In preparation of using multiple IRQs, switch to using the recently
introduced MSIX API. Instead of allocating and assigning IRQ in
a single step, we now have to use two distinct calls.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
block/nvme.c | 14 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/nvme.c b/block/nvme.c
index 428cda620df..a5518ad5bac 100644
--- a/block/nvme.c
+++ b/block/nvme.c
@@ -691,6 +691,7 @@ static int nvme_init(BlockDriverState *bs, const char
*device, int namespace,
Error *local_err = NULL;
volatile NvmeBar *regs = NULL;
size_t min_page_size = 4096;
+unsigned irq_count = MSIX_IRQ_COUNT;
qemu_co_mutex_init(&s->dma_map_lock);
qemu_co_queue_init(&s->dma_flush_queue);
@@ -784,8 +785,17 @@ static int nvme_init(BlockDriverState *bs, const char
*device, int namespace,
}
}
-ret = qemu_vfio_pci_init_irq(s->vfio, s->irq_notifier,
- VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX, errp);
+ret = qemu_vfio_pci_msix_init_irqs(s->vfio, &irq_count, errp);
+if (ret) {
+if (ret == -EOVERFLOW) {
+error_append_hint(errp, "%u IRQs requested but only %u
available\n",
+ MSIX_IRQ_COUNT, irq_count);
+}
+goto out;
+}
+
+ret = qemu_vfio_pci_msix_set_irq(s->vfio, MSIX_SHARED_IRQ_IDX,
+ s->irq_notifier, errp);
if (ret) {
goto out;
}
--
2.26.2