Re: Variable into Sequel.cast

[BeeRich33]

This is how I've been using it, now currently replaced with "30 days" 
manually.  I'd like to shove a variable in there.  

tm = PG::TypeMapByColumn.new([
  PG::TextEncoder::String.new
  ])
d = d.to_s

res = $conn.exec_params( %Q{ SELECT search_phrase, count(search_phrase) 
  FROM searches 
  WHERE creation_date::timestamp::date > (CURRENT_DATE - interval '$1 
days')::date 
AND search_phrase != 'about'
  GROUP BY search_phrase 
  ORDER BY count(search_phrase) DESC }, [ d ], 0, tm ).to_a



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sequel-talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sequel-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sequel-talk/37db9845-c5bc-4771-af53-83cef8ee29da%40googlegroups.com.

Re: Select Fields Not Empty (nil)

[BeeRich33]

Hi.  Sorry for the delay.  Fighting a now 4-week cold, been out of 
commission.

Been reading and testing some more, translating my current projects.  I try 
to post generalized examples as this isn't about anything specific.  



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sequel-talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sequel-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sequel-talk/1da11bff-dca0-45ef-916b-4c3c896f680b%40googlegroups.com.

Re: Should Sequel continue shipping tests in the gem?

[Adam Daniels]

No strong feelings either way; when I run Sequel tests I'm normally 
authoring a patch, which means I have the git repository anyways. I have to 
wonder how frequently the tests in the gem are being run tho.

That said, I can imagine the tests in something with a C extension (such as 
sequel_pg) being more valuable shipping inside the gem, as that's more 
frequently where I seem to run into edge cases. C extensions with 
Linuxism's not building on FreeBSD. Not directly applicable to sequel 
itself obviously, but might affect things since sequel_pg piggybacks on 
sequel tests.

On Saturday, January 18, 2020 at 2:27:50 PM UTC-5, Jeremy Evans wrote:
>
> Sequel has always shipped tests in the gem, so that users and packagers 
> can test it without cloning the repository, but it does make the gem 
> significantly larger.  I'm open to feedback on whether Sequel should 
> continue to do this, so if you feel strongly one way or the other, please 
> respond.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sequel-talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sequel-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sequel-talk/e3822936-097d-464b-86da-5c88f7bc0c01%40googlegroups.com.

Re: Should Sequel continue shipping tests in the gem?

[abhijit nandy]

I've never run the Sequel tests, so I'm fine with them not being included
in the gem. The source can anyway be downloaded if testing is to be done.
 - Abhijit.


On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 12:57 AM Jeremy Evans 
wrote:

> Sequel has always shipped tests in the gem, so that users and packagers
> can test it without cloning the repository, but it does make the gem
> significantly larger.  I'm open to feedback on whether Sequel should
> continue to do this, so if you feel strongly one way or the other, please
> respond.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sequel-talk" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sequel-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sequel-talk/700971c1-78e9-4fce-a857-960c06318a47%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sequel-talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sequel-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sequel-talk/CA%2BgkkgPc5WF_SwPydaHOfCK_30vQ7QdRseYbT5jrafdd5XPnsA%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: Should Sequel continue shipping tests in the gem?

[Marcelo Pereira]

I would guess most of the time users are not running Sequel tests and, if 
one wants to run them, it's simple enough to clone the repository - so I 
would say not shipping the tests sounds like a good idea. No strong 
opinions on this one, though - having the tests in the gem is, of course, 
not a big issue, and I will keep using Sequel either way.

On Saturday, January 18, 2020 at 8:27:50 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Evans wrote:
>
> Sequel has always shipped tests in the gem, so that users and packagers 
> can test it without cloning the repository, but it does make the gem 
> significantly larger.  I'm open to feedback on whether Sequel should 
> continue to do this, so if you feel strongly one way or the other, please 
> respond.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sequel-talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sequel-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sequel-talk/0a08bedf-4570-47d2-8ea5-323df84aeddc%40googlegroups.com.