[Samba] The network resource type is not correct

[George Mtonga]

I configured samba server on FC8 and when I try to map a share from a
windows xp machine I am getting error:
'Network resource type is not correct'. Previously , Selinux was
denying access to home directory so I disabled it but now the network
re
source type error is comming up. Can some one help please?
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with winxp+domain ?

[hamacker]

In my network I have winxp and win98 too, but the same logon script
for both. 'cause this, I need to use 'net time'.
I have a NTP server in my network, my samba server sync them, and
win9x/winxp sync with the samba.
To me, it's the best option.

2008/10/14 Eric Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 01:00:59PM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
>> "Jeff" == Jeff Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>f> Bruno La Torre wrote:
>>> hamacker ha scritto:
>>>> I can not find any element inside gpedit to change that.  Do
>>>> you know, what element I can change that ?
>>>>
>>>> hamacker ha scritto:
>>>>
>> Any eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon
>> script with winxp+domain ?
>>> configuration computer windows settings protection settings
>>> local settings set right user set change time
>>>
>>> sorry for my traslation.
>>>
>
> This might be slightly off topic but is there some reason you don't
> use NTP instead. More accurate, less overhead, less maintenance.
>
> You could set up the Samba server(s) as NTP time servers for your
> local subnet and run
>
> net time /setsntp:"ntp server list" just once and you would be good to
> go. You wouldn't need to worry about time after that.
>
>
>Jeff> By co-incidence I've just been looking into this myself.
>
>Jeff> I found this article most helpful:
>
>Jeff> http://blogs.msdn.com/aaron_margosis/archive/2005/02/11/371474.aspx
>
>Jeff> If I use INTERACTIVE as suggested, my netlogon script is
>Jeff> able to sync the time to the samba server.  Non-privledged
>Jeff> users are not able to set the time at the toolbar clock,
>Jeff> though.
>
> --
> Eric M. Boehm  /"\  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   \ /  No HTML or RTF in mail
>X   No proprietary word-processing
> Respect Open Standards / \  files in mail
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Multiple Samba accounts with the rights of a single Unix account?

[Norberto Bensa]

Quoting Peter Petrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Norberto Bensa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Quoting Peter Petrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

 Is it possible to have a standalone Samba server map different

username/password pairs to a single Unix account?



force user/group?



"force user/group" almost works. But smbd still tries to find a matching
Unix account for each username, failing with errors like this:



Well, yes. Samba needs to map each username to a unix uid. I've  
re-read your original post and AFAIK, what you want to do is not  
possible. You'll still need to create the unix users.





This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Multiple Samba accounts with the rights of a single Unix account?

[Paul Venzke]

On Tue October 14 2008 20:49, Peter Petrov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Norberto Bensa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Quoting Peter Petrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >  Is it possible to have a standalone Samba server map different
> >
> >> username/password pairs to a single Unix account?
> >
> > force user/group?
>
> "force user/group" almost works. But smbd still tries to find a matching
> Unix account for each username, failing with errors like this:
>
> [2008/10/15 04:29:42,  0] passdb/pdb_get_set.c:pdb_get_group_sid(210)
>   pdb_get_group_sid: Failed to find Unix account for admin
> [2008/10/15 04:29:42,  1] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_sam(562)
>   User admin in passdb, but getpwnam() fails!
>
> Any ideas?

Will a username map file work for what you want?  Look in manual for the 
parameter "username map=" in smb.conf.
-- 
Paul
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Multiple Samba accounts with the rights of a single Unix account?

[Peter Petrov]

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Norberto Bensa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Quoting Peter Petrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>  Is it possible to have a standalone Samba server map different
>> username/password pairs to a single Unix account?
>>
>
> force user/group?
>


"force user/group" almost works. But smbd still tries to find a matching
Unix account for each username, failing with errors like this:

[2008/10/15 04:29:42,  0] passdb/pdb_get_set.c:pdb_get_group_sid(210)
  pdb_get_group_sid: Failed to find Unix account for admin
[2008/10/15 04:29:42,  1] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_sam(562)
  User admin in passdb, but getpwnam() fails!

Any ideas?
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba 4 installation problem

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 10:39 +0800, wilson kwok wrote:
> Hello,
>  
> I'm trying install Samba 4 by this link 
> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO . The step 2 compile and step 3 
> install completed, but step 4 provisionhas following error:
>  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] setup]# ./provision --realm=sfa.local --domain=sfa 
> --adminpass= --server-role='domain controller'Traceback (most recent call 
> last):  File "./provision", line 32, in ?import sambaImportError: No 
> module named samba
>  
> Could someone has experience to fix this problem ?

For some reason the python modules have not been installed in a place
where the provision script can find them.  Perhaps try running it as
setup/provision (there is a hack to run from the source dir).

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team   http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Problems getting vampire to work with Windows 2000 server

[matt.delves]

Greetings all,
I'm currently tasked with getting all of the user accounts of a Windows
2000 Server and onto a Linux (centos) box running Samba. I've got the linux
box acting correctly through samba and it can join the domain.

The problem that I'm having is that it gives the following error when
running with samba and ldap
  smb_create_group: Running the command `/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-groupadd
-p 'Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access'' gave 83

And when running samba alone it gives
  fetch_account: Running the command `/usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false -d
/dev/null 'LP01$'' gave 83

Could I please get some help with being pointed in the right direction as
I'm coming up against brick walls whilst googling.

Thanks,
Matthew Delves

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Re: Problems with Share Modes "fill_share_mode_lock failed"

[Ricardo Santos]

Jeremy,

my problem doesn't seem related to the "fill_share_mode_lock failed".

I tested on another Samba server with a Windows client and the problem
is the same:

Windows request four times a "TRANSACT2_QPATHINFO" for each file (eg.
ASP script sweeping a directory)


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with winxp+domain ?

[Eric Boehm]

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 01:00:59PM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
> "Jeff" == Jeff Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

f> Bruno La Torre wrote:
>> hamacker ha scritto:
>>> I can not find any element inside gpedit to change that.  Do
>>> you know, what element I can change that ?
>>> 
>>> hamacker ha scritto:
>>> 
> Any eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon
> script with winxp+domain ?
>> configuration computer windows settings protection settings
>> local settings set right user set change time
>> 
>> sorry for my traslation.
>> 

This might be slightly off topic but is there some reason you don't
use NTP instead. More accurate, less overhead, less maintenance.

You could set up the Samba server(s) as NTP time servers for your
local subnet and run

net time /setsntp:"ntp server list" just once and you would be good to
go. You wouldn't need to worry about time after that.


Jeff> By co-incidence I've just been looking into this myself.

Jeff> I found this article most helpful:

Jeff> http://blogs.msdn.com/aaron_margosis/archive/2005/02/11/371474.aspx

Jeff> If I use INTERACTIVE as suggested, my netlogon script is
Jeff> able to sync the time to the samba server.  Non-privledged
Jeff> users are not able to set the time at the toolbar clock,
Jeff> though.

-- 
Eric M. Boehm  /"\  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   \ /  No HTML or RTF in mail
X   No proprietary word-processing
Respect Open Standards / \  files in mail
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with winxp+domain ?

[Jeff Ross]

Bruno La Torre wrote:

hamacker ha scritto:

I can not find any element inside gpedit to change that.
Do you know, what element I can change that ?

hamacker ha scritto:
 

Any eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with
winxp+domain ?

configuration computer
   windows settings
  protection settings
 local settings
set right user
   set change time

sorry for my traslation.



By co-incidence I've just been looking into this myself.

I found this article most helpful:

http://blogs.msdn.com/aaron_margosis/archive/2005/02/11/371474.aspx

If I use INTERACTIVE as suggested, my netlogon script is able to sync 
the time to the samba server.  Non-privledged users are not able to set 
the time at the toolbar clock, though.


Jeff Ross
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with winxp+domain ?

[hamacker]

Dont worry, your english is better than me.

Your tips is OK, now 'net time \\server /set /yes' it's run fine !

2008/10/14 Bruno La Torre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hamacker ha scritto:
>>
>> I can not find any element inside gpedit to change that.
>> Do you know, what element I can change that ?
>>
>> hamacker ha scritto:
>>

 Any eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with
 winxp+domain ?
>
> configuration computer
>   windows settings
>  protection settings
> local settings
>set right user
>   set change time
>
> sorry for my traslation.
>
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Profile loading/saving on gigabit network only runs at fast ethernet speeds! Help!

[Adam Williams]

page 211 of samba 3 by example.pdf has instructions on how to redirect 
folders using registry changes.  you can easily redirect my documents by 
right clicking on it and changing the target.  i don't save files to my 
desktop because that just results in a cluttered desktop and large 
roaming profiles.  No I don't think VMWare will run much slower than it 
is now.  In testing on my Poweredge servers, desktop PCs, etc, it seems 
in my experience that hard drives max out at reads/writes of 25 
megabytes a second, and even 100megabit transfers about 12 megabytes a 
second on a switched network.  I'd probably try a test, take a user, 
redirect my documents to a folder on the server, put the VM in it, and 
run it, and see how it affects your performance, you may not notice 
anything different.  I ran Windows XP and Fedora 8 on Microsoft Virtual 
PC in a test environment on my 100 megabit notebook PC with the VMs 
stored on a shared drive on a file server and I didn't notice much of a 
difference as running an operating system locally.


Jonathan Bougher wrote:
The VM is being saved to the Desktop, within a folder (or multiple 
folders if the user puts it there)


If I redirect My Docs, and the VM files are there - Then won't VMware 
run much more slowly trying to access this stuff across the network 
when the user wants to run the VM? Profile loading/saving would speed 
up, but overall performance would be impacted negatively I think


Thanks for the reply, I will look into it further - do you have any  
thoughts about what I stated above?



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Profile loading/saving on gigabit network only runs at fast ethernet speeds! Help!

[Jonathan Bougher]

The VM is being saved to the Desktop, within a folder (or multiple folders
if the user puts it there)

If I redirect My Docs, and the VM files are there - Then won't VMware run
much more slowly trying to access this stuff across the network when the
user wants to run the VM? Profile loading/saving would speed up, but overall
performance would be impacted negatively I think

Thanks for the reply, I will look into it further - do you have any
thoughts about what I stated above?

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Adam Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> where are you saving the VM at?  My documents?  you can redirect my
> documents as well as most folders under c:\documents and settings\user
>
>
> Jonathan Bougher wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I could really use some help trying to diagnose a tricky issue within the
>> domain
>> I have set up.
>>
>> I am using samba-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 and openldap-2.3.27-8.el5_2.4 on a
>> server
>> running Centos 5.1.
>>
>> I have everything working properly within the domain, users can log in,
>> netlogon
>> scripts are run, their profile is loaded, etc.
>>
>> I have been extremely happy with this software and can't thank the makers
>> enough
>> - great work!
>>
>> The issue I am having is with the speed of profile loading/saving. This
>> network
>> is hosted on a Gigabit Lan - this is a classroom environment where
>> students
>> must
>> save large files in their profile (virtual machines actually = ~3-4GB per
>> profile & will grow...).
>>
>> I know the best option is to save the work elsewhere, like their mapped
>> home
>> directory, but it would be highly inconvenient to copy the VM back and
>> forth
>> every time they wanted to use it (although much faster than the
>> logon/logoff
>> speeds).
>>
>> Let me elaborate: I have done speed tests transferring files and
>> directories
>> directly to writable shares. I have monitored the network speeds with
>> iptraf
>> on
>> the server while downloading/uploading a 1 GB or file or large directory
>> on
>> the
>> relevant interface (there are 4 local interfaces) and these are my
>> approximate
>> results:
>>
>> DL from Samba Share: 300,000 - 400,000 kb/s
>> UPL to Samba Share: 300,000 - 400,000 kb/s
>>
>> These speeds are GREAT! I was blown away! -- But then take a look at the
>> speeds
>> at which the network operates when loading/saving a user's profile while
>> logging
>> in/out:
>>
>> Profile Logoff: 50,000 kb/s (a ~3GB profile takes roughly 10 min to load)
>> Profile Logon: Not Tested - but observed to take about 10 minutes
>>
>> So my dilemma is that, while the networking is functioning exceptionally
>> well in
>> all other areas, it just takes so long to login/logoff! The users need to
>> have
>> roaming profiles (they do switch machines sometimes) & I would like them
>> to
>> be
>> able to store a lot of data inside their profile without speed becoming
>> too
>> much
>> of an issue like it is now.
>>
>> I have messed around with a few tweaking options in the smb.conf file, but
>> they
>> have not helped so far. So, I just went back to using TCP_NODELAY. I have
>> turned
>> off oplocks as well.
>>
>> I am not sure how to proceed now and I am pretty much taking random stabs
>> in
>> the
>> dark with this issue, any help would be GREATLY appreciated!
>>
>> Thank you all,
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba PDC - Usernames with over 20 characters are not working with Vista SP1

[Jeremy Allison]

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 06:07:25PM +0100, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> Bruno, thanks for the reply.
> 
> Having read through the section i have found the information on the
> group name limitations, which are mostly related to Unix like system.
> >From there, windows 200x systems support group names of 254 characters.
> It doesn't actually say anything about username limitations.
> 
> I have no problem using long usernames in Samba + Linux client - all
> works fine and I am able to login.
> 
> However, the problem is with Samba + Windows Vista SP1 and usernames
> longer then 20 characters. On the other hand, Samba + Windows Vista
> (without SP1 installed) works fine.
> 
> However, this problem does not happen with Microsoft 2003 AD + Vista
> SP1. Therefore, the combination of Samba + Vista SP1 seems to result in
> problems with logons using long usernames. I am using Samba 3.2.3 and
> the same problem happens on Samba 3.0.28 and 3.0.31.

Can you post an smbd debug level 10 log of the Vista SP1 login please ?

Thanks,

Jeremy.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with winxp+domain ?

[Bruno La Torre]

hamacker ha scritto:

I can not find any element inside gpedit to change that.
Do you know, what element I can change that ?

hamacker ha scritto:
  

Any eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with
winxp+domain ?

configuration computer
   windows settings
  protection settings
 local settings
set right user
   set change time

sorry for my traslation.
 
--

To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba + LDAP - Any way to create username alias?

[Andrei Mikhailovsky]

Hello everyone,

I was wondering if there is anyway to create username alias for Samba +
LDAP setup? I have a rather large number of long usernames (20+
characters) in my Samba + LDAP setup, which seems to be incompatible
with Vista SP1. Is there a way to create username aliases so that the
user can login with alternative usernames as well as with the long
usernames?

The reason for this complication is that cyrus imap service requires the
usernames to be in form of [EMAIL PROTECTED] in order to distinguish which
domain the username belongs to. This makes the usernames rather large
for Vista SP1. So I would like all Windows clients to login to domain by
using just their usernames without the "@domain" part.

Anyone have any ideas how can this be done with Samba + LDAP?

Andrei
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Profile loading/saving on gigabit network only runs at fast ethernet speeds! Help!

[Adam Williams]

where are you saving the VM at?  My documents?  you can redirect my 
documents as well as most folders under c:\documents and settings\user


Jonathan Bougher wrote:

Hello everyone,

I could really use some help trying to diagnose a tricky issue within the
domain
I have set up.

I am using samba-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 and openldap-2.3.27-8.el5_2.4 on a server
running Centos 5.1.

I have everything working properly within the domain, users can log in,
netlogon
scripts are run, their profile is loaded, etc.

I have been extremely happy with this software and can't thank the makers
enough
- great work!

The issue I am having is with the speed of profile loading/saving. This
network
is hosted on a Gigabit Lan - this is a classroom environment where students
must
save large files in their profile (virtual machines actually = ~3-4GB per
profile & will grow...).

I know the best option is to save the work elsewhere, like their mapped home
directory, but it would be highly inconvenient to copy the VM back and forth
every time they wanted to use it (although much faster than the logon/logoff
speeds).

Let me elaborate: I have done speed tests transferring files and directories
directly to writable shares. I have monitored the network speeds with iptraf
on
the server while downloading/uploading a 1 GB or file or large directory on
the
relevant interface (there are 4 local interfaces) and these are my
approximate
results:

DL from Samba Share: 300,000 - 400,000 kb/s
UPL to Samba Share: 300,000 - 400,000 kb/s

These speeds are GREAT! I was blown away! -- But then take a look at the
speeds
at which the network operates when loading/saving a user's profile while
logging
in/out:

Profile Logoff: 50,000 kb/s (a ~3GB profile takes roughly 10 min to load)
Profile Logon: Not Tested - but observed to take about 10 minutes

So my dilemma is that, while the networking is functioning exceptionally
well in
all other areas, it just takes so long to login/logoff! The users need to
have
roaming profiles (they do switch machines sometimes) & I would like them to
be
able to store a lot of data inside their profile without speed becoming too
much
of an issue like it is now.

I have messed around with a few tweaking options in the smb.conf file, but
they
have not helped so far. So, I just went back to using TCP_NODELAY. I have
turned
off oplocks as well.

I am not sure how to proceed now and I am pretty much taking random stabs in
the
dark with this issue, any help would be GREATLY appreciated!

Thank you all,

Jonathan
  

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba PDC - Usernames with over 20 characters are not working with Vista SP1

[Andrei Mikhailovsky]

Bruno, thanks for the reply.

Having read through the section i have found the information on the
group name limitations, which are mostly related to Unix like system.
>From there, windows 200x systems support group names of 254 characters.
It doesn't actually say anything about username limitations.

I have no problem using long usernames in Samba + Linux client - all
works fine and I am able to login.

However, the problem is with Samba + Windows Vista SP1 and usernames
longer then 20 characters. On the other hand, Samba + Windows Vista
(without SP1 installed) works fine.

However, this problem does not happen with Microsoft 2003 AD + Vista
SP1. Therefore, the combination of Samba + Vista SP1 seems to result in
problems with logons using long usernames. I am using Samba 3.2.3 and
the same problem happens on Samba 3.0.28 and 3.0.31.

Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.


Andrei

Bruno La Torre wrote the following on 14/10/08 17:28:
> see : http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/samba-3.0.9/Samba-Guide/migration.html
> 
> section: What are the limits or constraints that apply to group names
> 
> 
> 
> Andrei Mikhailovsky ha scritto:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am having difficulties logging into Samba domain with Vista SP1 with
>> usernames that have over 20 characters in their names. Vista SP1 gives
>> me the following error:
>>
>> The local Session Manager service failed the logon.
>> The data area passed to a system call is too small.
>>
>> Anyone know what might be the cause of the problem and how to solve it?
>>
>> Many thanks
>>   
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Profile loading/saving on gigabit network only runs at fast ethernet speeds! Help!

[Jonathan Bougher]

Ouch - insane is not what I was going for, hahaha jk. I just hoped that the
gigabit speeds would better support a larger profile.

If I was getting the full DL/UL speeds for profile transfer it would not be
such an issue because it would only take about a minute and a half.

But I see your wisdom Charles because the profiles can definitely grow much
larger and sooner or later I would be stuck once again...it's just those
dang big VM files!!!

Mike,

The VM's are actually just the VM Files that VMware Server uses to load the
Virtual OS. The students created their own VM's with Vmware Server and they
need to use them periodically (they can screw them up, wehatever they want,
it is a learning environment & then they can rebuild).

The Desktops are running a locally installed WinXP Pro and use the Samba
Server as PDC. The VM files themselves are the big problem here because they
run about 3 GB's - and each student must have his/her own.

I don't fully undertand you solution, but I did pick up on the fact that I
could create a local directory on the client machines in which users could
house their VMs. This would be a great Idea, but the only downside is that
it would limit their mobility.

I do not mind working around this issue in some way, and I really appreciate
all the help so far! In a perfect world however, I would like to diagnose
the issue with the speeds. Why is it that profile loading/saving is SO much
slower than other data transfer? Mabey I am missing something as far as how
profiles are copied/saved. Could someone clue me in and help me work out a
way to speed it up, or else then I will take one of the other routes

Thanks so much!

Jonathan

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Mike Gallamore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I think your right there. What type of OS/VM software are you using? Could
> you have the OS + common app bits in a virtual disk that is on the local
> machine and the user profile, user specific applications all in a seperate
> virtual disk that they get from the samba server? That would probably trim
> the amount of traffic hugely.
>
> Also since you have such a performance difference between the two options
> maybe you'd be better off saving the VM image locally then using a tool like
> a bash script/rsync whatever to copy the whole thing over once it is a
> single or couple files. Here seperating the apps from the data will help too
> because a big chunk might not need to be sent again as it wouldn't change,
> but if it is only one file you might end up sending the whole thing because
> someone made a little file. I'm thinking that the VM program might be
> creating a bunch of little bursty traffic for some reason which would cause
> the performance degradation.
>
> On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>  On 10/14/2008, Jonathan Bougher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>>> Profile Logoff: 50,000 kb/s (a ~3GB profile takes roughly 10 min to load)
>>>
>>
>> Using roaming profiles for profiles so large is - well - insane.
>>
>> You won't get much better performance...
>>
>> I'd look for another way (than using huge roaming profiles) to
>> accomplish your goal.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Charles
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Profile loading/saving on gigabit network only runs at fast ethernet speeds! Help!

[Jonathan Bougher]

Ouch - insane is not what I was going for, hahaha jk. I just hoped that the
gigabit speeds would better support a larger profile.

If I was getting the full DL/UL speeds for profile transfer it would not be
such an issue because it would only take about a minute and a half.

But I see your wisdom Charles because the profiles can definitely grow much
larger and sooner or later I would be stuck once again...it's just those
dang big VM files!!!

Mike,

The VM's are actually just the VM Files that VMware Server uses to load the
Virtual OS. The students created their own VM's with Vmware Server and they
need to use them periodically (they can screw them up, wehatever they want,
it is a learning environment & then they can rebuild).

The Desktops are running a locally installed WinXP Pro and use the Samba
Server as PDC. The VM files themselves are the big problem here because they
run about 3 GB's - and each student must have his/her own.

I don't fully undertand you solution, but I did pick up on the fact that I
could create a local directory on the client machines in which users could
house their VMs. This would be a great Idea, but the only downside is that
it would limit their mobility.

I do not mind working around this issue in some way, and I really appreciate
all the help so far! In a perfect world however, I would like to diagnose
the issue with the speeds. Why is it that profile loading/saving is SO much
slower than other data transfer? Mabey I am missing something as far as how
profiles are copied/saved. Could someone clue me in and help me work out a
way to speed it up, or else then I will take one of the other routes

Thanks so much!

Jonathan
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with winxp+domain ?

[hamacker]

I can not find any element inside gpedit to change that.
Do you know, what element I can change that ?

2008/10/14 Bruno La Torre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> you must give right permission to user xp by gpedit.msc
>
> hamacker ha scritto:
>>
>> Any eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with
>> winxp+domain ?
>>
>> Normal method, winxp refuses that with the error message : you're not
>> administrator.
>>
>> In next week, in Brazil enable summer time (Daylight Saving Time) and
>> I need to update many stations in the automatic way.
>>
>
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] samba+cups failure - no printers in the share list

[Jeremy Allison]

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:11:34AM +0200, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> Martin Zielinski wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Self compiled Samba?
>> Does "ldd smbd" has a link to libcups?
>> If you have a smbd that is linked to libcups and cups is running, it  
>> will work!
>>
>> Only reason why it wouldn't could be access rights in your cups  
>> configuration.
>>
>> After you verified, that libcups is used, it might be a good idea to  
>> increase the log level of samba and cups and examine the logfiles. They 
>> might contain the information you need.
>>
>> Bye,
>>
>> Martin
>
> Thanks Martin for the tips.
> While checking cups' logs, it showed me the infamous "Unsupported  
> character set" error, and after reading the bug reports regarding this,  
> I've converted the server to use utf8. Now samba can get the printers  
> from cups.

I've fixed this in the 3.2.x git tree, so should work
correctly in the next 3.2.x release.

Jeremy
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Server Maps by IP but not by Name for Domain Users

[Matthew Lind]

Update.

It seems as though this is not every client.  Only clients that specific
users log into and the problem is only for that user.

In other words it is an authentication problem with a set of my users
and it follows them from machine to machine.

wbinfo -u returns all the users even the ones having this issue.

Thanks again!

On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 18:11 +0200, Bruno La Torre wrote:
> on windows client nbtstat -a admin1 give you the ip of admin1
> 
> mh if  remember well, if you have a domain you must have a wins server.
> 
> sorry, I forgot the list :-(
> 
> Matthew Lind ha scritto:
> > We don't run the WINS service on our network.  We have no Win9x or
> > earlier clients.  All clients are Windows XP.
> >
> > However, to answer your question this is what I get on the server when I
> > run the nmblookup
> >
> > nmblookup admin1:
> > creating lame upcase table
> > creating lame lowcase table
> > querying admin1 on x.x.y.y
> > x.x.n.n admin1<00>
> >
> > nmblookup :
> > creating lame upcase table
> > creating lame lowcase table
> > querying admin1 on x.x.y.y
> > x.x.a.a <00>
> >
> > nmblookup doesn't work on Windows XP.
> >
> > Thanks again!
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:19 +0200, Bruno La Torre wrote:
> >   
> >> I thing that you have a WINS problem.
> >> nmblookup admin1 on the server and client give the rigth IP?
> >>
> >> Matthew Lind ha scritto:
> >> 
> >>> I gave that a shot and it was a no go.  Same errors are produced.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:57 -0500, Adam Williams wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>   
>  add in your [global] section:
> 
>  msdfs root = yes
> 
>  restart samba, and then try connecting to your shares by server name 
>  again.
> 
>  Matthew Lind wrote:
>  
>  
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I've got an issue with my Samba server.  I can't seem to get file shares
> > to map using Server Name, but I can get them to map using IP Address. 
> >
> > Here is my smb.conf:
> >
> > [global]
> >   workgroup = ADMIN
> >   server string = Snap Server
> >   timestamp logs = yes
> >   dos filetimes = yes
> >   dos filemode = yes
> >   inherit acls = yes
> >   name cache timeout = 0
> >   winbind uid = 101-600
> >   winbind gid = 101-600
> >   local master = No
> >   guest account = guest
> >   map to guest = Never
> >   unix charset = CP1252
> >   dos charset = CP850
> >   allow trusted domains = no
> >   security = ADS
> >   disable netbios = no
> >   password server = *
> >   encrypt passwords = Yes
> >   username level = 5
> >   debug level = 0
> >   load printers = no
> >   utmp directory = /var/run
> >   utmp = yes
> >   name resolve order = host lmhosts wins bcast
> >   ldap timeout = 5
> >   restrict anonymous = 2
> >   include = /etc/smb.conf.perm
> >   include = /etc/smb.conf.extra
> >   include = /etc/smb.conf.dm
> >   include = /etc/smb_shares.conf
> >
> > Here is my smb_shares.conf: *Note All shares follow this format and all 
> > seem affected I am just truncating *
> > ..snip..
> > [bordway]
> > path = /shares/bordway
> > read only = no
> > comment = 
> > follow symlinks = no
> > printable = no
> > browseable = yes
> > map acl inherit = yes
> > create mask = 0777
> > security mask = 0777
> > directory mask = 0777
> > directory security mask = 0777
> > create mask_ext = 0777
> > directory mask_ext = 0777
> > guest ok = No
> > valid users = \ 
> >  "admin"   \  
> >  "ADMIN\bordway" 
> >
> > write list = \ 
> >   "admin"   \   
> >   "ADMIN\bordway"  
> > ..snip..
> >
> > Here is my smb.conf.perm:
> > panic action = /usr/bin/backtrace %d > /tmp/segv_samba_%d.out 2>&1
> > #  root preexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/log_connect.sh '%u' '%m' '%I' 
> > '%S'
> > #  root postexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/log_disconnect.sh '%u' '%m' 
> > '%I' '%S'
> >   username level = 0
> >  realm = ADMIN.NHTI
> >
> > smb.conf.dm and smb.conf.extra are empty.
> >
> > When a client tries to connect using the Server Name this is the error 
> > in the log:
> >
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
> >   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
> >   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388)
> >   write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(413)
> >   write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 19: ERRNO = Connection 
> > reset by peer
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/uti

Re: [Samba] Server Maps by IP but not by Name for Domain Users

[Matthew Lind]

Here is the output from nbtstat -a 


   Name TypeStatus

ADMIN1 <00> UNIQUE  Registered
ADMIN1 <03> UNIQUE  Registered
ADMIN1 <20> UNIQUE  Registered
ADMIN  <00> GROUP   Registered
ADMIN1 <1E> GROUP   Registered

MAC Address = 

Thanks again!


On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 18:11 +0200, Bruno La Torre wrote:
> on windows client nbtstat -a admin1 give you the ip of admin1
> 
> mh if  remember well, if you have a domain you must have a wins server.
> 
> sorry, I forgot the list :-(
> 
> Matthew Lind ha scritto:
> > We don't run the WINS service on our network.  We have no Win9x or
> > earlier clients.  All clients are Windows XP.
> >
> > However, to answer your question this is what I get on the server when I
> > run the nmblookup
> >
> > nmblookup admin1:
> > creating lame upcase table
> > creating lame lowcase table
> > querying admin1 on x.x.y.y
> > x.x.n.n admin1<00>
> >
> > nmblookup :
> > creating lame upcase table
> > creating lame lowcase table
> > querying admin1 on x.x.y.y
> > x.x.a.a <00>
> >
> > nmblookup doesn't work on Windows XP.
> >
> > Thanks again!
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:19 +0200, Bruno La Torre wrote:
> >   
> >> I thing that you have a WINS problem.
> >> nmblookup admin1 on the server and client give the rigth IP?
> >>
> >> Matthew Lind ha scritto:
> >> 
> >>> I gave that a shot and it was a no go.  Same errors are produced.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:57 -0500, Adam Williams wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>   
>  add in your [global] section:
> 
>  msdfs root = yes
> 
>  restart samba, and then try connecting to your shares by server name 
>  again.
> 
>  Matthew Lind wrote:
>  
>  
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I've got an issue with my Samba server.  I can't seem to get file shares
> > to map using Server Name, but I can get them to map using IP Address. 
> >
> > Here is my smb.conf:
> >
> > [global]
> >   workgroup = ADMIN
> >   server string = Snap Server
> >   timestamp logs = yes
> >   dos filetimes = yes
> >   dos filemode = yes
> >   inherit acls = yes
> >   name cache timeout = 0
> >   winbind uid = 101-600
> >   winbind gid = 101-600
> >   local master = No
> >   guest account = guest
> >   map to guest = Never
> >   unix charset = CP1252
> >   dos charset = CP850
> >   allow trusted domains = no
> >   security = ADS
> >   disable netbios = no
> >   password server = *
> >   encrypt passwords = Yes
> >   username level = 5
> >   debug level = 0
> >   load printers = no
> >   utmp directory = /var/run
> >   utmp = yes
> >   name resolve order = host lmhosts wins bcast
> >   ldap timeout = 5
> >   restrict anonymous = 2
> >   include = /etc/smb.conf.perm
> >   include = /etc/smb.conf.extra
> >   include = /etc/smb.conf.dm
> >   include = /etc/smb_shares.conf
> >
> > Here is my smb_shares.conf: *Note All shares follow this format and all 
> > seem affected I am just truncating *
> > ..snip..
> > [bordway]
> > path = /shares/bordway
> > read only = no
> > comment = 
> > follow symlinks = no
> > printable = no
> > browseable = yes
> > map acl inherit = yes
> > create mask = 0777
> > security mask = 0777
> > directory mask = 0777
> > directory security mask = 0777
> > create mask_ext = 0777
> > directory mask_ext = 0777
> > guest ok = No
> > valid users = \ 
> >  "admin"   \  
> >  "ADMIN\bordway" 
> >
> > write list = \ 
> >   "admin"   \   
> >   "ADMIN\bordway"  
> > ..snip..
> >
> > Here is my smb.conf.perm:
> > panic action = /usr/bin/backtrace %d > /tmp/segv_samba_%d.out 2>&1
> > #  root preexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/log_connect.sh '%u' '%m' '%I' 
> > '%S'
> > #  root postexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/log_disconnect.sh '%u' '%m' 
> > '%I' '%S'
> >   username level = 0
> >  realm = ADMIN.NHTI
> >
> > smb.conf.dm and smb.conf.extra are empty.
> >
> > When a client tries to connect using the Server Name this is the error 
> > in the log:
> >
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
> >   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
> >   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388)
> >   write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(413)
> >   write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 19: ERRNO = Connection 
> > reset by peer
> > 

Re: [Samba] Samba PDC - Usernames with over 20 characters are not working with Vista SP1

[Bruno La Torre]

see : http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/samba-3.0.9/Samba-Guide/migration.html

section: What are the limits or constraints that apply to group names



Andrei Mikhailovsky ha scritto:

Hi all,

I am having difficulties logging into Samba domain with Vista SP1 with
usernames that have over 20 characters in their names. Vista SP1 gives
me the following error:

The local Session Manager service failed the logon.
The data area passed to a system call is too small.

Anyone know what might be the cause of the problem and how to solve it?

Many thanks
  

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba PDC - Usernames with over 20 characters are not working with Vista SP1

[Andrei Mikhailovsky]

Hi all,

I am having difficulties logging into Samba domain with Vista SP1 with
usernames that have over 20 characters in their names. Vista SP1 gives
me the following error:

The local Session Manager service failed the logon.
The data area passed to a system call is too small.

Anyone know what might be the cause of the problem and how to solve it?

Many thanks
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Server Maps by IP but not by Name for Domain Users

[Bruno La Torre]

on windows client nbtstat -a admin1 give you the ip of admin1

mh if  remember well, if you have a domain you must have a wins server.

sorry, I forgot the list :-(

Matthew Lind ha scritto:

We don't run the WINS service on our network.  We have no Win9x or
earlier clients.  All clients are Windows XP.

However, to answer your question this is what I get on the server when I
run the nmblookup

nmblookup admin1:
creating lame upcase table
creating lame lowcase table
querying admin1 on x.x.y.y
x.x.n.n admin1<00>

nmblookup :
creating lame upcase table
creating lame lowcase table
querying admin1 on x.x.y.y
x.x.a.a <00>

nmblookup doesn't work on Windows XP.

Thanks again!

On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:19 +0200, Bruno La Torre wrote:
  

I thing that you have a WINS problem.
nmblookup admin1 on the server and client give the rigth IP?

Matthew Lind ha scritto:


I gave that a shot and it was a no go.  Same errors are produced.

Thanks!

On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:57 -0500, Adam Williams wrote:
  
  

add in your [global] section:

msdfs root = yes

restart samba, and then try connecting to your shares by server name again.

Matthew Lind wrote:



Hey all,

I've got an issue with my Samba server.  I can't seem to get file shares
to map using Server Name, but I can get them to map using IP Address. 


Here is my smb.conf:

[global]
  workgroup = ADMIN
  server string = Snap Server
  timestamp logs = yes
  dos filetimes = yes
  dos filemode = yes
  inherit acls = yes
  name cache timeout = 0
  winbind uid = 101-600
  winbind gid = 101-600
  local master = No
  guest account = guest
  map to guest = Never
  unix charset = CP1252
  dos charset = CP850
  allow trusted domains = no
  security = ADS
  disable netbios = no
  password server = *
  encrypt passwords = Yes
  username level = 5
  debug level = 0
  load printers = no
  utmp directory = /var/run
  utmp = yes
  name resolve order = host lmhosts wins bcast
  ldap timeout = 5
  restrict anonymous = 2
  include = /etc/smb.conf.perm
  include = /etc/smb.conf.extra
  include = /etc/smb.conf.dm
  include = /etc/smb_shares.conf

Here is my smb_shares.conf: *Note All shares follow this format and all seem 
affected I am just truncating *
..snip..
[bordway]
path = /shares/bordway
read only = no
comment = 
follow symlinks = no

printable = no
browseable = yes
map acl inherit = yes
create mask = 0777
security mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
directory security mask = 0777
create mask_ext = 0777
directory mask_ext = 0777
guest ok = No
valid users = \ 
 "admin"   \  
 "ADMIN\bordway" 

write list = \ 
  "admin"   \   
  "ADMIN\bordway"  
..snip..


Here is my smb.conf.perm:
panic action = /usr/bin/backtrace %d > /tmp/segv_samba_%d.out 2>&1
#  root preexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/log_connect.sh '%u' '%m' '%I' '%S'
#  root postexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/log_disconnect.sh '%u' '%m' '%I' '%S'
  username level = 0
 realm = ADMIN.NHTI

smb.conf.dm and smb.conf.extra are empty.

When a client tries to connect using the Server Name this is the error in the 
log:

[2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
  getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
[2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
  getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
[2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388)
  write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
[2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(413)
  write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 19: ERRNO = Connection reset by 
peer
[2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(585)
  Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer)
[2008/10/13 11:53:00, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
  getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
[2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
  getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
[2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388)
  write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
[2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(413)
  write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 19: ERRNO = Connection reset by 
peer
[2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(585)
  Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer)

On the Windows side if I try by name the user is presented with a Login Box.  
When the credentials are entered the map fails.
If I try with IP no login box is presented and the mapping succeeds.

Things I have tried:

I have tried adding the following to smb.conf (individually and in combination)

smb ports = 139
smb ports = 445
netbios name = admin1

The clients can ping the server by name and the server can ping the clients by 
name.
The clients use the Domain Controller as their DNS server and it can map to the 
server by name.

wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g come back with the correct 

Re: [Samba] Profile loading/saving on gigabit network only runs at fast ethernet speeds! Help!

[Mike Gallamore]

I think your right there. What type of OS/VM software are you using?  
Could you have the OS + common app bits in a virtual disk that is on  
the local machine and the user profile, user specific applications all  
in a seperate virtual disk that they get from the samba server? That  
would probably trim the amount of traffic hugely.


Also since you have such a performance difference between the two  
options maybe you'd be better off saving the VM image locally then  
using a tool like a bash script/rsync whatever to copy the whole thing  
over once it is a single or couple files. Here seperating the apps  
from the data will help too because a big chunk might not need to be  
sent again as it wouldn't change, but if it is only one file you might  
end up sending the whole thing because someone made a little file. I'm  
thinking that the VM program might be creating a bunch of little  
bursty traffic for some reason which would cause the performance  
degradation.

On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:


On 10/14/2008, Jonathan Bougher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Profile Logoff: 50,000 kb/s (a ~3GB profile takes roughly 10 min to  
load)


Using roaming profiles for profiles so large is - well - insane.

You won't get much better performance...

I'd look for another way (than using huge roaming profiles) to
accomplish your goal.

--

Best regards,

Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Server Maps by IP but not by Name for Domain Users

[Matthew Lind]

We don't run the WINS service on our network.  We have no Win9x or
earlier clients.  All clients are Windows XP.

However, to answer your question this is what I get on the server when I
run the nmblookup

nmblookup admin1:
creating lame upcase table
creating lame lowcase table
querying admin1 on x.x.y.y
x.x.n.n admin1<00>

nmblookup :
creating lame upcase table
creating lame lowcase table
querying admin1 on x.x.y.y
x.x.a.a <00>

nmblookup doesn't work on Windows XP.

Thanks again!

On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:19 +0200, Bruno La Torre wrote:
> I thing that you have a WINS problem.
> nmblookup admin1 on the server and client give the rigth IP?
> 
> Matthew Lind ha scritto:
> > I gave that a shot and it was a no go.  Same errors are produced.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:57 -0500, Adam Williams wrote:
> >   
> >> add in your [global] section:
> >>
> >> msdfs root = yes
> >>
> >> restart samba, and then try connecting to your shares by server name again.
> >>
> >> Matthew Lind wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Hey all,
> >>>
> >>> I've got an issue with my Samba server.  I can't seem to get file shares
> >>> to map using Server Name, but I can get them to map using IP Address. 
> >>>
> >>> Here is my smb.conf:
> >>>
> >>> [global]
> >>>   workgroup = ADMIN
> >>>   server string = Snap Server
> >>>   timestamp logs = yes
> >>>   dos filetimes = yes
> >>>   dos filemode = yes
> >>>   inherit acls = yes
> >>>   name cache timeout = 0
> >>>   winbind uid = 101-600
> >>>   winbind gid = 101-600
> >>>   local master = No
> >>>   guest account = guest
> >>>   map to guest = Never
> >>>   unix charset = CP1252
> >>>   dos charset = CP850
> >>>   allow trusted domains = no
> >>>   security = ADS
> >>>   disable netbios = no
> >>>   password server = *
> >>>   encrypt passwords = Yes
> >>>   username level = 5
> >>>   debug level = 0
> >>>   load printers = no
> >>>   utmp directory = /var/run
> >>>   utmp = yes
> >>>   name resolve order = host lmhosts wins bcast
> >>>   ldap timeout = 5
> >>>   restrict anonymous = 2
> >>>   include = /etc/smb.conf.perm
> >>>   include = /etc/smb.conf.extra
> >>>   include = /etc/smb.conf.dm
> >>>   include = /etc/smb_shares.conf
> >>>
> >>> Here is my smb_shares.conf: *Note All shares follow this format and all 
> >>> seem affected I am just truncating *
> >>> ..snip..
> >>> [bordway]
> >>> path = /shares/bordway
> >>> read only = no
> >>> comment = 
> >>> follow symlinks = no
> >>> printable = no
> >>> browseable = yes
> >>> map acl inherit = yes
> >>> create mask = 0777
> >>> security mask = 0777
> >>> directory mask = 0777
> >>> directory security mask = 0777
> >>> create mask_ext = 0777
> >>> directory mask_ext = 0777
> >>> guest ok = No
> >>> valid users = \ 
> >>>  "admin"   \  
> >>>  "ADMIN\bordway" 
> >>>
> >>> write list = \ 
> >>>   "admin"   \   
> >>>   "ADMIN\bordway"  
> >>> ..snip..
> >>>
> >>> Here is my smb.conf.perm:
> >>> panic action = /usr/bin/backtrace %d > /tmp/segv_samba_%d.out 2>&1
> >>> #  root preexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/log_connect.sh '%u' '%m' '%I' '%S'
> >>> #  root postexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/log_disconnect.sh '%u' '%m' '%I' 
> >>> '%S'
> >>>   username level = 0
> >>>  realm = ADMIN.NHTI
> >>>
> >>> smb.conf.dm and smb.conf.extra are empty.
> >>>
> >>> When a client tries to connect using the Server Name this is the error in 
> >>> the log:
> >>>
> >>> [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
> >>>   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
> >>> [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
> >>>   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
> >>> [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388)
> >>>   write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
> >>> [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(413)
> >>>   write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 19: ERRNO = Connection 
> >>> reset by peer
> >>> [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(585)
> >>>   Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer)
> >>> [2008/10/13 11:53:00, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
> >>>   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
> >>> [2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
> >>>   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
> >>> [2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388)
> >>>   write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
> >>> [2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(413)
> >>>   write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 19: ERRNO = Connection 
> >>> reset by peer
> >>> [2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(585)
> >>>   Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer)
> >>>
> >>> On the Windows side if I try by name the user is presented with a Login 
> >>> Box.  When the credentials are entered the map fails.

Re: [Samba] Profile loading/saving on gigabit network only runs at fast ethernet speeds! Help!

[Charles Marcus]

On 10/14/2008, Jonathan Bougher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Profile Logoff: 50,000 kb/s (a ~3GB profile takes roughly 10 min to load)

Using roaming profiles for profiles so large is - well - insane.

You won't get much better performance...

I'd look for another way (than using huge roaming profiles) to
accomplish your goal.

-- 

Best regards,

Charles
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Cluster: node to node switching

[Bruno La Torre]

are you sure that the uid and gid of samba is the item on the node?

Aleksander Gudalo ha scritto:

Hi *,

I use samba 3.2.3 actually and have problems to switch between two 
nodes in a cluster in an active directory environment. I know of CTDB 
but I want to keep it simple and so I use a shared folder for the .tdb 
files.
But it does not work since samba 3.2 anymore. After switching from one 
node to another I have to delete the .tdb files and join again to the 
domain to have access to samba.

What I'm doing wrong here?

Thanks and regards,
Aleksander


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with winxp+domain ?

[Bruno La Torre]

you must give right permission to user xp by gpedit.msc

hamacker ha scritto:

Any eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with
winxp+domain ?

Normal method, winxp refuses that with the error message : you're not
administrator.

In next week, in Brazil enable summer time (Daylight Saving Time) and
I need to update many stations in the automatic way.
  

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Profile loading/saving on gigabit network only runs at fast ethernet speeds! Help!

[Jonathan Bougher]

Hello everyone,

I could really use some help trying to diagnose a tricky issue within the
domain
I have set up.

I am using samba-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 and openldap-2.3.27-8.el5_2.4 on a server
running Centos 5.1.

I have everything working properly within the domain, users can log in,
netlogon
scripts are run, their profile is loaded, etc.

I have been extremely happy with this software and can't thank the makers
enough
- great work!

The issue I am having is with the speed of profile loading/saving. This
network
is hosted on a Gigabit Lan - this is a classroom environment where students
must
save large files in their profile (virtual machines actually = ~3-4GB per
profile & will grow...).

I know the best option is to save the work elsewhere, like their mapped home
directory, but it would be highly inconvenient to copy the VM back and forth
every time they wanted to use it (although much faster than the logon/logoff
speeds).

Let me elaborate: I have done speed tests transferring files and directories
directly to writable shares. I have monitored the network speeds with iptraf
on
the server while downloading/uploading a 1 GB or file or large directory on
the
relevant interface (there are 4 local interfaces) and these are my
approximate
results:

DL from Samba Share: 300,000 - 400,000 kb/s
UPL to Samba Share: 300,000 - 400,000 kb/s

These speeds are GREAT! I was blown away! -- But then take a look at the
speeds
at which the network operates when loading/saving a user's profile while
logging
in/out:

Profile Logoff: 50,000 kb/s (a ~3GB profile takes roughly 10 min to load)
Profile Logon: Not Tested - but observed to take about 10 minutes

So my dilemma is that, while the networking is functioning exceptionally
well in
all other areas, it just takes so long to login/logoff! The users need to
have
roaming profiles (they do switch machines sometimes) & I would like them to
be
able to store a lot of data inside their profile without speed becoming too
much
of an issue like it is now.

I have messed around with a few tweaking options in the smb.conf file, but
they
have not helped so far. So, I just went back to using TCP_NODELAY. I have
turned
off oplocks as well.

I am not sure how to proceed now and I am pretty much taking random stabs in
the
dark with this issue, any help would be GREATLY appreciated!

Thank you all,

Jonathan
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Server Maps by IP but not by Name for Domain Users

[Bruno La Torre]

I thing that you have a WINS problem.
nmblookup admin1 on the server and client give the rigth IP?

Matthew Lind ha scritto:

I gave that a shot and it was a no go.  Same errors are produced.

Thanks!

On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:57 -0500, Adam Williams wrote:
  

add in your [global] section:

msdfs root = yes

restart samba, and then try connecting to your shares by server name again.

Matthew Lind wrote:


Hey all,

I've got an issue with my Samba server.  I can't seem to get file shares
to map using Server Name, but I can get them to map using IP Address. 


Here is my smb.conf:

[global]
  workgroup = ADMIN
  server string = Snap Server
  timestamp logs = yes
  dos filetimes = yes
  dos filemode = yes
  inherit acls = yes
  name cache timeout = 0
  winbind uid = 101-600
  winbind gid = 101-600
  local master = No
  guest account = guest
  map to guest = Never
  unix charset = CP1252
  dos charset = CP850
  allow trusted domains = no
  security = ADS
  disable netbios = no
  password server = *
  encrypt passwords = Yes
  username level = 5
  debug level = 0
  load printers = no
  utmp directory = /var/run
  utmp = yes
  name resolve order = host lmhosts wins bcast
  ldap timeout = 5
  restrict anonymous = 2
  include = /etc/smb.conf.perm
  include = /etc/smb.conf.extra
  include = /etc/smb.conf.dm
  include = /etc/smb_shares.conf

Here is my smb_shares.conf: *Note All shares follow this format and all seem 
affected I am just truncating *
..snip..
[bordway]
path = /shares/bordway
read only = no
comment = 
follow symlinks = no

printable = no
browseable = yes
map acl inherit = yes
create mask = 0777
security mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
directory security mask = 0777
create mask_ext = 0777
directory mask_ext = 0777
guest ok = No
valid users = \ 
 "admin"   \  
 "ADMIN\bordway" 

write list = \ 
  "admin"   \   
  "ADMIN\bordway"  
..snip..


Here is my smb.conf.perm:
panic action = /usr/bin/backtrace %d > /tmp/segv_samba_%d.out 2>&1
#  root preexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/log_connect.sh '%u' '%m' '%I' '%S'
#  root postexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/log_disconnect.sh '%u' '%m' '%I' '%S'
  username level = 0
 realm = ADMIN.NHTI

smb.conf.dm and smb.conf.extra are empty.

When a client tries to connect using the Server Name this is the error in the 
log:

[2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
  getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
[2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
  getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
[2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388)
  write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
[2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(413)
  write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 19: ERRNO = Connection reset by 
peer
[2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(585)
  Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer)
[2008/10/13 11:53:00, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
  getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
[2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
  getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
[2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388)
  write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
[2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(413)
  write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 19: ERRNO = Connection reset by 
peer
[2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(585)
  Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer)

On the Windows side if I try by name the user is presented with a Login Box.  
When the credentials are entered the map fails.
If I try with IP no login box is presented and the mapping succeeds.

Things I have tried:

I have tried adding the following to smb.conf (individually and in combination)

smb ports = 139
smb ports = 445
netbios name = admin1

The clients can ping the server by name and the server can ping the clients by 
name.
The clients use the Domain Controller as their DNS server and it can map to the 
server by name.

wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g come back with the correct group and user information.

Any help would be appreciated!

Thanks




  
  

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Windows password complexity dialog displays incorrect information (using crackcheck)

[Ryan Pugatch]

Hi everyone,



I am using crackcheck to enforce password complexity requirements on my 
PDC.  Windows obeys these password requirements, but the dialog box that 
pops up doesn't display the correct information.  This posting describes 
the same issue: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2007-May/131795.html



However, I'm not trying to change the message completely -- I just want it 
to provide the correct information.



I don't think changing the local group policy will work, and I'd prefer not 
to have to push changes to local policy to each computer.



Thanks in advance for any ideas.



-Ryan
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with winxp+domain ?

[hamacker]

Any eficient method to run [net time \\server] on logon script with
winxp+domain ?

Normal method, winxp refuses that with the error message : you're not
administrator.

In next week, in Brazil enable summer time (Daylight Saving Time) and
I need to update many stations in the automatic way.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba builtin groups and LDAP

[Adam Williams]

did you run:

net groupmap add rid=512 ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=ntadmins type=d
net groupmap add rid=513 ntgroup="Domain Users" unixgroup=users type=d
net groupmap add rid=514 ntgroup="Domain Guests" unixgroup=nobody type=d


Loren M. Lang wrote:

I just set up a fresh Samba PDC using OpenLDAP as the passdb.  When I
start smbd, I notice some log messages about failing to create some
builtin groups: Administrators and Users.  Is Samba trying to run a
group add script which I have not setup or to create posixGroups in LDAP
which it does not have permission to do?  I turned up debugging output
and saw that it complained about not getting gids from winbind.  I have
not set up and idmaps as it's only one domain and users exists in both
Windows and Linux.
  

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Server Maps by IP but not by Name for Domain Users

[Matthew Lind]

I gave that a shot and it was a no go.  Same errors are produced.

Thanks!

On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:57 -0500, Adam Williams wrote:
> add in your [global] section:
> 
> msdfs root = yes
> 
> restart samba, and then try connecting to your shares by server name again.
> 
> Matthew Lind wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I've got an issue with my Samba server.  I can't seem to get file shares
> > to map using Server Name, but I can get them to map using IP Address. 
> >
> > Here is my smb.conf:
> >
> > [global]
> >   workgroup = ADMIN
> >   server string = Snap Server
> >   timestamp logs = yes
> >   dos filetimes = yes
> >   dos filemode = yes
> >   inherit acls = yes
> >   name cache timeout = 0
> >   winbind uid = 101-600
> >   winbind gid = 101-600
> >   local master = No
> >   guest account = guest
> >   map to guest = Never
> >   unix charset = CP1252
> >   dos charset = CP850
> >   allow trusted domains = no
> >   security = ADS
> >   disable netbios = no
> >   password server = *
> >   encrypt passwords = Yes
> >   username level = 5
> >   debug level = 0
> >   load printers = no
> >   utmp directory = /var/run
> >   utmp = yes
> >   name resolve order = host lmhosts wins bcast
> >   ldap timeout = 5
> >   restrict anonymous = 2
> >   include = /etc/smb.conf.perm
> >   include = /etc/smb.conf.extra
> >   include = /etc/smb.conf.dm
> >   include = /etc/smb_shares.conf
> >
> > Here is my smb_shares.conf: *Note All shares follow this format and all 
> > seem affected I am just truncating *
> > ..snip..
> > [bordway]
> > path = /shares/bordway
> > read only = no
> > comment = 
> > follow symlinks = no
> > printable = no
> > browseable = yes
> > map acl inherit = yes
> > create mask = 0777
> > security mask = 0777
> > directory mask = 0777
> > directory security mask = 0777
> > create mask_ext = 0777
> > directory mask_ext = 0777
> > guest ok = No
> > valid users = \ 
> >  "admin"   \  
> >  "ADMIN\bordway" 
> >
> > write list = \ 
> >   "admin"   \   
> >   "ADMIN\bordway"  
> > ..snip..
> >
> > Here is my smb.conf.perm:
> > panic action = /usr/bin/backtrace %d > /tmp/segv_samba_%d.out 2>&1
> > #  root preexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/log_connect.sh '%u' '%m' '%I' '%S'
> > #  root postexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/log_disconnect.sh '%u' '%m' '%I' 
> > '%S'
> >   username level = 0
> >  realm = ADMIN.NHTI
> >
> > smb.conf.dm and smb.conf.extra are empty.
> >
> > When a client tries to connect using the Server Name this is the error in 
> > the log:
> >
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
> >   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
> >   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388)
> >   write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(413)
> >   write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 19: ERRNO = Connection 
> > reset by peer
> > [2008/10/13 11:51:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(585)
> >   Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer)
> > [2008/10/13 11:53:00, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
> >   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
> > [2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(926)
> >   getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
> > [2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388)
> >   write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
> > [2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(413)
> >   write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 19: ERRNO = Connection 
> > reset by peer
> > [2008/10/13 11:53:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(585)
> >   Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer)
> >
> > On the Windows side if I try by name the user is presented with a Login 
> > Box.  When the credentials are entered the map fails.
> > If I try with IP no login box is presented and the mapping succeeds.
> >
> > Things I have tried:
> >
> > I have tried adding the following to smb.conf (individually and in 
> > combination)
> >
> > smb ports = 139
> > smb ports = 445
> > netbios name = admin1
> >
> > The clients can ping the server by name and the server can ping the clients 
> > by name.
> > The clients use the Domain Controller as their DNS server and it can map to 
> > the server by name.
> >
> > wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g come back with the correct group and user 
> > information.
> >
> > Any help would be appreciated!
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] samba with kerboros and ADS

[Prashanth Adiyodi]

Greetings

 

I have a Samba server configured as part of workgroup in my
organization. I would like integrate ADS with this server so that users
can use the credentials of domain to authenticate on my samba server. If
any body has been successful in doing so, please help me with the
configuration files.

 

Prashanth Adiyodi
System Administrator


Roamware (I) Pvt. Ltd.
7th Floor, Sigma, Hiranandani Gardens
Technology Street, Powai, 
Mumbai-400 076
Tel: 40406000 Ext: 6124
GSM: 91-9833377712

www.roamware.com  
"The information contained herein may include confidential or privileged
information and is intended solely for the recipient(s) noted above. If
you receive this e-mail in error, please respond to the sender and
delete the e-mail. Any dissemination of this e-mail or the information
contained in this e-mail or attachments to unintended parties is
prohibited."

 

 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] samba+cups failure - no printers in the share list

[LÉVAI Dániel]

Martin Zielinski wrote:

Hi!

Self compiled Samba?
Does "ldd smbd" has a link to libcups?
If you have a smbd that is linked to libcups and cups is running, it 
will work!


Only reason why it wouldn't could be access rights in your cups 
configuration.


After you verified, that libcups is used, it might be a good idea to 
increase the log level of samba and cups and examine the logfiles. They 
might contain the information you need.


Bye,

Martin


Thanks Martin for the tips.
While checking cups' logs, it showed me the infamous "Unsupported 
character set" error, and after reading the bug reports regarding this, 
I've converted the server to use utf8. Now samba can get the printers 
from cups.


Daniel




LÉVAI Dániel schrieb:

LÉVAI Dániel wrote:

Hi!

It seems my samba and cups won't communicate with each other. I've 
configured samba to load the printers from cups:

load printers = yes
printing = cups
printcap name = cups

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = yes
public = no
read only = yes
create mode = 0700
valid users = @digiszfv
printer admin = daniell

# lpstat -t
scheduler is running
no system default destination
device for hp_lj_p2015n: socket://192.168.1.66
hp_lj_p2015n accepting requests since 2008. okt. 10., p?ek, 08.49.44 
CEST
printer hp_lj_p2015n is idle.  enabled since 2008. okt. 10., p?ek, 
08.49.44 CEST


Despite all this, samba fails to advertise the printer:
# smbclient -U daniell -L FILESERVER
Enter daniell's password:
Domain=[DIGISZFV] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.2.3]

Sharename   Type  Comment
-     ---
print$  Disk  Printer Drivers
ugyfelszolgalat Disk  Ugyfélszolgálat
adminisztrator  Disk  Adminisztrátorok
optikus Disk  Szemészet
IPC$IPC   IPC Service (Samba (fileserver))
daniell Disk  Home Directories
Domain=[DIGISZFV] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.2.3]

What am I missing? Any help would be appreciated.

What this post is missing is some more info I think.
Samba is 3.2.3
Cups is 1.3.8
OS is a Debian testing
Kernel is linux kernel 2.6.24

The printers doesn't show on Linux nor on Win.
On the Cups www admin page, I can print out a test page, so the 
printer is usable.
The problem is with the link between cups and samba. Can't seem to 
figure or find out what is it, though.


Thanks in advance!
Daniel



--
LEVAI Daniel
PGP key ID = 0x4AC0A4B1
Key fingerprint = D037 03B9 C12D D338 4412  2D83 1373 917A 4AC0 A4B1
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba