it might be their bug. But we also don't want a core feature like that not working when it gets released. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: AJAX callbacks are not executed atomically?
I don't need A to finish before B. I need A's callbacks to not be cut
off by B's instantiation.
On Sep 24, 12:44 pm, Phil Petree wrote:
> If you want a() to finish before b() and b() to finish before c() then you
> will have to daisy chain in the onComplete code.
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:21 PM, JoJo wrote:
> > I have several lines of code that I want to run atomically (no context
> > switches to other code). Please look at the following barebones
> > example that illustrates the issue:
>
> > //=
>
> > function doAjax() {
> > console.info('making request');
> > new Ajax.Request(
> > url, {
> > onSuccess: function() {
> > console.info('success');
> > },
> > onFailure: function() {
> > console.info('failure');
> > },
> > onComplete: function() {
> > console.info('complete');
> > }
> > }
> > );
> > }
>
> > doAjax();
> > doAjax();
>
> > //=
>
> > If the processor is "faster" than the network, I expect the output to
> > be :
>
> > making request
> > making request
> > success
> > complete
> > success
> > complete
>
> > However, under certain conditions, success+complete is sometimes not
> > atomic. Here's some output that I have seen:
>
> > (A) making request
> > (A) success
> > (B) making request
> > (A) complete
> > (B) success
> > (B) complete
>
> > This is against my expectations and breaks my code logic - the website
> > fails to function when complete does not IMMEDIATELY follow success.
> > Can someone shed some light on why this is happening? I thought AJAX
> > is only asynchronous while waiting for the server and should become
> > synchronous as it's executing the callback code...
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> > prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] AJAX callbacks are not executed atomically?
If you want a() to finish before b() and b() to finish before c() then you
will have to daisy chain in the onComplete code.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:21 PM, JoJo wrote:
> I have several lines of code that I want to run atomically (no context
> switches to other code). Please look at the following barebones
> example that illustrates the issue:
>
> //=
>
> function doAjax() {
> console.info('making request');
> new Ajax.Request(
> url, {
> onSuccess: function() {
> console.info('success');
> },
> onFailure: function() {
>console.info('failure');
> },
> onComplete: function() {
>console.info('complete');
> }
> }
> );
> }
>
> doAjax();
> doAjax();
>
> //=
>
> If the processor is "faster" than the network, I expect the output to
> be :
>
> making request
> making request
> success
> complete
> success
> complete
>
> However, under certain conditions, success+complete is sometimes not
> atomic. Here's some output that I have seen:
>
> (A) making request
> (A) success
> (B) making request
> (A) complete
> (B) success
> (B) complete
>
> This is against my expectations and breaks my code logic - the website
> fails to function when complete does not IMMEDIATELY follow success.
> Can someone shed some light on why this is happening? I thought AJAX
> is only asynchronous while waiting for the server and should become
> synchronous as it's executing the callback code...
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] AJAX callbacks are not executed atomically?
I have several lines of code that I want to run atomically (no context
switches to other code). Please look at the following barebones
example that illustrates the issue:
//=
function doAjax() {
console.info('making request');
new Ajax.Request(
url, {
onSuccess: function() {
console.info('success');
},
onFailure: function() {
console.info('failure');
},
onComplete: function() {
console.info('complete');
}
}
);
}
doAjax();
doAjax();
//=
If the processor is "faster" than the network, I expect the output to
be :
making request
making request
success
complete
success
complete
However, under certain conditions, success+complete is sometimes not
atomic. Here's some output that I have seen:
(A) making request
(A) success
(B) making request
(A) complete
(B) success
(B) complete
This is against my expectations and breaks my code logic - the website
fails to function when complete does not IMMEDIATELY follow success.
Can someone shed some light on why this is happening? I thought AJAX
is only asynchronous while waiting for the server and should become
synchronous as it's executing the callback code...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: how to update a function with a remote call
Hi,
Sorry, I missed out an opening bracket. Should have been:
function replace_weather_table(){
zoomy = map.getZoom();
new Ajax.Request('/weather/update_weather_tables?zoom='+zoomy, {
// ^--
this was missing
onSuccess: function(response) {
weather_table_one.setContents(response.responseText);
}
});
};
-- T.J.
On Sep 23, 8:29 pm, nephish wrote:
> Thanks for your help,
>
> i am getting a syntax error in firebug when i place this in my script.
>
> missing ) after argument list in this line
> onSuccess: function(response) {
>
> i have tried lots of different adjustments.
>
> thanks
> sk
>
> On Sep 22, 4:53 pm, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > You're taking the return value of `new Ajax.Request` and using it to
> > set the contents of `weather_table_one`. The return value of `new
> > Ajax.Request` is (of course) an Ajax.Request object. It's really worth
> > reading the documentation.
>
> > If you want to use the contents of the resource that the Ajax.Request
> > loads, you need to use the onSuccess callback:
>
> > function replace_weather_table(){
> > zoomy = map.getZoom();
> > new Ajax.Request('/weather/update_weather_tables?zoom='+zoomy,
> > onSuccess: function(response) {
> > weather_table_one.setContents(response.responseText);
> > }
> > });
>
> > };
>
> > Note that by default, Ajax requests are asynchronous, and so the
> > update will happen at some point after the `replace_weather_table`
> > function returns. You probably want to handle failures as well.
>
> > More
> > here:http://api.prototypejs.org/ajax/ajax/request/http://proto-scripty.wik..
>
> > HTH,
> > --
> > T.J. Crowder
> > Independent Software Engineer
> > tj / crowder software / com
> > www / crowder software / com
>
> > On Sep 22, 7:22 pm, nephish wrote:
>
> > > I am working with a javascript function called Elabel, part of the
> > > Google maps api
> > > the Elabel has a function called setContents(html)
>
> > > i need to be able to call this function and get new html for it. ( the
> > > html is a table that displays weather data)
>
> > > here is what i have so far
>
> > > function replace_weather_table(){
> > > zoomy = map.getZoom();
> > > weather_table_one.setContents(new Ajax.Request('/weather/
> > > update_weather_tables?zoom='+zoomy));
>
> > > };
>
> > > GEvent.addListener(map,"moveend", replace_weather_table);
>
> > > i would like to have the contents be those of a partial, but when
> > > executed, the display only shows "[object Object]"
>
> > > would appreciate any help, thanks
>
> > > sk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: how to update a function with a remote call
Hey there,
Wanted to say thanks for all your help here.
The links especially.
I am still very new at all this and it's a lot to get my head around.
That site is excellent.
sk
On Sep 22, 4:53 pm, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You're taking the return value of `new Ajax.Request` and using it to
> set the contents of `weather_table_one`. The return value of `new
> Ajax.Request` is (of course) an Ajax.Request object. It's really worth
> reading the documentation.
>
> If you want to use the contents of the resource that the Ajax.Request
> loads, you need to use the onSuccess callback:
>
> function replace_weather_table(){
> zoomy = map.getZoom();
> new Ajax.Request('/weather/update_weather_tables?zoom='+zoomy,
> onSuccess: function(response) {
> weather_table_one.setContents(response.responseText);
> }
> });
>
> };
>
> Note that by default, Ajax requests are asynchronous, and so the
> update will happen at some point after the `replace_weather_table`
> function returns. You probably want to handle failures as well.
>
> More
> here:http://api.prototypejs.org/ajax/ajax/request/http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/prototype:how-to-bulletproof-ajax-re...
>
> HTH,
> --
> T.J. Crowder
> Independent Software Engineer
> tj / crowder software / com
> www / crowder software / com
>
> On Sep 22, 7:22 pm, nephish wrote:
>
>
>
> > I am working with a javascript function called Elabel, part of the
> > Google maps api
> > the Elabel has a function called setContents(html)
>
> > i need to be able to call this function and get new html for it. ( the
> > html is a table that displays weather data)
>
> > here is what i have so far
>
> > function replace_weather_table(){
> > zoomy = map.getZoom();
> > weather_table_one.setContents(new Ajax.Request('/weather/
> > update_weather_tables?zoom='+zoomy));
>
> > };
>
> > GEvent.addListener(map,"moveend", replace_weather_table);
>
> > i would like to have the contents be those of a partial, but when
> > executed, the display only shows "[object Object]"
>
> > would appreciate any help, thanks
>
> > sk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Execute JavaScript within HTML Response to Ajax Request
Via Google search, I found this answer today here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/278122/how-to-force-javascript-to-execute-within-html-response-to-ajax-request
I have it "half" working. What I mean is, my response text comes back
and updates my div perfectly with the HTML when evalScripts: false,
however the scripts within the HTML are of course not executed. When I
set evalScripts: true, then the ONLY thing that executes is the
scripts and it outputs it directly to the page instead of loading it
into the div.
I think the problem is that the scripts I am trying to execute are
likely document.writes generated by the Maani charts (http://
www.maani.us/xml_charts/index.php) and so instead of loading text into
the div, the executed scripts just write themselves out to the
browser.
Any ideas on how I can fix this? Here's my Prototype code:
function runCalcs() {
var request = new Ajax.Updater
(
"result_tab_frame","ajax_runCalcs.asp",
{
method: "get",
evalScripts: true,
onSuccess: function () {
document.getElementById("loading").className = "clsHide";
}
}
);
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
